An interventional study of Maxillary sinus augmentation in Histomorphometry, sponsored by Camlog Oral Reconstruction Foundation. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-04-07.
Sponsored by Camlog Oral Reconstruction Foundation · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The present study aimed to compare the histomorphometrically evaluated new bone formation, the radiographically measured graft stability and the clinical implant outcome between maxillary sinuses grafted either with deproteinized porcine bone mineral (DPBM) or deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM). Conclusions: From a clinical point of view, the present results demonstrate that DPBM provides for comparable bone formation and stable graft dimension and high implant success rates combined with healthy peri-implant condition:
Materials and Methods: Thirty maxillary sinuses in 28 participants were initially included and randomly assigned to the test group (TG;DPBM: n=15) or the control group (CG,DBBM: n=15). After a healing period (6 months) bone core biopsies were axially retrieved in the molar site for histological/ histomorphometrical analysis of new bone formations. In addition, radiographically measured graft stability as well as the clinical implant outcome (implant survival/success/peri-implant health) were assessed at the 1-year and 3-year follow-up evaluations.
This is the only study on the registry with Camlog Oral Reconstruction Foundation as lead sponsor.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients received maxillary sinus augmentation grafting with bovine bone mineral
Procedure: Maxillary sinus augmentation
patients received maxillary sinus augmentation grafting with porcine bone mineral
Procedure: Maxillary sinus augmentation
Maxillary sinus grafting with 2 different xenogenic materials
New bone formation
Bone trephine specimen retrieved at implant placement were histomorphometrically analyzed. With special interest % of new bone formation,% of residual graft and % of connective tissue were evaluated and compared between bovine and porcine mineral bone used for sinus grafting.
Time frame: 3 year
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.