CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05738551Updated Jun 4, 2024

Non-pharmacolytic Method in Obese; Pain and Anxiety

An interventional study of stress ball and chewing gum in Obesity, sponsored by Necmettin Erbakan University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-06-04.

Sponsored by Necmettin Erbakan University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
108
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Access to the vascular access is difficult in obese patients. Therefore, vascular access can be challenging and worrying for obese individuals. This strain causes pain and anxiety. Different interventions can be applied to reduce the pain and anxiety felt. One of them is the methods of distraction. Among these methods, chewing gum and using a stress ball can contribute positively to the pain and anxiety at the entrance to the vein in order to draw blood in obese individuals. In addition, these interventions may affect vital parameters. It was aimed to evaluate the effects of chewing gum and using a stress ball during vascular access in obese individuals on pain level, anxiety level and vital signs

Read the detailed description

It is a three-armed randomized controlled trial.

Research Questions/Hypotheses:

H1: There is a difference between the arterial blood pressure, heart rate and oxygen saturation values of the groups H2: There is a difference between the state anxiety scores of the groups H3: There is a difference between the pain scores experienced by the groups

Type of Research:

3 groups post-test Randomized controlled trial

Location and Features of the Research:

The research will be completed in the outpatient blood collection unit of XXX hospital.

The populaıon of the Research:

The population of the research will be the patients who applied to the blood collection unit of XXX hospital.

Sample of the Research:

The sample of the research; An effect size of 0.35 was calculated as 108 with a margin of error 0.05 and a power of 0.90.

F tests - ANOVA: Fixed effects, omnibus, one-way Analysis: A priori: Compute required sample size Input: Effect size f = 0.35 α err prob = 0.05 Power (1-β err prob) = 0.90 Number of groups = 3 Output: Noncentrality parameter λ = 13.2300000 Critical F = 3.0828520 Numerator df = 2 Denominator df = 105 Total sample size = 108 Actual power = 0.9047332

Randomization A random.org package program was used for randomization, and a randomization table was created (Random.Org).

In the study, the patient, the nurse who took blood and the researcher will not be blinded, the people who made the randomization and statistics and the person who collected the data after the intervention will be blinded.

Inclusion Criteria for Participants in the Study:

  • Being over 18 years old
  • Having a body mass index of 30 and above
  • Giving blood for analyzes upon the request of the physician
  • Having the harmony of place and time
  • Willingness to participate in the research Exclusion criteria
  • Absence of vision and hearing problems
  • Presence of any disease that may affect pain perception
  • Having cognitive problems
  • Having a condition that prevents chewing gum
  • Having a condition that prevents him from using the stress ball

Data Collection Tools:

Individual identification form, Visual comparison scale (VAS), state anxiety inventory, pulse oximeter, sphygmomanometer, tape measure Individual introduction form and initiative materials It is a form consisting of 12 questions prepared by researchers in accordance with the literature. It includes the socio-demographic and health-related characteristics of individuals.

VAS (Visual Comparison Scale) The scale consists of or vertical lines. The scale is scaled to 10 cm/100 mm. Horizontal form will be used in this study. A score of 0 on the scale in the assessment of pain indicates that there is no pain during the blood draw procedure, and a score of 10 indicates unbearable/very severe pain.

State Anxiety Inventory It was developed by Spielberg et al (1964). Öner and le Compte (1983) was adapted into Turkish. It can measure state and trait anxiety separately, a total of 40 items. In this study, only the 20-item section that measures state anxiety will be used. It gives information about the individual's feelings only at that moment. It is a four-point Likert-type scale; It is evaluated as "not at all", "somewhat", "a lot" and "completely" with 1, 2, 3 and 4 points. In the state anxiety scale, items 1, 2, 5, 8, 10, 11, 15, 16, 19 and 20 are reversed items. The scale scores between 20 and 80, with a high score indicating a high level of anxiety. However, since the scale is not calculated straight, it is stated that the average score generally varies between 36-41. After subtracting the total score of the reverse scored items from the total score of the flat items, the scale's own constant constant value of 50 is added to this score. The reliability (Kurder-Richardson Alpha) coefficient of the original version of the state anxiety scale was reported as 0.83-0.92, while the Turkish version was 0.94-0.96.

Stress ball Stress ball to be used; It is a 6 cm diameter, soft-textured, polyurethane ball, disinfected with a surface disinfectant.

Chewing gum The gum to be used is for all patients; the same brand is an easy-to-chew sugar-free gum that does not contain sorbitol and xylitol. Before the chewing gum was given to the patient, the hands of the patient and the researcher were disinfected with hand disinfectant. The gum was given to the patient in a package and he was allowed to open it himself.

Sphygmomanometer sphygmomanometer will be used for measurements. Pulse oximeter device Finger type pulse oximeter device will be used. The probe of the device, the hands of the patient and the researcher will be disinfected before and after each application.

Implementation of the Research and Collection of Data:

The consent of the individuals who met the inclusion criteria was obtained from the individuals who came to the blood collection outpatient clinic, and which group they would be included in will be determined by the researcher by drawing lots. First, the introductory data of the individual will be collected with the introduction form, and the arm diameter will be measured. Then, the initiative will be applied according to which group it will take place in.

Experiment 1 (stress ball) The patient will be asked to squeeze and loosen the stress ball with his non intervention hand for 5 minutes before and during the blood collection procedure. The researcher will continue to observe the patient to ensure that the stress ball is used throughout the blood collection procedure. After the blood collection procedure is completed, the patient will be referred to a nurse independent of the study to measure the patient's vital signs (blood pressure, pulse rate, SPO2 measurement and filling out the pain and anxiety scale). The nurse who made the last measurements will not know which group the patient is in. The nurse who made the final measurements will be blind.

Experiment 2 (Chewing gum) The patient will be given an unopened package of chewing gum and will be asked to chew the gum before and during the blood collection procedure.Chewing gum will take a total of 5 minutes. During this process, it will be observed by the researcher that the patient continues to chew gum.After the blood collection procedure is completed, the patient will be referred to a nurse independent of the study to measure the patient's vital signs (blood pressure, pulse rate, SPO2 measurement and filling out the pain and anxiety scale). The nurse who made the last measurements will not know which group the patient is in. The nurse who made the final measurements will be blind.

Control group Introductory form and introductory data will be obtained from the individuals they will be directed to the bloodletting nurse without any application. The same practices will be applied to the other two groups.

blood collection procedure

  • Blood collection procedures will be done by a single nurse working in the blood collection unit. It will be ensured that the same nurse performs the intervention of all groups in order to avoid differences in the intervention due to the person performing the procedure.
  • Blood collection will be done from the antecubital vein of the right or left arm in all patients.

After the application area is wiped with 70% alcohol and asepsis is achieved, blood will be drawn.

  • Patients who will receive blood are individuals who come to donate blood at the request of a physician. Patients will not be subjected to any interventions such as taking extra blood, getting an examination, etc. for this research.
  • In all applications, due to the Covid-19 process, attention will be paid to the use of masks and hand hygiene, ventilation of the environment and distance.

Distribution of the research Obtaining permissions for research; Hilal Türkben Polat, collection of data and the implementation of the initiative; Hilal Türkben Polat and Rukiye Burucu, introduction and method Rukiye Burucu, Hilal TÜRKBEN POLAT, findings and discussion Hilal Türkben Polat, Rukiye BURUCU.

Variables of the Study Dependent variables: Patient Post-procedure arterial blood pressure, heart rate, peripheral oxygen saturation, pain score, state anxiety score.

Independent variables: Patient: age, gender, body mass index (BMI), education level, marital status, employment status, income level, chronic disease status Ethical Dimension of Research Research permission was obtained from the XXX Ethics Committee (04.02.2022, 2022/3640), and application permission was obtained from XXX Hospital (25.11.2022 E-14567952-900-273749).

Limitations of the Research The limitation of the study is that the data of the study are collected from patients followed only in one center in Konya.

Evaluation of research data Statistics of the research will be done in SPSS 22 program; The data will be summarized as number, percentage, mean and standard deviation, chi-square analysis will be used to compare the sociodemographic characteristics of the experimental and control groups, and t-test for independent groups will be used for the means. The effect size obtained as a result of the calculations will be considered as ≤0.20 weak, if it is between 0.20\<d\<0.80, medium and d≥0.80 large effect size. The relationship between the scores will be examined by pearson correlation analysis, r≤0.25 is very weak in the evaluation of the correlation; 0.26≤ r ≤0.49 weak; 0.50≤ r ≤ 0.69 medium; 0.70≤ r ≤ 0.89 strong; If 0.90≤ r \< 1, it will be considered very strong.

02

Conditions studied

  • Obesity

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • obesity
  • pain
  • anxiety
  • vascular access
03

In context

Obesity

6,296 studies on the registry are indexed under Obesity; 1,692 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 108 is above the median of 78 across 4,878 interventional studies indexed under Obesity.

Browse Obesity studies →

Lead sponsor

Necmettin Erbakan University is the lead sponsor of 198 studies on the registry; 48 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Being over 18 years old

  • Having a body mass index of 30 and above
  • Giving blood for analyzes upon the request of the physician
  • Having the harmony of place and time
  • Willingness to participate in the research

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Absence of vision and hearing problems
  • Presence of any disease that may affect pain perception
  • Having cognitive problems
  • Having a condition that prevents chewing gum
  • Having a condition that prevents him from using the stress ball
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
108 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    STRESS BALL

    Starting 5 minutes before the access to the vascular access, the patient will be asked to squeeze the stress ball in the palm until the blood collection is completed.

    Other: stress ball

  • Experimental
    CHEWİNG GUM

    Starting 5 minutes before the vascular access, the patient will be allowed to chew gum until the blood collection is completed.

    Other: chewing gum

  • No intervention
    ROUTINE APPLICATION

    Only within the scope of routine practice of the patient, vascular access will be provided and the blood collection process will be completed.

Interventions

  • Otherstress ball

    Applicable to group 1

  • Otherchewing gum

    Applicable to group 2

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. pain severity

    The patient will be asked to evaluate the pain felt by the VAS pain scale.

    Time frame: within 5 minutes after procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Anxiety state

    The level of anxiety felt by the patient will be evaluated with the anxiety scale.

    Time frame: within 5 minutes after procedure

Other outcomes

  1. Arterial blood pressure value

    Measurement will be made with a manual sphygmomanometer;90/60 mmHg\<blood pressure\>140/90 mmHg

    Time frame: within 5 minutes after procedure

  2. Heart rate value

    It will be counted by resting from the apex with a stethoscope;60\<heart rate\>110

    Time frame: "within 5 minutes after procedure

  3. Oxygen saturation valu

    Measurement will be made with a pulse oximeter; saturation\>95%

    Time frame: within 5 minutes after procedure

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Necmettin Erbakan Univercity
    Konya, 42370, Turkey
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Weijenberg RA, Lobbezoo F. Chew the Pain Away: Oral Habits to Cope with Pain and Stress and to Stimulate Cognition. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:149431. doi: 10.1155/2015/149431. Epub 2015 May 18. PubMed 26090381 ↗
  • Kabore RAF, Traore IA, Traore SIS, Bougouma CTHW, Augustin P, Ouro-Bang'na Maman AF. Broken needle during spinal anesthesia: an avoidable complication. Local Reg Anesth. 2018 Nov 23;11:111-113. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S175547. eCollection 2018. PubMed 30538540 ↗
  • Rodriguez-Calero MA, Blanco-Mavillard I, Morales-Asencio JM, Fernandez-Fernandez I, Castro-Sanchez E, de Pedro-Gomez JE. Defining risk factors associated with difficult peripheral venous Cannulation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart Lung. 2020 May-Jun;49(3):273-286. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2020.01.009. Epub 2020 Feb 11. PubMed 32057426 ↗
  • Dat M, Jc TM, Ac N, Reis RK, Mh B, Sem T. Prevalence of and factors associated with difficult peripheral venipuncture in adult surgical patients. J Vasc Access. 2021 May;22(3):404-410. doi: 10.1177/1129729820939335. Epub 2020 Jul 28. PubMed 32720556 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 4, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05738551
Lead sponsor
Necmettin Erbakan University
Responsible party
Rukiye Burucu (Assit. Prof., Necmettin Erbakan University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 22, 2023
Start date
Feb 15, 2023
Primary completion
Mar 15, 2023
Completion
Mar 30, 2023
Last update
Jun 4, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion