ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05767333Updated Mar 14, 2023

Evaluation of Cicaplast in Subjects With Skin Irritation

An observational study in Skin Diseases, sponsored by Cosmetique Active International. Completed at 4 sites in 4 countries. Open to participants aged 3 Years to 70 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-03-14.

Sponsored by Cosmetique Active International (part of L'Oréal) · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
109
Ages
3 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this open, before/after, multicentric study is to assess the effect and tolerance of Cicaplast Baume B5 in patients having a skin irritation (irritative and cracked dermatitis, dry eczematids, rubbing irritation, ...) under dermatological control. Patients are asked to apply the product at least twice a day until complete recovery (maximum 21 days).

Read the detailed description

Dermscan has implemented a quality management system which has been certified by the International Standards Organization (ISO 9001: 2015). This quality assurance system includes appropriate Good Clinical Practices (GCP) and regulation requirements. The proofreader is not involved in the audited study. A certificate of quality inspection signed by the person who checked the report is enclosed in each study.

Statistical method

Regarding the descriptive analysis, the quantitative data is summarized using the following statistics by time point:

  • Number of values
  • Mean
  • Median
  • Standard deviation (SD)
  • Minimum value
  • Maximum value.

Are summarized in frequency (N) and percentage (%) by time point:

  • the Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score assessed by the investigator using a 6-point scale
  • the soothing effect assessed by the subject using a 4-point scale for the parameters pain and pruritus
  • each global tolerance score assessed by the investigator and by the subject using a 4-point scale.

The score of anti-irritating effect (SCOre de REparation de l'EPIderme= SCOREPI) is summarized using statistics for quantitative variables at each time point.

The local signs of irritated area assessed using a 4-point scale (erythema, desquamation, pigmentation, cracks, oedema) are summarized in frequency (N) and percentage (%) and by time point and by parameter.

02

Conditions studied

  • Skin Diseases

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • skin irritation
  • irritative dermatitis
  • superficial burn
03

In context

Skin Diseases

496 studies on the registry are indexed under Skin Diseases; 77 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 109 is below the median of 165 across 101 observational studies indexed under Skin Diseases.

Browse Skin Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Cosmetique Active International is the lead sponsor of 55 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
3 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

adults, teens and children meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria and willing to adhere to the protocol and study procedures

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • subjects presenting the following skin irritations (at least 3 to 5 per irritation): irritative and cracked dermatitis, dry eczematids/dry patches, rubbing irritation in specific location (ex: thumb frictions, lichenifications), ...
  • localization of irritation lesions: face, limbs, trunk, feet, fold, hands, ...
  • subjects having a feeling of discomfort at the site of the lesion.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • cutaneous pathology on the studied zone (other than the required irritations)
  • use of topical or systemic treatment during the previous weeks liable to interfere with the assessment of the cutaneous acceptability of the study product (according to the investigator's appreciation);
  • subject with healing disorder (keloid, hypertrophic)
  • subject with Type 1 diabetic
  • subject under chemotherapy and radiotherapy
  • subject with a skin disease on evaluation site: psoriasis and atopic dermatitis active lesions and hand dermatitis
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
109 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. evaluation of the effect on the recovery of irritated skin lesions

    the investigator evaluates the improvement of the tested product using the IGA score on a 6-point scale (from -1: aggravation to 4: complete recovery)

    Time frame: from baseline to Day21

Secondary outcomes

  1. evaluation of the local signs of irritated area

    the investigator assesses the local signs (erythema, desquamation, pigmentation, cracks, oedema) using a 4-point scale (from absent to severe)

    Time frame: from baseline to Day21

  2. evaluation of the anti-irritating effect

    the investigator evaluates the lesions using SCOREPI tool which takes into account the following parameters: total surface of the skin lesions, erythema, desquamation, and cracks.

    Time frame: from baseline to Day21

  3. evaluation of the skin sensitivity

    the patient evaluates the sensitivity of irritated areas using a 4-point scale for pain and pruritus ((from 0= absent to 3= severe)

    Time frame: from baseline to Day21

  4. evaluation of the global tolerance by the investigator

    the investigator evaluates the global tolerance using a 4-point scale (from 0=null to 3= excellent)

    Time frame: from baseline to Day21

  5. evaluation of the global tolerance by the patient

    the patient evaluates the global tolerance using a 4-point scale (from 0=null to 3= excellent)

    Time frame: from baseline to Day21

  6. evaluation of post-recovery marks

    the investigator assesses post-recovery marks score concerning type (redness, hyperpigmentation, hypopigmentation) and severity using a 4-point scale (from 1= almost absent to 4= severe) of an irritated area

    Time frame: Day21

  7. evaluation of the global effect by the investigator

    the investigator evaluates the global effect using a 5-point scale (from -1= worsening to 3= excellent)

    Time frame: Day21

  8. evaluation of the global effect by the patient

    the patient evaluates the global effect using a 5-point scale (from -1= worsening to 3= excellent)

    Time frame: Day21

07

Study locations

4 sites
  • EUROFINS CRL, Inc.
    Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, United States
  • EUROFINS CONSUMER PRODUCT TESTING Co. Ltd
    Guangzhou, China
  • Insight Research
    Quatre Bornes, Mauritius
  • EUROFINS DERMSCAN POLAND Sp.
    Gdańsk, Poland
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Oct 2021 to primary completion in Jun 2022, 7 months.

Of 54 observational studies under Skin Diseases, half reached primary completion within 29 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 250. This study's 7 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 2, 2023
First posted
Mar 14, 2023
StartActual
Oct 11, 2021
Primary completionActual
Jun 6, 2022
CompletionActual
Jun 6, 2022
Last update
Mar 14, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 14, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05767333
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 14, 2023
Start date
Oct 11, 2021
Primary completion
Jun 6, 2022
Completion
Jun 6, 2022
Last update
Mar 14, 2023

Study contacts

Caroline Le Floc'h
study director · Cosmetique Active International

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion