CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05890586Updated Sep 26, 2023Results posted

ACTIV-6: COVID-19 Study of Repurposed Medications - Arm B (Fluvoxamine)

A Phase 3 interventional study of Fluvoxamine and Placebo in Covid19, sponsored by Susanna Naggie, MD. Completed at 91 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 30 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-09-26.

Sponsored by Susanna Naggie, MD · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 11 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jun 2021, registered Jun 2023).
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,331
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
30 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of repurposed medications (study drug(s) in reducing symptoms of non-hospitalized participants with mild to moderate COVID-19. Participants will receive either study drug or placebo. They will self-report any new or worsening symptoms or medical events they may experience while taking study drug or placebo. This study is intended to be all remote with no in person visits, unless the study team feels it is in the best interest of a participant to see them in person.

Prior and current drug arms are listed on clinicaltrials.gov and will be updated with the activation of any new drug arms. Each study arm will also have its own clinicaltrials.gov entry and will include "Pro00107921" in the Unique Protocol ID.

Read the detailed description

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a novel betacoronavirus that first emerged in December 2019 and has since caused a global pandemic unseen in almost a century with respect to the number of cases and overall mortality. The clinical disease related to SARS-CoV-2 is referred to as Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Over 2020, advances were made for treatment of COVID-19 and several vaccinations have received emergency use authorization for prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infections. However, the pandemic continues to evolve with new variants and surges of infections in different regions of the world, requiring an ongoing evidence-generating platform, in particular for the treatment of COVID-19 infection in the outpatient setting.

This proposed platform protocol can serve as an evidence generating system for prioritized drugs repurposed from other indications with an established safety record and preliminary evidence of clinical efficacy for the treatment of COVID-19. The ultimate goal is to evaluate if repurposed medications can make participants feel better faster and reduce death and hospitalization.

This platform protocol is designed to be flexible so that it is suitable for a wide range of settings within healthcare systems and in community settings where it can be integrated into routine COVID-19 testing programs and subsequent treatment plans. This platform protocol will enroll participants in an outpatient setting with a confirmed polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or antigen test for SARS-CoV-2.

Participants will be randomized to study drugs or placebo based on the arms that are actively enrolling at the time of randomization. Study drugs may be added or removed according to adaptive design and/or emerging evidence. When there are multiple study drugs available, randomization will occur based on appropriateness of each drug for the participant as determined by the study protocol and investigator and participant equipoise. Each participant will be required to randomize to at least one study drug versus placebo. The probability of placebo to treatment will remain the same regardless of eligibility decisions.

Eligible participants will be randomized (1:1), in a blinded fashion, to either the study drug arm or placebo arm in addition to standard of care. As additional study drugs are added, the randomization will be altered to leverage placebo data across arms. Participants will receive a complete supply study drug or placebo with the quantity depending on the study drug/placebo to which they are randomized.

All study visits are designed to be remote. However, screening and enrollment may occur in-person at sites and unplanned study visits may occur in-person or remotely, as deemed appropriate by the site investigator for safety purposes. Participants will be asked to complete questionnaires and report safety events during the study. Participants will be prompted by the online system to report safety events and these will be reviewed and confirmed via medical records and site staff, as necessary.

02

Conditions studied

  • Covid19

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • SARS-CoV-2
  • COVID-19
  • Placebo
  • Duke University Health System
  • Outcomes
  • Duke Clinical Research Institute
  • fluvoxamine
  • ACTIV 6
  • ACTIV
03

In context

COVID-19

7,640 studies on the registry are indexed under COVID-19; 488 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,331 is above the median of 100 across 4,099 interventional studies indexed under COVID-19.

Browse COVID-19 studies →

Lead sponsor

Susanna Naggie, MD is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 8 (100%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Completed Informed Consent
  • Age ≥ 30 years old
  • Confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection by any authorized or approved polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or antigen test collected within 10 days of screening
  • Two or more current symptoms of acute infection for ≤7 days. Symptoms include the following: fatigue, dyspnea, fever, cough, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, body aches, chills, headache, sore throat, nasal symptoms, new loss of sense of taste or smell

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior diagnosis of COVID-19 infection (> 10 days from screening)
  • Current or recent (within 10 days of screening) hospitalization
  • Known allergy/sensitivity or any hypersensitivity to components of the study drug or placebo
  • Known contraindication(s) to study drug including prohibited concomitant medications
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
1,331 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Arm B - Fluvoxamine

    Fluvoxamine will be self-administered orally by each participant at a dose of 50 mg twice a day for 10 days.

    Drug: Fluvoxamine

  • Placebo comparator
    Arm B - Placebo

    Placebo - appearance and size matched to active study drug. Placebo will be self-administered orally by each participant twice a day for 10 days.

    Other: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugFluvoxamine

    Fluvoxamine is a round golden 50 mg tablet that is scored on both sides - one side has "APO" and the other side has "F50" with a partial bisect. All packaging will be labeled to indicate that the product is for investigational use, administered at a dose of 50 mg, twice daily for 10 days.

    Also known as: Fluvoxamine Maleate Tablets

  • OtherPlacebo

    Each study arm will contain a placebo comparator. Placebo will look similar to study drug and will be administered via the same route of administration and dose. However, placebo will be an inactive substance, containing no study drug.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to Sustained Recovery in Days

    Time to sustained recovery was the number of days between receipt of study drug and the third of 3 consecutive days without symptoms. Participants who died, by definition, did not recover regardless of reported symptom freedom. The reported summary is the median survival time.

    Time frame: Up to 28 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Hospitalization or Death

    Time frame: Up to 28 days

  2. Number of Participants With Mortality

    Time frame: Up to 28 days

  3. Time to Mortality

    Time to mortality was the number of days between drug receipt and death.

    Time frame: Up to 28 days

  4. Number of Participants With Hospitalization, Urgent Care, Emergency Room Visit, or Death

    Time frame: Up to 28 days

  5. Number of Participants at Each Score on the COVID Clinical Progression Scale at Day 7

    COVID Clinical Progression Scale is a scale of 0 to 8 where 0 = No clinical or virological evidence of infection, 1 = No limitation of activities, 2 = Limitation of activities, 3 = Hospitalized, no oxygen therapy, 4 = Hospitalized, on oxygen by mask or nasal prongs, 5 = Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen, 6 = Hospitalized, on intubation and mechanical ventilation, 7 = Hospitalized, on ventilation + additional organ support (pressors, RRT, ECMO), 8 = Death.

    Time frame: Day 7

  6. Number of Participants at Each Score on the COVID Clinical Progression Scale at Day 14

    COVID Clinical Progression Scale is a scale of 0 to 8 where 0 = No clinical or virological evidence of infection, 1 = No limitation of activities, 2 = Limitation of activities, 3 = Hospitalized, no oxygen therapy, 4 = Hospitalized, on oxygen by mask or nasal prongs, 5 = Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen, 6 = Hospitalized, on intubation and mechanical ventilation, 7 = Hospitalized, on ventilation + additional organ support (pressors, RRT, ECMO), 8 = Death.

    Time frame: Day 14

  7. Number of Participants at Each Score on the COVID Clinical Progression Scale at Day 28

    COVID Clinical Progression Scale is a scale of 0 to 8 where 0 = No clinical or virological evidence of infection, 1 = No limitation of activities, 2 = Limitation of activities, 3 = Hospitalized, no oxygen therapy, 4 = Hospitalized, on oxygen by mask or nasal prongs, 5 = Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen, 6 = Hospitalized, on intubation and mechanical ventilation, 7 = Hospitalized, on ventilation + additional organ support (pressors, RRT, ECMO), 8 = Death.

    Time frame: Day 28

  8. Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the PROMIS-29 - Physical Function

    The PROMIS-29 (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) consists of seven health domains with four 5-level items associated with each and a pain intensity assessment using a 0-10 numeric rank. The seven health domains include physical function, fatigue, pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and sleep disturbance. Raw score ranges from 4-20, where a higher score correlates to better outcome for physical function. Day 90 data to be reported by September 4, 2023.

    Time frame: Day 7, 14, 28, and 90

  9. Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the PROMIS-29 - Fatigue

    The PROMIS-29 (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) consists of seven health domains with four 5-level items associated with each and a pain intensity assessment using a 0-10 numeric rank. The seven health domains include physical function, fatigue, pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and sleep disturbance. Raw score ranges from 4-20, where a lower score correlates to better outcome for fatigue. Day 90 data to be reported by September 4, 2023.

    Time frame: Day 7, 14, 28, and 90

  10. Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the PROMIS-29 - Pain

    The PROMIS-29 (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) consists of seven health domains with four 5-level items associated with each and a pain intensity assessment using a 0-10 numeric rank. The seven health domains include physical function, fatigue, pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and sleep disturbance. Raw score ranges from 4-20, where a lower score correlates to better outcome for pain. Day 90 data to be reported by September 4, 2023.

    Time frame: Day 7, 14, 28, and 90

  11. Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the PROMIS-29 - Depression

    The PROMIS-29 (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) consists of seven health domains with four 5-level items associated with each and a pain intensity assessment using a 0-10 numeric rank. The seven health domains include physical function, fatigue, pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and sleep disturbance. Raw score ranges from 4-20, where a lower score correlates to better outcome for depression. Day 90 data to be reported by September 4, 2023.

    Time frame: Day 7, 14, 28, and 90

  12. Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the PROMIS-29 - Anxiety

    The PROMIS-29 (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) consists of seven health domains with four 5-level items associated with each and a pain intensity assessment using a 0-10 numeric rank. The seven health domains include physical function, fatigue, pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and sleep disturbance. Raw score ranges from 4-20 where a lower score correlates to better outcome for anxiety.

    Time frame: Day 7, 14, 28, and 90

  13. Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the PROMIS-29 - Social

    The PROMIS-29 (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) consists of seven health domains with four 5-level items associated with each and a pain intensity assessment using a 0-10 numeric rank. The seven health domains include physical function, fatigue, pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and sleep disturbance. Raw score ranges from 4-20 where a higher score correlates to better outcome for social roles and activities. Day 90 data to be reported by September 4, 2023.

    Time frame: Day 7, 14, 28, and 90

  14. Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the PROMIS-29 - Sleep

    The PROMIS-29 (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) consists of seven health domains with four 5-level items associated with each and a pain intensity assessment using a 0-10 numeric rank. The seven health domains include physical function, fatigue, pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and sleep disturbance. Raw score ranges from 4-20 where a lower score correlates to better outcome for sleep. Day 90 data to be reported by September 4, 2023.

    Time frame: Day 7, 14, 28, and 90

  15. Time Unwell in Days as Measured by the Symptom and Clinical Event Scale

    The symptom and clinical event scale is a daily measurement that combines the global symptom burden scale with clinical events hospitalization and mortality. (No symptoms, mild symptoms, moderate symptoms, severe symptoms, hospitalized, deceased). Time unwell was the portion of follow-up (in days) that a participant was symptomatic, hospitalized, or deceased. The quantity is estimated from a Bayesian longitudinal ordinal regression model with covariate adjustment and weakly informative priors.

    Time frame: Up to 14 days

  16. Mean Days Benefit as Measured by the Symptom and Clinical Event Scale

    The symptom and clinical event scale is a daily measurement that combines the global symptom burden scale with clinical events hospitalization and mortality. (No symptoms, mild symptoms, moderate symptoms, severe symptoms, hospitalized, deceased). The cumulative benefit of treatment A is the probability of experiencing a better outcome on treatment A compared to treatment B, summed over the days of follow-up. The difference between the cumulative benefit of treatment A and the cumulative benefit of treatment B is known as the difference in days benefit. Measure of dispersion is 95% credible interval.

    Time frame: Up to 14 days

07

Results

Posted Aug 2, 2023

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneArm B - Fluvoxamine 50Arm B - Placebo
Started686645
Completed676615
Not completed1030

Outcome measures

PrimaryTime to Sustained Recovery in Days

Time to sustained recovery was the number of days between receipt of study drug and the third of 3 consecutive days without symptoms. Participants who died, by definition, did not recover regardless of reported symptom freedom. The reported summary is the median survival time.

Time frame:
Up to 28 days
Reported as:
Median · days
Time to Sustained Recovery in Days
daysArm B - Fluvoxamine 50Arm B - Placebo
Time to Sustained Recovery in Days12 (11 to 14)13 (12 to 13)
Statistical analysis
  • Arm B - Fluvoxamine 50 vs Arm B - Placebo · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.96 · 95% CI 0.86 to 1.07Hazard ratios greater than one favored the active intervention for a faster time to recovery.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Hospitalization or Death
Time frame:
Up to 28 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Hospitalization or Death
ParticipantsArm B - Fluvoxamine 50Arm B - Placebo
Number of Participants With Hospitalization or Death13
Statistical analysis
  • Arm B - Fluvoxamine 50 vs Arm B - Placebo · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.3 · 95% CI 0.03 to 2.88Low event rate precluded covariate adjustment.
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Mortality
Time frame:
Up to 28 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Mortality
ParticipantsArm B - Fluvoxamine 50Arm B - Placebo
Number of Participants With Mortality00
SecondaryTime to Mortality

Time to mortality was the number of days between drug receipt and death.

Time frame:
Up to 28 days
Reported as:
Mean · days
Time to Mortality
daysArm B - Fluvoxamine 50Arm B - Placebo
Time to MortalityNA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Hospitalization, Urgent Care, Emergency Room Visit, or Death
Time frame:
Up to 28 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Hospitalization, Urgent Care, Emergency Room Visit, or Death
ParticipantsArm B - Fluvoxamine 50Arm B - Placebo
Number of Participants With Hospitalization, Urgent Care, Emergency Room Visit, or Death2726
Statistical analysis
  • Arm B - Fluvoxamine 50 vs Arm B - Placebo · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.0 · 95% CI 0.6 to 1.7Hazard ratios less than one favor the active intervention of inhaled fluticasone furoate. The interval is a highest density credible interval.
SecondaryNumber of Participants at Each Score on the COVID Clinical Progression Scale at Day 7

COVID Clinical Progression Scale is a scale of 0 to 8 where 0 = No clinical or virological evidence of infection, 1 = No limitation of activities, 2 = Limitation of activities, 3 = Hospitalized, no oxygen therapy, 4 = Hospitalized, on oxygen by mask or nasal prongs, 5 = Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen, 6 = Hospitalized, on intubation and mechanical ventilation, 7 = Hospitalized, on ventilation + additional organ support (pressors, RRT, ECMO), 8 = Death.

Time frame:
Day 7
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants at Each Score on the COVID Clinical Progression Scale at Day 7
ParticipantsArm B - Fluvoxamine 50Arm B - Placebo
0 = No clinical or virological evidence of infection5534
1 = No limitation of activities542511
2 = Limitation of activities4533
3 = Hospitalized, no oxygen therapy01
4 = Hospitalized, on oxygen by mask or nasal prongs01
5 = Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen00
6 = Hospitalized, on intubation and mechanical ventilation00
7 = Hospitalized, on ventilation + additional organ support (pressors, RRT, ECMO)00
8 = Death00
Statistical analysis
  • Arm B - Fluvoxamine 50 vs Arm B - Placebo · Odds ratio (or): 1.32 · 95% CI 0.74 to 1.98The interval is a highest-density credible interval on the log relative odds scale. Odds ratio estimate from a Bayesian cumulative probability ordinal regression model with weakly informative priors.
SecondaryNumber of Participants at Each Score on the COVID Clinical Progression Scale at Day 14

COVID Clinical Progression Scale is a scale of 0 to 8 where 0 = No clinical or virological evidence of infection, 1 = No limitation of activities, 2 = Limitation of activities, 3 = Hospitalized, no oxygen therapy, 4 = Hospitalized, on oxygen by mask or nasal prongs, 5 = Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen, 6 = Hospitalized, on intubation and mechanical ventilation, 7 = Hospitalized, on ventilation + additional organ support (pressors, RRT, ECMO), 8 = Death.

Time frame:
Day 14
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants at Each Score on the COVID Clinical Progression Scale at Day 14
ParticipantsArm B - Fluvoxamine 50Arm B - Placebo
0 = No clinical or virological evidence of infection3937
1 = No limitation of activities574518
2 = Limitation of activities2321
3 = Hospitalized, no oxygen therapy00
4 = Hospitalized, on oxygen by mask or nasal prongs00
5 = Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen00
6 = Hospitalized, on intubation and mechanical ventilation00
7 = Hospitalized, on ventilation + additional organ support (pressors, RRT, ECMO)00
8 = Death00
Statistical analysis
  • Arm B - Fluvoxamine 50 vs Arm B - Placebo · Odds ratio (or): 1.22 · 95% CI 0.53 to 2.06The interval is a highest-density credible interval on the log relative odds scale. Odds ratio estimate from a Bayesian cumulative probability ordinal regression model with weakly informative priors.
SecondaryNumber of Participants at Each Score on the COVID Clinical Progression Scale at Day 28

COVID Clinical Progression Scale is a scale of 0 to 8 where 0 = No clinical or virological evidence of infection, 1 = No limitation of activities, 2 = Limitation of activities, 3 = Hospitalized, no oxygen therapy, 4 = Hospitalized, on oxygen by mask or nasal prongs, 5 = Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen, 6 = Hospitalized, on intubation and mechanical ventilation, 7 = Hospitalized, on ventilation + additional organ support (pressors, RRT, ECMO), 8 = Death.

Time frame:
Day 28
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants at Each Score on the COVID Clinical Progression Scale at Day 28
ParticipantsArm B - Fluvoxamine 50Arm B - Placebo
0 = No clinical or virological evidence of infection4030
1 = No limitation of activities569528
2 = Limitation of activities2112
3 = Hospitalized, no oxygen therapy00
4 = Hospitalized, on oxygen by mask or nasal prongs00
5 = Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen00
6 = Hospitalized, on intubation and mechanical ventilation00
7 = Hospitalized, on ventilation + additional organ support (pressors, RRT, ECMO)00
8 = Death00
Statistical analysis
  • Arm B - Fluvoxamine 50 vs Arm B - Placebo · Odds ratio (or): 1.45 · 95% CI 0.74 to 2.22The interval is a highest-density credible interval on the log relative odds scale. Odds ratio estimate from a Bayesian cumulative probability ordinal regression model with weakly informative priors.
SecondaryQuality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the PROMIS-29 - Physical Function

The PROMIS-29 (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) consists of seven health domains with four 5-level items associated with each and a pain intensity assessment using a 0-10 numeric rank. The seven health domains include physical function, fatigue, pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and sleep disturbance. Raw score ranges from 4-20, where a higher score correlates to better outcome for physical function. Day 90 data to be reported by September 4, 2023.

Time frame:
Day 7, 14, 28, and 90
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the PROMIS-29 - Physical Function
score on a scaleArm B - Fluvoxamine 50Arm B - Placebo
Day 720 (16 to 20)20 (17 to 20)
Day 1420 (19 to 20)20 (19 to 20)
Day 2820 (20 to 20)20 (20 to 20)
Day 9020 (20 to 20)20 (20 to 20)
Statistical analysis
  • Arm B - Fluvoxamine 50 vs Arm B - Placebo · Odds ratio (or): 0.65 · 95% CI 0.51 to 0.83Initially estimated on the log relative odds scale, and then transformed to the odds ratio scale. On the log relative odds scale, the estimated parameter value was the posterior mean. Interval estimate is highest density Bayesian credible interval.
  • Arm B - Fluvoxamine 50 vs Arm B - Placebo · Odds ratio (or): 0.92 · 95% CI 0.70 to 1.21Initially estimated on the log relative odds scale, and then transformed to the odds ratio scale. On the log relative odds scale, the estimated parameter value was the posterior mean. Interval estimate is highest density Bayesian credible interval.
  • Arm B - Fluvoxamine 50 vs Arm B - Placebo · Odds ratio (or): 0.75 · 95% CI 0.55 to 1.03Initially estimated on the log relative odds scale, and then transformed to the odds ratio scale. On the log relative odds scale, the estimated parameter value was the posterior mean. Interval estimate is highest density Bayesian credible interval.
  • Arm B - Fluvoxamine 50 vs Arm B - Placebo · Odds ratio (or): 0.97 · 95% CI 0.68 to 1.39Initially estimated on the log relative odds scale, and then transformed to the odds ratio scale. On the log relative odds scale, the estimated parameter value was the posterior mean. Interval estimate is symmetric density Bayesian credible interval.
SecondaryQuality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the PROMIS-29 - Fatigue

The PROMIS-29 (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) consists of seven health domains with four 5-level items associated with each and a pain intensity assessment using a 0-10 numeric rank. The seven health domains include physical function, fatigue, pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and sleep disturbance. Raw score ranges from 4-20, where a lower score correlates to better outcome for fatigue. Day 90 data to be reported by September 4, 2023.

Time frame:
Day 7, 14, 28, and 90
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the PROMIS-29 - Fatigue
score on a scaleArm B - Fluvoxamine 50Arm B - Placebo
Day 78 (7 to 12)8 (7 to 12)
Day 147 (4 to 9)7 (4 to 8)
Day 284.5 (4 to 8)4 (4 to 8)
Day 904 (4 to 8)4 (4 to 7)
Statistical analysis
  • Arm B - Fluvoxamine 50 vs Arm B - Placebo · Odds ratio (or): 1.29 · 95% CI 1.04 to 1.60Initially estimated on the log relative odds scale, and then transformed to the odds ratio scale. On the log relative odds scale, the estimated parameter value was the posterior mean. Interval estimate is symmetric density Bayesian credible interval.
  • Arm B - Fluvoxamine 50 vs Arm B - Placebo · Odds ratio (or): 1.22 · 95% CI 0.98 to 1.51Initially estimated on the log relative odds scale, and then transformed to the odds ratio scale. On the log relative odds scale, the estimated parameter value was the posterior mean. Interval estimate is symmetric density Bayesian credible interval.
  • Arm B - Fluvoxamine 50 vs Arm B - Placebo · Odds ratio (or): 1.07 · 95% CI 0.84 to 1.35Initially estimated on the log relative odds scale, and then transformed to the odds ratio scale. On the log relative odds scale, the estimated parameter value was the posterior mean. Interval estimate is symmetric density Bayesian credible interval.
  • Arm B - Fluvoxamine 50 vs Arm B - Placebo · Odds ratio (or): 1.16 · 95% CI 0.92 to 1.47Initially estimated on the log relative odds scale, and then transformed to the odds ratio scale. On the log relative odds scale, the estimated parameter value was the posterior mean. Interval estimate is symmetric density Bayesian credible interval.
SecondaryQuality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the PROMIS-29 - Pain

The PROMIS-29 (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) consists of seven health domains with four 5-level items associated with each and a pain intensity assessment using a 0-10 numeric rank. The seven health domains include physical function, fatigue, pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and sleep disturbance. Raw score ranges from 4-20, where a lower score correlates to better outcome for pain. Day 90 data to be reported by September 4, 2023.

Time frame:
Day 7, 14, 28, and 90
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the PROMIS-29 - Pain
score on a scaleArm B - Fluvoxamine 50Arm B - Placebo
Day 74 (4 to 8)4 (4 to 8)
Day 144 (4 to 6)4 (4 to 5)
Day 284 (4 to 4)4 (4 to 4)
Day 904 (4 to 4)4 (4 to 4)
Statistical analysis
  • Arm B - Fluvoxamine 50 vs Arm B - Placebo · Odds ratio (or): 1.02 · 95% CI 0.80 to 1.29Initially estimated on the log relative odds scale, and then transformed to the odds ratio scale. On the log relative odds scale, the estimated parameter value was the posterior mean. Interval estimate is symmetric density Bayesian credible interval.
  • Arm B - Fluvoxamine 50 vs Arm B - Placebo · Odds ratio (or): 1.11 · 95% CI 0.84 to 1.47Initially estimated on the log relative odds scale, and then transformed to the odds ratio scale. On the log relative odds scale, the estimated parameter value was the posterior mean. Interval estimate is symmetric density Bayesian credible interval.
  • Arm B - Fluvoxamine 50 vs Arm B - Placebo · Odds ratio (or): 1.08 · 95% CI 0.80 to 1.46Initially estimated on the log relative odds scale, and then transformed to the odds ratio scale. On the log relative odds scale, the estimated parameter value was the posterior mean. Interval estimate is symmetric density Bayesian credible interval.
  • Arm B - Fluvoxamine 50 vs Arm B - Placebo · Odds ratio (or): 1.05 · 95% CI 0.77 to 1.44Initially estimated on the log relative odds scale, and then transformed to the odds ratio scale. On the log relative odds scale, the estimated parameter value was the posterior mean. Interval estimate is symmetric density Bayesian credible interval.
SecondaryQuality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the PROMIS-29 - Depression

The PROMIS-29 (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) consists of seven health domains with four 5-level items associated with each and a pain intensity assessment using a 0-10 numeric rank. The seven health domains include physical function, fatigue, pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and sleep disturbance. Raw score ranges from 4-20, where a lower score correlates to better outcome for depression. Day 90 data to be reported by September 4, 2023.

Time frame:
Day 7, 14, 28, and 90
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the PROMIS-29 - Depression
score on a scaleArm B - Fluvoxamine 50Arm B - Placebo
Day 74 (4 to 6)4 (4 to 6)
Day 144 (4 to 5)4 (4 to 5)
Day 284 (4 to 4)4 (4 to 5)
Day 904 (4 to 4)4 (4 to 5)
Statistical analysis
  • Arm B - Fluvoxamine 50 vs Arm B - Placebo · Odds ratio (or): 0.90 · 95% CI 0.70 to 1.16Initially estimated on the log relative odds scale, and then transformed to the odds ratio scale. On the log relative odds scale, the estimated parameter value was the posterior mean. Interval estimate is symmetric density Bayesian credible interval.
  • Arm B - Fluvoxamine 50 vs Arm B - Placebo · Odds ratio (or): 0.83 · 95% CI 0.63 to 1.10Initially estimated on the log relative odds scale, and then transformed to the odds ratio scale. On the log relative odds scale, the estimated parameter value was the posterior mean. Interval estimate is symmetric density Bayesian credible interval.
  • Arm B - Fluvoxamine 50 vs Arm B - Placebo · Odds ratio (or): 0.73 · 95% CI 0.54 to 0.99Initially estimated on the log relative odds scale, and then transformed to the odds ratio scale. On the log relative odds scale, the estimated parameter value was the posterior mean. Interval estimate is symmetric density Bayesian credible interval.
  • Arm B - Fluvoxamine 50 vs Arm B - Placebo · Odds ratio (or): 0.88 · 95% CI 0.66 to 1.18Initially estimated on the log relative odds scale, and then transformed to the odds ratio scale. On the log relative odds scale, the estimated parameter value was the posterior mean. Interval estimate is symmetric density Bayesian credible interval.
SecondaryQuality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the PROMIS-29 - Anxiety

The PROMIS-29 (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) consists of seven health domains with four 5-level items associated with each and a pain intensity assessment using a 0-10 numeric rank. The seven health domains include physical function, fatigue, pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and sleep disturbance. Raw score ranges from 4-20 where a lower score correlates to better outcome for anxiety.

Time frame:
Day 7, 14, 28, and 90
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the PROMIS-29 - Anxiety
score on a scaleArm B - Fluvoxamine 50Arm B - Placebo
Day 75 (4 to 7)5 (4 to 8)
Day 144 (4 to 6)4 (4 to 6)
Day 284 (4 to 5)4 (4 to 5)
Day 904 (4 to 5)4 (4 to 5)
Statistical analysis
  • Arm B - Fluvoxamine 50 vs Arm B - Placebo · Odds ratio (or): 1.08 · 95% CI 0.85 to 1.37Initially estimated on the log relative odds scale, and then transformed to the odds ratio scale. On the log relative odds scale, the estimated parameter value was the posterior mean. Interval estimate is symmetric density Bayesian credible interval.
  • Arm B - Fluvoxamine 50 vs Arm B - Placebo · Odds ratio (or): 1.11 · 95% CI 0.85 to 1.44Initially estimated on the log relative odds scale, and then transformed to the odds ratio scale. On the log relative odds scale, the estimated parameter value was the posterior mean. Interval estimate is symmetric density Bayesian credible interval.
  • Arm B - Fluvoxamine 50 vs Arm B - Placebo · Odds ratio (or): 0.93 · 95% CI 0.70 to 1.24Initially estimated on the log relative odds scale, and then transformed to the odds ratio scale. On the log relative odds scale, the estimated parameter value was the posterior mean. Interval estimate is symmetric density Bayesian credible interval.
  • Arm B - Fluvoxamine 50 vs Arm B - Placebo · Odds ratio (or): 1.03 · 95% CI 0.78 to 1.37Initially estimated on the log relative odds scale, and then transformed to the odds ratio scale. On the log relative odds scale, the estimated parameter value was the posterior mean. Interval estimate is symmetric density Bayesian credible interval.
SecondaryQuality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the PROMIS-29 - Social

The PROMIS-29 (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) consists of seven health domains with four 5-level items associated with each and a pain intensity assessment using a 0-10 numeric rank. The seven health domains include physical function, fatigue, pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and sleep disturbance. Raw score ranges from 4-20 where a higher score correlates to better outcome for social roles and activities. Day 90 data to be reported by September 4, 2023.

Time frame:
Day 7, 14, 28, and 90
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the PROMIS-29 - Social
score on a scaleArm B - Fluvoxamine 50Arm B - Placebo
Day 716.5 (14 to 20)18 (14 to 20)
Day 1420 (16 to 20)20 (16 to 20)
Day 2820 (18 to 20)20 (18 to 20)
Day 9020 (19 to 20)20 (19 to 20)
Statistical analysis
  • Arm B - Fluvoxamine 50 vs Arm B - Placebo · Odds ratio (or): 0.84 · 95% CI 0.68 to 1.05Initially estimated on the log relative odds scale, and then transformed to the odds ratio scale. On the log relative odds scale, the estimated parameter value was the posterior mean. Interval estimate is symmetric density Bayesian credible interval.
  • Arm B - Fluvoxamine 50 vs Arm B - Placebo · Odds ratio (or): 0.88 · 95% CI 0.70 to 1.11Initially estimated on the log relative odds scale, and then transformed to the odds ratio scale. On the log relative odds scale, the estimated parameter value was the posterior mean. Interval estimate is symmetric density Bayesian credible interval.
  • Arm B - Fluvoxamine 50 vs Arm B - Placebo · Odds ratio (or): 0.93 · 95% CI 0.72 to 1.21Initially estimated on the log relative odds scale, and then transformed to the odds ratio scale. On the log relative odds scale, the estimated parameter value was the posterior mean. Interval estimate is symmetric density Bayesian credible interval.
  • Arm B - Fluvoxamine 50 vs Arm B - Placebo · Odds ratio (or): 0.98 · 95% CI 0.75 to 1.29Initially estimated on the log relative odds scale, and then transformed to the odds ratio scale. On the log relative odds scale, the estimated parameter value was the posterior mean. Interval estimate is symmetric density Bayesian credible interval.
SecondaryQuality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the PROMIS-29 - Sleep

The PROMIS-29 (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) consists of seven health domains with four 5-level items associated with each and a pain intensity assessment using a 0-10 numeric rank. The seven health domains include physical function, fatigue, pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and sleep disturbance. Raw score ranges from 4-20 where a lower score correlates to better outcome for sleep. Day 90 data to be reported by September 4, 2023.

Time frame:
Day 7, 14, 28, and 90
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the PROMIS-29 - Sleep
score on a scaleArm B - Fluvoxamine 50Arm B - Placebo
Day 710 (8 to 12)10 (7 to 12)
Day 149 (6 to 12)9 (6 to 11)
Day 288 (6 to 11)8 (6 to 11)
Day 908 (6 to 11)8 (6 to 10)
Statistical analysis
  • Arm B - Fluvoxamine 50 vs Arm B - Placebo · Odds ratio, log: 1.30 · 95% CI 1.05 to 1.60Initially estimated on the log relative odds scale, and then transformed to the odds ratio scale. On the log relative odds scale, the estimated parameter value was the posterior mean. Interval estimate is symmetric density Bayesian credible interval.
  • Arm B - Fluvoxamine 50 vs Arm B - Placebo · Odds ratio (or): 1.23 · 95% CI 1.00 to 1.52Initially estimated on the log relative odds scale, and then transformed to the odds ratio scale. On the log relative odds scale, the estimated parameter value was the posterior mean. Interval estimate is symmetric density Bayesian credible interval.
  • Arm B - Fluvoxamine 50 vs Arm B - Placebo · Odds ratio (or): 1.04 · 95% CI 0.84 to 1.27Initially estimated on the log relative odds scale, and then transformed to the odds ratio scale. On the log relative odds scale, the estimated parameter value was the posterior mean. Interval estimate is symmetric density Bayesian credible interval.
  • Arm B - Fluvoxamine 50 vs Arm B - Placebo · Odds ratio (or): 0.98 · 95% CI 0.80 to 1.21Initially estimated on the log relative odds scale, and then transformed to the odds ratio scale. On the log relative odds scale, the estimated parameter value was the posterior mean. Interval estimate is symmetric density Bayesian credible interval.
SecondaryTime Unwell in Days as Measured by the Symptom and Clinical Event Scale

The symptom and clinical event scale is a daily measurement that combines the global symptom burden scale with clinical events hospitalization and mortality. (No symptoms, mild symptoms, moderate symptoms, severe symptoms, hospitalized, deceased). Time unwell was the portion of follow-up (in days) that a participant was symptomatic, hospitalized, or deceased. The quantity is estimated from a Bayesian longitudinal ordinal regression model with covariate adjustment and weakly informative priors.

Time frame:
Up to 14 days
Reported as:
Mean · days
Time Unwell in Days as Measured by the Symptom and Clinical Event Scale
daysArm B - Fluvoxamine 50Arm B - Placebo
Time Unwell in Days as Measured by the Symptom and Clinical Event Scale11.21 (11.03 to 11.42)11.28 (11.10 to 11.48)
Statistical analysis
  • Arm B - Fluvoxamine 50 vs Arm B - Placebo · Difference in model estimate time unwell: -0.07 · 95% CI -0.43 to 0.31The interval is a highest-density credible interval.
SecondaryMean Days Benefit as Measured by the Symptom and Clinical Event Scale

The symptom and clinical event scale is a daily measurement that combines the global symptom burden scale with clinical events hospitalization and mortality. (No symptoms, mild symptoms, moderate symptoms, severe symptoms, hospitalized, deceased). The cumulative benefit of treatment A is the probability of experiencing a better outcome on treatment A compared to treatment B, summed over the days of follow-up. The difference between the cumulative benefit of treatment A and the cumulative benefit of treatment B is known as the difference in days benefit. Measure of dispersion is 95% credible interval.

Time frame:
Up to 14 days
Reported as:
Mean · days
Mean Days Benefit as Measured by the Symptom and Clinical Event Scale
daysArm B - Fluvoxamine 50Arm B - Placebo
Mean Days Benefit as Measured by the Symptom and Clinical Event Scale3.45 (3.23 to 3.70)3.37 (3.14 to 3.60)
Statistical analysis
  • Arm B - Fluvoxamine 50 vs Arm B - Placebo · Difference in model estimated means: 0.08 · 95% CI -0.37 to 0.52The interval is a highest-density credible interval.

Adverse events

Collected over Up to 90 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Arm B - Fluvoxamine 500/676 (0%)3/676 (0.4%)0/676 (0%)
Arm B - Placebo0/615 (0%)6/615 (1%)0/615 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventArm B - Fluvoxamine 50Arm B - Placebo
COPD exacerbationRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/6760/615
COVID-19 pneumoniaInfections and infestations0/6761/615
Coronary vasospasmVascular disorders0/6761/615
Diabetes mellitusMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/6761/615
Ophthalmic migraineEye disorders0/6761/615
Broken ankleInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/6761/615
Chest painGeneral disorders0/6761/615
Infected fingerInfections and infestations1/6760/615

Baseline characteristics

Participants with Baseline Characteristics data collected.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Arm B - Fluvoxamine 50Arm B - PlaceboTotal
Median47 (38 to 57)47 (39 to 58)47 (38 to 57)
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(Participants)Arm B - Fluvoxamine 50Arm B - PlaceboTotal
Sex/Gender — Female372327699
Sex/Gender — Male273254527
Sex/Gender — Prefer Not to Answer the Question123
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Arm B - Fluvoxamine 50Arm B - PlaceboTotal
Hispanic or Latino11393206
Not Hispanic or Latino5334901023
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Arm B - Fluvoxamine 50Arm B - PlaceboTotal
Race — American Indian or Alaska Native044
Race — Asian393372
Race — Black, African American, or African394382
Race — Middle Eastern or North African235
Race — Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander011
Race — White508462970
Race — More than one race16925
Race — None of the above261541
Race — Prefer not to answer91019
Race — No response7310
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Arm B - Fluvoxamine 50Arm B - PlaceboTotal
United States6465831229
08

Study locations

91 sites
  • Lamb Health, LLC
    Gilbert, Arizona 85298, United States
  • First Care Medical Clinic
    Mesa, Arizona 85203, United States
  • Trident Health Center
    Peoria, Arizona 85382, United States
  • Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
    Newport Beach, California 92663, United States
  • Assuta Family Medical Group APMC
    North Hollywood, California 91606, United States
  • Stanford
    Palo Alto, California 94304, United States
  • Doctors Medical Group of Colorado Springs, P.C.
    Colorado Springs, Colorado 80917, United States
  • Pine Ridge Family Medicine Inc.
    Colorado Springs, Colorado 80924, United States
  • Tabitha B. Fortt, M.D., LLC
    Stamford, Connecticut 06905, United States
  • George Washington University Hospital
    Washington, District of Columbia 20037, United States
  • Arena Medical Group
    Deerfield Beach, Florida 33441, United States
  • Lupus Foundation of Gainesville
    Gainesville, Florida 32606, United States
  • University of Florida Health
    Gainesville, Florida 32611, United States
  • University of Florida-JAX-ASCENT
    Jacksonville, Florida 32209, United States
  • AMRON Vitality and Wellness Center, LLC
    Jacksonville, Florida 32244, United States
  • Sunshine Walk In Clinic
    Lake Mary, Florida 32746, United States
  • Lakeland Regional Medical Center
    Lakeland, Florida 33805, United States
  • Jackson Memorial Hospital
    Miami, Florida 33136, United States
  • University of Miami
    Miami, Florida 33136, United States
  • Well Pharma Medical Research
    Miami, Florida 33173, United States
  • Innovation Clinical Trials Inc.
    Palmetto Bay, Florida 33157, United States
  • Lice Source Services Plantation
    Plantation, Florida 33313, United States
  • Premier Health
    Saint Petersburg, Florida 33707, United States
  • Tallahassee Memorial Hospital
    Tallahassee, Florida 32308, United States
  • Tampa General Hospital
    Tampa, Florida 33606, United States
  • UF Health Precision Health Research
    The Villages, Florida 32159, United States
  • Emory Healthcare
    Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
  • Essential Medical Care, Inc.
    College Park, Georgia 30349, United States
  • David Kavtaradze MD, Inc.
    Cordele, Georgia 31015, United States
  • Elite Family Practice
    Douglasville, Georgia 30134, United States
  • Christ the King Health Care, P.C.
    Loganville, Georgia 30052, United States
  • Miller Family Practice, LLC
    Macon, Georgia 31201, United States
  • Rush University Medical Center
    Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
  • Olivo Wellness Medical Center
    Chicago, Illinois 60618, United States
  • NorthShore Medical Group
    Evanston, Illinois 60201, United States
  • Advanced Medical Care, Ltd
    Lake Zurich, Illinois 60047, United States
  • Franciscan Health Michigan City
    Michigan City, Indiana 46360, United States
  • Del Pilar Medical and Urgent Care
    Mishawaka, Indiana 46545, United States
  • University of Kansas - Wichita
    Wichita, Kansas 67214, United States
  • A New Start II, LLC
    Central City, Kentucky 42330, United States
  • University Medical Center- New Orleans
    New Orleans, Louisiana 70112, United States
  • Ochsner Clinic Foundation
    New Orleans, Louisiana 70121, United States
  • Johns Hopkins Hospital
    Baltimore, Maryland 21287-1900, United States
  • Jadestone Clinical Research, LLC
    Rockville, Maryland 20855, United States
  • Boston Medical Center
    Boston, Massachusetts 02118, United States
  • Health Quality Primary Care
    Lawrence, Massachusetts 01843, United States
  • Ananda Medical Clinic
    Dearborn, Michigan 48124, United States
  • GFC of Southeastern Michigan, PC
    Detroit, Michigan 48202, United States
  • Romancare Health Services
    Detroit, Michigan 48206, United States
  • Essentia Health
    Duluth, Minnesota 55805, United States
  • University of Minnesota
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States
  • University of Missouri - Columbia
    Columbia, Missouri 65212, United States
  • Comprehensive Pain Management and Endocrinology
    Henderson, Nevada 89052, United States
  • Focus Clinical Research Solutions
    Bayonne, New Jersey 07002, United States
  • Raritan Bay Primary Care & Cardiology Associates
    Matawan, New Jersey 07747, United States
  • G&S Medical Associates, LLC
    Paterson, New Jersey 07514, United States
  • Mediversity Healthcare
    Turnersville, New Jersey 08012, United States
  • Geriatrics and Medical Associates
    Clinton, New York 13323, United States
  • Weill Cornell Medical College
    New York, New York 10065, United States
  • Spinal Pain and Medical Rehab, PC
    Yonkers, New York 10701, United States
  • Vaidya MD PLLC
    Clayton, North Carolina 27520, United States
  • Maria Medical Center, PLLC
    Dunn, North Carolina 28334, United States
  • Duke Clinical Research Institute
    Durham, North Carolina 27701, United States
  • Duke University Medical Center
    Durham, North Carolina 27710, United States
  • Wake Forest Baptist Health
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27151, United States
  • Diabetes and Endocrinology Assoc. of Stark County
    Canton, Ohio 44718, United States
  • University of Cincinnati
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45267, United States
  • TriHealth, Inc
    Montgomery, Ohio 45242, United States
  • The Heart and Medical Center
    Durant, Oklahoma 74701, United States
  • Hugo Medical clinic
    Hugo, Oklahoma 74743, United States
  • Bucks County Clinical Research
    Morrisville, Pennsylvania 19067, United States
  • Temple University Hospital
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19140, United States
  • University of Pittsburgh
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
  • Medical University of South Carolina
    Charleston, South Carolina 29403, United States
  • Clinical Trials Center of Middle TN
    Franklin, Tennessee 37067, United States
  • Rapha Family Wellness
    Hendersonville, Tennessee 37075, United States
  • Medical Specialists of Knoxville
    Knoxville, Tennessee 37938, United States
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center
    Nashville, Tennessee 37203, United States
  • Express Family Clinic
    Allen, Texas 75013, United States
  • DHR Health Institute for Research
    Edinburg, Texas 78539, United States
  • Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
    El Paso, Texas 79905, United States
  • Texas Health Physicians Group
    Fort Worth, Texas 76107, United States
  • Highlands Medical Associates, P.A.
    Highlands, Texas 77562, United States
  • University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • Family Practice Doctors P.A.
    Humble, Texas 77338, United States
  • Texas Health Physicians Group
    Irving, Texas 75039, United States
  • Kintex Group Texas LLC, DBA Activian Clinical Research
    Kingwood, Texas 77339, United States
  • University Diagnostics and Treatment Clinic
    Pasadena, Texas 77504, United States
  • University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
    San Antonio, Texas 78229, United States
  • Jeremy W. Szeto, D.O., P.A.
    Sugar Land, Texas 77479, United States
  • University of Virginia
    Charlottesville, Virginia 22903, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Jul 6, 2021
  • Statistical analysis plan · Apr 1, 2022
  • Informed consent form · Jan 7, 2022

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — We will share this data after it has been de-identified. We will share data beginning around 6 months after publication and for up to 36 months afterward. Access will only be shared with those who have obtained prior IRB approval to be able to access this data.

Supporting information: Sap, Csr

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 26, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05890586
Lead sponsor
Susanna Naggie, MD
Collaborators
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Responsible party
Susanna Naggie, MD (Associate Professor of Medicine, Duke University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jun 6, 2023
Start date
Jun 8, 2021
Primary completion
Jul 4, 2022
Completion
Sep 4, 2022
Results posted
Aug 2, 2023
Last update
Sep 26, 2023

Study contacts

Susanna Naggie, MD
principal investigator · Duke Clinical Research Institute
Adrian Hernandez, MD
principal investigator · Duke Clinical Research Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion