CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05738122Updated Apr 8, 2025

Evaluating the Efficacy of a 60-day Emotion Regulation Journal

An interventional study of 60-Day self-guided Emotion Regulation Journal in Mental Health and Emotional Regulation, sponsored by University of Victoria. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 19 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-08.

Sponsored by University of Victoria · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
19 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Participants randomized to the intervention group will receive a physical copy of the 60-day emotion regulation journal during the baseline meeting. Participants will also be introduced the purpose of the journal and its intended usage (i.e., daily journaling). Intervention participants will not be offered guidance or feedback on the journal after these initial instructions, in order to emulate an ad libitum usage. Control group participants will not receive any contact with the researchers outside of the planned questionnaires and to receive their journal at the two-month timepoint.

02

Conditions studied

  • Mental Health
  • Emotional Regulation
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Victoria is the lead sponsor of 32 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • (1) being 18+ years old (2) being fluent in English, (3) currently living in the Greater Victoria area, (4) self-reporting no previously diagnosed mental illness or psychiatric conditions, and (5) scoring a mean of \<4.6 on the Cognitive Reappraisal, and mean of >3.14 on the Expressive Suppression subscales of the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (based on previous mean data)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Scoring a mean of ≥4.6 on the Cognitive Reappraisal or a mean of ≤3.14 on the Expressive Suppression subscales of the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, currently receiving or seeking therapy for a mental illness, a current or previous diagnosis of mental illness, or self-identifying as neurodivergent.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention (Journal Group)

    Participants in the Intervention group are provided with the 60-day self-guided emotion regulation journals upon enrolment in the study. These participants complete surveys at 2 weeks, 1 month, and 2 months. After the 60-day period, these participants also complete an exit interview and a follow-up survey.

    Other: 60-Day self-guided Emotion Regulation Journal

  • No intervention
    Control (Waitlist Group)

    Participants in the Waitlist group complete a 2-week, 1-month and 2-month survey. After the 60-day period, they receive access to the 60-day self-guided emotion regulation journal for their own use.

Interventions

  • Other60-Day self-guided Emotion Regulation Journal

    A 60-day self guided journal with activities designed to be completed daily to improve an individual's emotion regulation abilities and habits

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Participant Emotion Regulation

    Change in participants' emotion regulation abilities and habits assessed using the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire.

    Time frame: 2 weeks, 1-month, 2-months, 60 day exit interview, 90 days follow up

  2. Participant Emotion Regulation

    Change in participants' emotion regulation abilities and habits assessed using the using the Difficulties in Emotional Regulation.

    Time frame: 2 weeks, 1-month, 2-months, 60 day exit interview, 90 days follow up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Adherence

    Participants' adherence to the 60-days of activities in the journal assessed using three items: "Currently, what is the last day of the journal you have completed?"; "Have you skipped or not completed any days prior to the latest day you have completed?"; and "Approximately how many minutes do you spend completing a day, within the journal?"

    Time frame: 2 weeks, 1-month, 2-months

  2. Experience using journal

    Usability and user experience of intervention group collected during exit interview

    Time frame: 60 days

  3. Demographics

    Age, preferred gender, socio-economic status, ethnicity, educational attainment, and employment status will be collected.

    Time frame: Baseline

  4. Mental Health

    Depression and anxiety will be assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. There is a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 21 for each anxiety and depression. Individuals with a score of greater than 8 are considered to have considerable symptoms of anxiety and/or depression.

    Time frame: 2 weeks, 1-month, 2-months, and 3-month follow up for intervention group

  5. Subjective Well-Being

    Subjective well-being will be assessed using the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale. There is a minimum score of 14 and a maximum score of 70. Scores above 51 are above mean population mental well-being while a score below 51 is below mean population mental well-being.

    Time frame: 2 weeks, 1-month, 2-months, and 3-month follow up for intervention group

  6. Self-Compassion

    Self-Compassion will be assessed using the full version of the Self-Compassion Scale. Minimum score is 1 and Maximum score is 5. Scores from 1-2.5 indicate low self-compassion, 2.5-3.5 indicates moderate, and 3.5-5 indicates high self-compassion.

    Time frame: 2 weeks, 1-month, 2-months, and 3-month follow up for intervention group

  7. Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour

    Past week hours of sitting, walking, mild, moderate, and vigorous physical activity will be assessed using a modified version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire. A HIGH score consists of vigorous intensity activity on at least 3 days OR 7 or more days of any combination of walking, moderate intensity or vigorous intensity activities. A MODERATE score consists of 3 or more days of vigorous intensity activity and/or walking of at least 30 minutes per day OR 5 or more days of moderate intensity activity and/or walking of at least 30 minutes per day OR 5 or more days of any combination of walking, moderate intensity or vigorous intensity activities. A LOW score is not achieving the high or moderate physical activity levels.

    Time frame: 2 weeks, 1-month, 2-month, and 3-month follow up for intervention group

  8. Screen Time

    Past week average weekday and weekend occupational and recreational (i.e., leisure) screen time hours will be assessed using four bespoke items (e.g., In the last seven days, on an average weekday, how many hours did you spend using screens for recreational purposes (e.g., watching TV, playing video games)?)

    Time frame: 2 weeks, 1-month, 2-month, and 3-month follow up for intervention group

  9. Sleep

    Past week average hours of sleep will be assessed using an adapted item from the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Assessment: 20 "During the past week, how many hours of actual sleep did you get at night?". The minimum score is 0 representing 7 or more hours of sleep and the maximum score is 3 representing less than 5 hours of sleep. The higher the score, the worse the sleep duration.

    Time frame: 2 weeks, 1-month, 2-month, and 3-month follow up for intervention group

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Behavioural Medicine Lab - University of Victoria
    Victoria, British Columbia V8P 5C2, Canada
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 8, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05738122
Lead sponsor
University of Victoria
Collaborators
Switch Research, Mathematics of Information Technology and Complex Systems
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 21, 2023
Start date
Jan 18, 2023
Primary completion
Nov 11, 2023
Completion
Nov 11, 2023
Last update
Apr 8, 2025

Study contacts

Ryan E Rhodes, PhD
principal investigator · University of Victoria

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion