CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05818215Updated Apr 18, 2023

Impact of the Qatar 2022 FIFA World Cup on PED Use and Misuse Patterns

An observational study in Emergencies, Epidemic Disease and Pediatric ALL, sponsored by Pediatric Clinical Research Platform. Completed at 1 site in Switzerland. Open to participants aged Up to 16 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-04-18.

Sponsored by Pediatric Clinical Research Platform · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
18,000
Ages
Up to 16 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A retrospective cohort study to explore the impact of the FIFA World Cup 2022 Qatar on paediatric emergency department attendance at two tertiary centres during unprecedent winter viral epidemics.

Read the detailed description

Earlier studies have reported contradictory relationship between major sporting events and paediatric emergency department attendance. None were conducted during an epidemic surge. The FIFA football World Cup 2022 was held for the first time in its history during the winter period in the northern hemisphere during unprecedented cumulative waves of respiratory syncitial virus (RSV), influenza and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) epidemics.

This study aims to measure the impact of such a global major sporting events on the pattern of paediatric emergency department use and hospital admissions during a peak epidemic season in 2 tertiary hospitals. The study hypothesis was that major sporting events, even during an epidemic peak, can reduce the number of paediatric emergency department visits compared with periods without a sporting event. Major sporting events could serve as a model for identifying human behaviours and patterns leading to paediatric emergency department misuse, in order to develop public health interventions to better rationalise health-seeking behaviours.

02

Conditions studied

  • Emergencies
  • Epidemic Disease
  • Pediatric ALL
  • Electronic Medical Record

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Pediatric Emergency Medicine
  • Emergency Service Hospital
  • Pediatrics
  • Epidemics
  • Respiratory Syncytial Viruses
  • Influenza, Human
  • SARS-CoV-2
  • Sports
03

In context

Emergencies

1,692 studies on the registry are indexed under Emergencies; 333 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 18,000 is above the median of 353 across 714 observational studies indexed under Emergencies.

Browse Emergencies studies →

Lead sponsor

Pediatric Clinical Research Platform is the lead sponsor of 13 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 16 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

All patients under 16 years of age with medical, surgical and traumatology emergencies attending each pediatric emergency department during the study period will be included. This also includes transfer cases from other hospitals, as well as those who leave prematurely without being seen.

Inclusion criteria

  • all patients

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • none
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
18,000 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • All participants

    Data from electronic medical records of all patients under 16 years of age with medical, surgical and traumatology emergencies attending the paediatric emergency departments during the study period

    Other: NO intervention

Interventions

  • OtherNO intervention

    NO intervention

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. PED visits

    Retrospective analysis of number of PED visits (counts).

    Time frame: Institutional electronic medical records analysed retrospectively from October 1st, 2022 to December 31, 2022

Secondary outcomes

  1. Triage acuity score

    Retrospective analysis of number of PED visits (counts) by triage acuity score (coded using the 5-level Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (from level 1 \[resuscitation\] to level 5 \[nonurgent\]).

    Time frame: Institutional electronic medical records analysed retrospectively from October 1st, 2022 to December 31, 2022

  2. Chief complaint

    Retrospective analysis of number of PED visits (counts) by chief complaints.

    Time frame: Institutional electronic medical records analysed retrospectively from October 1st, 2022 to December 31, 2022

  3. Main diagnosis

    Retrospective analysis of number of PED visits (counts) by main diagnosis (coded using the International Classification of Primary Care, 2nd edition \[ICPC-2\], and International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th revision \[ICD-10-GM\]).

    Time frame: Institutional electronic medical records analysed retrospectively from October 1st, 2022 to December 31, 2022

  4. Audience

    Daily television and online media audience collected by the independent, multi-platform Swiss national foundation for media research (Mediapulse AG, Bern, Switzerland).

    Time frame: Analysed retrospectively from October 1st, 2022 to December 31, 2022

  5. RSV incidence

    RSV-incidence estimates among children will be obtained from the anonymised Swiss RSV EpiCH multicentre database. RSV testing uses reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction or rapid antigen test at the point of care.

    Time frame: Analysed retrospectively from October 1st, 2022 to December 31, 2022

  6. Influenza incidence

    Influenza-incidence among children visiting the PED during the study period will be obtained from the institutional electronic medical records. RSV testing on nasopharyngeal swabs uses reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction at the point of care.

    Time frame: Analysed retrospectively from October 1st, 2022 to December 31, 2022

  7. SARS-CoV-2 incidence

    SARS-CoV-2-incidence among children visiting the PED during the study period will be obtained from the institutional electronic medical records. SARS-CoV-2 testing on nasopharyngeal swabs uses reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction at the point of care.

    Time frame: Analysed retrospectively from October 1st, 2022 to December 31, 2022

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Geneva Children's Hospital
    Geneva, Switzerland
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Individual Participant Data will be deidentified and the study investigators will house the data locally on secured servers at the Geneva University Hospitals. The datasets used or analysed during the current trial will be available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Only deidentified/anonymised data will be shared.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 18, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05818215
Lead sponsor
Pediatric Clinical Research Platform
Collaborators
University of Lausanne Hospitals
Responsible party
Johan Siebert, MD (Principal Investigator, Pediatric Clinical Research Platform) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 18, 2023
Start date
Sep 1, 2021
Primary completion
Jan 20, 2023
Completion
Jan 20, 2023
Last update
Apr 18, 2023

Study contacts

Johan N Siebert, MD
study director · Geneva Children's Hospital, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion