CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05926687Updated Jan 29, 2026

Optimizing Outcomes for Young Autistic Children

A Phase 2 interventional study of Social Communication and Disruptive Behavior in Autism and Autism Spectrum Disorder, sponsored by Northwestern University. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Months to 48 Months, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-29.

Sponsored by Northwestern University · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2023; still recruiting 3 years 2 months later.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
184
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Months to 48 Months
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The overarching goal of the proposed study is to: (a) determine how best to sequence two parent-mediated interventions: a social communication intervention (Project ImPACT, Improving Parents as Communication Teachers) and a disruptive behavior intervention (Parent Training for Disruptive Behavior) and (b) examine moderators and mediators of intervention outcomes.

Read the detailed description

Despite advances in early identification of and intervention for children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD), the long-term outcomes for children with ASD remain variable. As many as 40% of children with ASD are minimally verbal at 9 years of age, and 75% of adults with ASD have persistent social communication (SC) difficulties. Furthermore, as many as 70% of children with ASD have a co-occurring diagnosis of disruptive behavior (DB) disorder. Parents play an important role in SC development and in the prevention of and intervention for DB. As such, the overarching goal of the proposed study is to: (a) determine how best to sequence two parent-mediated interventions: an SC intervention (Project ImPACT, Improving Parents as Communication Teachers) and a DB intervention (Parent Training for Disruptive Behavior) and (b) examine moderators and mediators of intervention outcomes. While evidence of efficacy and feasibility exist for both of these interventions individually, an adaptive intervention approach that considers and optimizes both interventions has not been evaluated. This type of adaptive intervention approach may be particularly needed in parent-mediated interventions due to the cost, burden, and complexity of teaching parents to use multiple intervention strategies. To determine the optimal intervention sequence that considers parent moderators and parent use of intervention strategies, the investigators propose a sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trial (SMART) design in which the investigators will initially randomly assign 184 children with ASD, between 18 and 48 months of age, to receive either the SC or DB intervention. Following each respective manualized, 12-week intervention (first-stage intervention; SC or DB), the interventionist will measure the parents' use of intervention strategies. At this point, all parents will be re-randomized before starting the second-stage intervention. Second-stage intervention decisions are designed to be responsive to parents' implementation of the first-stage intervention strategies. That is, parents who are implementing the first-stage intervention strategies with high fidelity (high implementers) will be re-randomized to receive the same intervention at a lower frequency (Reduce) or to receive the other intervention (Switch). Parents who are implementing the first-stage intervention strategies with low fidelity (low implementers) will be re-randomized to receive the same intervention with an additional parent instructional method, such as video feedback (Augment) or to receive the other intervention (Switch). After 24 weeks of intervention (12 weeks for first stage, 12 weeks for second stage), the investigators will assess child SC skills, child DB, and family life participation in everyday activities. The investigators will also measure parent-child joint engagement continually during intervention to examine the extent to which joint engagement mediates intervention outcomes. The proposed research is significant because if an intervention for one domain (SC or DB) has an impact on the other, an intervention sequence that systematically includes both interventions may have an even greater impact on both domains.

02

Conditions studied

  • Autism
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder

Keywords

  • intervention
  • early intervention
  • toddlers
  • autistic
  • autism
  • virtual
  • tele-health
03

In context

Autistic Disorder

1,344 studies on the registry are indexed under Autistic Disorder; 334 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 184 is above the median of 45 across 1,044 interventional studies indexed under Autistic Disorder.

Browse Autistic Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

Northwestern University is the lead sponsor of 1,396 studies on the registry; 199 are open to participants now.

Of its 102 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 73 (72%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Months to 48 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Child is between 18 and 48 months old
  • Child scores above the research cutoff for ASD on the TELE-ASD-PEDS
  • Child has no other known diagnosis or disability at study entry
  • Child has normal vision
  • Child is exposed to English at least 50% of the time
  • Child has a caregiver willing to learn the intervention strategies
  • Caregiver wants help supporting their child's social communication and behavior regulation
  • Caregiver understands conversational English well enough to participate in caregiver instruction
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
184 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Social Communication + Reduce Frequency

    Starting Intervention: Social Communication Who: Parent \& Child \& Therapist Frequency: 1-hour twice/week Secondary Intervention: "Reduce Frequency" of Social Communication Intervention Intervention: Social Communication Who: Parent \& Child \& Therapist Reduce Frequency: 1-hour once/week

    Behavioral: Social Communication · Behavioral: Social Communication + Reduce Frequency

  • Active comparator
    Social Communication + Add Tools

    Starting Intervention: Social Communication Who: Parent \& Child \& Therapist Frequency: 1-hour twice/week Secondary Intervention: "Add Tools" to Social Communication Intervention Intervention: Social Communication Who: Parent \& Child \& Therapist Frequency: 1-hour twice/week Add: Video feedback

    Behavioral: Social Communication · Behavioral: Social Communication + Add Tools

  • Active comparator
    Social Communication + Switch Intervention to Disruptive Behavior

    Starting Intervention: Social Communication Who: Parent \& Child \& Therapist Frequency: 1-hour twice/week Secondary Intervention: Switch to Disruptive Behavior Intervention Who: Parent \& Therapist only Frequency: 1-hour once/week

    Behavioral: Social Communication · Behavioral: Disruptive Behavior

  • Active comparator
    Disruptive Behavior + Reduce Frequency

    Starting Intervention: Disruptive Behavior Who: Parent \& Therapist only Frequency: 1-hour once/week Secondary Intervention: "Reduce Frequency" of Disruptive Behavior Intervention Intervention: Disruptive Behavior Who: Parent \& Therapist only Reduce Frequency: 1-hour every other week

    Behavioral: Disruptive Behavior · Behavioral: Disruptive Behavior + Reduce Frequency

  • Active comparator
    Disruptive Behavior + Add Tools

    Starting Intervention: Disruptive Behavior Who: Parent \& Therapist only Frequency: 1-hour once/week Secondary Intervention: "Add Tools" to Disruptive Behavior Intervention Intervention: Disruptive Behavior Who: Parent \& Therapist \& Child Frequency: 1-hour once/week Add: Video feedback

    Behavioral: Disruptive Behavior · Behavioral: Disruptive Behavior + Add Tools

  • Active comparator
    Disruptive Behavior + Switch Intervention to Social Communication

    Starting Intervention: Disruptive Behavior Who: Parent \& Therapist only Frequency: 1-hour once/week Secondary Intervention: "Switch" to Social Communication Intervention Who: Parent \& Child \& Therapist Frequency: 1-hour twice/week

    Behavioral: Social Communication · Behavioral: Disruptive Behavior

Interventions

  • BehavioralSocial Communication

    Intervention: Social Communication Who: Parent \& Child \& Therapist Frequency: 1-hour twice/week

    Also known as: SC, Project Impact

  • BehavioralDisruptive Behavior

    Intervention: Disruptive Behavior Who: Parent \& Therapist only Frequency: 1-hour once/week

    Also known as: RUBI, DB

  • BehavioralSocial Communication + Reduce Frequency

    Intervention: Social Communication Who: Parent \& Child \& Therapist Frequency: 1-hour once/week

  • BehavioralSocial Communication + Add Tools

    Intervention: Social Communication Who: Parent \& Child \& Therapist Frequency: 1-hour twice/week

  • BehavioralDisruptive Behavior + Reduce Frequency

    Intervention: Disruptive Behavior Who: Parent \& Therapist only Frequency: 1-hour every other week

  • BehavioralDisruptive Behavior + Add Tools

    Intervention: Disruptive Behavior Who: Parent \& Therapist only Frequency: 1-hour once/week

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Observed Child Social Communication

    The child's observed social communication is measured from a caregiver-child interaction in which the dyad interacts across a variety of daily activities using materials in their home. This interaction will be recorded and coded for the child's social communication using the codebook from the Early Communication Indicator assessment.

    Time frame: Between 25-30 weeks

  2. Observed Child Disruptive Behavior

    The child's disruptive behavior is measured from a caregiver-child interaction in which the dyad interacts across a variety of daily activities using materials in their home. This interaction will be recorded and coded for the child's disruptive behavior using the Disruptive Behavior Diagnostic Observation (DB-DOS) codebook.

    Time frame: Between 25-30 weeks

  3. Caregiver Report of Child Social Communication

    The caregiver's assessment of the child's social communication is measured from the Developmental Profile 4 (DP-4) Social-Emotional and Communication Scales. This assessment will yield a total raw score ranging from 0 (minimum) to 70 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better outcomes.

    Time frame: Between 25-30 weeks

  4. Caregiver Report of Child Disruptive Behavior

    The caregiver's assessment of the child's disruptive behavior is measured from the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory.

    Time frame: Between 25-30 weeks

  5. Family Life Impairment Scale

    Family life participation outcomes are measured using the Family Life Impairment Scale. The measure's values range from 0 (minimum) to 38 (maximum) with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.

    Time frame: Between 25-30 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Caregiver Satisfaction

    The caregiver's satisfaction with the intervention(s) are measured from a researcher developed satisfaction questionnaire. Sample items include asking about the caregiver's confidence in supporting their child's development, the difficulty in finding time to support their child's development, the added stress of participating in the study, the reasonableness of the study time requirement, the satisfaction with their study therapist's presentation of the material, and whether they would recommend the intervention to another family.

    Time frame: Between 25-30 weeks

  2. Caregiver Perceived Stress

    The caregiver's stress levels are measured using the Perceived Stress Scale. The measure's values range from 0 (minimum) to 40 (maximum) with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.

    Time frame: Between 25-30 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and informed consent form · May 23, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — We will share the final dataset in two ways: the National Database for Autism Research (NDAR) and the Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR).

Supporting information: Study protocol

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 29, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05926687
Lead sponsor
Northwestern University
Collaborators
University of Texas at Austin
Responsible party
Megan Roberts (Principal Investigator, Northwestern University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 3, 2023
Start date
Jul 11, 2023
Primary completion
Feb 28, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 28, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 29, 2026

Study contacts

Laura J Sudec, MSW
Contact
Laura.Sudec@northwestern.edu
8474913183
Megan Y Roberts, PhD
Contact
megan.y.roberts@northwestern.edu
8474913183

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion