CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT05785936DELIGHTUpdated Mar 29, 2023

Immune Response in Desensitized Patients

An observational study in Kidney Transplant Rejection, sponsored by University Hospital, Grenoble. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-03-29.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Grenoble · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Apr 2025, 1 year 5 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
20
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Kidney transplantation is the best treatment for chronic renal failure in terms of morbidity and mortality, quality of life for patients and health economics. Sensitization with anti-Human Leukocyte Antigen antibodies is a barrier to access to transplantation.

Highly-sensitized patients wait 2 to 3 times longer on the waiting list with important health and economic consequences. Desensitization strategies by apheresis techniques allow access to a transplant with a negative crossmatch (absence of specific HLA antibodies against their donor) on the day of the transplant.

The main objective of this study is to assess the impact of desensitization on the antibody memory immune response in highly sensitized patients awaiting kidney transplantation.

The analyses will be based on samples from the 20 patients (10 desensitized transplanted patients, 5 highly sensitized non-desensitized transplanted patients and 5 healthy donors) at the University Hospital of Grenoble, France.

Analyses will include phenotypic and immuno-metabolic analysis by flow cytometry of antibody-secreting cells, a functional analysis by anti HLA ELISpot B technique and histological analysis of post-kidney transplantation follow-up renal biopsies with gene expression mapping (RNA tissue labeling using the Nanostring technique) within the renal parenchyma.

02

Conditions studied

  • Kidney Transplant Rejection

Keywords

  • HLA sensitization
  • Desensitization
  • Antibody secreting cells
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Grenoble is the lead sponsor of 815 studies on the registry; 205 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

15 highly sensitized patients: 10 that received desensitization before kidney transplan tation and 5 that were not desensitized before kidney transplantation.

5 healthy donors

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients (age >18 years) with end-stage renal disease (on hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis or stage V chronic kidney disease) who are candidates for pre-renal transplantation desensitization from living or deceased donors.
  • For women of childbearing age: a plasma pregnancy test before inclusion is mandatory. Highly effective contraception for women of childbearing age is required throughout the study period:
  • combined hormonal contraception (containing estrogen and progestin)
  • contraception associated with ovulation inhibition :

    • oral
    • intravaginal
    • transdermal
  • Progestin-only hormonal contraception associated with ovulation inhibition:

    • oral
    • injectable
    • implantable
  • intrauterine device (IUD) - intrauterine hormone delivery system (IUS)
  • bilateral tubal occlusion
  • vasectomized partner
  • sexual abstinence
  • Have signed the DELIGHT protocol consent.
  • Affiliated to a social security system
  • Can be contacted in case of emergency
  • For the control groups :
  • Healthy controls from blood samples (centrifugation ring) from the French Blood Agency. The use of healthy controls is necessary to compare immunological analyses to a reference group without immunosuppression.
  • Highly sensitized kidney transplant patients without the need for de-immunization. Hyperimmunization is defined by a Panel Reactive Antibody score > 85%. Transplantation can be from deceased or living donors.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who object to the use of their data and/or samples in the research
  • Patients having received an immunosuppressive treatment in the 12 months preceding the inclusion
  • All protected persons: pregnant women, parturients, nursing mothers, persons deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision, persons under legal protection.
  • Subjects in a period of exclusion from another study
  • Subject under administrative or judicial supervision
  • Subject unable to be contacted in case of emergency
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Highly sensitized and desensitized kidney transplanted group

    Patient that were HLA desensitized for kidney transplantation

    Procedure: Desensitization

  • Highly sensitized and non-desensitized kidney transplanted group

    Patient that were not HLA desensitized for kidney transplantation but were highly sensitized and received a kidney graft due to local priority system

  • Healthy donors

Interventions

  • ProcedureDesensitization

    Patients that received apheresis and anti-cluster of differentiation antigen 20 for desensitization priori to kidney transplantation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Flow Cytometry analyses of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells

    Change of the percentage of "antibody secreting cells" (plasmablasts) over time

    Time frame: Before desensitization, at the time of transplantation and Before desensitization, at the time of transplantation and post transplantation

  2. Change in Anti HLA B-cell ELISpot response

    Change in the number of Spot over time

    Time frame: Before desensitization, at the time of transplantation and Month 3, Month 6 and Month 12 post transplantation

  3. Change in Flow Cytometry analyses of medullary cells

    Change in the percentage of "antibody secreting cells" (plasmablasts) over time

    Time frame: The first day of desensitization and at the day of kidney transplantation

  4. Change in analyses of RNA expression on renal histology

    CHange in percentage of gene expression using Nanostring technology

    Time frame: Month1, Month 3 and Month 12 post transplantation

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 29, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05785936
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Grenoble
Responsible party
Noble_Johan, MD (Principal investigator, University Hospital, Grenoble) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 27, 2023
Start date
May 1, 2023 (estimated)
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 30, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 29, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Mar 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion