CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05799196Updated Apr 5, 2023

The Effectiveness of the Microfracture Technique in the Meniscal Healing

An observational study in Microfractures and Meniscus Tear, sponsored by Hasanuddin University. Status unknown at 1 site in Indonesia. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-04-05.

Sponsored by Hasanuddin University · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Mar 2023), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
62
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Meniscus injuries are a very common cause of knee pain. The meniscus is a semilunar fibrocartilage structure found on the medial and lateral sides of the knee. The meniscus serves to absorb impact and protect the articular cartilage during weight-bearing activities, joint stability, proprioception, and nutrition. This has a significant effect on knee biomechanics.

After the menisci are injured, the biomechanics of the knee change so that degenerative changes occur more frequently in the tibiofemoral compartment. Improvement of tibiofemoral arthrosis after meniscectomy surgery has been demonstrated in several long-term clinical studies. With increasing awareness of the importance of the meniscus in knee biomechanics, various meniscus repair techniques have been developed. In addition, several adjuvants for healing have been proposed to enhance meniscus healing. However, a study showed the meniscal repair failure rate increased from 22% to 24% at 5 years.

Study found the healing rate of meniscus repair, which was accompanied by ACL repair, had a greater healing rate, 93% vs. 50%. Hemarthrosis that occurs after bony tunneling during ACL reconstruction provides a fibrin clot and an environment rich in factors that promote healing of the newly repaired meniscus. The fibrin clot provides the structural foundation for meniscus healing. Transmission factors, such as fibronectin and growth factors, are also present.

Microfracture is a common procedure used for the treatment of damage to the articular cartilage in the knee. This procedure is used to stimulate the production of fibrocartilage in areas of injured cartilage. Microfractures are performed by creating 1 or more small channels (1 to 3 mm in size) that pierce the subchondral bone and release bone-forming components into the joint. Microfractures serve to promote the formation of fibrocartilage over damaged cartilage. Research in 2016 used an animal model (Capra hircus) to investigate the effectiveness of the microfracture technique on meniscus tear healing rates. They found significant healing in meniscal repair accompanied by microfracture technique (65% vs 12%).

However there is still not enough research regarding the efficacy of microfracture in meniscal healing, especially among Indonesian. Therefore, the investigators aim to investigate its efficacy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Microfractures
  • Meniscus Tear

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • meniscus tear
  • microfracture
03

In context

Fractures, Stress

168 studies on the registry are indexed under Fractures, Stress; 41 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 62 is below the median of 95 across 29 observational studies indexed under Fractures, Stress.

Browse Fractures, Stress studies →

Lead sponsor

Hasanuddin University is the lead sponsor of 65 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with meniscus tear in Wahidin Sudirohusodo General Hospital

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  1. Patients with meniscus tears
  2. The patient underwent meniscus repair surgery using arthroscopy.
  3. Have an MRI examination before and after surgery within 6 months post-surgery.

B. Exclusion Criteria

  1. Patients with meniscus tears in the white-white area
  2. The patient underwent meniscus repair surgery without using arthroscopy
  3. The patient did not perform an MRI examination before after surgery within 6 months post-surgery.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
62 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
6 Months
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Microfracture

    The patient with meniscus tear would be performed meniscus repair with additional microfracture

    Procedure: Microfracture

  • Conventional

    The patient with meniscus tear would be performed meniscus repair

    Procedure: Microfracture

Interventions

  • ProcedureMicrofracture

    Microfracture was made in the non-weight bearing chondral to provide the release of MSC and growth factor.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Healing Rate

    Healing Rate, Investigated by MRI and Arthroscopy

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. Healing Rate

    Healing Rate, Investigated by MRI and Arthroscopy

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Functional Outcome

    Functional Outcome assessed with IKDC ScoreFunctional Outcome assessed with IKDC Score. The higher the score, the higher the level of function and the lower the level of symptoms. A score of 100 suggests no limitation with activities of daily living or sports activities and the absence of symptoms.

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. Functional Outcome

    Functional Outcome assessed with IKDC Score. The higher the score, the higher the level of function and the lower the level of symptoms. A score of 100 suggests no limitation with activities of daily living or sports activities and the absence of symptoms.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Hasanuddin University
    Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 5, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05799196
Lead sponsor
Hasanuddin University
Responsible party
Leonard Christianto Singjie (Principal Investigator, Hasanuddin University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 5, 2023
Start date
Mar 31, 2023 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2023 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 5, 2023

Study contacts

Leonard Christianto Singjie, MD
Contact
leonardcs@hotmail.co.id
+6281212609805
Muhammad Sakti, MD, Ph.D
study chair · Hasanuddin University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Mar 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion