ClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT05809154UroLUTSUpdated Jul 9, 2024

Quality, Cost and Treatment Success on Patients With Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction Undergoing Urodynamic Examination

An observational study in Urodynamics, Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms and Neurogenic Bladder, sponsored by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern. Withdrawn. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-09.

Sponsored by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern · Observational

Why this study was withdrawn
Personnel changes
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
0
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD) is a very common complication of urological, gynecological, neurological, metabolic, inflammatory or tumor disease. LUTD is not an inevitable condition, the investigators can help in many ways. Modern clinical examinations like urodynamics allow for patient tailored treatment strategies. Urodynamics however, even if minimal invasive, may lead to urinary tract infections and are very expensive4. Aim of this study is to evaluate in the long-term perspective what patients profit of urodynamic examinations and in what patients the investigators could resign to perform urodynamics in the future and or in what patients the interval of urodynamics could be extended. Main objective is to follow in a long-term prospective cohort study, patients suffering of lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD). In this observational study the investigators will include all patient undergoing clinical routine urodynamic examination to better address what is the normal course of LUTD with and without Treatment. The aim is to have a prospective urodynamics database allowing to answer questions related to urodynamics.

Read the detailed description

Patients with a clinical indication for routine urodynamic assessment will be included in to this prospective cohort study. All standard urodynamic results as well as the treatment decision will be collected. Patients undergoing repeated urodynamic measurements i.e. spinal cord injured patients with yearly assessments will each time be included allowing for long-term and follow up analysis of both disease progress and therapy success.

Bladder function is rather simple: storage and voiding of urine. The control of the urinary bladder on the other hand is very complex with many areas that still remain unclear, as for example the cross play of the central and and autonomous nervous system. Voiding of the bladder is an active process that is controlled by nervous impulses from the central nervous system. The detrusor muscle is contracted, and the urethral sphincter muscle is relaxed at the same time so that the urine can be drained off.

Uroflow examination in combination with post-void residual assessment (by sonography or catheterization) are a simple but powerful screening tool to evaluate bladder function. Since both the uroflow as well as the post-void residual are dependent on the detrusor pressure and the infravesical resistance they do not allow for differentiation between hypocontractile detrusor muscle and infravesical obstruction or a combination of both. To do so, the minimal invasive Urodynamic examination is needed. Cystomanometry for the assessment of the bladder storage phase and a pressure-flow for the assessment of the voiding phase. By a thin transurethral catheter, body warm fluid is filled in to the bladder and at the same time is the intravesical and abdominal pressure traced with a computer system. The pelvic floor muscle activity (i.e. the urethral sphincter muscle) is assessed at the same time using EMG surface electrodes.

For Video-Urodynamics, Contrast agent is mixed in to the body warm infusion solution allowing to judge bladder configuration (i.e. diverticula or trabeculation) and if there is vesico-uretero-renal reflux.

Patients with a clinical indication for routine urodynamic assessment will be included in to this prospective cohort study. All standard urodynamic results as well as the treatment decision will be collected. Patients undergoing repeated urodynamic measurements i.e. spinal cord injured patients with yearly assessments will each time be included allowing for long-term and follow up analysis of both disease progress and therapy success.

Except for urinary tract infections, are complications in urodynamic measurements very rare. The investigators estimate additional complications (like pain or autonomic dysreflexia) in about 1% of urodynamic examinations. To have a minimum of 50 complications, the investigators aim to include about 5000 urodynamic examinations for reliable numbers of each complication, ideally allowing for subgroup analysis.

All patients undergoing clinical routine urodynamic examination will be included, i.e. per year approximately 500 urodynamic measurements and 450 patients (some patients will have multiple measurements per year). With the aim of 5000 included urodynamic examinations the investigators estimate a study duration of 10 years. This has the advantage that the investigators will also have a meaningful average follow-up of at least 5 years or more in patients undergoing annual urodynamic measurements (e.g. spinal cord injured patients).

Descriptive statistics: Data will be presented on interval-scales with median and quartiles or with means and standard deviations summarized. Dichotomic variables will be presented as ratios and percentages.

Univariate analysis: t-test will be used to compare means between groups and Chi-Square for the comparison of dichotomic variables.

Multivariate analysis: To assess the distribution of initial parameters the investigators will use multivariate regression models.

02

Conditions studied

  • Urodynamics
  • Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
  • Neurogenic Bladder

Keywords

  • Urodynamics
  • Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
  • Neurogenic Bladder
03

In context

Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

411 studies on the registry are indexed under Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms; 110 are open to participants now.

Browse Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms studies →

Lead sponsor

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern is the lead sponsor of 737 studies on the registry; 178 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with a clinical indication for routine urodynamic assessment will be included in to this prospective cohort study. All standard urodynamic results as well as the treatment decision will be collected. Patients undergoing repeated urodynamic measurements i.e. spinal cord injured patients with yearly assessments will each time be included allowing for long-term and follow up analysis of both disease progress and therapy success.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants fulfilling all of the following inclusion criteria are eligible for the study:

    • Female and male patients, age >18 years
    • Informed consent
    • Lower urinary tract symptoms
    • Planned clinical routine urodynamic examination

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The presence of any of the following exclusion criteria will lead to exclusion of the participant:

    • Age \<18 years
    • Pregnancy or breast feeding
    • Individuals especially in need of protection (according to Research with Human Subjects published by the Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences https://www.samw.ch/en/Publications/Medical-ethical-Guidelines.html)
    • No informed consent
    • Patients incapable to follow the trial, e.g. because of language problems, psychiatric disorders, dementia and so on.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)
Target follow-up
5 Years
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction

    Lower urinary tract dysfunction due to any neurological condition like spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis and others.

    Diagnostic Test: Video-Urodynamics

  • Non-Neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction

    Lower urinary tract dysfunction in absence of any neurological pathology.

    Diagnostic Test: Video-Urodynamics

  • Chronic pelvic pain

    Chronic pelvic pain as defined by the EAU guidelines.

    Diagnostic Test: Video-Urodynamics

  • Urodynamic normal Bladder function

    Normal urodynamic findings and absence of chronic pelvic pain.

    Diagnostic Test: Video-Urodynamics

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testVideo-Urodynamics

    Minimal invasive Urodynamic examination: Cystomanometry for the assessment of the bladder storage phase and a pressure-flow for the assessment of the voiding phase. By a thin transurethral catheter, body warm fluid is filled in to the bladder and at the same time is the intravesical and abdominal pressure traced with a computer system. The pelvic floor muscle activity is assessed at the same time using EMG surface electrodes.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of voids per 24 hours

    Number of voids per 24 hours

    Time frame: At the urodynamic assessment, up to 24 hours

  2. Number of leakages per 24 hours

    Number of leakages per 24 hours

    Time frame: At the urodynamic assessment, up to 24 hours

  3. Number of used pads per 24 hours

    Number of used pads per 24 hours

    Time frame: At the urodynamic assessment, up to 24 hours

  4. Post void residual (mL)

    Residual urine remaining in the bladder after voiding.

    Time frame: At the urodynamic assessment, up to 10-30 minutes

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cystometric capacity (mL)

    Measured in mL in urodynamics

    Time frame: At the urodynamic assessment, up to 10-30 minutes

  2. Compliance (mL/cmH2O)

    Measured in mL/cmH2O in urodynamics

    Time frame: At the urodynamic assessment, up to 10-30 minutes

  3. Bladder volume (mL) at detrusor overactivity

    Measured in mL in urodynamics

    Time frame: At the urodynamic assessment, up to 10-30 minutes

  4. Maximum detrusor pressure amplitude (cmH2O) at detrusor overactivity

    Measured in cmH2O in urodynamics

    Time frame: At the urodynamic assessment, up to 10-30 minutes

  5. Detrusor leak point pressure (cmH2O)

    Measured in cmH2O in urodynamics

    Time frame: At the urodynamic assessment, up to 10-30 minutes

  6. Maximum detrusor pressure (cmH2O) during storage phase

    Measured in cmH2O in urodynamics

    Time frame: At the urodynamic assessment, up to 10-30 minutes

  7. Maximum detrusor pressure (cmH2O) during voiding phase

    Measured in cmH2O in urodynamics

    Time frame: At the urodynamic assessment, up to 10-30 minutes

  8. Detrusor pressure at maximum flow

    Measured in urodynamics

    Time frame: At the urodynamic assessment, up to 10-30 minutes

  9. Scores in Qualiveen & International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)

    Score value between 0 and a maximum of 35 points. Interpretation: Mild (IPSS\<8), moderate (IPSS=8-19) and severe (IPSS=20-35) symptoms

    Time frame: At the urodynamic assessment, up to 10-30 minutes

  10. Scores in Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)

    The FSFI1 is a 19-item, self-report measure of female sexual function that provides scores on overall levels of sexual function as well as the primary components of sexual function in women, including sexual desire, arousal, orgasm, pain, and satisfaction. To score the measure of 19 Items, the sum of each domain score is first multiplied by a domain factor ratio (0.6 for desire; 0.3 for arousal; 0.3 for lubrication; 0.4 for orgasm; 0.4 for satisfaction; and 0.4 for pain) in order to place all domain totals on a more comparable scale, and then subsequently summed to derive a total FSFI score. The absence of sexual activity or intercourse is not necessarily attributable to sexual dysfunction. proper scoring and interpretation of the measure necessitates: a) inclusion of a distress measure for diagnosing sexual dysfunction clinically, as defined by current standards; and b) correction for sexual activity status and adapted scoring for sexually inactive respondents.

    Time frame: At the urodynamic assessment, up to 10-30 minutes

  11. Number of patients with adverse events grade 1 bis 5 following the National Cancer Institute terminology Vers. 4 (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)

    urodynamic assessment

    Time frame: At the urodynamic assessment, up to 10-30 minutes

  12. International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)

    Based on IIEF, ED severity is classified into five categories: no ED (score 22-25), mild (17-21), mild to moderate (12-16), moderate (8-11), and severe (5-7).

    Time frame: At the urodynamic assessment, up to 10-30 minutes

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — We do not share IPD with other researchers.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Jan 2019.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 18, 2018
First posted
Apr 12, 2023
StartEst.
Jan 1, 2019
Primary completionActual
Jul 3, 2024
CompletionActual
Jul 3, 2024
Last update
Jul 9, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 9, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05809154
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 12, 2023
Start date
Jan 1, 2019 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 3, 2024
Completion
Jul 3, 2024
Last update
Jul 9, 2024

Study contacts

Marc P Schneider, MD, PhD
study chair · Universitätsklinik für Urologie

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Jul 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion