CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05856123Updated Oct 22, 2025Results posted

A Study to Evaluate SimPull for Lateral Patient Transfer

An interventional study of SimPull Lateral Transfer Device and Survey in Lateral Patient Transfer, sponsored by Mayo Clinic. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-10-22.

Sponsored by Mayo Clinic · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this research is to test an investigational device called SimPull to see if it is a more efficient method of transferring a patient from one bed to another compared to that of current methods. The purpose of this research is to gather information on the safety and effectiveness of the SimPull device.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lateral Patient Transfer
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Mayo Clinic is the lead sponsor of 3,218 studies on the registry; 670 are open to participants now.

Of its 445 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 313 (70%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients requiring lateral transfer for an invasive cardiac procedure to and from gurney to exam table.
  • Patients requiring lateral transfer for an invasive cardiac procedure to and from exam table to gurney.
  • Patient does not have compound fractures or cervical fractures present.
  • Patient does not have skin damage or open wounds to the dorsal cavity.
  • Patient or legally authorized representative (LAR) must be able/present to sign consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who do not require lateral transfer for an invasive cardiac procedure to and from gurney to exam table.
  • Patients who do not require lateral transfer for an invasive cardiac procedure to and from exam table to gurney.
  • Patient has compound fractures or cervical fractures present.
  • Patient has skin damage or open wounds to the dorsal cavity.
  • Patient or legally authorized representative (LAR) are unable/present to sign consent.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Group 1: Standard of Care Transfer

    After cardiac catheterization lab or electrophysiology lab procedure, the subject will be moved from one bed to another using the current standard of practice lateral patient transfer methods by nursing staff.

  • Experimental
    Group 2: SimPull Device Transfer

    After cardiac catheterization lab or electrophysiology lab procedure, the subject will be moved from one bed to another using the SimPull device.

    Device: SimPull Lateral Transfer Device

  • Active comparator
    Group 3: Clinicians

    Study clinicians complete a survey after conducting intervention or standard of care on participants.

    Other: Survey

Interventions

  • DeviceSimPull Lateral Transfer Device

    Automated lateral transfer device

  • OtherSurvey

    Complete Survey

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to Complete Lateral Transfer

    The average total time (minutes) it took to complete a lateral transfer.

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. The Number of Staff Involved in a Transfer

    The average number of staff members engaged during transfers

    Time frame: Baseline

  3. Average Weight of Participants

    The average weight (kilograms) of participants who underwent a lateral transfer

    Time frame: Baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Clinician Satisfaction

    Number of survey responses where clinicians indicated they were satisfied with the transfer method

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. The Number of Survey Responses From Clinicians Who Indicated They Were Very Likely to Experience Injury During Transfers

    Measured by a post transfer survey where clinicians indicated how likely they feel they are to be injured during lateral patient transfer using standard transfer methods versus SimPull on a scale of "Not at all likely", "Not likely", "Neutral", "Likely", or "Very Likely."

    Time frame: Baseline

07

Results

Posted Oct 22, 2025

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneGroup 1: Standard of Care TransferGroup 2: SimPull Device TransferGroup 3: Clinicians
Started50507
Completed50507
Not completed000

Outcome measures

PrimaryTime to Complete Lateral Transfer

The average total time (minutes) it took to complete a lateral transfer.

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Time to Complete Lateral Transfer
minutesGroup 1: Standard of Care TransferGroup 2: SimPull Device Transfer
Time to Complete Lateral Transfer33.40 ± 121.404.094 ± 1.688
PrimaryThe Number of Staff Involved in a Transfer

The average number of staff members engaged during transfers

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Mean · staff members
The Number of Staff Involved in a Transfer
staff membersGroup 1: Standard of Care TransferGroup 2: SimPull Device Transfer
The Number of Staff Involved in a Transfer4.98 ± 0.874.92 ± 0.88
PrimaryAverage Weight of Participants

The average weight (kilograms) of participants who underwent a lateral transfer

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Mean · kilograms
Average Weight of Participants
kilogramsGroup 1: Standard of Care TransferGroup 2: SimPull Device Transfer
Average Weight of Participants86.24 ± 20.2389.47 ± 22.57
SecondaryClinician Satisfaction

Number of survey responses where clinicians indicated they were satisfied with the transfer method

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Count of units · Survey Responses
Clinician Satisfaction
Survey ResponsesGroup 3: Clinicians
Standard of Care-subject moved using the standard of practice lateral patient transfer methods44
SimPull Device Transfer-subject moved using the SimPull automated lateral transfer device40
SecondaryThe Number of Survey Responses From Clinicians Who Indicated They Were Very Likely to Experience Injury During Transfers

Measured by a post transfer survey where clinicians indicated how likely they feel they are to be injured during lateral patient transfer using standard transfer methods versus SimPull on a scale of "Not at all likely", "Not likely", "Neutral", "Likely", or "Very Likely."

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Count of units · Survey Responses
The Number of Survey Responses From Clinicians Who Indicated They Were Very Likely to Experience Injury During Transfers
Survey ResponsesGroup 3: Clinicians
Standard of Care-subject moved using the standard of practice lateral patient transfer methods0
SimPull Device Transfer-subject moved using the SimPull automated lateral transfer device2

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were collected from the time of informed consent through study completion, approximately 1 hour.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Group 1: Standard of Care Transfer0/50 (0%)0/50 (0%)0/50 (0%)
Group 2: SimPull Device Transfer0/50 (0%)0/50 (0%)0/50 (0%)
Group 3: Clinicians———

Baseline characteristics

Group 3 was not enrolled in the study. They participated in the evaluation of this intervention as providers. This group did not receive the study intervention nor standard of care, and no demographic data was collected from this group. Only data from Group 1 and Group 2 is reported.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Group 1: Standard of Care TransferGroup 2: SimPull Device TransferTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years333467
>=65 years171633
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Group 1: Standard of Care TransferGroup 2: SimPull Device TransferTotal
Female131730
Male373370
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Group 1: Standard of Care TransferGroup 2: SimPull Device TransferTotal
Count of participants——0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Group 1: Standard of Care TransferGroup 2: SimPull Device TransferTotal
United States5050100
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Mayo Clinic Arizona
    Phoenix, Arizona 85054, United States
09

References and documents

Related links

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · May 15, 2024

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 22, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05856123
Lead sponsor
Mayo Clinic
Collaborators
The Patient Company, LLC
Responsible party
Deanna L. Covelli (Principal Investigator, Mayo Clinic) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 12, 2023
Start date
Nov 16, 2023
Primary completion
Aug 14, 2024
Completion
Aug 14, 2024
Results posted
Oct 22, 2025
Last update
Oct 22, 2025

Study contacts

Deanna Covelli, MSN, RN
principal investigator · Mayo Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion