ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05880095ENSATIUpdated Mar 27, 2026

Healthy Aging Through Time- Restricted Eating in Adults With Overweight/Obesity and Incipient Liver Disease: ENSATI

An interventional study of Unrestricted Mediterranean diet and Energy-reduced Mediterranean diet in Biological Aging, sponsored by IMDEA Food. Completed at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 55 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-27.

Sponsored by IMDEA Food · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
176
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
55 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effect of a time-restricted eating (TRE) regimen on hallmarks of aging, in comparison with traditional caloric restriction and an unrestricted diet in adults with overweight/obesity.

Investigators aim to assess:

  1. If TRE is sustainable over 6-months.
  2. If TRE positively affects metabolism and body composition
  3. If TRE improves circadian rhythm/sleep.
  4. If TRE benefits cognitive function, mood and quality of life (QoL).
  5. If these beneficial effects are associated with changes in molecular hallmarks of aging.

Participants will be randomly allocated to:

  • an unrestricted Mediterranean diet group (MedD)
  • a energy-reduced Mediterranean diet group (MedD_RC)
  • or to an unrestricted Mediterranean diet with TRE group (MedD_TRE)

Intervention will be maintained for 6 months, and there will be an additional 6-months period of follow-up to assess the maintenance of the intervention without supervision.

Changes from baseline in phenotypic and molecular hallmarks of aging, including: chronobiology, quality of life, cognition, metabolism and epigenetics among groups over the follow-up will be analyzed.

Read the detailed description

Aging has been defined as the time-dependent functional decline that affects most living organisms, and this biological process occurs with great variability from person to person. Healthy aging refers to developing and maintaining functional abilities to enable the well-being of the elderly. Therefore, promoting healthy aging strategies in the population would result in people living in a healthy state for most of their lifespan. This would have an important socio-economic impact, considering that aging is a risk factor for multiple diseases and that the proportion of older persons continues to increase. Interestingly, healthy lifestyle habits such as proper nutrition and physical exercise could attenuate the progression of aging-related diseases and ameliorate age-related decline. Among the lifestyle interventions that could improve healthspan, time restricted eating (TRE) is a promising candidate. TRE is a type of intermittent fasting that involves time-limited consumption of food during a specific time window. This dietary intervention has a demonstrated positive impact on some aspects of health both in pre-clinical models and clinical trials. The beneficial effects of TRE can occur at different physiological levels that are related to healthy aging, such as metabolism and body composition, circadian rhythms and sleep, and cognitive function. However, the mechanisms through which TRE may influence these aspects are not fully understood. Therefore, and considering current evidence pointing to a beneficial effect of TRE on health, the hypothesis is that an intervention with TRE in overweight/obese individuals has a positive impact on their aging determinants (metabolism and body composition, circadian rhythms and sleep, quality of life, and cognitive function) which is associated with favorable changes in cellular traits of aging (autophagy, immunosenescence, and biological age). This is a controlled, randomized, parallel group intervention trial to assess the effect of TRE, in comparison with traditional caloric restriction and unrestricted diet on phenotypic and molecular aging parameters.

02

Conditions studied

  • Biological Aging

Keywords

  • Clinical trial
  • Time-restricted eating
  • Healthy aging
  • Epigenetics
  • Obesity
  • Precision nutrition
  • Autophagy
  • Metabolism
03

In context

Intermittent Fasting

333 studies on the registry are indexed under Intermittent Fasting; 99 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 176 is above the median of 50 across 320 interventional studies indexed under Intermittent Fasting.

Browse Intermittent Fasting studies →

Lead sponsor

IMDEA Food is the lead sponsor of 17 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
55 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • : 27-35 Kg/m2
  • Prevalent fatty liver disease (FLI > 59 or echography screening) EASL, Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, 2016.
  • Habitual daily eating window ≥ 14 h
  • Regular sleeping patterns (7 ± 2 sleeping hours every day)
  • Stable weight during the last 3 months (weight changes ≤ 4 Kg)
  • Not considering changes in thei physical activity in the following 6 months
  • Not being under a weight-loss program or medication.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-menopausal women
  • Alcohol abuse (CAGE score > 2, Ewing, 1984; Malet et al. 2005)
  • Change in smoking habits in the previous 6 months.
  • Prevalent renal, cardiovascular, liver (excluding fatty liver), endocrine o pancreatic disease.
  • Type 1 diabetes
  • Type 2 diabetes with poor glucose control.
  • Poorly control hypertension.
  • Medical treatment affecting weight or sleep.
  • Food allergies or intolerances affecting the adherence to the intervention.
  • Eating disorders.
  • Shift workers.
  • Participants of other studies.
  • Social factors affecting to the adherence to the intervention (being institutionalized, unable to ingest solid food).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
176 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Unrestricted Mediterranean diet (MedD)

    The aim of this group is to serve as control group. Participants will be advised to adhere to a traditional Mediterranean diet

    Other: Unrestricted Mediterranean diet

  • Experimental
    Energy-reduced Mediterranean diet (MedD_RC)

    The aim of this group is to allow the comparison between a traditional caloric restriction approach and a time-restricted eating program without caloric restriction.

    Other: Energy-reduced Mediterranean diet

  • Experimental
    Mediterranean diet with time-restricted eating (MedD_TRE)

    This is the intervention group designed to asses the main hypothesis.

    Other: Mediterranean diet with time-restricted eating

Interventions

  • OtherUnrestricted Mediterranean diet

    Participants will received nutritional educational information to encourage their adherence to a Mediterranean dietary pattern. Neither caloric restriction nor time-eating restriction will be indicated.

    Also known as: MedD

  • OtherEnergy-reduced Mediterranean diet

    Participants will follow a Mediterranean diet with a 25% caloric restriction. Participants will be provided with dietary programs, menus, shopping lists and other educational material to encourage adherence to the intervention.

    Also known as: MEdD_RC

  • OtherMediterranean diet with time-restricted eating

    Participants will follow the same dietary guidelines given to MedD group, but they must to adjust their daily meals to a self-selected 10-hour eating window. This 10h eating window of their choice should be comprised between 6.00 to 20.00h. Participants will be allowed to consume water and non-caloric drinks during the fasting period (outside the 10h eating window). Participants will be advised to follow the 10h TRE during weekdays and weekends.

    Also known as: MedD_TRE

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in participant's meal timing measured by questionnaires.

    Daily time of the eating window (hours) and the daily fasting period (hours) willk be assesed through questionniares to record the meal time every day.

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Change from baseline in participant's postprandial glucose levels

    Glucose levels will be continuously monitores with glucose sensors. Glucose levels (mg/dL) 30, 60, 120 and 240 minutes after meals will be recorded.

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Change from baseline in fat mass measured by bioimpedance

    % of fat mass will be recorded by bioimpedance

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Change from baseline in muscle mass measured by bioimpedance

    % of muscle mass will be recorded by bioimpedance

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. Change from baseline in the blood concentration of metabolites as measured by MNR

    MNR will be used to quantified the concentration of metabolites in blood and urine samples

    Time frame: 12 months

  6. Change from baseline in chronotype assessed by the morningness/eveningness (MEQ)questionnaire

    The chronotype classification from extreme morning phenotype to extreme evening phenotype will be assessed by the MEQ questionnaires and changes in classification from baseline will be assessed

    Time frame: 12 months

  7. Change from baseline in sleep quality as measured with the Pittsburg's questionnaire

    The scores obtained in Pittsburg's questionnaires in each visit will be compared with the baseline scores with mixes linear models. The score ranges from 0 to 20. Higher scores in the Pittsburg's questionnaire means worse sleeping quality.

    Time frame: 12 months

  8. Changes form baseline in cognitive function scores measured by the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT).

    The scores obtained in RAVLT in each visit will be compared with the baseline scores with mixes linear models. The raw scores are corrected by age group and shown as percentil score. Higher percentile means better performance in the test.

    Time frame: 12 months

  9. Changes form baseline in cognitive function scores measured by STROOP color and Word test.

    The T scores obtained in the STROOP test in each visit will be compared with the baseline scores with mixes linear models. Scores range from 20 to 80. Higher scores means better cognitive performance.

    Time frame: 12 months

  10. Changes from baseline in the Emotional Eating Questionnaire.

    Changes in the classification from emotional eater to non-emotional eater will be compared among visits.

    Time frame: 12 months

  11. Changes from baseline in anxiety scores measured by the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale

    The anxiety scores obtained in each visit will be compared with the baseline scores with mixes linear models. Higher anxiety scores means higher degree of anxiety feeling. The score ranges from 0 to 56. A score of 17 or less indicates mild anxiety severity. A score from 18 to 24 indicates mild to moderate anxiety severity. Lastly, a score of 25 to 30 indicates a moderate to severe anxiety severity.

    Time frame: 12 months

  12. Changes from baseline in mood scores measured by the EVEA Scale for Mood Assessment.

    The 0-10 scores obtained in the sadness-depression, anxiety, anger/hostility and cheerfulness domains in each visit will be compared with the baseline scores with mixed linear models. Higher scores in each domains means a higher magnitude of the corresponding feeling. Scores range form 0 to 10.

    Time frame: 12 months

  13. Changes from baseline in health-related quality of life measured by the SF-36 questionnaire

    The scores obtained in the different domains of the health-related quality of life questionnaire, and in the aggregated physical and mental component will be recorded and compared between visits with mixes linear models. Normalized scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores meaning better quality of life.

    Time frame: 12 months

  14. Changes from baseline in well-being measured by the W-BQ12 questionnaire.

    The total scores obtained in the well-being questionnaire in each visit will be compared with the baseline scores with mixes linear models. Scores range from 0 to 36 and higher score means better perception of well-being.

    Time frame: 12 months

  15. Changes from baseline in the accumulation of autophagy vacuoles

    The dynamics of autophagy will be measured through the analysis of accumulation of autophagy vacuoles in participant's T lymphocytes and changes in the number of vacuoles comparing with baseline will be analyzed by mixed linear models.

    Time frame: 12 months

  16. Changes from baseline in biological age measured by the Horvath's DNAmPhenoage algorithm

    DNA methylation will be quantified with Illumina Infinium EPIC V2.0 array and the change in methylation levels will be combined with changes in phenotypic features included in teh DNAmPhenoage algorithm. Changes comparing with baseline will be analyzed by mixed linear models.

    Time frame: 12 months

  17. Changes from baseline in the percentage of senescent T cells

    Percentage of senescent T cells will be assessed by FACS using CD3 as T lymphocyte marker and CD28 as marker of senescent T cells. Percentage of senescent T cells will be calculated as the (nº of senecent T cells / Total T cells)\*100. Changes from baseline will be analyzed by mixed linear models

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • IMDEA Food
    Madrid, Madrid 28049, Spain
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Codified data and samples would be made available to other researchers upon request to the principal investigator.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 27, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05880095
Lead sponsor
IMDEA Food
Collaborators
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Spain, CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y la Nutrición
Responsible party
Lidia Daimiel Ruiz (Principal Investigator, IMDEA Food) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 30, 2023
Start date
Jul 5, 2023
Primary completion
Mar 15, 2026
Completion
Mar 15, 2026
Last update
Mar 27, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion