An interventional study of Double Standards and Self-criticism avatar in Self-Criticism, sponsored by University Medical Center Groningen. Completed at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 17 Years to 30 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-17.
Sponsored by University Medical Center Groningen · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The purpose of this study is to investigate two independent Virtual Reality interventions for self-criticism and self-compassion and the use of perspective-change in these interventions.
The current study will use two novel Virtual Reality (VR) exercises that will be investigated through two independent sub-studies. First of all, an exercise that uses the CBT (Cognitive Behavioral Therapy) technique called 'Double standards'. People with excessive self-criticism often set higher standards for themselves, which makes them more critical towards themselves. A way to distance from this, to enable a more nuanced reflection, is to ask the patient what they would say to a friend having those same negative thoughts about themselves. Doing this utilizing a role play in a realistic VR environment of which the avatar has the characteristics of a friend, the effect could be even stronger. Furthermore, VR offers the chance to switch perspectives, in which the participants receive their own compassionate comments from the perspective of the friend, and experience themselves as a good friend.
The second exercise, 'Self-criticism avatar', has common grounds with the (two-)chair exercises of schema therapy and the voice dialogue method in which a patient enters a dialogue between one's inner voices. In the VR exercise, the participant will be able to choose a virtual character with a voice that represents their own inner critic and that gives them their own self-criticism. By assertively and strictly speaking up to the inner critic, after which the virtual character becomes smaller and smaller until it backs down, the participant can experience a sense of control over their self-criticism, which leaves more room for self-compassion. A discussion with the inner critic enables a more nuanced image with more self-compassion. The switch in perspective after the role-play allows the participant to see himself/herself speaking assertively to the avatar, which can strengthen the increase in self-compassion and decrease in self-criticism.
Switching of perspectives is a relatively new technique within VR, that can be of added value to regular psychological therapies. Regular psychological therapies use switching of perspectives by switching roles in a physical role-play between a therapist and a patient or in a group. Furthermore, imaginative switches of perspective are used in, for example, schema therapy or imagery rescripting. Even though this can bring new insight into another perspective, it is not possible to replay the role play where the participant can see himself/herself from someone else's perspective. This is, however, possible through VR.
The current study will investigate the two beforementioned VR exercises using two independent sub-studies, to determine whether they contribute to self-compassion and if the switch in perspective is of added value. This will be done by comparing two conditions for each VR exercise; one with a switch in perspective and one without a switch in perspective. The study aims to answer the following research questions:
University Medical Center Groningen is the lead sponsor of 609 studies on the registry; 174 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
The intervention (two role-plays), however without using a perspective change afterwards.
Behavioral: Double Standards · Behavioral: Self-criticism avatar
The intervention (two role-plays) with a perspective change after each role-play.
Behavioral: Double Standards · Behavioral: Self-criticism avatar
We created a VR intervention based on the Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) technique 'double standards'. In the intervention the participants have to respond to a virtual character they imagine as their friend, who expresses similar self-criticism as they struggle with themselves. Two role-plays are played in Virtual Reality (either with or without perspective change after the role-plays). In the perspective change condition, the perspective is changed with the virtual friend (second person perspective).
We created a VR intervention called 'Self-criticism avatar' that has common ground with two-chair dialogue. Participants have to assertively respond to their inner critic who criticizes them using their own self-critical thoughts. After responding assertively (for example: 'Go away, I don't need you', 'Good is good enough'), the virtual character becomes weaker until they give up. Two role-plays are played in Virtual Reality (either with or without perspective change after the role-plays). In the perspective change condition, the perspective is changed with a bystander (third person perspective).
Self-Criticism and Self-Compassion Scales (SCCS) - Change in Self-Criticism
Levels of state self-criticism as measured by the SCCS. The questionnaire consists of five scenarios that could induce self-critical and/or self-compassionate reactions. For the self-criticism scale, participants indicate on a 7-point Likert scale (1= not at all to 7= highly) to what extent they would react towards themselves in a contemptuous, critical, and harsh manner (range 15-105, higher scores reflect more self-criticism).
Time frame: Right before (Timepoint 1) and directly after (Timepoint 2) the +/- 60 minute intervention
Self-Criticism and Self-Compassion Scales (SCCS) - Change in Self-Compassion
Levels of state self-compassion as measured by the SCCS. The questionnaire consists of five scenarios that could induce self-critical and/or self-compassionate reactions. For the self-compassion scale, participants indicate on a 7-point Likert scale (1= not at all to 7= highly) to what extent they would react towards themselves in a reassuring, soothing, and compassionate manner (range 15-105, higher scores reflect more self-compassion).
Time frame: Right before (Timepoint 1) and directly after (Timepoint 2) the +/- 60 minute intervention
Change in negative affect
Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) measuring negative affect with three questions (range 0-100 for each question, higher scores reflect a higher negative affect)
Time frame: Right before (Timepoint 1) and directly after (Timepoint 2) the +/- 60 minute intervention
Change in positive affect
Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) measuring positive affect with three questions (range 0-100 for each questions, higher scores reflect a higher positive affect)
Time frame: Right before (Timepoint 1) and directly after (Timepoint 2) the +/- 60 minute intervention
Change in self-compassion and self-esteem
Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) measuring self-compassion and self-esteem with six questions (range 0-100 for each question, higher scores reflect higher self-compassion and self-esteem)
Time frame: Right before (Timepoint 1) and directly after (Timepoint 2) the +/- 60 minute intervention
Demographics
Age, gender and whether they've received psychological treatment in past/present
Time frame: Screening
Forms of Self-Criticizing/Attacking and Self-Reassuring Scale (FSCRS)
Trait levels of self-compassion and self-criticism as measured by the FSCRS. This questionnaire consists of 22 questions divided over 3 scales: 'Inadequate Self scale' (range 0-36, where higher scores reflect more self-criticism), 'Hated self' (range 0-20, where higher scores reflect more excessive self-criticism) and 'Reassured Self' (range 0-32, where higher scores reflect more self-compassion). Each question is answered on a 5-point Likert Scale (0= not at all like me; 4= extremely like me).
Time frame: Screening
Evaluation questions
A questionnaire asking participants what they thought of the intervention, consisting of nine questions answered on a 7-point Likert scale (with 1= strongly disagree and 7= strongly agree).
Time frame: Directly after the +/- 60 minute intervention (Timepoint 2)
Igroup Presence questionnaire (IPQ)
A questionnaire measuring presence in VR. The IPQ consists of 14 items that measure 3 subscales ('Spatial Presence', 'Involvement' and 'Experienced Realism') and has 1 item that measures the general 'sense of being there'. Participants answer the questions on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from -3 to +3.
Time frame: Directly after the +/- 60 minute intervention (Timepoint 2)
Schema Mode Inventory, short version (SMI)
A questionnaire measuring the presence of 14 different schema modes (based on schema therapy). The questionnaire consists of 118 questions which participants answer on a 6 point Likert-scale (1= never/rarely, 6= always).
Time frame: Right before the +/- 60 minute intervention (Timepoint 1)
Suicide Probability Scale - Suicide Ideation
A questionnaire that measures the probability of suicide. For our study, we only included questions that measure the Suicide Ideation scale of the questionnaire. This scale consists of 8 questions that are answered on a 4-point Likert scale (0=Never/rarely to 3= Almost always/always). The range for the subscale Suicide Ideation is 0-24, where higher scores reflect more suicide ideation.
Time frame: Right before the +/- 60 minute intervention (Timepoint 1)
Plan to share: No — The data that support the findings of this study are available from Marit Hidding, upon reasonable request.
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University Medical Center Groningen