CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05856942HOT4PrEPUpdated May 10, 2024

Hybrid Evaluation of a Home-based HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Program

An interventional study of Health service - home-based PrEP monitoring in HIV Prevention, Pre-exposure Prophylaxis and STI, sponsored by University of Washington. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-10.

Sponsored by University of Washington · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Mar 2025, 1 year 7 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Registered 1 year after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2022, registered Apr 2023).
  • Started Mar 2022; still recruiting 4 years 7 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
458
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study's aim is to implement a home-based PrEP (HB-PrEP) monitoring system (self-collected blood and extragenital specimens at home and telehealth follow-up) into a large, urban sexual health clinic while also evaluating the program's clinical effectiveness. Study participants will self-collect blood specimens using Tasso devices, which are currently designated as FDA Class 2 exempt medical devices (similar to a medical lancet). This study will be integrated into King County's Ending the HIV Epidemic plan and generate data to inform refinement, adaptation and scale-up of future HB-PrEP programs.

Specific research aims are to:

  1. Conduct a hybrid randomized trial to compare the impact of a HB-PrEP program versus standard of care (routine in-clinic monitoring) on PrEP retention over time and use mixed-methods assessments to define the factors that influence HB-PrEP implementation. Hypothesis: HB-PrEP will increase PrEP retention rates by >10% at 18 months and 60% of those offered HB-PrEP will use it for over half of visits.
  2. Perform a cost analysis of the HB-PrEP implementation strategy compared to standard care. Hypothesis: HB-PrEP cost will fall within the HIV prevention budget and be affordable with comparable costs to SOC.
  3. Develop a qualitative tool to engage healthcare stakeholders and determine the wider scalability of HB-PrEP.
Read the detailed description

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an established and effective method for HIV prevention, but lack of access to PrEP providers and the burden of quarterly monitoring visits remain barriers to PrEP uptake and retention, particularly for people of color and younger men who have sex with men (MSM). Home-based PrEP (HB-PrEP) monitoring could unburden medical systems and increase PrEP access, but whether this remote care option improves key clinical outcomes like PrEP retention is not known.

The study's specific aims are to:

  • AIM 1: Evaluate the impact of HB-PrEP on PrEP retention and define the factors that influence HB-PrEP implementation. The investigators will conduct a type 1 hybrid randomized controlled trial comparing HB-PrEP as an implementation strategy (self-collected lab specimens from home and telehealth follow-up) to standard of care (SOC) at the Public Health-Seattle \& King County (PHSKC) Sexual Health Clinic (SHC). The study's primary outcome will be effectiveness of the implementation strategy measured as the rate of retention in PrEP care. In secondary analyses, investigators will utilize mixed methods to assess reach (proportion of persons offered HB-PrEP who choose to use it), and examine individual-level barriers and facilitators (B\&F) to PrEP retention (participant surveys and interviews) and system-level B\&F to HB-PrEP implementation (participant surveys and interviews, PHSKC staff interviews). Hypothesis: HB-PrEP will increase PrEP retention rates by >10% at 18 months and 60% of those offered HB-PrEP will use it for over half of visits.
  • AIM 2: Perform a cost analysis of HB-PrEP service implementation at the PHSKC SHC compared to SOC. Investigators will track resource use and prospectively collect unit costs for laboratory fees, healthcare worker time and other clinic resources to estimate the total monthly cost of providing HB-PrEP services overall and the monthly cost per person retained in PrEP care in the HB-PrEP and SOC arms. Hypothesis: HB-PrEP cost will fall within the HIV prevention budget and be affordable with comparable costs to SOC.
  • AIM 3: Conduct a HB-PrEP scale-up assessment with healthcare organizations (HCO) and other key stakeholders to determine the scalability of HB-PrEP within Washington State. To evaluate institution-level factors that may impede or facilitate statewide HB-PrEP scale-up, investigators will conduct semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders from a countywide EHE HCO collaborative.

The Aim 1 study is a pragmatic, non-blinded, hybrid type 1 (clinical-implementation) RCT and includes mixed-methods assessments to evaluate both qualitative and quantitative data for the primary and secondary outcomes. Aim 3 is a qualitative study using in-depth interviews.

02

Conditions studied

  • HIV Prevention
  • Pre-exposure Prophylaxis
  • STI

Keywords

  • Implementation science
  • PrEP
  • Screening
  • Telehealth
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Washington is the lead sponsor of 1,397 studies on the registry; 225 are open to participants now.

Of its 154 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 132 (86%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Must be eligible to receive PrEP per PHSKC criteria
  • Age ≥18 years
  • Washington State resident
  • Ability to speak, understand and read/write in English or Spanish
  • Willing to provide contact information
  • Willing to be randomized and adhere to study procedures

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Recent (\<4 weeks) "high risk" HIV exposure while off PrEP or symptoms of acute HIV
  • No mailing address to receive sampling kits
  • No working telephone number
  • No smartphone or other device with internet access
  • History of a bleeding disorder, or current or recent (≤7 days) use of anticoagulant medications
  • Pregnancy
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
458 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Standard care

    Patients will receive standard PrEP care in the clinic including in-person visits for triannual (every 4 months) HIV \& STI screening and comprehensive sexual health care.

  • Experimental
    Home-based care

    Patients will have the option to complete their PrEP care from home including 1) self-collection of blood specimens for HIV, syphilis and creatinine; 2) self-swabs for extragenital GC/CT screening; and 3) telehealth follow-up. A maximum of two triannual follow-up visits per year may be conducted remotely; one visit per year must be in person. Participants also have the option to attend visits in person and are otherwise eligible to continue receiving comprehensive sexual health services in the clinic.

    Other: Health service - home-based PrEP monitoring

Interventions

  • OtherHealth service - home-based PrEP monitoring

    Home-based PrEP care

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. PrEP retention

    Proportion of participants who successfully complete triannual monitoring tests and visits to receive a renewed PrEP prescription

    Time frame: 18 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Reach

    Proportion of patients who successfully utilize home-based monitoring for at least 50% of triannual visits over the study period

    Time frame: 18 months

  2. User satisfaction

    Self-reported satisfaction with the assigned PrEP care strategy on Likert scale (1: very satisfied to 5: very dissatisfied)

    Time frame: Every 4 months up to 16 months and at study exit (on/after 18 months)

  3. PrEP adherence

    Self-reported adherence within prior 4 weeks to self-selected PrEP use strategy (daily vs event-driven PrEP); ordinal self-reported adherence scale from excellent to very poor

    Time frame: Every 4 months up to 16 months and at study exit (on/after 18 months)

  4. Time to action on abnormal results

    Time from receipt and review of abnormal monitoring or HIV/STI results to patient notification

    Time frame: Every 4 months up to 16 months and at study exit (on/after 18 months)

  5. STI positivity rate

    Composite asymptomatic STI (syphilis, gonorrhea, chlamydia) rate

    Time frame: Every 4 months up to 16 months and at study exit (on/after 18 months)

  6. Barriers and facilitators of PrEP retention

    In-depth interviews with study participants and clinic staff/administrators to understand B\&F of PrEP retention

    Time frame: Every 4 months starting at month 4 until target of 24 reached

  7. Cost

    "Real world" costs of PrEP delivery and retention in each arm (total dollars spent per individual retained on PrEP per month)

    Time frame: Month 12 through study completion, an average of 6 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • University of Washington
    Seattle, Washington 98195, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Cannon CA, Ramchandani MS, Golden MR. Feasibility of a novel self-collection method for blood samples and its acceptability for future home-based PrEP monitoring. BMC Infect Dis. 2022 May 13;22(1):459. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07432-0. PubMed 35562692 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 10, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05856942
Lead sponsor
University of Washington
Collaborators
Tasso Inc.
Responsible party
Chase Cannon (Assistant Professor, School of Medicine, University of Washington) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 12, 2023
Start date
Mar 8, 2022
Primary completion
Mar 8, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 8, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
May 10, 2024

Study contacts

Chase Cannon, MD, MPH
Contact
ccannon5@uw.edu
206-744-4393
Chase Cannon, MD, MPH
principal investigator · University of Washington

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion