ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05779540SAFEBACKUpdated Mar 22, 2023

Efficacy and Pathophysiological Implications of a New Asphyxiation Delaying Device

An interventional study of Safeback SBX and Sham device in Avalanche, Landslide, or Mudslide and Asphyxia; Immersion, sponsored by Institute of Mountain Emergency Medicine. Status unknown at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-03-22.

Sponsored by Institute of Mountain Emergency Medicine · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Mar 2023), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
26
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Survival of fully buried avalanche victims depends in major part on a triad of hypoxia, hypercapnia, and hypothermia and therefore decreases rapidly after complete burial. Besides optimizing companion rescue, which still today and even by trained people often takes more than 15 minutes to the extraction of an avalanche victim, prolonging the ability to breath after critical avalanche burial increases survival probability by giving rescuers more time to find and unbury avalanche victims. Based on previous research, the Norwegian company Safeback SE (Bergen, Norway) developed a new non-medical device using an innovative functional principle. The device, called the Safeback SBX (Safeback SE, Bergen, Norway), should make it possible to prevent asphyxia by delivering fresh air to the air pocket. Company claims to achieve a prolongation of survival up to over 60 minutes, giving companion rescuers as well as professional rescue teams more time to get access to the victim. Technical tests conducted by the developing company already provided some promising results regarding the general functioning. However, this study is needed to provide the scientific evidence of the effectiveness and influence on physiologic parameters buried in snow debris humans under realistic conditions.

02

Conditions studied

  • Avalanche, Landslide, or Mudslide
  • Asphyxia; Immersion

Keywords

  • Avalanche
  • Avalanche burial
  • Cardiac arrest
  • Asphyxia
  • Emergengy medicine
03

In context

Asphyxia

39 studies on the registry are indexed under Asphyxia; 7 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 26 is below the median of 111 across 24 interventional studies indexed under Asphyxia.

Browse Asphyxia studies →

Lead sponsor

Institute of Mountain Emergency Medicine is the lead sponsor of 20 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • healthy subjects

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • II or higher
  • chronic high degree cardiovascular or pulmonary disease
  • claustrophobia
  • psychiatric or neurological disease
  • long-term medication
  • pregnant woman
  • no
  • history of fever or serious cough in the past two weeks
  • current Covid-19 symptoms or recently tested positive for Covid-19
  • body temperature ≥ 37.5°on test days.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
26 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Intervention

    Active Device

    Device: Safeback SBX

  • Sham comparator
    Control

    Sham Device

    Device: Sham device

Interventions

  • DeviceSafeback SBX

    The intervention consists in the test of the active device.

  • DeviceSham device

    The intervention consists in a similar device to that emits same noise but does not deliver airflow.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time limit

    Reaching a predefined time limit (min)

    Time frame: From baseline up to 60 minutes

  2. Physiological threshold

    Time to reach a SpO2 threshold up to \<75% (min)

    Time frame: From baseline up to 60 minutes

Secondary outcomes

  1. End-tidal CO2 (EtCO2)

    Changes in EtCO2 (mmHg)

    Time frame: Changes from baseline (measurement at 0 min) -> snow-breathing phase (5min, 15min, and timepoint immediately before interruption [up to 60 min) (countinuous monitoring)

  2. Minute ventilation (VE)

    Changes in VE (L/min)

    Time frame: Changes from baseline (measurement at 0 min) -> snow-breathing phase (5min, 15min, and timepoint immediately before interruption [up to 60 min) (countinuous monitoring)

  3. Cerebral Regional Oxygen Saturation (rSO2)

    Changes in rSO2 (%)

    Time frame: Changes from baseline (measurement at 0 min) -> snow-breathing phase (5min, 15min, and timepoint immediately before interruption [up to 60 min) (countinuous monitoring)

  4. NASA-task load index (NASA-TLX) questionnaire (perceived workload)

    Changes in NASA-task load index (NASA-TLX) questionnaire (numerical scale)

    Time frame: Change from basal measurement (before hypoxia exposure) to post-exposure measurement (after hypoxia exposure - up to 60 min)

  5. Reactive oxygen species - ROS

    Changes in ROS in saliva samples (μmol/min)

    Time frame: Change from basal measurement (before hypoxia exposure) to post-exposure measurement (after hypoxia exposure - up to 60 min)

  6. Total antioxidant capacity - TAC

    Changes in TAC in saliva samples (mM)

    Time frame: Change from basal measurement (before hypoxia exposure) to post-exposure measurement (after hypoxia exposure - up to 60 min)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Institute of Mountain Emergency Medicine, Eurac Research
    Bolzano, Bz 39100, Italy
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Falk M, Brugger H, Adler-Kastner L. Avalanche survival chances. Nature. 1994 Mar 3;368(6466):21. doi: 10.1038/368021a0. No abstract available. PubMed 7969398 ↗
  • Wik L, Brattebo G, Osteras O, Assmus J, Irusta U, Aramendi E, Mydske S, Skaalhegg T, Skaiaa SC, Thomassen O. Physiological effects of providing supplemental air for avalanche victims. A randomised trial. Resuscitation. 2022 Mar;172:38-46. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2022.01.007. Epub 2022 Jan 19. PubMed 35063621 ↗
  • Strapazzon G, Paal P, Schweizer J, Falk M, Reuter B, Schenk K, Gatterer H, Grasegger K, Dal Cappello T, Malacrida S, Riess L, Brugger H. Effects of snow properties on humans breathing into an artificial air pocket - an experimental field study. Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 15;7(1):17675. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17960-4. PubMed 29247235 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 22, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05779540
Lead sponsor
Institute of Mountain Emergency Medicine
Responsible party
Giacomo Strapazzon, MD PhD (Dr., Institute of Mountain Emergency Medicine) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 22, 2023
Start date
Feb 15, 2023
Primary completion
Apr 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 22, 2023

Study contacts

Frederik Eisendle, Dr.
Contact
frederik.eisendl@eurac.edu
+39 0471 055 759
Giacomo Strapazzon, Dr.
principal investigator · Institute of Mountain Emergency Medicine, Eurac Research

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Mar 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion