An observational study in Falls-Risk, sponsored by University of Wisconsin, Madison. Completed at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-05.
Sponsored by University of Wisconsin, Madison · Observational
The purpose of the overall study to evaluate implementation-related outcomes of a falls-risk clinical decision support (CDS) system using patient electronic health records (EHR) data to automatically screen and identify older adult ED patients at high risk of future falls and allowing ED clinicians to place referral orders to the UW Health Mobility and Falls clinic. This CDS tool has already been implemented at the UWHC ED, and will be additionally implemented at The American Center and Swedish American Hospital EDs (all QI initiatives) over the next two years. This study involves engaging a sample of referred patients from each site to gather their perspectives on the delivery of the referral in the ED, their experiences in making and completing appointments at the Falls Clinic (if applicable), and perceived benefits of the intervention overall.
The aim of this study is to assess perceptions and implementation-related outcomes for the automated screening and referral tool based upon the experiences of older adult patients receiving the referral (or who could be eligible for the referral) at each of the three ED sites, including identifying reasons why some referred patients do not schedule or attend appointments as a result of the referral order.
Phone interviews will be conducted with a minimum of 12 referred patients per each of the 3 ED sites, approximately half of whom scheduled and completed a Falls Clinic visit, and half whom declined or did not complete an appointment. Interview questions include a mix of verbally-delivered Likert-type rating scales and open-ended questions evaluating their experience of the referral process (e.g., verbal communication, written information received), appropriateness of the CDS screening tool, and perceived value of the intervention for preventing falls.
Additionally, in person interviews will be conducted with a minimum of 10 patients each at the American Center and Swedish American Hospital sites prior to implementation of the intervention at these sites. These will be conducted among patients aged 65 and older who are in the emergency department and likely to be discharged. These interviews will be aimed at collecting patient input necessary to adapt the design of the intervention at these sites. Interview questions will include open-ended questions evaluating the perceived value of the the intervention for preventing falls as well as potential barriers and facilitators to completing the intervention at these sites. Interviews will be conducted by ED staff trained and experienced in research data collection in the ED to minimize interruption of clinical workflows. In consultation with provider teams, interviewers will time interviews to avoid clinical interventions, and will pause research activities while any clinical care is taking place.
University of Wisconsin, Madison is the lead sponsor of 1,161 studies on the registry; 182 are open to participants now.
Of its 151 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 114 (75%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
ED patients age 65 or older
For In-person interviews in the ED:
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients age 65 and Older identified by the automated system as being high-risk of future falls, and subsequently referred to the UW Health Mobility and Falls Clinic by the ED provider at discharge
Other: Patient Phone Interviews
Patients age 65 and Older identified by the automated system as being high-risk of future falls, and subsequently referred to the UW Health Mobility and Falls Clinic by the ED provider at discharge
Other: Patient Phone Interviews
Patients aged 65 and older who are in the emergency department and likely to be discharged.
Other: Patient In Person Interviews
Collecting perceptions about automated falls-risk screening and referral tool
Interviews will be aimed at collecting patient input necessary to adapt the design of the intervention at these sites.
Qualitative Measure to Summarize Reasons Patients Did Not Schedule or Attend Appointments Based on Referral
Participant responses will be coded to identify themes. Participant counts will be reported.
Time frame: up to 30 months
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Wisconsin, Madison