CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05742542Updated Feb 24, 2023

The Effects of High vs. Low Time Spent Near VO2max During Two Work-matched High Intensity Interval Training.

An interventional study of Exercise training in VO2max, sponsored by University of the State of Santa Catarina. Completed at 1 site in Brazil. Open to male participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-02-24.

Sponsored by University of the State of Santa Catarina · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jul 2021, registered Feb 2023).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
15
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

Maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) is used to define cardiorespiratory fitness, which is important to health and sport performance in humans. Although different types of training can improve VO2max, the high intensity interval training is recognized as one of the best ways to do it. Furthermore, it has long been speculated that high intensity interval training that elicits a high time spent near VO2max could be the best way to improve VO2max. However, this theory has not been verified. Thus, the investigators performed a randomized controlled trial with crossover in healthy individuals who underwent two high intensity interval training protocols of two weeks, being a workout with longer and other with shorter time spent near VO2max.

Read the detailed description

Fifteen participants were enrolled in a randomized trial with crossover to perform two weeks of high intensity interval training with high (i.e., five times 2 minutes of work and 1 minute of recovery; T-2min:1min) or low (i.e., ten times 1 minutes of work and 30 seconds of recovery; T-1min:30seg) time spent near VO2max. The work intensity was adjusted at 85% and 87% of power output achieved at the end of incremental test for the first and second week, respectively. Before and after the T-2min:1min and T-1min:30seg, the participants performed tests to determine VO2max, lactate threshold, muscle oxidative capacity, pulmonary oxygen uptake kinetics, power output achieved at the end of incremental test, and power output related to Wingate anaerobic test. The training programs had a washout period of at least one month.

02

Conditions studied

  • VO2max

Keywords

  • VO2max
  • Exercise
  • Aerobic
  • Performance
  • Training
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of the State of Santa Catarina is the lead sponsor of 24 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Male ≥ 18 years;
  • No known musculoskeletal disorders;
  • Apparently healthy
  • Physically active according to American College of Sports Medicine standards and recommendations (Garber et al., 2011; RIEBE et al., 2015).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Taking any medication that could affect aerobic parameters;
  • Smokers;
  • Involved in an aerobic training program at the start of the study.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
15 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    High intensity interval training with high time spent near VO2max

    Participants performed high intensity interval training with high time spent near VO2max three times a week for two weeks. All training sessions consisted of five times 2 minutes of work and 1 minute of passive recovery. The work intensity was adjusted at 85% and 87% of power output achieved at the end of incremental test for the first and second week, respectively. The training sessions were performed using cycle ergometer. Findings were compared to high intensity interval training with low time spent near VO2max, which followed the same exercise frequency, intensity and total duration.

    Other: Exercise training

  • Experimental
    High intensity interval training with low time spent near VO2max

    Participants performed high intensity interval training with low time spent near VO2max three times a week for two weeks. All training sessions consisted of ten times 1 minutes of work and 30 seconds of passive recovery. The work intensity was adjusted at 85% and 87% of power output achieved at the end of incremental test for the first and second week, respectively. The training sessions were performed using cycle ergometer. Findings were compared to high intensity interval training with high time spent near VO2max, which followed the same exercise frequency, intensity and total duration.

    Other: Exercise training

Interventions

  • OtherExercise training

    Two weeks of high intensity interval training with high or low time spent near VO2max.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Maximal oxygen uptake

    The highest 15 seconds VO2 average determined from rolling averages of 5 seconds samples measured during incremental test or confirmation test of VO2max.

    Time frame: Change at Maximal oxygen uptake after two weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Lactate threshold

    The work intensity at which blood lactate concentration increased 1 mmol.L-1 above baseline.

    Time frame: Change at Lactate threshold after two weeks

  2. Muscle oxidative capacity

    Rate recovery of muscle oxygen consumption (k-mV̇O2) of the vastus lateralis, with the k-mV̇O2 indicating muscle oxidative capacity.

    Time frame: Change at Muscle oxidative capacity after two weeks

  3. Pulmonary oxygen uptake kinetics

    The on-transient response for V̇O2 was fitted using a mono-exponential model, which the rate constant (k-pV̇O2) for the kinetics of V̇O2 was calculated as 1/tau (expressed in min-1).

    Time frame: Change at Pulmonary oxygen uptake kinetics after two weeks

  4. Power output achieved at the end of incremental test

    Power output achieved at the end of ramp incremental test (20 W.min-1).

    Time frame: Change at Power output achieved at the end of incremental test after two weeks

  5. Wingate anaerobic test

    Peak power, mean power, and minimum power were defined as the highest mechanical power output, the average power sustained throughout the 30-s period, and the power output attained before the end of the test, respectively.

    Time frame: Change at Wingate anaerobic test after two weeks

  6. Time spent near VO2max

    Time spent at or above 90% or 95% of VO2max.

    Time frame: First to the last day of test or training, an average of 4 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. Session-rating of perceived exertion

    The original 10-point version.

    Time frame: First to the last day of test or training, an average of 4 weeks

  2. Perceived Recovery Status Scale

    The original 10-point version from Laurent et al (2011).

    Time frame: First to the last day of test or training, an average of 4 weeks

  3. Heart rate

    Measured before and during exercise and used to determine 1) the highest heart rate, 2) the time spent near highest heart rate, 3) training impulse, and 4) heart rate variability.

    Time frame: First to the last day of test or training, an average of 4 weeks

  4. Adipose tissue thickness

    Adipose tissue thickness measured by a B-mode ultrasound imaging.

    Time frame: Change at Adipose tissue thickness after two weeks

  5. Body mass

    Body mass measured by a digital scale.

    Time frame: Change at Body mass after two weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of the State of Santa Catarina
    Florianópolis, Santa Catarina 88080-350, Brazil
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Buchheit M, Laursen PB. High-intensity interval training, solutions to the programming puzzle: Part I: cardiopulmonary emphasis. Sports Med. 2013 May;43(5):313-38. doi: 10.1007/s40279-013-0029-x. PubMed 23539308 ↗
  • Laursen PB, Jenkins DG. The scientific basis for high-intensity interval training: optimising training programmes and maximising performance in highly trained endurance athletes. Sports Med. 2002;32(1):53-73. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200232010-00003. PubMed 11772161 ↗
  • Lisboa FD, Raimundo JAG, Salvador AF, Pereira KL, Turnes T, Diefenthaeler F, Oliveira MFM, Caputo F. Acute Cardiopulmonary, Metabolic, and Neuromuscular Responses to Severe-Intensity Intermittent Exercises. J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Feb;33(2):408-416. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002130. PubMed 28704307 ↗
  • Lisboa FD, Salvador AF, Raimundo JA, Pereira KL, de Aguiar RA, Caputo F. Decreasing Power Output Increases Aerobic Contribution During Low-Volume Severe-Intensity Intermittent Exercise. J Strength Cond Res. 2015 Sep;29(9):2434-40. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000914. PubMed 26308828 ↗
  • Midgley AW, Mc Naughton LR. Time at or near VO2max during continuous and intermittent running. A review with special reference to considerations for the optimisation of training protocols to elicit the longest time at or near VO2max. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2006 Mar;46(1):1-14. PubMed 16596093 ↗
  • Midgley AW, Mc Naughton LR, Wilkinson M. Criteria and other methodological considerations in the evaluation of time at V.O2max. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2006 Jun;46(2):183-8. PubMed 16823345 ↗
  • Raimundo JAG, Turnes T, de Aguiar RA, Lisboa FD, Loch T, Ribeiro G, Caputo F. The Severe Exercise Domain Amplitude: A Comparison Between Endurance Runners and Cyclists. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2019 Mar;90(1):3-13. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2018.1549356. Epub 2019 Jan 17. PubMed 30653425 ↗
  • Turnes T, de Aguiar RA, Cruz RS, Caputo F. Interval training in the boundaries of severe domain: effects on aerobic parameters. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016 Jan;116(1):161-9. doi: 10.1007/s00421-015-3263-0. Epub 2015 Sep 15. PubMed 26373721 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — The data will be presented as a group (training protocol), but data from representative subjects may be presented if they add relevant information.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 24, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05742542
Lead sponsor
University of the State of Santa Catarina
Responsible party
João Antonio Gesser Raimundo (Member of Human Performance Research Group, University of the State of Santa Catarina) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 24, 2023
Start date
Jul 1, 2021
Primary completion
Dec 15, 2021
Completion
Dec 15, 2021
Last update
Feb 24, 2023

Study contacts

João G Raimundo, PhD
principal investigator · Member of Human Performance Research Group

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion