CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05904223INHALEUpdated Jul 3, 2023

Effect of IN Hospital PCR Based Assessment of Patients With Lower Respiratory Tract Infections on LEngth of Stay

An interventional study of Respiratory Panel PCR Sputum in Respiratory Infection, sponsored by Alexander Zoufaly. Recruiting at 1 site in Austria. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-07-03.

Sponsored by Alexander Zoufaly · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2024, 1 year 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started May 2023; still recruiting 3 years 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
302
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Does the use of the BIOFIRE® FILMARRAY® Pneumonia Panel plus in hospitalized patients with lower respiratory infections lead to a reduction in length of hospital stay (LOS) and customized antibiotic treatment (higher amount of specific vs empiric treatment, shorter treatment duration, less antibiotic treatment, lower incidence of side effects) compared to the standard of care?

Read the detailed description

Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) like pneumonia, exacerbations of COPD or bronchitis are caused by several viral and/or bacterial pathogens. Even in huge epidemiological studies the causative pathogen can just be detected in approximately 50% of pneumonia cases. In clinical practice the pathogen is only known in few cases, e.g. Legionella via urine antigen test. It is impossible to distinguish the triggering bacteria by clinical parameters and even accurate differentiation between bacterial and viral infections is often not possible. The same problem exists for other LRTIs.

The lack of knowledge of the causative pathogen leads to several problems:

First, clinicians tend to observe patients after treatment initiation for a longer period than probably necessary, which may lead to an increased length of hospital stay. Secondly, the antibiotic treatment has to be broad enough to cover all possible pathogens empirically. This might lead to an overuse of broad-spectrum antibiotics, an increased risk of side effects, the development of antibiotic resistance or even delayed treatment of the causative agent. Finally, antibiotics are prescribed erroneously for viral infections, which have been misinterpreted as bacterial infections by clinicians.

The BIOFIRE® FILMARRAY® Pneumonia Panel plus can help to solve these problems by identifying the causative pathogen in LRTIs within 1.5 hours. The decision of the treatment and its duration would be pathogen driven and no longer just empirically based on a lot of unknown factors.

The investigators would like to perform the following study with two groups: standard of care (control group) vs Pneumonia panel plus (intervention group). Both groups will receive the standard of care treatment but the intervention group will additionally have their sputum analyzed via the BIOFIRE® FILMARRAY® Pneumonia Panel plus.

Additional information empiric vs specific treatment:

  • empiric therapy - every antimicrobial therapy prescribed without knowing the pathogen

    o Amoxicillin/Clavulanic acid or Cefuroxime or Ceftriaxone/Cefotaxime or Piperacillin/Tazobactam or Levofloxacin

  • Specific therapy - pathogen driven, prescribed knowing the pathogen; narrowed spectrum of agent

    • Pneumococcus - Penicillin G
    • H. influenzae - Cefuroxime or Doxycycline
    • Moraxella - Cefuroxime or Doxycycline
    • MSSA - Cefazolin or Flucloxacillin
    • MRSA - Linezolid or Vancomycin
    • Pseudomonas - Ceftazidime
    • E. coli - Cefuroxime or third generation Cephalosporin or Ciprofloxacin
    • Klebsiella - Cefuroxime or third generation Cephalosporin or Ciprofloxacin
    • Proteus, Serratia - third generation Cephalosporin or Ciprofloxacin
    • Enterobacter cloacae - Ertapenem
    • Legionella - Levofloxacin or Azithromycin
    • Mycoplasma - Azithromycin or Doxycycline
    • In case of ESBLs - Ertapenem or Meropenem
    • In case of carbapenemases - Ceftazidime/Avibactam (OXA48, KPC) or Meropenem/Vaborbactam (KPC) or Aztreonam +/- Ceftazidime/Avibactam (MBL +- others)
02

Conditions studied

  • Respiratory Infection

Keywords

  • Biofire
03

In context

Infections

6,687 studies on the registry are indexed under Infections; 807 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 302 is above the median of 120 across 4,201 interventional studies indexed under Infections.

Browse Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Alexander Zoufaly as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Hospitalised patients on a general ward
  • Ability to give consent
  • Ability to produce sputum

AND (one of the following diagnosis)

  • acute exacerabation of COPD (defined as known COPD and worsening of symptoms like dyspnea +/- wheezing +/- increased sputum purulence and the need for additional treatment)
  • Pneumonia (diagnosed via chest X-ray)

OR

Lower respiratory infection (which does not belong to one of the two former diagnosis) with following symptoms:

At least one criterion Cough (more than usual if smoker) Dyspnea Increased sputum purulence

AND (at least one criterion) Respiratory rate ≥22/min Reduced oxygen saturation (\<95%) (or worsening of oxygen saturation by 3% (e.g. in patients with COPD) Fever (temp >38°C) Rales/wheezing Chest pain upon breathing

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other proven or suspected systemic diseases which require antibiotic treatment, like:

    • Intraabdominal infections (appendicitis, cholecystitis, diverticulitis, peritonitis)
    • C. difficile associated diarrhea (only if existing on admission otherwise it will be identified as a side effect)
    • Urinary tract infections like pyelonephritis, urosepsis, cystitis + fever (asymptomatic bacteriuria is NOT an exclusion criterion)
    • Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (erysipelas, abscess with systemic symptoms, diabetic foot infection, osteomyelitis)
    • Another single cause which can explain the respiratory symptoms better than an infection (acute heart failure, pulmonary embolism, hypertension induced lung edema)
  • Proven respiratory infection via another PCR based system (e.g. influenza or tuberculosis)
  • Inability to give consent
  • Inability to produce sputum
  • Moribund and palliative patients
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
302 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Standard of Care

    standard of care (SOC) group = control group: * Routine laboratory parameters (CBC, CRP, kidney and liver parameters, etc.) on the day of admission and when clinically necessary - decision is made by the physician in charge * Sputum microscopy for quality assessment (via Bartlett score) * Chest X-ray on the day of admission or the day after * 2 Sets of blood cultures (if temperature \>38°) * Pneumococcus urine antigen test for every patient with proven or suspected pneumonia * Legionella urine antigen test for every patient with proven or suspected pneumonia and clinical suspicion for Legionella infection (travel history, air condition, elevated CK, hyponatremia, reduced kidney function) * Antibiotic treatment if deemed necessary by the treating physician

  • Experimental
    Standard of Care + Respiratory Panel

    Pneumonia panel plus group = intervention group * Sputum analysis via the BIOFIRE® FILMARRAY® Pneumonia Panel plus * Routine laboratory parameters (CBC, CRP, kidney and liver parameters, etc.) on the day of admission and when clinically necessary - decision is made by the physician in charge * Sputum microscopy for quality assessment (via Bartlett score) * Chest X-ray on the day of admission or the day after * 2 Sets of blood cultures * Pneumococcus urine antigen test for every patient with proven or suspected pneumonia * Legionella urine antigen test for every patient with proven or suspected pneumonia and * Antibiotic treatment if deemed necessary by the treating physician

    Diagnostic Test: Respiratory Panel PCR Sputum

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testRespiratory Panel PCR Sputum

    Multiplex PCR Respiratory Panel from Biomerieux used on Patients Sputum

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. length of stay (LOS) in days

    How long is the lenght of stay in days (half-days)?

    Time frame: From admission to discharge or death, whichever comes first, assessed up to 12 Months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Duration of antibiotic treatment needed represented as days of treatment (DOT)

    How long is the duration of antibiotic treatment in days?

    Time frame: From start of antibiotic treatment to discontinuation of any cause, assessed up to 12 Months

  2. Number of usage of specific vs empiric antibiotic treatment

    Is there a difference in used antibiotic treatment?

    Time frame: From start of antibiotic treatment to discontinuation of any cause, assessed up to 12 Months

  3. Cost of antibiotic treatment

    Is there a differnece in cost of antibiotic treatment?

    Time frame: From start of antibiotic treatment to discontinuation of any cause, assessed up to 12 Months

  4. In hospital and 30-day mortality

    Is there a difference in 30-day mortality?

    Time frame: From admission to death or 30 days after admission

  5. C. difficile associated diarrhea within 30-day-follow-up

    Is there a diference in incidence of C. difficile associated diarrhea?

    Time frame: From admission to death or 30 days after admission

  6. 30-day re-admission rate

    Is there a difference in 30-day re-admission rate?

    Time frame: From admission to death or 30 days after admission

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 3, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05904223
Lead sponsor
Alexander Zoufaly
Collaborators
BioMérieux
Responsible party
Alexander Zoufaly (PI, Klinik Favoriten) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jun 15, 2023
Start date
May 10, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 3, 2023

Study contacts

Klaus Breinbauer, Dr. med.
Contact
klaus.breinbauer@gesundheitsverbund.at
+43 1 60191 72454
Alexander Zoufaly, Prof. Dr.
Contact
alexander.zoufaly@gesundheitsverbund.at
+43 1 60191 72415
Alexander Zoufaly, Prof. Dr.
principal investigator · Klinik Favoriten

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion