ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT05937009Updated Dec 5, 2023

12 Weeks Orienteering Program Exercise on Older Adults

An interventional study of Orienteering exercise program in Community-dwelling Older Adults, sponsored by University of Évora. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in Portugal. Open to participants aged 65 Years to 75 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-12-05.

Sponsored by University of Évora · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
54
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
65 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to determine the effects of an orientation exercise program addressed to old on physical-motor, cognitive, and affective competencies.

This quasi-experimental study is a controlled trial involving an orientation exercise program. The program will run for 12 weeks (3 sessions per week).

Participants will be clustered into two groups: the experimental group will perform the exercise orientation sessions, and the control group will maintain regular activities routines. Evaluations will be performed before and after the intervention.

After the study is finished, the control group will attend a similar exercise program.

Read the detailed description

The aging process is lived for all and is associated with uncountable limitations, such as physical, psychological, cognitive, or emotional, that daily translate into difficulty in accomplishing normal activities (2). Simple tasks such as getting up and sitting, carrying a shopping bag, or climbing some stairs, start being seen as an obstacle, much because of aging and the associated decline in physical and cognitive competencies such as balance, limb strength, aerobic capacity, motor coordination, processing speed, memory, executive functioning and, consequently, affective competences, such as emotional states and depression may also be compromised (1).

Despite the above, it is known that there are some ways and alternatives that, even not reversing the aging process, might delay it, promoting healthy aging (6). Scientific advances recommend regular physical exercise since exercise ensures a more active lifestyle and, therefore, a less dependent on others' life. There are many options that physical exercise professionals can choose for planning physical exercise programs for older people (3).

Nonetheless, instead of exercise planning training prescription, other options can be used to achieve healthy aging. In alternative to traditional exercise training, sporting modalities, such as orientation, may benefit this population.

According to a study, after applying a protocol that included changes to the terrain to improve older adults' balance, there were significant improvements in their stride time (4).

Other studies done within the same area, which applied one questionnaire on functional well-being, and four scales on depression, gastrointestinal system, physical activity, and healthy index to senior athletes between the ages of 67 and 71, found significant improvements in all the referred parameters except for the depression scale where the control group made up of older adults who do not practice the modality showed better results (5).

However, the literature is scarce concerning the participation in orientation programs by the elderly population, namely in terms of this program's effect on aerobic capacity, lower limb strength, motor coordination, processing speed, memory, and executive functioning.

02

Conditions studied

  • Community-dwelling Older Adults
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Évora is the lead sponsor of 34 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 65-75 years old;
  • Locomotor independent capacity;
  • Independent living in the community;
  • Historical of physical activity practice;
  • Attended, at least, the 3º school grade.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cognitive impairment such \< 15 points in (MMSE);
  • Evidence of neuromuscular disturb;
  • Use of medication that conditions the performance of the orientation exercise tasks.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

MMSE and MoCA

Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
54 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental: Experimental Orienteering group program

    The experimental group intervention will attend the orienteering program. The program integrates 3 sessions / week during 12 consecutive weeks.

    Other: Orienteering exercise program

  • No intervention
    The control group

    The control group will maintain the usually daily activities, not attending any exercise program. After study end, the control group will have the opportunity to participate on an exercise program.

Interventions

  • OtherOrienteering exercise program

    Orienteering exercise program running for 12 weeks (30-45 minutes, 3 sessions/week). Sessions will have 4 phases: 1) Signature of attendance sheet; 2) warm-up exercises for 5 minutes; 3) Start of orienteering proofs, where the departs will occur individually, with 3 interval minutes between participants; 4) stretches session, to return to a calm state.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from the beginning, between groups comparison, in physical competencies

    Fullerton Advance Balance Scale to assess balance, ranging from 0 (worst) to 40 (best) points

    Time frame: 0, 12 weeks

  2. Change from the beginning, between groups comparison, in physical competencies

    Senior Fitness Test, 6 minutes walking to assess aerobic capacity, measure in meters

    Time frame: 0, 12 weeks

  3. Change from the beginning, between groups comparison, in physical competencies

    Senior Fitness Test, Sit and Stand to assess limb strength, measure by the number of repetitions

    Time frame: 0, 12 weeks

  4. Change from the beginning, between groups comparison, in physical competencies

    Soda Pop Test to assess motor coordination.

    Time frame: 0, 12 weeks

  5. Change from the beginning, between groups comparison, in cognitive competencies

    Trail Making Test (Part A and B) to assess processing speed and executive functioning, measure in seconds

    Time frame: 0, 12 weeks

  6. Change from the beginning, between groups comparison, in cognitive competencies

    Rey Auditory Verbal Test to assess memory, measure in seconds

    Time frame: 0, 12 weeks

  7. Change from the beginning, between groups comparison, in affective competencies

    Profile of Mood States to assess mood states, ranging from -32 (best) to 200 (worst) points

    Time frame: 0, 12 weeks

  8. Change from the beginning, between groups comparison, in affective competencies

    Geriatric Depression Scale to assess depression state, ranging from 0 (best) to 30 (worst) points

    Time frame: 0, 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cognitive impairment

    Mini-Mental State Examination, ranging from 0 (worst) to 30 (best) points

    Time frame: 0 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bliss ES, Wong RH, Howe PR, Mills DE. Benefits of exercise training on cerebrovascular and cognitive function in ageing. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2021 Mar;41(3):447-470. doi: 10.1177/0271678X20957807. Epub 2020 Sep 20. PubMed 32954902 ↗
  • Eckstrom E, Neukam S, Kalin L, Wright J. Physical Activity and Healthy Aging. Clin Geriatr Med. 2020 Nov;36(4):671-683. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2020.06.009. Epub 2020 Aug 19. PubMed 33010902 ↗
  • Hemmeter UM, Ngamsri T. [Physical Activity and Mental Health in the Elderly]. Praxis (Bern 1994). 2022;110(4):193-198. doi: 10.1024/1661-8157/a003853. German. PubMed 35291872 ↗
  • McCarthy, I., Suzuki, T., Tyler, N. & Holloway, C. (2016). Mobility in the built environment: Age-related changes in gait characteristics when walking on complex terrain. Healthy Aging Research, 5:10.
  • Ostlund-Lagerstrom L, Blomberg K, Algilani S, Schoultz M, Kihlgren A, Brummer RJ, Schoultz I. Senior orienteering athletes as a model of healthy aging: a mixed-method approach. BMC Geriatr. 2015 Jul 8;15:76. doi: 10.1186/s12877-015-0072-6. PubMed 26152308 ↗
  • Thomas E, Battaglia G, Patti A, Brusa J, Leonardi V, Palma A, Bellafiore M. Physical activity programs for balance and fall prevention in elderly: A systematic review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jul;98(27):e16218. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016218. PubMed 31277132 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 5, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05937009
Lead sponsor
University of Évora
Responsible party
Franclim Martins (Principal Investigator, University of Évora) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 10, 2023
Start date
Jul 1, 2023
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2023
Completion
Jan 1, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 5, 2023

Study contacts

Catarina Pereira, Doctoral degree
principal investigator · University of Évora
José Marmeleira, Doctoral degree
principal investigator · University of Évora

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion