An observational study in Stress Fracture, sponsored by Ryan Kruse. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-01.
Sponsored by Ryan Kruse · Observational
The primary purpose of this study is to determine whether or not there is a correlation between MRI and ultrasound for the diagnosis of lower limb stress injuries. Patients that are seen at the University of Iowa Sports Medicine Center with a suspected diagnosis of a lower limb stress injury will be recruited. These patients will undergo a diagnostic ultrasound of the affected region prior to undergoing an MRI of that region. Then, the ultrasound findings will be compared to the MRI findings to determine if a correlation exists.
23 studies on the registry are indexed under Fractures, Stress; 4 are open to participants now.
Browse Fractures, Stress studies →This is the only study on the registry with Ryan Kruse as lead sponsor.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
25 patients ages 18-50 with a suspected diagnosis of a lower limb stress injury (specifically of the tibia or metatarsal) will be recruited. Patients will excluded if they have a prior history of stress fracture or fracture in the affected limb at the region on concern.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion criteria:
-Prior history of stress fracture or fracture in the affected limb at the region of concern.
US correlation to MRI
Time frame: 1 year
Ran from Feb 2021 to primary completion in Apr 2024, 37 months.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.