ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05765539PRESTOUpdated Sep 19, 2025

Performance of the Echopen Probe in Its Clinical Use for Pregnancy Follow-up in Senegal

An interventional study of echOpen O1 Handheld Ultrasound device in Pregnancy Related, sponsored by echOpen Factory. Completed at 2 sites in Senegal. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-19.

Sponsored by echOpen Factory · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
224
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Pregnancy follow-up in a country with limited resources in decentralized areas usually consists of a clinical examination exclusively because of a lack of access to additional examination equipment and qualified personnel to use them. However, the pregnancy follow-up relies in part on the visual investigation by ultrasound scanners that estimate the risks of morbi-mortality for the mother and child during and after pregnancy. The WHO recommendations support at least one ultrasound before 24 weeks of amenorrhea. Thus, at the same time as a usual clinical examination, the possibility of visually assessing certain relevant criteria would help to increase the effectiveness of follow-up visits without complicating the care journey. A simple ultra-portable device would be an opportunity for caregivers to facilitate the detection of complications and thus offer a more adapted follow-up and orientation.

This would allow, in contexts where resources are limited, to improve monitoring and limit the risks of complications due to inappropriate management.

Read the detailed description

The echOpen O1 Ultrasound Probe is a medical device designed to guide the diagnosis during clinical examination by providing a non-invasive, non-irradiant inside body image.

The investigator's hypothesis is that the use of this ultrasound stethoscopy probe during pregnancy, by a trained midwife, would improve the development and outcome of pregnancy for women by identifying situations requiring specificity. Through this protocol, the investigators propose a pilot study to evaluate, under field conditions, the performance of the echOpen O1 probe as part of the 3rd-trimester pregnancy monitoring, compared to a standard ultrasound examination, routinely performed with an ultrasound machine.

The main objective of this prospective pilot study is to evaluate the performance and operationality of the echOpen O1 probe from the 37th week of amenorrhea.

The secondary objectives are :

  • To evaluate the feasibility and usability of the echOpen O1 probe in the context of pregnancy monitoring by midwives and in zone field conditions:

    • One urban health center (Centralized)
    • One rural health center (Decentralized)
  • Assess women's quality of life during pregnancy and obtain satisfaction with echOpen O1 probe.
02

Conditions studied

  • Pregnancy Related

Keywords

  • Medical Device
  • Handheld Ultrasound
  • Echostethoscopy
03

In context

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with echOpen Factory as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Pregnancy ≥ 37 weeks of amenorrhea
  • Women aged ≥ 18 years old
  • Delivery scheduled to take place in the recruitment center
  • Have given her written to participate

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known fetal morphological abnormality
  • Emergency context during the participant's management
  • Obstetrical work in progress
  • Women anticipating displacement or no delivery at the clinical site
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
224 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Pregnant women benefitting ultrasound examination

    This is the unique arm of the study. This arm is made of eligible pregnant women, with a pregnancy of at least 37 weeks.

    Device: echOpen O1 Handheld Ultrasound device

Interventions

  • DeviceechOpen O1 Handheld Ultrasound device

    The performance of the Handheld ultrasound device (echOpen O1 device) will be assessed during these visits for all evaluation criteria. * One examination with the US machine by the midwife focused on 4 targets ; * One examination with a classic US machine by the same midwife (comparator) including the search for the four targets ; * One examination with the US machine by a second operator ; Review of the images obtained by the US machine by the referring radiologist at a separate point of time. The mode of delivery and the vital status of the mother and newborn will also be collected. Operator A will start by using either the echOpen O1 device or the US machine (random order, via sealed envelopes) and will then perform the other type of examination. Another operator (Operator B) will come to perform an examination with the Handheld ultrasound device (blind to the result of the first operator). The switch between operators A and B will also be random.

    Also known as: Multicentric prospective comparative study

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The intra-operator agreement

    The intra-operator agreement will be measured on the result of the 4 ultrasound targets chosen. The 4 ultrasound targets for each pregnancy are: The fetal position; Number of fetuses; Fetal vitality (presence of fetal heartbeat) Placental implantation To define an intra-operator concordance, the images for the 4 ultrasound targets (collected by the same operator) must be identical for both devices (echOpen probe and Ultrasound device routinely used in pregnant women)

    Time frame: Day 0

Secondary outcomes

  1. The inter-operator agreement

    The inter-operator concordance will be measured on the result of the 4 ultrasound targets chosen. The 4 ultrasound targets for each pregnancy are: The fetal position; Number of fetuses; Fetal vitality (presence of fetal heartbeat) Placental implantation To define an inter-operator concordance, the images on the 4 ultrasound targets (collected by two different operators) must be identical for the same device (echOpen probe). All ultrasound images will go to the radiologist for review and validation. This review will be done blindly of the result provided by the operators.

    Time frame: Day 0

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Poste de Santé de Karang
    Karang Poste, Fatick, Senegal
  • Centre de Santé de Sokone
    Sokone, Fatick, Senegal
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Edvardsson K, Mogren I, Lalos A, Persson M, Small R. A routine tool with far-reaching influence: Australian midwives' views on the use of ultrasound during pregnancy. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Aug 27;15:195. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0632-y. PubMed 26311437 ↗
  • Amoah B, Anto EA, Osei PK, Pieterson K, Crimi A. Boosting antenatal care attendance and number of hospital deliveries among pregnant women in rural communities: a community initiative in Ghana based on mobile phones applications and portable ultrasound scans. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Jun 14;16(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0888-x. PubMed 27301244 ↗
  • Edvardsson K, Ntaganira J, Ahman A, Sengoma JP, Small R, Mogren I. Physicians' experiences and views on the role of obstetric ultrasound in rural and urban Rwanda: a qualitative study. Trop Med Int Health. 2016 Jul;21(7):895-906. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12718. Epub 2016 May 18. PubMed 27125579 ↗
  • Holmlund S, Ntaganira J, Edvardsson K, Lan PT, Semasaka Sengoma JP, Ahman A, Small R, Mogren I. Improved maternity care if midwives learn to perform ultrasound: a qualitative study of Rwandan midwives' experiences and views of obstetric ultrasound. Glob Health Action. 2017;10(1):1350451. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2017.1350451. PubMed 28764602 ↗
  • Ahman A, Edvardsson K, Lesio Kidanto H, Ngarina M, Small R, Mogren I. 'Without ultrasound you can't reach the best decision' - Midwives' experiences and views of the role of ultrasound in maternity care in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2018 Mar;15:28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2017.11.007. Epub 2017 Nov 22. PubMed 29389498 ↗
  • Gomes DJ, Kaufman B, Aluisio AR, Kendall S, Thomas V, Bloem C. Assessment of Acute Obstetrical Needs and the Potential Utility of Point-Of-Care Ultrasound in the North East Region of Haiti: A Cross-Sectional Study. Ann Glob Health. 2020 Jul 3;86(1):72. doi: 10.5334/aogh.2597. PubMed 32676301 ↗
  • Glazebrook R, Manahan D, Chater B, Barker P, Row D, Steele B, Morris G, Cornelius S, McLellan T. Educational needs of rural and remote Australian non-specialist medical practitioners for obstetric ultrasound. Aust J Rural Health. 2004 Apr;12(2):73-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1038-5282.2004.00559.x. PubMed 15023225 ↗
  • Swanson JO, Kawooya MG, Swanson DL, Hippe DS, Dungu-Matovu P, Nathan R. The diagnostic impact of limited, screening obstetric ultrasound when performed by midwives in rural Uganda. J Perinatol. 2014 Jul;34(7):508-12. doi: 10.1038/jp.2014.54. Epub 2014 Apr 3. PubMed 24699218 ↗
  • Vinayak S, Brownie S. Collaborative task-sharing to enhance the Point-Of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) access among expectant women in Kenya: The role of midwife sonographers. J Interprof Care. 2018 Sep;32(5):641-644. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2018.1470499. Epub 2018 May 10. PubMed 29746179 ↗
  • Shah S, Santos N, Kisa R, Mike Maxwell O, Mulowooza J, Walker D, Muruganandan KM. Efficacy of an ultrasound training program for nurse midwives to assess high-risk conditions at labor triage in rural Uganda. PLoS One. 2020 Jun 30;15(6):e0235269. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235269. eCollection 2020. PubMed 32603339 ↗
  • Narula J, Chandrashekhar Y, Braunwald E. Time to Add a Fifth Pillar to Bedside Physical Examination: Inspection, Palpation, Percussion, Auscultation, and Insonation. JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Apr 1;3(4):346-350. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.0001. PubMed 29490335 ↗
  • Van den Hof MC. No 359-Effets biologiques et innocuite de l'echographie obstetricale. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018 May;40(5):633-639. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.04.008. No abstract available. PubMed 29731209 ↗
  • Slavin V, Gamble J, Creedy DK, Fenwick J, Pallant J. Measuring physical and mental health during pregnancy and postpartum in an Australian childbearing population - validation of the PROMIS Global Short Form. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Oct 22;19(1):370. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2546-6. PubMed 31640626 ↗
  • Vinayak S, Sande J, Nisenbaum H, Nolsoe CP. Training Midwives to Perform Basic Obstetric Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Rural Areas Using a Tablet Platform and Mobile Phone Transmission Technology-A WFUMB COE Project. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2017 Oct;43(10):2125-2132. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2017.05.024. Epub 2017 Jul 14. PubMed 28716434 ↗
  • Ballard JL, Khoury JC, Wedig K, Wang L, Eilers-Walsman BL, Lipp R. New Ballard Score, expanded to include extremely premature infants. J Pediatr. 1991 Sep;119(3):417-23. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)82056-6. PubMed 1880657 ↗
  • Kang C, Qaqish B, Monaco J, Sheridan SL, Cai J. Kappa statistic for clustered dichotomous responses from physicians and patients. Stat Med. 2013 Sep 20;32(21):3700-19. doi: 10.1002/sim.5796. Epub 2013 Mar 27. PubMed 23533082 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Nov 2023 to primary completion in Aug 2024, 9 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 1, 2023
First posted
Mar 13, 2023
StartActual
Nov 29, 2023
Primary completionActual
Aug 30, 2024
CompletionActual
Jun 19, 2025
Last update
Sep 19, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 19, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05765539
Lead sponsor
echOpen Factory
Collaborators
Institut Pasteur de Dakar, Fondation Sanofi Espoir
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 13, 2023
Start date
Nov 29, 2023
Primary completion
Aug 30, 2024
Completion
Jun 19, 2025
Last update
Sep 19, 2025

Study contacts

Fatoumata D. Sarr, M.D., MPH
principal investigator · Institut Pasteur de Dakar

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion