ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05958433Updated Jul 28, 2023

Preoperative Rehabilitation With Stoma Appliance in Colorectal Cancer Patients

An interventional study of Rehabilitation with stoma appliance in Rehabilitation, sponsored by Assiut University. Status unknown. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-07-28.

Sponsored by Assiut University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jul 2023), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
170
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a randomized, controlled trial aiming to assess the effects of preoperative education using stoma appliance on stoma self-care, quality of life, anxiety, and depression levels in colorectal cancer patients with a stoma.

Read the detailed description

Colorectal cancer is third cancer worldwide after breast and lung cancer accounting for 10% of all cancer cases and 9.4% of cancer deaths. Over 2.2 million new colorectal cancer cases and 1.8 million deaths have been estimated to occur in 2020. In Egypt, it is the seventh cancer, accounting for 3.9% of all cancers, with about 5,000 new cases annually.

Colorectal resections are often associated with temporary or permanent stoma formations. In the United Kingdom it is estimated that more than 20,000 new stomas are created each year, 11,800 of them were colostomies. About one-half of the stoma was permanent. The formation of a stoma is associated with psychologic morbidity, which can be reduced with preoperative and postoperative patient education and psychologic support.

Living with a stoma is a challenging situation for various reasons including uncontrolled gas passage through it, diarrhea, odor, and leakage around the stoma or appliance. It would take several months for the patients to adjust to this difficult time. At that point, the patient's Quality of life becomes essential for the remaining time.

Ostomy formation is one of the therapeutic procedures performed to manage bowel dysfunction due to various reasons; however, it affects quality of life of patients. World health organization defines QOL as an individual's perspective of his/her health status concerning a few aspects- physical, psychological, economic, social, and environmental.

A stoma influences the physical, mental, emotional, and social life of the patient significantly. A good quality of life is essential to achieve a comprehensive approach to treating patients. A study done in China to assess stoma related quality of life using a stoma self-care agency scale and health hope index showed that patients had difficulties in work and social institutions. Additional concerns pointed out were sexuality, body image and the stoma itself. A long-term effect on the quality of life of members of the United Ostomy Association of America after 5 years of ostomy surgery was assessed using a questionnaire. Their report has shown that patients feel better as they live longer with the stoma. Research done on Iranian by ostomy society has shown that factors such as the type of ostomy, the underlying disease that had led to the stoma formation, depression after ostomy, dissatisfaction with sexual activities, a problem with the location of ostomy and change in clothing style affected the Quality of Life.

Ostomies can lead to intensified distress and suffering in patients because of skin irritation (76%), pouch leakage (62%), offensive odor (59%), reduction in pleasurable activities (54%), and depression/anxiety (53%). In such circumstances, it is worthwhile to assess the quality of life in the evaluation of the outcomes of various therapeutic procedures along with their final impact on patients' lives. Quality of care and training provided to patients can be associated with their subsequent quality of life. The main aim of this study is to assess the effects of preoperative education on stoma self-care, quality of life, Anxiety, and depression levels in colorectal cancer patients with a stoma.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rehabilitation
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Assiut University is the lead sponsor of 5,050 studies on the registry; 2,174 are open to participants now.

Of its 14 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients undergoing elective operable colorectal resections that would require the formation of a temporary or permanent stoma.
  • Patients who were likely to be self-sufficient in managing their stoma pouching system after surgery.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Those who undergo emergency surgery
  2. Disoriented patients who cannot cooperate.
  3. Patients with psychiatric disease.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
170 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    standard postoperative education.

    These patients will receive stoma care and stoma education beginning on postoperative day1.

    Behavioral: Rehabilitation with stoma appliance

  • Experimental
    preoperative rehabilitation group

    The rehabilitation group will receive preoperative stoma education in addition

    Behavioral: Rehabilitation with stoma appliance

Interventions

  • BehavioralRehabilitation with stoma appliance

    The rehabilitation group will receive preoperative stoma education in addition, a water-filled ostomy appliance (50-100 ml) will be attached 48 hours before surgery. These pouches will not be removed until surgery, and the EST nurse will teach the patients preoperatively how to manage the ostomy appliance with similar standards as described in the usual postoperative stoma care.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. duration of hospital stay

    Compare duration from surgery until independent stoma self-care between preoperative rehabilitation using a stoma appliance group and traditional care group.

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Assess anxiety and depression

    Assess anxiety and depression according to HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale). 0-7 normal 8-10 border line abnormal 11-21 abnormal

    Time frame: 9 monthes

  2. assess the effects of preoperative education using stoma appliance on quality of life in colorectal cancer patients with a stoma

    Assess the quality of life of those patients including physical, social/family, emotional, functional wellbeing, using FACT-C version 4 (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal) questionnaire. recall period past 7 days response scale 5point Likert-type scale total a FACT-C score (functional assessment of cancer therapy -colorectal) range 0-136 the higher the score the better the quality of life

    Time frame: 11 months

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4. PubMed 33538338 ↗
  • Archambault AN, Su YR, Jeon J, Thomas M, Lin Y, Conti DV, Win AK, Sakoda LC, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Peterse EFP, Zauber AG, Duggan D, Holowatyj AN, Huyghe JR, Brenner H, Cotterchio M, Bezieau S, Schmit SL, Edlund CK, Southey MC, MacInnis RJ, Campbell PT, Chang-Claude J, Slattery ML, Chan AT, Joshi AD, Song M, Cao Y, Woods MO, White E, Weinstein SJ, Ulrich CM, Hoffmeister M, Bien SA, Harrison TA, Hampe J, Li CI, Schafmayer C, Offit K, Pharoah PD, Moreno V, Lindblom A, Wolk A, Wu AH, Li L, Gunter MJ, Gsur A, Keku TO, Pearlman R, Bishop DT, Castellvi-Bel S, Moreira L, Vodicka P, Kampman E, Giles GG, Albanes D, Baron JA, Berndt SI, Brezina S, Buch S, Buchanan DD, Trichopoulou A, Severi G, Chirlaque MD, Sanchez MJ, Palli D, Kuhn T, Murphy N, Cross AJ, Burnett-Hartman AN, Chanock SJ, de la Chapelle A, Easton DF, Elliott F, English DR, Feskens EJM, FitzGerald LM, Goodman PJ, Hopper JL, Hudson TJ, Hunter DJ, Jacobs EJ, Joshu CE, Kury S, Markowitz SD, Milne RL, Platz EA, Rennert G, Rennert HS, Schumacher FR, Sandler RS, Seminara D, Tangen CM, Thibodeau SN, Toland AE, van Duijnhoven FJB, Visvanathan K, Vodickova L, Potter JD, Mannisto S, Weigl K, Figueiredo J, Martin V, Larsson SC, Parfrey PS, Huang WY, Lenz HJ, Castelao JE, Gago-Dominguez M, Munoz-Garzon V, Mancao C, Haiman CA, Wilkens LR, Siegel E, Barry E, Younghusband B, Van Guelpen B, Harlid S, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A, Liang PS, Du M, Casey G, Lindor NM, Le Marchand L, Gallinger SJ, Jenkins MA, Newcomb PA, Gruber SB, Schoen RE, Hampel H, Corley DA, Hsu L, Peters U, Hayes RB. Cumulative Burden of Colorectal Cancer-Associated Genetic Variants Is More Strongly Associated With Early-Onset vs Late-Onset Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2020 Apr;158(5):1274-1286.e12. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.12.012. Epub 2019 Dec 19. PubMed 31866242 ↗
  • Chaudhri S, Brown L, Hassan I, Horgan AF. Preoperative intensive, community-based vs. traditional stoma education: a randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Mar;48(3):504-9. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0897-0. PubMed 15768181 ↗
  • Zewude WC, Derese T, Suga Y, Teklewold B. Quality of Life in Patients Living with Stoma. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2021 Sep;31(5):993-1000. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v31i5.11. PubMed 35221616 ↗
  • Anaraki F, Vafaie M, Behboo R, Maghsoodi N, Esmaeilpour S, Safaee A. Quality of life outcomes in patients living with stoma. Indian J Palliat Care. 2012 Sep;18(3):176-80. doi: 10.4103/0973-1075.105687. PubMed 23439841 ↗
  • Richbourg L, Thorpe JM, Rapp CG. Difficulties experienced by the ostomate after hospital discharge. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2007 Jan-Feb;34(1):70-9. doi: 10.1097/00152192-200701000-00011. PubMed 17228210 ↗
  • Krouse RS, Grant M, Rawl SM, Mohler MJ, Baldwin CM, Coons SJ, McCorkle R, Schmidt CM, Ko CY. Coping and acceptance: the greatest challenge for veterans with intestinal stomas. J Psychosom Res. 2009 Mar;66(3):227-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.09.009. Epub 2009 Jan 16. PubMed 19232235 ↗
  • Prieto L, Thorsen H, Juul K. Development and validation of a quality of life questionnaire for patients with colostomy or ileostomy. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005 Oct 12;3:62. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-3-62. PubMed 16219109 ↗
  • Bocerean C, Dupret E. A validation study of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in a large sample of French employees. BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Dec 16;14:354. doi: 10.1186/s12888-014-0354-0. PubMed 25511175 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 28, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05958433
Lead sponsor
Assiut University
Responsible party
Mariana kamal (principal investigator, Assiut University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 24, 2023
Start date
Aug 2023 (estimated)
Primary completion
Aug 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 28, 2023

Study contacts

Nora gouda, lecturer
Contact
noraatef148@yahoo.com
01005627897
Doaa Wadie, Proffesor
Contact
01223703067
Nelly AliEldien, proffesor
study chair · Prof. Biostatistics & Cancer Epidemiology National Cancer Institute, Cairo University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jul 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion