An observational study in Analgesia and Anesthesia, sponsored by Università degli Studi di Brescia. Completed at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-03-27.
Sponsored by Università degli Studi di Brescia · Observational
The aim of this study is to verify the feasibility of an evaluation of the depth of analgesia during an opioid sparing anesthesia (OSA) carried out with continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine in addition to general multimodal anesthesia trough an instrumental pupillary evaluation.
In recent years, different strategies have been proposed to reduce opioid use during the perioperative period, i.e., the so-called OFA (opioid free anesthesia) or OSA (opioid sparing anesthesia), in order to reduce some opioid-related side effects with equivalent intraoperative analgesia compared to opioid-based anesthesia.
Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective α2-agonist, with sedative and pain-relieving effects. The use of perioperative dexmedetomidine seems to reduce intraoperative opioid and hypnotic consumption, postoperative pain intensity and postoperative opioid use.
A dexmedetomidine-based protocol for anesthesia in obese patients was introduced in our department towards the end of 2018. All patients undergoing bariatric surgery have been treated with a premedication of dexmedetomidine and a steady infusion of dexmedetomidine as an opioid-savings adjuvant during general anesthesia. In this context, the amount of fentanyl (induction of anesthesia) and remifentanil (maintenance of anesthesia) has been reduced empirically and clinically.
Traditionally, during general anesthesia, the level of nociception is indirectly assessed by observing heart rate, blood pressure and surgical steps. In recent years, new indicators have been proposed to obtain an objective and standardized nociception assessment. Pupillary dilation reflex (PDR) can be related to both painful stimulation and analgesic depth, but not to neuromuscular blockade or hypnotic drug administration. Recently, another rating scale for nociception has been proposed: the PPI (pupillary pain index). This index is based on tetanic stimulation of increasing intensity delivered by two skin electrodes placed on the forearm, evaluating the PDR at each stimulus. A PPI from 1 to 3, from 4 to 6, or from 7 to 9 describes a numbed PDR and deep analgesia, a medium PDR and suboptimal analgesia and a highly reactive PDR and uncontrolled pain, respectively.
The investigators proposal is to study the feasibility of an evaluation of the nociception during an Opioid Sparing Anesthesia (OSA), with continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil, vs "traditional" anesthesia without adjuvant, using the PPI as an indicator of nociception.
Università degli Studi di Brescia is the lead sponsor of 46 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Patients underwent no-laparoscopic surgery involving at least one surgical incision of more than 5 cm with remifentanil as an intravenous analgesic.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patient undergoing general anesthesia receving initial administration of dexmedetomidine loading dose of 0.5-1 μg/kg (ADJUSTED weight) over 15 minutes. After intubation maintenance of general anesthesia is administrated with desflurane or sevoflurane (MAC 0.6 - 1, according to Bispectral Index (BIS) or Patient State Index (Psi)), dexmedetomidine (0.2- 0.4 μg/kg/h (Lean Body Weight)) with constant infusion rate unless hypotension or bradycardia not responsive to standard treatments (filling, atropine, ephedrine, ethylephrine) occurred, and remifentanil (0.02 - 0.2 μg/kg/min (LBW)) based on clinical and instrumental assessment (Heart Rate, Blood Pressure, BIS or Psi).
Device: Pupillometer
Patients in this group receive an eventual premedication with benzodiazepines according to anaesthesiologist assessment and patient condition. After intubation general anesthesia is administrated with inhaled (desflurane or sevoflurane; MAC 0.6 - 1) or intravenous (propofol) anesthetics (according to BIS or Psi) and remifentanil (0.02 - 0.2 μg/kg/min (LBW) based on clinical and instrumental assessment (HR, BP, BIS or Psi)).
Device: Pupillometer
1st pupil evaluation between induction of general anesthesia and onset of surgery. After incision, at least 3 pupil evaluations are performed. Measurements are spaced 15 minutes apart and also taken at least 10 minutes after any variation in drugs dosage
Feasibility of study protocol
Number of patients enrolled and number of pupillary evaluation during anesthesia
Time frame: 6 months
Depth of analgesia
depth of intraoperative analgesia with PPI (pupillary pain index). A PPI from 1 to 3, from 4 to 6, or from 7 to 9 describes a numbed PDR and deep analgesia, a medium PDR and suboptimal analgesia and a highly reactive PDR and uncontrolled pain, respectively.
Time frame: Intraoperative
Intra-operative opioid consumption
total consumption of remifentanil (μg/kg/min - Lean Body Weight)
Time frame: Intraoperative
Incidence of side effects
incidence of perioperative side effects, PONV and post-operative intolerable pain in the first 24 hours after surgery
Time frame: Intraoperative
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Università degli Studi di Brescia