CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05709119Ellele-01Updated Oct 18, 2024

Feasibility of the Oricol™ Sampling Device to Retrieve Vagina Mucus (Wall) Samples for Genomic & Epigenetic Analysis.

An observational study in Vagina Disease and Diagnosis, sponsored by Origin Sciences. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-18.

Sponsored by Origin Sciences · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
45
Ages
18 Years to 99 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Primary Objective

The primary objective is to explore the feasibility of collecting a vaginal sample using the OriCol™ Sampling Device.

Secondary Objectives

The study has secondary objectives to assess:

  1. Acceptability of the sampling technique to both patient and clinician
  2. To understand the balloon volume (maximum 80ml) required for effective intra-vaginal sampling.
  3. Participant feedback during and after the test for using the OriCol™ Sampling Device using a Visual Analogue Scale
  4. Patient discrete choice of Oricol™ versus speculum examination.
Read the detailed description

The female genital tract is comprised of the vagina, cervix, uterine body, fallopian tubes, and the ovaries. Studies into the dimensions of the vagina have demonstrated there is limited variation, and such variation are not significantly impacted by parity, body size or demographics. The length of the vagina differs depending on measuring techniques and whether the anterior or posterior wall is measured, but on average is between 6 - 10cm in length (OS012-TR001). Vaginal width varies significantly depending on whether this was measured at the level of the introitus, in line with the pelvic floor or more proximally within the tract. Further changes in the vagina are seen in relationship to parity.

As is found in the gastro-intestinal tract, the cervicovaginal tract is, in part, lined with mucus producing goblet cells. The mucus layer also contains shed epithelial cells, microbes and various macromolecules, including antibodies (OS012-TR002). The preliminary results of the colorectal Ori-EGI-02 study, demonstrates that human amplifiable DNA suitable for genomic and epigenetic analysis can be collected from rectal mucus samples (H. N. Humphrey et al. 2022). The rectal mucus samples are collected using the OriCol™ Sampling device, which is inserted into the rectum via a standard proctoscope and then by inflation of a nitrile membrane with 80mL of air.

The current standard examination technique used in gynaecology is a digital vaginal examination (VE) followed by speculum examination. Speculum examination may be performed in the left lateral position (using a Sims Speculum) or in lithotomy (using a Cusco's speculum). Both techniques (and variants) have been in clinical use for over 150 years and allow visual assessment of the vagina and cervix as well as allowing access for diagnostic and/or therapeutic procedures.

The current standard diagnostic investigations for cervical, endometrial, and ovarian malignancy are colposcopy, hysteroscopy, trans-abdominal and trans-vaginal ultrasonography, or CT scanning. Colposcopy requires the insertion of a bivalve speculum into the vagina to directly visualise the cervix. In outpatient hysteroscopy, speculum examination is often carried out to assess the cervix and vagina prior to the procedure. All these investigations take place within a secondary care setting.

The standard Cusco's speculum is bivalved and in the closed state has a length of 80mm and width of 22mm. The volume of the closed lubricated speculum passed into the vagina is 36.3cm3 assuming a closed cylinder. Changes in volume will occur with use. One study assessing the high-pressure zones within the vagina inflated a polyethylene bag of 10cm in length to up to 70cc volume and recorded no adverse effects during the study (OS012-TR001). This suggests that a medical device of 70cc could be inserted into the vagina for diagnostic purposes without discomfort for the patient (Jung et al. 2007)

A review was conducted of the standard Intraspec Contour speculum (Robinson Healthcare Ltd), which is supplied in three sizes: small, medium and large. This was to compare the volume and dimensions of the speculum with the OriCol™ Sampling Device membrane. Origin Sciences Limited have taken measurements of the speculums, as a specification from the manufacturer could not be located.

Due to the characteristics of membrane material of the OriCol™ Sampling Device (PS0025), the height and width of the balloon when inflated to 80ml of air can vary slightly. Inflated membrane quality control (QC) checks during manufacturing indicate that the length of the membrane should not exceed 80mm and the width 63mm. However, the average height of the inflated membrane is approximately 75.2mm and width of 41.3mm. Although the dimensions of the membrane fluctuate slightly between devices, the volume of the inflated membrane stays constant at 65cm3 when inflated with 80mls of air.

The first 40mls of air inserted from the syringe into the membrane push the deflated membrane out of the device. Air inserted above 40mls start to inflate the membrane. This data suggests that at approximate maximum volume (65cm3) the OriCol™ Sampling Device inflated membrane has a smaller volume than a small sized open speculum (\~80.9cm3).

There is a current focus on reducing discomfort and increasing compliance in the ability to obtain samples of disease of the female genital tract (Campaign Against Painful Hysteroscopy: Open letter to the UK Department of Health \& Social Care (20 October 2022)). Hysteroscopy especially has been the focus on public campaigns to raise awareness of the discomfort associated with this when performed in the Outpatient Setting. Similarly discomfort during sampling of the cervix for pre-malignant change has led to interest in the development of an alternative technology, that is easier to use, has increased patient acceptability and gives a wider range of results leading to greater clinical benefit. As a minimally invasive test, it is important that it's use can be replicated easily, achieve very high levels of compliance, be extremely safe for women and deliver samples that allow high levels of analysis.

In terms of future health economic benefit, the value of the test is the potential reproducibility and ease of use in a variety of clinical settings in primary and secondary care as well as the remote environment.

This feasibility study will address the mechanics of sampling to inform on the technique used in future larger studies.

02

Conditions studied

  • Vagina Disease
  • Diagnosis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Vaginal Diseases

163 studies on the registry are indexed under Vaginal Diseases; 13 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 45 is below the median of 200 across 17 observational studies indexed under Vaginal Diseases.

Browse Vaginal Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Origin Sciences is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients will be enrolled until 40 samples have been collected and confirmed assessable by the sponsor. Estimated that 45 recruits will be required to collect 40 assessable samples. For this study, 40 Participant samples will be sufficient to fulfil the objectives of the clinical study. The aim is to obtain a variety of samples from pre-, peri- and post-menopausal women to understand if the change in menopausal status affects device acceptability.

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria: All participants must meet the following criteria to be eligible for the study:

  • Aged 18 years or over
  • Able to give voluntary, written informed consent to participate in the study
  • Attending a Gynaecology Outpatient Clinic
  • Undergoing vaginal speculum examination as part of their routine clinical care

Exclusion Criteria: The following exclusion criteria are applied

  • Vaginal, vulval or perineal symptoms make vaginal examination inappropriate.
  • Penetrative vaginal sex within the last 24 hours
  • Allergy to barrier contraception
  • History of allergic reactions to polypropylene and/or nitrile
  • Pregnant or suspicion of pregnancy
  • Participation in an interventional or pharmaceutical clinical study if treatment/intervention has already commenced
  • Previously had a hysterectomy
  • Previously had pelvic cancer
  • Previously had chemotherapy or pelvic radiotherapy
  • Currently undergoing hormone-based treatment for breast or other cancer
  • Women with known Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, HIV or HTLV-II infection, or any other similarly classified human pathogen including prion diseases (Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease).
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
45 participants (actual)
Target follow-up
1 Day
Patient registry
Yes
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testQuantification of human DNA retrieved and DNA fragmentation profile.

    The sample will be analysed for material quality and have no impact on the patient's future care.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The primary objective is to explore the feasibility of collecting an assessable vaginal sample using the OriCol™ Sampling Device.

    Quantification of human DNA retrieved.

    Time frame: Within 3 months of completion of recruitment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Acceptability of the sampling technique to both patient and clinician

    To assess both ease of use and patient acceptance

    Time frame: Immediate from test performance

  2. To understand the balloon volume (maximum 80ml) required for effective intra-vaginal sampling.

    Assess variation of vaginal volume and balloon inflation to sample retrieved.

    Time frame: Within 3 months

  3. Participant feedback during and after the test for using the OriCol™ Sampling Device using a Visual Analogue Scale

    To assess patient feedback from the test compared to the speculum examination

    Time frame: Immediate from test performance

07

Study locations

1 site
  • The Queens Medical Research Institute
    Edinburgh, Scotland EH16 4TJ, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 18, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05709119
Lead sponsor
Origin Sciences
Collaborators
Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 1, 2023
Start date
Jan 11, 2024
Primary completion
May 30, 2024
Completion
Jul 31, 2024
Last update
Oct 18, 2024

Study contacts

Andrew Horne, PhD MRCOG
principal investigator · Edinburgh Royal Infirmary

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion