ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05947578Updated Feb 17, 2025

The Safety and Tolerability of CLZ-2002 in Patients With Charcot-Marie Tooth Disease.

A Phase 1 interventional study of CLZ-2002 in Charcot Marie Tooth Disease, Type 1, sponsored by Cellatoz Therapeutics, Inc. Completed at 1 site in Korea, Republic of. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-17.

Sponsored by Cellatoz Therapeutics, Inc · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
9
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A Phase 1, Open-Label, Prospective, Dose-finding Clinical Trial for Evaluation of Safety and Tolerability of Intramuscular Injections of CLZ-2002 for the Treatment of Subjects with Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 1(CMT 1)

Read the detailed description

This study is the First In Human (FIH) clinical trial for evaluating the safety and tolerability of IM injections of CLZ-2002 in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) Type 1.

CLZ-2002 is the allogeneic mesenchymal stem cell-derived Neuronal Regeneration Promoting Cells. These cells are Schwann cell-like cells differentiated from tonsillar mesenchymal stem cells. CLZ-2002 helps the remyelination of the damaged peripheral nerves by restoring the myelin sheaths. It also induces the nerve regeneration and myelination pathways in the sciatic nerve and restores abnormal muscle tissues in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1 (CMT1).

02

Conditions studied

  • Charcot Marie Tooth Disease, Type 1

Keywords

  • Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease
  • CMT1
  • Cell therapy
  • Tonsillar mesenchymal stem cells (T-MSC)
  • Neuronal Regeneration Promoting Cells
  • Schwann cell-like cells
03

In context

Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease

113 studies on the registry are indexed under Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease; 37 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 9 is below the median of 41 across 62 interventional studies indexed under Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease.

Browse Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Cellatoz Therapeutics, Inc as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects aged 18 years or older
  • Subjects with a proven diagnosis of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1 at the time of screening visit
  • Subjects who have muscle weakness in at least foot dorsiflexion (clinical assessment) at the time of screening visit
  • Subjects with a CMT neuropathy score (CMTNS-v2) of 2 or more and 30 or fewer points at the time of screening visit
  • Subjects who can understand and are willing to sign a written document are willing to comply with all study procedures and schedule visits.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who have any other neuromuscular diseases
  • Subjects who have undergone upper and lower limb bone surgery within six months before screening visit
  • Subjects who have concerns about muscle strength measurements due to the previous surgery
  • Subjects who have severe active infection including severe/purulent cellulitis at the injection sites at screening visit
  • Subjects who have a history of hospitalization due to to antihistamines or allergy or hypersensitivity to certain substances such as food or drugs
  • Subjects who have a history of unstable cardiovascular disease defined by the presence of myocardial infarction (STEMI or NSTEMI) within 6 months before the screening or the presence of unstable angina pectoris (in the case of increased frequency of symptoms, increased severity, or signs of prolonged symptoms at moderate activity or rest)
  • Subjects who have a history of a (TIA) or stroke within 6 months before screening visit
  • Subjects who have a positive antibody test, antigen, or antibody test result
  • Subjects who have a history of malignant tumors within 5 years before screening visit
  • Subjects who have received systemic (inhaled steroids are allowed), immunotherapy, or cytotoxic therapy within 14 days before screening, or who are expected to receive such treatment during the study period
  • Subjects who have participated in other clinical trials within 30 days before screening visit
  • Pregnant and lactating women or women of and men who plan a pregnancy or are unwilling to use adequate methods\& until 30 days after the end of drug administration
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(9)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

TIA (transient ischaemic attack)

A “mini-stroke”: temporary stroke-like symptoms caused by reduced blood flow to part of the brain, spinal cord or eye, without signs of a new stroke on a scan.

Stroke symptoms need emergency care at once, even if they go away.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
9 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    CLZ-2002

    CLZ-2002 injection is intramuscular in lower limbs on Day 1.

    Drug: CLZ-2002

Interventions

  • DrugCLZ-2002

    Low dose group (6×10\^6 cells), Mid dose group (12×10\^6 cells), High dose group (24×10\^6 cells)

    Also known as: Allogeneic tonsillar mesenchymal stem cell-derived schwann cell like cells

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Safety and tolerability of intramuscular (IM) injections of CLZ-2002 in Participants

    Frequency and percentage of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious adverse events after injection through laboratory tests, physical examinations, vital signs, and electrocardiogram measurements conducted during the clinical trial.

    Time frame: Day 1 (visit 2) to Week 24 (visit 6)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes from baseline in the disease severity of CMTNS-v2 score at Weeks 4, 12, and 24.

    The range of CMTNS-v2 (Charcot Marie Tooth Neuropathy Score-v2) ranges from 0-36. The disease severity is classified as mild (≤10), moderate (11 to 20), and severe (\>21).

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 12 and 24

  2. Changes from baseline in neurological examination at Weeks 1, 4, 12 and 24

    The principal investigator will assess the neurological examination which is investigated the evidence of muscle weakness in the arms, legs, hands, and feet; as well as signs of muscle wasting, reduced reflexes, and any sensory loss.

    Time frame: Weeks 1, 4, 12 and 24

  3. Changes from baseline in the overall neuropathy limitation scale (ONLS) at Weeks 4, 12 and 24

    The Overall Neuropathy Limiting Scale (ONLS) assesses scale scores in the lower extremities as the Total Neuropathy Limiting Scale. A 1-point stage represents a clinically meaningful change in terms of disability.

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 12 and 24

  4. Changes from baseline in functional disability using the functional disability scale (FDS) at Weeks 4, 12, and 24

    The Functional Disability Scale (FDS) primarily evaluates impairment in motor function and is assessed by the neurologist (principal investigator) during the visit. The 9 stages of FDS are as follows: 0; normal, 1; normal but with cramps and fatigability, 2; inability to run, 3; walking difficulty but still possible unaided, 4; If able to walk with a cane (walk with cane), 5; walk with crutches, 6; walk with a walker, 7; wheelchair bound, 8; bedridden.

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 12, and 24

  5. Changes from baseline in the 10-meter walk test at Weeks 4, 12, and 24

    This test measures the time required for a subject to walk 10 m through the 10-Meter Walking Test (10MWT)

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 12, and 24

  6. Change from baseline in the fatty infiltration level of lower limb muscles at Week 24.

    The degree of fat infilteration seen on MRI was classified into five grades from 0-4 and compared as follow: No fat infiltration at all (Grade 0; no fat), some traces of fat infiltration (Grade1; some fatty streak), more muscle than fat (Grade2; fat \<muscle), when muscle and fat are similar (Grade3; fat = muscle), and when fat is more than muscle (Grade 4; fat\>muscle).

    Time frame: Week 24

  7. Changes from baseline in the velocity of Motor and Sensory nerve conduction at Weeks 4, 12, and 24

    Motor and sensory nerve conduction studies will be performed on the median nerve, ulnar nerve, peroneal nerve, tibial nerve, and sural nerve using skin surface stimulation electrodes and recording electrodes. using the skin surface stimulation and recording method. The studies will be performed with the amplitudes of the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) and the sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) from the positive maximum value to the negative maximum value.

    Time frame: Weeks 4, 12, and 24

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Samsung Medical center
    Seoul, Gangnam-gu 06351, Korea, Republic of
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jun 2023 to primary completion in Aug 2024, 13 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 16, 2023
First posted
Jul 17, 2023
StartActual
Jun 19, 2023
Primary completionActual
Aug 9, 2024
CompletionActual
Aug 9, 2024
Last update
Feb 17, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 17, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05947578
Lead sponsor
Cellatoz Therapeutics, Inc
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 17, 2023
Start date
Jun 19, 2023
Primary completion
Aug 9, 2024
Completion
Aug 9, 2024
Last update
Feb 17, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion