CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05834647Updated Apr 28, 2023

Efficacy and Safety of Prilocaine 2% and Lidocaine 5% Hyperbaric Against Spinal Anesthesia in Post Cystoscopy Procedure

A Phase 4 interventional study of Prilocaine 2% and Hyperbaric Lidocaine 5% in Anesthesia; Reaction and Anesthesia, sponsored by Universitas Sebelas Maret. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-04-28.

Sponsored by Universitas Sebelas Maret · Phase 4, Interventional, and Diagnostic

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Apr 2023), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
45
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Regional anesthesia is defined as the temporary removal of nerve conduction and pain in certain areas of the body with local anesthetic drugs without causing loss of consciousness. Spinal anesthesia can provide better analgesia and shorter recovery time in urological procedures resulted in shorter operating times, lower postoperative pain, lower analgesic requirements, and shorter length of stay (LOS) compared to the general anesthesia. Lidocaine is an attractive regional anesthesia drug for ambulatory surgery since it has a rapid onset and rapid recovery from motor and sensory block. However, when it is compared with other local anesthetic agents, the use of lidocaine in spinal anesthesia is associated with an increased risk of transient neurologic symptoms, thus impeding its application to outpatient spinal anesthesia. Lidocaine is more neurotoxic than other local anesthetic agents, especially when high concentrations are applied directly to nervous tissue. Another local anesthetic agent can be used is prilocaine. It has medium potency, rapid duration, and rapid onset of action. Compared with lidocaine, prilocaine has a lower incidence of neurological symptoms in spinal anesthesia for outpatient surgery, and suitable as an alternative to long-acting low-dose local anesthetics. Therefore, the investigators intend to observe the efficacy and safety of these two agents in adult patients who will undergo cystoscopy procedure using spinal anesthesia. In this study the investigators used high-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hs-CRP) and high-sensitive Troponin (hs-Troponin). CRP is a systemic inflammation marker associated with conditions such as pain. Troponin can represent patient's kidney function since its metabolism and excretion are affected by changes of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Previous study also showed that the use of spinal anesthesia can reduce the incidence of acute kidney injury. Therefore, the investigators aim to carry out further examination of the following two markers regarding to spinal anesthesia using lidocaine and prilocaine.

Read the detailed description

The investigators will conduct a double-blind randomized controlled trial to compare hs-CRP and hs-Troponin levels between prilocaine 2% and hyperbaric lidocaine 5% in adult patients undergoing cystoscopy procedure with spinal anesthesia. This study was approved by the Health Research Ethics Committee (Institutional Review Board) of Dr. Moewardi General Hospital Surakarta. Before randomization, participants who are eligible based on inclusion and exclusion criteria will be given informed consent. If the patients agree, the patient will be included in this research. Ninety adult patients will be randomly divided into control group and treatment group. Control group (group L) will be given 1 mL hyperbaric lidocaine 5% (50 mg) and treatment group (group P) will be given 2.5 mL prilocaine 2% (50 mg) as spinal anesthesia. The investigators will measure hs-CRP serum levels and hs-Troponin serum levels as the primary outcome. Serum levels of hs-CRP dan hs-Troponin will be measured 4 hours postoperative.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anesthesia; Reaction
  • Anesthesia

Keywords

  • hs-CRP
  • Troponin
  • Regional Anesthesia
  • Cystoscopy procedure
  • Lidocaine
  • Prilocaine
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Universitas Sebelas Maret is the lead sponsor of 25 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients who will undergo cystoscopy procedure with spinal anesthesia
  2. Patients age between 18-60 years
  3. Normal BMI according to WHO (World Health Organization) classification (18.5-24.9 kg/m2)
  4. Physical status ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) I or ASA II according to the ASA Physical Status Classification System by the American Society of Anesthesiologists in 2020.
  5. Do not have a history of disease, medication, and medical procedures related to coronary heart disease
  6. There are no absolute contraindications for spinal anesthesia
  7. Do not take non-steroidal analgesics and steroids within 2 weeks before surgery.
  8. Do not have history and treatment of Diabetes Mellitus.
  9. Willing to participate in research and sign informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Has been or will be included in other research.
  2. Have a direct relative with the research team.
  3. Known or suspected to HIV infection.
  4. History of hypersensitivity to prilocaine or lidocaine.
  5. Patients with impaired renal, hepatic, cardiac rhythm, neurologic function, myopathy, thrombocytopenia (\<100,000/mL), and coagulopathy (international normalized ratio >1.5)
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
45 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group P

    Drug: prilocaine 2% Dosage : 50 mg prilocaine 2% (2.5 mL volume)

    Drug: Prilocaine 2%

  • Active comparator
    Group L

    Drug: hyperbaric lidocaine 5% Dosage : 50 mg hyperbaric lidocaine 5% (1 mL volume)

    Drug: Hyperbaric Lidocaine 5%

Interventions

  • DrugPrilocaine 2%

    50 mg prilocaine 2% (2.5 mL volume) before undergoing cystoscopy procedure

    Also known as: Takipril

  • DrugHyperbaric Lidocaine 5%

    50 mg Hyperbaric Lidocaine 5% (1.0 mL volume) before undergoing cystoscopy procedure

    Also known as: Lidodex

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. hs-CRP serum level

    hs-CRP serum concentration will be measured using particle enhanced immunoturbidimetry method as indicator of inflammatory biomarker resulted from pain due to surgery.

    Time frame: 4 hours postoperative

  2. hs-Troponin serum level

    Serum hs-Troponin at 4 hours postoperative \[ Time Frame: 4 hours postoperative \] hs-Troponin serum concentration will be measured using Enzyme-Linked Fluorescent Assay (ELFA) method as indicator of kidney injury comparing lidocain 5% hyperbaric and prilocaine 2%

    Time frame: 4 hours postoperative

Secondary outcomes

  1. Full regression of sensory block

    Full regression of sensory block, defined as the duration (in minutes) between intrathecal drug injection and appearance of first pain sensation reported by patients and will be confirmed by using Visual Analogue Scale. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is a 10 cm or 100 mm line with anchor statements on the left scale 0 represents no pain and on the right scale 10 (or 100) represents an extreme pain. The patient is asked to mark their current pain level on the line. The examiner scores the VAS by measuring the distance in either centimeters (0 to 10) or millimeters (0 to 100) from the "no pain" anchor point.

    Time frame: Through Study Completion, an average of 1 day

  2. Duration of PACU (Post-Anaesthesia Care Unit) stay

    Duration of PACU stay in minutes based on Bromage scale. Patients will be discharged from PACU if Bromage Scale \<2. Bromage scale is most commonly used, although this represents only lumbosacral motor fibers and have grading scale as follow: 0 : free movement of legs and feet with 0% blockade 1. : just able to flex knees with free movement of feet with 33% (partial) blockade 2. : unable to flex knee, but with free movement of feet with 66% (almost complete) blockade 3. : unable to move legs or feet with 100% (complete) blockade

    Time frame: Through Study Completion, an average of 1 day

  3. Pain score after cystoscopy procedure

    Pain score after cystoscopy procedure comparing administration of lidocaine 5% hyperbaric and prilocaine 2% using visual analogue scale (VAS) on a 100- mm VAS. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is a 10 cm or 100 mm line with anchor statements on the left scale 0 represents no pain and on the right scale 10 (or 100) represents an extreme pain. The patient is asked to mark their current pain level on the line. The examiner scores the VAS by measuring the distance in either centimeters (0 to 10) or millimeters (0 to 100) from the "no pain" anchor point.

    Time frame: Through Study Completion, an average of 1 day

  4. The incidence of adverse effects of hypotension

    Hypotension will be defined as a systolic blood pressure of \< 90 mmHg or a decrease in mean arterial pressure (MAP in mmHg) of more than 20% from baseline preoperative value. MAP is measured from formula \[(2xsystolic pressure in mmHg) + diastolic pressure in mmHg)\] / 3

    Time frame: Through Study Completion, an average of 1 day

  5. The incidence of adverse effects of bradycardia

    Bradycardia will be defined as heart rate \< 50 beat/min

    Time frame: Through Study Completion, an average of 1 day

  6. The incidence of adverse effects of nausea.

    Nausea will be assessed using (Visual Analogue Scale) VAS score for PONV (Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting). The severity of nausea was divided into four groups based on the VAS scale: 0-1 (no nausea), 1-4 (mild), 4-7 (moderate) and 7-10 (severe).

    Time frame: Through Study Completion, an average of 1 day

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Afari N, Mostoufi S, Noonan C, Poeschla B, Succop A, Chopko L, Strachan E. C-reactive protein and pain sensitivity: findings from female twins. Ann Behav Med. 2011 Oct;42(2):277-83. doi: 10.1007/s12160-011-9297-6. PubMed 21785898 ↗
  • Banerjee D, Perrett C, Banerjee A. Troponins, Acute Coronary Syndrome and Renal Disease: From Acute Kidney Injury Through End-stage Kidney Disease. Eur Cardiol. 2019 Dec 18;14(3):187-190. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2019.28.2. eCollection 2019 Dec. PubMed 31933690 ↗
  • Becker DE, Reed KL. Local anesthetics: review of pharmacological considerations. Anesth Prog. 2012 Summer;59(2):90-101; quiz 102-3. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006-59.2.90. PubMed 22822998 ↗
  • Choi HR, Song IA, Oh TK, Jeon YT. Perioperative C-reactive protein is associated with pain outcomes after major laparoscopic abdominal surgery: a retrospective analysis. J Pain Res. 2019 Mar 27;12:1041-1051. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S187249. eCollection 2019. PubMed 31114292 ↗
  • Ezmek B, Arslan A, Delilbasi C, Sencift K. Comparison of hemodynamic effects of lidocaine, prilocaine and mepivacaine solutions without vasoconstrictor in hypertensive patients. J Appl Oral Sci. 2010 Jul-Aug;18(4):354-9. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572010000400006. PubMed 20835569 ↗
  • Garg P, Morris P, Fazlanie AL, Vijayan S, Dancso B, Dastidar AG, Plein S, Mueller C, Haaf P. Cardiac biomarkers of acute coronary syndrome: from history to high-sensitivity cardiac troponin. Intern Emerg Med. 2017 Mar;12(2):147-155. doi: 10.1007/s11739-017-1612-1. Epub 2017 Feb 11. PubMed 28188579 ↗
  • Hu H, Qin B, He D, Lu Y, Zhao Z, Zhang J, Wang Y, Wang S. Regional versus General Anesthesia for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 2015 May 11;10(5):e0126587. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126587. eCollection 2015. PubMed 25961831 ↗
  • Kato J, Svensson CI. Role of extracellular damage-associated molecular pattern molecules (DAMPs) as mediators of persistent pain. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2015;131:251-79. doi: 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2014.11.014. Epub 2015 Jan 30. PubMed 25744676 ↗
  • Koo CH, Ryu JH. Anesthetic considerations for urologic surgeries. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2020 Apr;73(2):92-102. doi: 10.4097/kja.19437. Epub 2019 Dec 17. PubMed 31842248 ↗
  • Manassero A, Fanelli A. Prilocaine hydrochloride 2% hyperbaric solution for intrathecal injection: a clinical review. Local Reg Anesth. 2017 Mar 31;10:15-24. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S112756. eCollection 2017. PubMed 28408851 ↗
  • Reece AS. High-sensitivity CRP in opiate addiction: relative and age-dependent elevations. Cardiovasc Toxicol. 2012 Jun;12(2):149-57. doi: 10.1007/s12012-012-9154-2. PubMed 22297435 ↗
  • Uher T, Bob P. Neuropathic pain, depressive symptoms, and C-reactive protein in sciatica patients. Int J Neurosci. 2013 Mar;123(3):204-8. doi: 10.3109/00207454.2012.746335. PubMed 23126320 ↗
  • Freda BJ, Tang WH, Van Lente F, Peacock WF, Francis GS. Cardiac troponins in renal insufficiency: review and clinical implications. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Dec 18;40(12):2065-71. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02608-6. PubMed 12505215 ↗
  • Kelley WE, Januzzi JL, Christenson RH. Increases of cardiac troponin in conditions other than acute coronary syndrome and heart failure. Clin Chem. 2009 Dec;55(12):2098-112. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2009.130799. Epub 2009 Oct 8. PubMed 19815610 ↗
  • Kula A, Bansal N. Applications of cardiac biomarkers in chronic kidney disease. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2022 Nov 1;31(6):534-540. doi: 10.1097/MNH.0000000000000829. Epub 2022 Aug 4. PubMed 36004954 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 28, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05834647
Lead sponsor
Universitas Sebelas Maret
Collaborators
Indonesia Endowment Fund for Education
Responsible party
Septian Adi Permana. MD (Staff Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Universitas Sebelas Maret) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 28, 2023
Start date
Aug 1, 2023 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2023 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 28, 2023

Study contacts

Septian A Permana, Intensivist
Contact
septian.adi03@gmail.com
+6281393724000
Ageng Sunjoyo, MD
Contact
ageng.sunjoyo1@gmail.com
+62811250503
Purwoko Purwoko, PhD
principal investigator · Universitas Sebelas Maret

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion