An interventional study of Subjects treated with Newest medical device in Atrophic Scar, sponsored by Mastelli S.r.l. Completed at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-12.
Sponsored by Mastelli S.r.l · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
This clinical study wants to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a medical device combining "Polynucleotide Highly Purified Technology" (PN-HPT™) and hyaluronic acid (Newest-Mastelli S.r.l) for treating moderate-to-severe atrophic post-acne scars.
This is a prospective, open label study aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of Newest in facial acne scars treatment. The study will be conducted at Fatebenefratelli Hospital in Rome (Italy). All procedures have to be conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 and 2008.
A subject will be involved in the study for 6 months and photographs and instrumental assessment (Antera 3 D) will be performed at 1 months, 2 months, 3 months and 6 months after first treatment administration; results will be compared with basal line evaluation (T0).
The sample size of 30 patients has been selected, based on the previous clinical results obtained from a "Preliminary Prospective and Randomized Study of Highly Purified Polynucleotide vs Placebo in Treatment of Moderate to Severe Acne Scars". This sample size combined with this study model is statistically sufficient to provide robust estimation of the primary endpoint.
The study primary objective is to show the clinical improvement in acne facial scars treated with Newest.
The primary end-point of the study is the variation of post-acne scars characteristics evaluated through the Goodman Baron scale at follow up visits F.U. 3 and F.U. 6 versus baseline visit (T1). At the end of follow-up, an average reduction of at least two points of the Goodman score versus baseline will be considered as a positive outcome.
A descriptive statistical analysis will illustrate the percentage of patients with different score variation versus basal line.
The secondary objectives of the study are the improvement of the skin quality and the safety of the investigational device; the secondary end-points are:
All the screened patients at the baseline visit (T0), after checking the inclusion/exclusion criteria, will be prospectively randomized in the clinical study. The Investigator has to grade the post-acne scar's severity according to the "Goodman Baron classification". The eligible patient will undergo the first injection with the study medical device and the investigator shall evaluate the clinical result by the Goodman score. At follow up visits the patient and the investigator have to judge the aesthetic improvement of scars by checking the GAIS questionnaire.
A total of 4 administrations of the investigational product are scheduled: at the baseline visit (T1), at T2, T3 and T4, with an interval of 2 weeks from each other. The clinical evaluation (Goodman score) has to be performed in addition to the basal visit (T1) also after 3 and 6 months of follow-up respectively.
Standardized photographs shall be taken prior to the first injection of the study product and at every study visit in order to document treatment effect. A reference basal photo should be taken of each patient, with a snapshot of the facial region most damaged by the acne scars. A service basal photo on which the shooted damaged facial area is marked out should be the reference photo for further evaluations.
Note that no covering make-up should be used on the photographs. Each Investigator and other study site personnel designated to take photographs shall be thoroughly trained in the photographic equipment and techniques before study start, if applicable.
Photographs shall be taken at the baseline visit before treatment (T1). If the photographs are considered good quality, the Investigator may proceed with treatment of the subject; if the photographs are considered not good enough, the photography shall be repeated.
All snapshot must be taken against a neutral background and artificial light only, in same circumstances (same perspective/angle, same distance) and ideally with the same camera (usually using a 5 mega pixel camera and analyzed as for color and pigmentation by a computer program).
The subject should keep the eyes closed during photography and shall have a neutral facial expression.
Mastelli S.r.l is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Eligible subjects aged 20 to 60 years and in good general health, with grade 3 to 4 moderate-to-severe atrophic post-acne scars according to the Goodman Baron classification
Device: Subjects treated with Newest medical device
Newest is a sterile, non-pyrogenic, viscoelastic gel for single use for intradermal infiltrations. Newest is a medical device containing 2ml of the original association of polynucleotides (10mg/ml) and hyaluronic acid (10mg/ml). Total number of treatments will consist in 4 Newest administrations: at T0 - basal, at T1- 2 weeks, at T2 - 4 weeks, at T3- 6 weeks.
Goodman Baron score
The primary end-point of the study is the blinded assessment of variations of scar characteristics evaluated through the Goodman Baron score at scheduled visits versus baseline visit (T1)
Time frame: 6 months
Skin quality difference
Centralized evaluation of the photos of scars, taken pre- and post-treatment and evaluated by a blinded investigator. Optionally the differences pre- and post-treatment in skin roughness, texture (elasticity/hydration), colors/evenness, vascular features, and pore dimensions could be also evaluated by means of 3D pictures (Antera 3D® or QuantifiCARE®).
Time frame: 6 months
Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale
Aesthetic improvement of depressed facial atrophic scars using the "Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale" (GAIS) performed by both the patient and the investigator; the percentage of questionnaire score improvement ≥ 2 between the two follow up visits will be considered of a clinical significance
Time frame: 6 months
Adverse events (AE)
Adverse events (AE) will be monitored throughout the trial. A safety assessment has to be conducted by the investigator at each scheduled visit. The intensity (mild/moderate/severe) will be assessed according to the investigator's judgement. If a patient drops out of the study, the possible reasons for drop-out, including no improvement in the scar, or occurrence of unacceptable signs/symptoms, need to be documented.
Time frame: 6 months
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Mastelli S.r.l