ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05954975BeSurEUpdated Jul 20, 2023

Baby Sickness Evaluation

An observational study in Infant, Newborn, Diseases, sponsored by Ilona C Narayen, MD pHD. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 0 Months to 6 Months. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-07-20.

Sponsored by Ilona C Narayen, MD pHD · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jul 2023), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,500
Ages
0 Months to 6 Months
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this prospective single center feasibility study is to assess the feasibility of using BabyCheck and PO by GPs as an illness severity score for young infants > 6 months of age in order to aid the decision for referral to hospital.

The emergency GP posts in Leiderdorp will add the BabyCheck and PO to their standard evaluation of infants presenting with systemic illness \< six months of age for a period of six months.

The feasibility will be determined by calculating the percentage of eligible infants in whom a complete BabyCheck score and PO data were retrieved. The investigators consider the protocol feasible if this is done in 80% of all eligible infants.

Read the detailed description

Young infants frequently visit general practitioners (GP) with acute pathology, such as infections. Assessing severity of illness in this group is often challenging, since the likelihood of serious illness in this group is low, deterioration of the clinical condition can occur more rapidly. Therefore, early recognition of pathology in young babies is pivotal.

The Netherlands Triage System (derived from the Manchester Triage System) is a reliable tool for both children and adults to decide if a patient should be seen by the GP. However, after presentation at the GP, a scoring system to assess illness severity in babies with a decision aid for referral to hospital, is currently lacking.

The BabyCheck is a scoring system developed and validated as a clinical checklist to assess young infants up to six months of age. The BabyCheck is validated in multiple low illness prevalent settings.

In addition, abnormal oxygen saturation and/or heart rate can be an early sign of infection, respiratory or circulatory pathology in infants. Since it is difficult to adequately judge oxygen saturation solely by skin colour, it is preferable to objectify this parameter via pulse oximetry (PO).

The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility of using BabyCheck and PO by GPs as an illness severity score for young infants \< six months of age in order to aid the decision for referral to hospital.

02

Conditions studied

  • Infant, Newborn, Diseases

Keywords

  • Screening
  • BabyCheck
  • Pulse oximetry
  • Young infant
03

In context

Infant, Newborn, Diseases

140 studies on the registry are indexed under Infant, Newborn, Diseases; 29 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,500 is above the median of 100 across 49 observational studies indexed under Infant, Newborn, Diseases.

Browse Infant, Newborn, Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Ilona C Narayen, MD pHD as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
0 Months to 6 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Our study population consists of infants up to six months of age, presenting with systemic (non-traumatic/surgical) illness at the emergency GP post.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Infants up to six months of age.
  • Presenting with systemic illness (no injuries or traumata).
  • Presenting at the emergency GP post of Leiderdorp.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Infants up to six months of age, presenting with traumata or that are in a resuscitation setting.
  • Infants with referral to other hospitals than the Alrijne hospital. The location for referral is coded and available from the anonymized database of the emergency GP post.
  • Infant \< 1 month of age presenting with fever (body temperature > 38.0 ⁰C), with or without unknown origin, since these infants should always be referred according to the national guidelines for GPs.
  • Infants \< 3 months of age presenting with fever of unknown origin (temperature > 38.0 ⁰C), since these infants should always be referred according to the national guidelines for GPs.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,500 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Infants up to 6 months of age

    Infants up to six months of age, presenting with systemic illness at the emergency GP post.

    Combination Product: BabyCheck and pulse oximetry

Interventions

  • Combination productBabyCheck and pulse oximetry

    The BabyCheck is a validated scoring system to grade the severity of acute systemic illness in infants up to six months of age. Severity of illness is graded by using a weighted score of a combination of nineteen signs and symptoms. The higher the score, the higher the chance of severe illness. Nellcor PM10N is a pulse oximeter which is cleared for use in young infants. A sensor for infants will be used, so reliable oxygen saturation and heart rate can be obtained.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility

    Feasibility will be determined by calculating the percentage of eligible infants in whom a complete BabyCheck score and PO data were retrieved. We consider the protocol feasible if this is done in 80% of all eligible infants.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Sensitivity and specificity of the combined BabyCheck-PO score

    a referral to the pediatric department is assigned just if no treatment, diagnostic tools or follow up is performed in hospital, which could not have been performed at the GP post.

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Acceptability of GPs

    1. Was the combination of questions and pulse oximetry useful for assessing illness severity in this infant? \[yes/no\] 2. Did the outcome of the scores influence your decision for referral? \[yes/no\] 3. Do you have any comments for the reseaerchers? \[open field\]

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Acceptability of pediatricians

    1. Was the referral necessary or just? \[yes/no\] 2. Was the referral possibly previously missed or too much delayed? \[yes/no\]. 3. Was the combination of BabyCheck and pulse oximetry useful in assessing illness severity in this infant? \[yes/no\]

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Sep 2023; primary completion for Mar 2024, 6 months later.

Of 32 observational studies under Infant, Newborn, Diseases, half reached primary completion within 25 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 39. This study's planned 6 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 12, 2023
First posted
Jul 20, 2023
StartEst.
Sep 2023
Primary completionEst.
Mar 2024
CompletionEst.
May 2024
Last update
Jul 20, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 20, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05954975
Lead sponsor
Ilona C Narayen, MD pHD
Responsible party
Ilona C Narayen, MD pHD (Pediatrician and principal investigator Ilona Narayen, Leiden University Medical Center) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jul 20, 2023
Start date
Sep 2023 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 2024 (estimated)
Completion
May 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 20, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jul 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion