CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT05757583IMAPUpdated Jul 14, 2026

Impact of Metabolic Dysfunction and Mucus Plugging on Asthma Physiology

An observational study in Asthma, sponsored by University of California, San Francisco. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-14.

Sponsored by University of California, San Francisco · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
80
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a single-center study of 80 subjects with asthma including those with obesity and metabolic dysfunction (MD), those with obesity and without metabolic dysfunction, those with severe asthma and mucus plugging and those with severe asthma and without mucus plugging. Screening data will be reviewed to determine participant eligibility. Participants who meet all inclusion criteria will participate in a cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) visit to compare lung function markers and change in oxygen saturation between obese patients with and without MD and severe asthma patients with and without mucus plugging.

Read the detailed description

The mechanism of poor exercise tolerance in patients with severe asthma is poorly understood. In preliminary data, the investigators have identified increases in air trapping in patients with obese asthma and metabolic dysfunction and patients with asthma and mucus plugs. The investigators have also found air trapping on CT (Computerized Tomography) scans of severe asthma patients with mucus plugs. Therefore, the investigators hypothesize that obese patients with metabolic dysfunction (MD) and severe asthma patients with mucus plugs develop changes in lung function during exercise.

To test this hypothesis, this protocol will plan for cardiopulmonary exercise testing in patients with obesity or severe asthma. The analyses will compare dynamic hyperinflation, expiratory flow limitation, and the RV/TLC ratio (ratio of residual volume to total lung capacity) before and after exercise between obese patients with and without MD and severe asthma patients with and without mucus plugs.

02

Conditions studied

  • Asthma

Browse trials for

03

In context

Asthma

3,921 studies on the registry are indexed under Asthma; 506 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 80 is below the median of 150 across 970 observational studies indexed under Asthma.

Browse Asthma studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, San Francisco is the lead sponsor of 2,132 studies on the registry; 375 are open to participants now.

Of its 262 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 196 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study will recruit up to 80 asthma participants, at least 20 with obesity and MD, 20 with obesity and no MD, 20 with severe asthma and mucus plugs and 20 with severe asthma and no mucus plugs.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Male or female ≥ 18 years old at Visit 0
  2. Written informed consent obtained from subject and ability for subject to comply with the requirements of the study.
  3. History of physician diagnosed asthma
  4. Evidence of bronchodilator reversibility (12% improvement in FEV1 after albuterol administration) or positive methacholine challenge PC20 or PD20. Historical evidence is accepted.
  5. Meets criteria for obesity or severe asthma a. Obesity: BMI≥30 i. Metabolic dysfunction is defined as presence of either:

1. IL-6 high: Plasma IL-6 > 3.0 pg/mL 2. Insulin resistance: HOMA-IR > 3 mass units b. Severe asthma: Requires treatment with high dose inhaled corticosteroids plus a second controller, systemic corticosteroid, or biologic therapy.

i. Mucus Plugging is defined as mucus plug score ≥ 4

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Asthma exacerbation or URI within the previous 6 weeks.
  2. History of smoking

    1. If \<30 years old: Smoked for ≥5 pack-years
    2. If ≥30: Smoked for ≥10 pack years
  3. Pregnancy
  4. Absolute or relative contraindication to exercise testing per ATS criteria
  5. Any other criteria that place the subject at unnecessary risk according to the judgment of the Principal Investigator and/or attending physician of record.
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients with asthma, obesity and metabolic dysfunction

    Otherwise healthy asthmatic subjects with: 1. Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 30; and 2. Metabolic dysfunction evidenced by at least one of the following: * high plasma IL-6 (\> 3.0 pg/mL) * insulin resistance (HOMA-IR \> 3 mass units)

  • Patients with asthma, obesity and no metabolic dysfunction

    Otherwise healthy asthmatic subjects with: 1. Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 30; and 2. No evidence of metabolic dysfunction

  • Patients with severe asthma and mucus plugs

    Otherwise healthy asthmatic subjects: 1. Requiring treatment with high dose inhaled corticosteroids plus a second controller, systemic corticosteroid, or biologic therapy; and 2. Evidence of mucus plugs as defined by a mucus plug score ≥ 4

  • Patients with severe asthma and no mucus plugs

    Otherwise healthy asthmatic subjects: 1. Requiring treatment with high dose inhaled corticosteroids plus a second controller, systemic corticosteroid, or biologic therapy; and 2. No evidence of mucus plugs as defined by a mucus plug score \< 4

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in EELV (End Expiratory Lung Volume)

    We will compare change in EELV during the CPET (Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test) between the obese asthma patients with MD or without MD and between the patients with severe asthma with mucus plugs or without mucus plugs.

    Time frame: At CPET visit.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in RV (Residual Volume) and TLC (Total Lung Capacity)

    We will compare change in RV and TLC during the CPET between the obese asthma patients with MD or without MD and between the patients with severe asthma with mucus plugs or without mucus plugs.

    Time frame: At CPET Visit

  2. Change in oxygen saturation during exercise

    Change in oxygen saturation during the CPET will be assessed and compared between the obese asthma patients with MD or without MD and between the patients with severe asthma with mucus plugs or without mucus plugs.

    Time frame: At CPET Visit

07

Study locations

1 site
  • UCSF Airway Clinical Research Center
    San Francisco, California 94143, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 14, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05757583
Lead sponsor
University of California, San Francisco
Collaborators
National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 7, 2023
Start date
Apr 5, 2023
Primary completion
Jun 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 14, 2026

Study contacts

John Fahy, MD, MS
principal investigator · University of California, San Francisco

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion