An interventional study of transcranial magnetic stimulation in Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, sponsored by Florida State University. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 30 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-25.
Sponsored by Florida State University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science
The objective of this study is to examine the effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) on the prefrontal cortex and posterior parietal cortex.
The Comprehensive Control Task (CCT) was designed to examine hierarchical control in a single, well-controlled factorial task. On each trial, participants view a letter surrounded by a colored shape at a particular screen location. Color cues the relevant feature, letter or location, for a block of trials. The first trial of a block requires a decision of whether the stimulus is the first position of a circular sequence (sequence start). Subsequent trials require a decision of whether the viewed stimulus follows the previous stimulus in a circular sequence (sequence 1-back). The letter sequence (T-A-B-L-E-T) and spatial sequence (Top-Bottom Right-Left-Right-Bottom Left-Top) are difficulty-matched.
Shape cues the task to perform. Squares indicate the standard baseline task, and each block begins and ends with baseline trials. Different shapes indicate sub-tasks. In Switching blocks, shape-switches (e.g. from square to circle or circle to square) cue the sequence start task. Shape-repeats cue the sequence 1-back task. In Planning blocks, triangle shapes indicate that the stimulus can be ignored (automatic "no" response). All the while, the last square-shaped stimulus must be retained as a reference for the next square-shaped stimulus. Finally, in Dual blocks, diamond shapes indicate switching (sequence start) and also planning. The reversion back to square shapes requires sequence matching to the distal, previous square.
The design is factorial with stimulus-domain x contextual control x temporal control orthogonally manipulated. Full details of the CCT have been previous described in Nee \& D'Esposito, 2016; 2017.
The focus in this study will be comparison of FPl-TMS, MFG-TMS, and S1-TMS in an interleaved fMRI-TMS-fMRI design. The logic is to test the apical status of the FPl/MFG through the extent to which TMS impacts other PFC areas and behavior.
Each experiment will begin with 1 session of the CCT with fMRI to localize PFC targets. Each participant will then perform 3 counter-balanced sessions wherein a different site will be targeted by TMS followed immediately by fMRI on the CCT.
Florida State University is the lead sponsor of 241 studies on the registry; 46 are open to participants now.
Of its 15 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 9 (60%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Transcranial magnetic stimulation to the lateral frontal pole. 600 pulses delivered in 50 Hz bursts every 5 Hz for 2 seconds repeated every 10 seconds at 80% of active motor threshold.
Device: transcranial magnetic stimulation
Transcranial magnetic stimulation to the middle frontal gyrus. 600 pulses delivered in 50 Hz bursts every 5 Hz for 2 seconds repeated every 10 seconds at 80% of active motor threshold.
Device: transcranial magnetic stimulation
Transcranial magnetic stimulation to the primary somatosensory cortex. 600 pulses delivered in 50 Hz bursts every 5 Hz for 2 seconds repeated every 10 seconds at 80% of active motor threshold.
Device: transcranial magnetic stimulation
Transcranial magnetic stimulation delivered to the scalp targeting specific brain structures via stereotactic guidance.
PFC-PPC Effective Connectivity
effective connectivity among areas of the prefrontal and posterior parietal cortex in the blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal assessed with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) \[note, this measure has no units, but effective connectivity is a rate measure, so is expressed in Hertz\]
Time frame: baseline, pre-intervention and immediately after intervention (5 minutes to 1 hour post-TMS)
PFC-PPC Activation
blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal in areas of the prefrontal and posterior parietal cortex assessed with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) \[note, this measure has no units\]
Time frame: baseline, pre-intervention and immediately after intervention (5 minutes to 1 hour post-TMS)
Temporal Control Performance (Error Rate)
behavioral performance (error rate) on conditions involving temporal control in the comprehensive control task
Time frame: baseline, pre-intervention and immediately after intervention (5 minutes to 1 hour post-TMS)
Contextual Control Performance (Error Rate)
behavioral performance (error rate) on conditions involving contextual control in the comprehensive control task
Time frame: baseline, pre-intervention and immediately after intervention (t minutes to 1 hour post-TMS)
Temporal x Contextual Control Performance (Error Rate)
behavioral performance (error rate) of the interaction of temporal and contextual control in the comprehensive control task
Time frame: baseline, pre-intervention and immediately after intervention (5 minutes to 1 hour post-TMS)
Temporal Control Performance (Reaction Time)
behavioral performance (reaction time in milliseconds) on conditions involving temporal control in the comprehensive control task
Time frame: baseline, pre-intervention and immediately after intervention (5 minutes to 1 hour post-TMS)
Contextual Control Performance (Reaction Time)
behavioral performance (reaction time in milliseconds) on conditions involving contextual control in the comprehensive control task
Time frame: baseline, pre-intervention and immediately after intervention (5 minutes to 1 hour post-TMS)
Temporal x Contextual Control Performance (Reaction Time)
behavioral performance (reaction time in milliseconds) on the interaction between temporal control and contextual control in the comprehensive control task
Time frame: baseline, pre-intervention and immediately after intervention (5 minutes to 1 hour post-TMS)
| Milestone | MFG-TMS Then FPl-TMS Then S1-TMS | MFG-TMS Then S1-TMS Then FPl-TMS | FPl-TMS Then MFG-TMS Then S1-TMS | FPl-TMS Then S1-TMS Then MFG-TMS | S1-TMS Then MFG-TMS Then FPl-TMS | S1-TMS Then FPl-TMS Then MFG-TMS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Started | 6 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 8 |
| Completed | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Not completed | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Withdrew: Tms intolerance | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
effective connectivity among areas of the prefrontal and posterior parietal cortex in the blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal assessed with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) \[note, this measure has no units, but effective connectivity is a rate measure, so is expressed in Hertz\]
| Hertz | FPl-TMS | MFG-TMS | S1-TMS |
|---|---|---|---|
| MFG Efferent Connectivity Overall Magnitude | 0.2177 ± 0.0268 | 0.2248 ± 0.0336 | 0.1911 ± 0.0317 |
| MFG Efferent Connectivity to Temporal Control Areas Magnitude | 0.3157 ± 0.0331 | 0.3168 ± 0.0533 | 0.3153 ± 0.038 |
| MFG Efferent Connectivity to Contextual Control Areas Magnitude | 0.1198 ± 0.0369 | 0.1327 ± 0.0497 | 0.067 ± 0.0446 |
| FPl Efferent Connectivity Overall Magnitude | 0.0738 ± 0.0239 | 0.0653 ± 0.0303 | 0.1078 ± 0.0293 |
| FPl Efferent Connectivity to Temporal Control Areas Magnitude | 0.1212 ± 0.0899 | 0.0865 ± 0.0717 | 0.0992 ± 0.0828 |
| FPl Efferent Connectivity to Contextual Control Areas Magnitude | 0.0508 ± 0.0345 | 0.0479 ± 0.0397 | 0.0946 ± 0.0396 |
| FPl Efferent Connectivity to Sensorimotor Control Areas Magnitude | 0.0952 ± 0.0396 | 0.0964 ± 0.042 | 0.156 ± 0.0579 |
| MFG Efferent Connectivity Overall Magnitude Change from Baseline | 0.008 ± 0.032 | 0.015 ± 0.0189 | -0.0186 ± 0.0185 |
| MFG Efferent Connectivity to Temporal Control Areas Magnitude Change from Baseline | -0.0056 ± 0.0264 | -0.0045 ± 0.0306 | -0.006 ± 0.0314 |
| MFG Efferent Connectivity to Contextual Control Areas Magnitude Change from Baseline | 0.0216 ± 0.0602 | 0.0346 ± 0.031 | -0.0311 ± 0.0291 |
| FPl Efferent Connectivity Overall Magnitude Change from Baseline | -0.00089 ± 0.0204 | -0.0093 ± 0.0318 | 0.0332 ± 0.0234 |
| FPl Efferent Connectivity to Temporal Control Areas Magnitude Change from Baseline | -0.0228 ± 0.0718 | -0.0575 ± 0.0476 | -0.0449 ± 0.0681 |
| FPl Efferent Connectivity to Contextual Control Areas Magnitude Change from Baseline | 0.0121 ± 0.0251 | 0.0092 ± 0.0403 | 0.0559 ± 0.028 |
| FPl Efferent Connectivity to Sensorimotor Control Areas Magnitude Change from Baseline | -0.0178 ± 0.0282 | -0.0166 ± 0.0348 | 0.043 ± 0.0508 |
blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal in areas of the prefrontal and posterior parietal cortex assessed with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) \[note, this measure has no units\]
| No Unit | FPl-TMS | MFG-TMS | S1-TMS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall BOLD | 0.1649 ± 0.019 | 0.174 ± 0.0177 | 0.1721 ± 0.0198 |
| Overall BOLD in Temporal Control Subsystem | 0.0796 ± 0.0257 | 0.0958 ± 0.0199 | 0.1021 ± 0.0209 |
| Overall BOLD in Contextual Control Subsystem | 0.2405 ± 0.0275 | 0.239 ± 0.024 | 0.2402 ± 0.0282 |
| Overall BOLD in Sensorimotor Control Subsystem | 0.1748 ± 0.0162 | 0.1871 ± 0.0198 | 0.1738 ± 0.0199 |
| Temporal Control BOLD in Temporal Control Subsystem | 0.2512 ± 0.0382 | 0.2482 ± 0.0351 | 0.26 ± 0.0414 |
| Temporal Control BOLD in Contextual Control Subsystem | 0.1159 ± 0.0325 | 0.1414 ± 0.0305 | 0.1039 ± 0.0377 |
| Temporal Control BOLD in Sensorimotor Control Subsystem | -0.0366 ± 0.0247 | -0.0044 ± 0.0223 | -0.0043 ± 0.0264 |
| Contextual Control BOLD in Temporal Control Subsystem | 0.1324 ± 0.0429 | 0.0525 ± 0.0388 | 0.1156 ± 0.042 |
| Contextual Control BOLD in Contextual Control Subsystem | 0.3907 ± 0.0422 | 0.2856 ± 0.0445 | 0.3423 ± 0.0489 |
| Contextual Control BOLD in Sensorimotor Control Subsystem | 0.2846 ± 0.0221 | 0.2389 ± 0.0372 | 0.2328 ± 0.0283 |
| Temporal x Contextual Control BOLD in Temporal Control Subsystem | -0.1448 ± 0.0334 | -0.0133 ± 0.0347 | -0.0692 ± 0.0339 |
| Temporal x Contextual Control BOLD in Contextual Control Subsystem | 0.2149 ± 0.0369 | 0.2899 ± 0.0316 | 0.2748 ± 0.0369 |
| Temporal x Contextual Control BOLD in Sensorimotor Control Subsystem | 0.2762 ± 0.0296 | 0.3269 ± 0.0293 | 0.2929 ± 0.033 |
| Overall BOLD Change from Baseline | 0.0318 ± 0.0152 | 0.0409 ± 0.0154 | 0.0389 ± 0.017 |
| Overall BOLD in Temporal Control Subsystem Change from Baseline | 0.0164 ± 0.0199 | 0.0326 ± 0.0169 | 0.039 ± 0.0166 |
| Overall BOLD in Contextual Control Subsystem Change from Baseline | 0.0459 ± 0.0202 | 0.0444 ± 0.0233 | 0.0457 ± 0.0247 |
| Overall BOLD in Sensorimotor Control Subsystem Change from Baseline | 0.0331 ± 0.0124 | 0.0455 ± 0.0144 | 0.0322 ± 0.0154 |
| Temporal Control BOLD in Temporal Control Subsystem Change from Baseline | -0.0335 ± 0.043 | -0.0365 ± 0.0326 | -0.0247 ± 0.0299 |
| Temporal Control BOLD in Contextual Control Subsystem Change from Baseline | 0.0632 ± 0.0409 | 0.0887 ± 0.0314 | 0.051 ± 0.0353 |
| Temporal Control BOLD in Sensorimotor Control Subsystem Change from Baseline | 0.0364 ± 0.03 | 0.0686 ± 0.0233 | 0.0686 ± 0.0285 |
| Contextual Control BOLD in Temporal Control Subsystem Change from Baseline | 0.1002 ± 0.0298 | 0.0202 ± 0.0379 | 0.0833 ± 0.0427 |
| Contextual Control BOLD in Contextual Control Subsystem Change from Baseline | 0.0423 ± 0.0236 | -0.0628 ± 0.0482 | -0.0061 ± 0.0448 |
| Contextual Control BOLD in Sensorimotor Control Subsystem Change from Baseline | 0.0084 ± 0.0165 | -0.0373 ± 0.0327 | -0.0434 ± 0.03 |
| Temporal x Contextual Control BOLD in Temporal Control Subsystem Change from Baseline | -0.0173 ± 0.0349 | 0.1141 ± 0.0347 | 0.0582 ± 0.0284 |
| Temporal x Contextual Control BOLD in Contextual Control Subsystem Change from Baseline | 0.0323 ± 0.0367 | 0.1073 ± 0.0324 | 0.0922 ± 0.0372 |
| Temporal x Contextual Control BOLD in Sensorimotor Control Subsystem Change from Baseline | 0.0546 ± 0.0288 | 0.1052 ± 0.0223 | 0.0713 ± 0.0222 |
behavioral performance (error rate) on conditions involving temporal control in the comprehensive control task
| Percentage of errors | FPl-TMS | MFG-TMS | S1-TMS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Difference between high and low temporal control trials error roate | 3.6774 ± 0.7965 | 4.6272 ± 0.8695 | 3.9773 ± 0.932 |
| Difference between high and low temporal control sub-task trial error rate | -0.9785 ± 0.628 | 0.0688 ± 0.5453 | -0.7576 ± 0.5464 |
| Difference between high and low temporal control return trial error rate | 8.3333 ± 1.5957 | 9.1856 ± 1.6764 | 8.7121 ± 1.9221 |
| Difference between high and low temporal control trials error rate relative to baseline | -0.4939 ± 0.8229 | 0.4559 ± 1.0711 | -0.1941 ± 0.9148 |
| Difference between high and low temporal control sub-task trial error rate relative to baseline | -0.0156 ± 0.6639 | 1.0317 ± 0.6544 | 0.2053 ± 0.518 |
| Difference between high and low temporal control return trial error rate relative to baseline | -0.9722 ± 1.4047 | -0.1199 ± 2.1866 | -0.5934 ± 1.711 |
behavioral performance (error rate) on conditions involving contextual control in the comprehensive control task
| Percent Errors | FPl-TMS | MFG-TMS | S1-TMS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Difference between high and low contextual control trial error rate | 7.7178 ± 1.2148 | 4.7408 ± 0.8493 | 5.7449 ± 1.2389 |
| Difference between high and low contextual control sub-task trial error rate | 2.5568 ± 0.6332 | 2.3794 ± 0.4384 | 2.399 ± 0.6224 |
| Difference between high and low contextual control return trial error rate | 12.8788 ± 2.303 | 7.1023 ± 1.51 | 9.0909 ± 2.1519 |
| Difference between high and low contextual control trial error rate relative to baseline | 1.1336 ± 1.1381 | -1.8434 ± 0.8927 | -0.8393 ± 1.1115 |
| Difference between high and low contextual control sub-task trial error rate relative to baseline | 0.0828 ± 0.6901 | -0.0946 ± 0.5645 | -0.075 ± 0.6446 |
| Difference between high and low contextual control return trial error rate relative to baseline | 2.1843 ± 2.1215 | -3.5922 ± 1.5391 | -1.6035 ± 1.9302 |
behavioral performance (error rate) of the interaction of temporal and contextual control in the comprehensive control task
| Percentage Errors | FPl-TMS | MFG-TMS | S1-TMS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interaction contrast of temporal and contextual control on error rate | -0.2367 ± 0.9101 | -0.4449 ± 0.8262 | -0.5051 ± 1.0789 |
| Interaction contrast of temporal and contextual control on error rate on sub-task trials | 2.5568 ± 0.5682 | 2.0457 ± 0.551 | 2.5884 ± 0.5051 |
| Interaction contrast of temporal and contextual control on error rate on return trials | -3.0303 ± 1.9015 | -2.9356 ± 1.7413 | -3.5985 ± 2.168 |
| Interaction contrast of temporal and contextual control on error rate relative to baseline | 0.2806 ± 0.825 | 0.0724 ± 0.8132 | 0.0122 ± 0.9786 |
| Interaction contrast of temporal and contextual control on error rate on sub-task trials vs baseline | 0.8515 ± 0.6016 | 0.3404 ± 0.513 | 0.8831 ± 0.6663 |
| Interaction contrast of temporal and contextual control on error rate on return trials vs baseline | -0.2904 ± 1.4981 | -0.1957 ± 1.6377 | -0.8586 ± 1.7872 |
behavioral performance (reaction time in milliseconds) on conditions involving temporal control in the comprehensive control task
| Milliseconds | FPl-TMS | MFG-TMS | S1-TMS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Difference between high and low temporal control trial reaction time | 14.7162 ± 12.6302 | 1.3866 ± 13.0687 | 2.3381 ± 14.4946 |
| Difference between high and low temporal control sub-task trial reaction time | -49.5445 ± 12.9196 | -49.5869 ± 14.5006 | -65.4566 ± 13.2162 |
| Difference between high and low temporal control return trial reaction time | 78.977 ± 19.9733 | 52.3601 ± 17.9037 | 70.1329 ± 23.4219 |
| Difference between high and low temporal control trial reaction time relative to baseline | 17.1732 ± 11.8695 | 3.8436 ± 10.8624 | 4.7951 ± 12.1586 |
| Difference between high and low temporal control sub-task trial reaction time relative to baseline | 22.1352 ± 10.4356 | 22.0929 ± 11.3812 | 6.2231 ± 7.7173 |
| Difference between high and low temporal control return trial reaction time relative to baseline | 12.2112 ± 18.1079 | -14.4056 ± 17.8138 | 3.3671 ± 21.5217 |
behavioral performance (reaction time in milliseconds) on conditions involving contextual control in the comprehensive control task
| Milliseconds | FPl-TMS | MFG-TMS | S1-TMS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Difference between high and low contextual control trial reaction time | 223.8835 ± 13.897 | 196.5144 ± 16.5796 | 207.0607 ± 12.3121 |
| Difference between high and low contextual control sub-task trial reaction time | 185.165 ± 11.2663 | 151.2204 ± 12.6028 | 172.9899 ± 13.9 |
| Difference between high and low contextual control return trial reaction time | 262.6019 ± 22.2582 | 241.8084 ± 24.9603 | 241.1315 ± 19.2476 |
| Difference between high and low contextual control trial reaction time relative to baseline | -8.7656 ± 14.3625 | -36.1347 ± 17.6706 | -25.5884 ± 12.5704 |
| Difference between high and low contextual control sub-task trial reaction time relative to baseline | -20.5084 ± 11.4171 | -54.453 ± 13.4582 | -32.6835 ± 11.8063 |
| Difference between high and low contextual control return trial reaction time relative to baseline | 2.9771 ± 22.6942 | -17.8164 ± 28.1807 | -18.4993 ± 20.0323 |
behavioral performance (reaction time in milliseconds) on the interaction between temporal control and contextual control in the comprehensive control task
| Milliseconds | FPl-TMS | MFG-TMS | S1-TMS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interaction contrast of temporal control x contextual control trials on reaction time | 73.9891 ± 17.2049 | 62.1515 ± 11.3344 | 73.5031 ± 12.0316 |
| Interaction contrast of temporal control x contextual control sub-task trials on reaction time | 174.2524 ± 18.1531 | 157.9577 ± 15.4228 | 161.0199 ± 13.3624 |
| Interaction contrast of temporal control x contextual control return trials on reaction time | -26.2741 ± 27.3581 | -33.6546 ± 18.6431 | -14.0137 ± 21.2459 |
| Interaction contrast of temporal control x contextual control trials on reaction time vs baseline | 14.056 ± 17.9829 | 2.2184 ± 10.6303 | 13.5699 ± 11.4938 |
| Interaction contrast of temporal control x contextual control sub-task trials on RT vs baseline | 2.6641 ± 15.6154 | -13.6306 ± 14.4518 | -10.5684 ± 12.8136 |
| Interaction contrast of temporal control x contextual control return trials on RT vs baseline | 25.4479 ± 25.721 | 18.0674 ± 15.353 | 37.7083 ± 21.3244 |
Collected over From enrollment until end of participation, up to 6 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| FPl-TMS | 0/37 (0%) | 0/37 (0%) | 4/37 (10.8%) |
| MFG-TMS | 0/34 (0%) | 0/34 (0%) | 1/34 (2.9%) |
| S1-TMS | 0/35 (0%) | 0/35 (0%) | 0/35 (0%) |
| Event | FPl-TMS | MFG-TMS | S1-TMS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scalp discomfortSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | 4/37 | 1/34 | 0/35 |
| Age, Categorical(Participants) | MFG-TMS Then FPl-TMS Then S1-TMS | MFG-TMS Then S1-TMS Then FPl-TMS | FPl-TMS Then MFG-TMS Then S1-TMS | FPl-TMS Then S1-TMS Then MFG-TMS | S1-TMS Then MFG-TMS Then FPl-TMS | S1-TMS Then FPl-TMS Then MFG-TMS | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <=18 years | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 6 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 39 |
| >=65 years | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Age, Continuous(years) | MFG-TMS Then FPl-TMS Then S1-TMS | MFG-TMS Then S1-TMS Then FPl-TMS | FPl-TMS Then MFG-TMS Then S1-TMS | FPl-TMS Then S1-TMS Then MFG-TMS | S1-TMS Then MFG-TMS Then FPl-TMS | S1-TMS Then FPl-TMS Then MFG-TMS | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 19.5 (18 to 22) | 20 (18 to 23) | 20 (18 to 23) | 19.67 (18 to 22) | 19.6 (18 to 21) | 20 (18 to 25) | 19.8 (18 to 25) |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | MFG-TMS Then FPl-TMS Then S1-TMS | MFG-TMS Then S1-TMS Then FPl-TMS | FPl-TMS Then MFG-TMS Then S1-TMS | FPl-TMS Then S1-TMS Then MFG-TMS | S1-TMS Then MFG-TMS Then FPl-TMS | S1-TMS Then FPl-TMS Then MFG-TMS | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 4 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 7 | 29 |
| Male | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 10 |
| Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | MFG-TMS Then FPl-TMS Then S1-TMS | MFG-TMS Then S1-TMS Then FPl-TMS | FPl-TMS Then MFG-TMS Then S1-TMS | FPl-TMS Then S1-TMS Then MFG-TMS | S1-TMS Then MFG-TMS Then FPl-TMS | S1-TMS Then FPl-TMS Then MFG-TMS | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 |
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Black or African American | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| White | 4 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 24 |
| More than one race | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | MFG-TMS Then FPl-TMS Then S1-TMS | MFG-TMS Then S1-TMS Then FPl-TMS | FPl-TMS Then MFG-TMS Then S1-TMS | FPl-TMS Then S1-TMS Then MFG-TMS | S1-TMS Then MFG-TMS Then FPl-TMS | S1-TMS Then FPl-TMS Then MFG-TMS | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hispanic or Latino | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| Not Hispanic or Latino | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 32 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: Yes — Behavioral and imaging data will be shared
Supporting information: Analytic code
This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Florida State University