CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05706610Updated Dec 2, 2025Results posted

A Pilot Feasibility Trial of a Tailored Intervention to Improve Adherence in Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer

An interventional study of Tailored Program and Feedback Program in Cancer and Adherence, Medication, sponsored by Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati. Completed at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 15 Years to 24 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-02.

Sponsored by Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
70
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
15 Years to 24 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A pilot feasibility randomized clinical trial comparing a tailored intervention to uniform standard of care will be conducted. A total of 40 AYAs with cancer will be randomized to one of the two programs. Data will be collected to explore the hypotheses that the intervention meets pre-established enrollment, retention, fidelity, and data completion feasibility criteria and that AYAs will rate the intervention as easy to use and acceptable.

Read the detailed description

The proposed research includes a randomized clinical trial of a tailored adherence-promotion intervention (Tailored Program) as compared to uniform standard of care (Feedback Program) for adolescents and young adults with cancer. Up to 40 adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer will be enrolled in this study. Participants who enroll in this trial will be given an eCAP electronic monitor, a pill bottle with a computer chip in the cap, to store their medication. After using the electronic monitor for 4 weeks to assess baseline adherence, participants who demonstrate non-adherence and have used the electronic monitor without difficulty will be asked to complete pre-treatment questionnaires. Next, participants will be randomly assigned to either the tailored adherence-promotion intervention group (Tailored Program) or the uniform standard of care group (Feedback Program). Participants will be assigned in a 1:1 ratio so that, at the end of the study, an equal number of participants will have been randomized to each group.

Participants in the tailored program will participate in 4 sessions with a coach, 1 every other week. During these sessions, the AYA will work with their coach to identify a barrier to adherence to target and create an action plan using evidence-based behavior change techniques to address this barrier. In between sessions (on alternating weeks), the coach will check-in with a text including a reminder about the action plan and a calendar of the AYA's eCAP adherence data. Participants in the Feedback Program will receive weekly text messages including: a calendar depicting their weekly adherence (per eCAP data) and guidance for requesting additional support as desired.

Adolescents and young adults will continue to use the electronic monitor to store their medication until approximately a month after their program ends. After their program ends, participants will complete post-treatment questionnaires regarding program usability and acceptability as well as their adherence.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cancer
  • Adherence, Medication

Keywords

  • cancer
  • adherence
03

In context

Neoplasms

9,365 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasms; 2,489 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 70 is above the median of 50 across 7,253 interventional studies indexed under Neoplasms.

Browse Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati is the lead sponsor of 661 studies on the registry; 134 are open to participants now.

Of its 54 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 30 (56%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
15 Years to 24 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient between 15 and 24 years of age
  • Patient diagnosis of cancer
  • Patient prescribed oral chemotherapy or prophylactic medication

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is not fluent in English
  • Patient evidences significant cognitive deficits per medical team
  • Patient's medical status or treatment precludes participation per medical team, patient, or caregiver
  • Patient demonstrates greater than or equal to 95% adherence during run-in period
  • Patient declines to use electronic monitoring device
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
70 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Tailored Program

    8-week tailored program including 4 coach visits and 4 bi-weekly text check-ins

    Behavioral: Tailored Program

  • Other
    Feedback Program

    8-week feedback program including 8 weekly texts

    Behavioral: Feedback Program

Interventions

  • BehavioralTailored Program

    Participants in the tailored program will participate in 4 sessions with a coach, 1 every other week. During these sessions, the AYA will work with their coach to identify a barrier to adherence to target and create an action plan using evidence-based behavior change techniques to address this barrier. In between sessions (on alternating weeks), the coach will check-in with a text including a reminder about the action plan and a calendar of the AYA's eCAP adherence data.

  • BehavioralFeedback Program

    Participants in the Feedback Program will receive weekly text messages including: a calendar depicting their weekly adherence (per eCAP data) and guidance for requesting additional support as desired.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Enrollment Rate

    Percent of approached eligible participants enrolling in the study

    Time frame: End of study enrollment period, approximately 12 months after enrollment initiation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Retention Rate

    The percent of participants completing all procedures for which they were eligible The numerator is calculated via the following formula: (n AYAs eligible to complete at least some study procedures \[n enrolled AYAs - n AYAs meeting criteria for unenrollment prior to study start\] - n AYAs who never started study procedures - n AYAs who did not complete at least some study procedures) The denominator (n AYAs eligible to complete at least some study procedures) is calculated via the following formula: (n enrolled AYAs - n AYAs meeting criteria for unenrollment prior to study start)

    Time frame: From enrollment to study completion (approximately 4 weeks for patients deemed ineligible after run-in and approximately 16 weeks for patients deemed eligible after run-in)

  2. Intervention Fidelity: Contact

    Percent of participants randomized to the Tailored Program who completed 4 intervention sessions

    Time frame: From randomization to the Tailored Program (at approximately week 4) to the completion of the Tailored Program (at approximately week 12) (total duration = approximately 8 weeks)

  3. Intervention Fidelity: Length

    Percent of participants randomized to the Tailored Program for whom all sessions were 30-45 minutes in length

    Time frame: From randomization to the Tailored Program (at approximately week 4) to the completion of the Tailored Program (at approximately week 12) (total duration = approximately 8 weeks)

  4. Intervention Fidelity: Duration

    Percent of randomized to the Tailored Program who completed all 4 intervention sessions during a 8-10 week period

    Time frame: From randomization to the Tailored Program (at approximately week 4) to the completion of the Tailored Program (at approximately week 12) (total duration = approximately 8 weeks)

  5. Intervention Fidelity: Content

    Percent of participants randomized to the Tailored Program who received all of the planned intervention content as defined in the fidelity checklist

    Time frame: From randomization to the Tailored Program (at approximately week 4) to the completion of the Tailored Program (at approximately week 12) (total duration = approximately 8 weeks)

  6. Assessment Completion

    Percent of enrolled participants with complete data

    Time frame: From enrollment to the completion of post-intervention assessment which occurred approximately 4 weeks after program completion (total time frame = approximately 16 weeks)

  7. System Usability Scale

    A 10-item rating of usability, range = 0-100, better scores indicate better usability

    Time frame: Post-intervention assessment, approximately 4 weeks after program completion and approximately 16 weeks after enrollment

  8. "Adjective Rating Scale" (Measure of Usability)

    1-item rating of user friendliness, range = 1 (worst imaginable) to 7 (best imaginable), higher scores indicate better usability

    Time frame: Post-intervention assessment, approximately 4 weeks after program completion and approximately 16 weeks after enrollment

  9. Number of Participants Rating Behavioral Treatment Acceptability as 4 or Greater

    Rating of behavioral treatment acceptability - "I would recommend this program to other adolescents and young adults"; Possible range = 1 (strongly disagree) - 5 (strongly agree), better scores represent better acceptability; Dichotomous variable created representing whether participants scored this item as 1-3 (not acceptable) or 4-5 (acceptable)

    Time frame: Post-intervention assessment, approximately 4 weeks after program completion and approximately 16 weeks after enrollment

  10. Medical Adherence Measure

    1-item self-report of missed doses

    Time frame: Post-intervention assessment, approximately 4 weeks after program completion and approximately 16 weeks after enrollment

  11. Electronically Monitored Medication Adherence

    Each participant will be given an electronic monitoring device to store their medication. The electronic monitoring device records each time the device is opened.

    Time frame: Starting 4 weeks prior to treatment initiation (approximately weeks 1-4) and continuing until 4 weeks after program completion (approximately weeks 12-16)

07

Results

Posted Dec 2, 2025

Participant flow

Of the 70 enrolled participants, 24 met inclusion criteria and were randomized to one of the two intervention conditions

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTailored ProgramFeedback Program
Started1212
Completed1212
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryEnrollment Rate

Percent of approached eligible participants enrolling in the study

Time frame:
End of study enrollment period, approximately 12 months after enrollment initiation
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Enrollment Rate
ParticipantsOverall
Enrollment Rate70
SecondaryRetention Rate

The percent of participants completing all procedures for which they were eligible The numerator is calculated via the following formula: (n AYAs eligible to complete at least some study procedures \[n enrolled AYAs - n AYAs meeting criteria for unenrollment prior to study start\] - n AYAs who never started study procedures - n AYAs who did not complete at least some study procedures) The denominator (n AYAs eligible to complete at least some study procedures) is calculated via the following formula: (n enrolled AYAs - n AYAs meeting criteria for unenrollment prior to study start)

Time frame:
From enrollment to study completion (approximately 4 weeks for patients deemed ineligible after run-in and approximately 16 weeks for patients deemed eligible after run-in)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Retention Rate
ParticipantsOverall
Retention Rate56
SecondaryIntervention Fidelity: Contact

Percent of participants randomized to the Tailored Program who completed 4 intervention sessions

Time frame:
From randomization to the Tailored Program (at approximately week 4) to the completion of the Tailored Program (at approximately week 12) (total duration = approximately 8 weeks)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Intervention Fidelity: Contact
ParticipantsTailored ProgramFeedback Program
Intervention Fidelity: Contact10—
SecondaryIntervention Fidelity: Length

Percent of participants randomized to the Tailored Program for whom all sessions were 30-45 minutes in length

Time frame:
From randomization to the Tailored Program (at approximately week 4) to the completion of the Tailored Program (at approximately week 12) (total duration = approximately 8 weeks)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Intervention Fidelity: Length
ParticipantsTailored ProgramFeedback Program
Intervention Fidelity: Length8—
SecondaryIntervention Fidelity: Duration

Percent of randomized to the Tailored Program who completed all 4 intervention sessions during a 8-10 week period

Time frame:
From randomization to the Tailored Program (at approximately week 4) to the completion of the Tailored Program (at approximately week 12) (total duration = approximately 8 weeks)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Intervention Fidelity: Duration
ParticipantsTailored ProgramFeedback Program
Intervention Fidelity: Duration10—
SecondaryIntervention Fidelity: Content

Percent of participants randomized to the Tailored Program who received all of the planned intervention content as defined in the fidelity checklist

Time frame:
From randomization to the Tailored Program (at approximately week 4) to the completion of the Tailored Program (at approximately week 12) (total duration = approximately 8 weeks)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Intervention Fidelity: Content
ParticipantsTailored ProgramFeedback Program
Intervention Fidelity: Content12—
SecondaryAssessment Completion

Percent of enrolled participants with complete data

Time frame:
From enrollment to the completion of post-intervention assessment which occurred approximately 4 weeks after program completion (total time frame = approximately 16 weeks)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Assessment Completion
ParticipantsTailored ProgramFeedback Program
Assessment Completion1212
SecondarySystem Usability Scale

A 10-item rating of usability, range = 0-100, better scores indicate better usability

Time frame:
Post-intervention assessment, approximately 4 weeks after program completion and approximately 16 weeks after enrollment
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
System Usability Scale
score on a scaleTailored ProgramFeedback Program
System Usability Scale80.42 ± 13.0581.25 ± 11.15
Secondary"Adjective Rating Scale" (Measure of Usability)

1-item rating of user friendliness, range = 1 (worst imaginable) to 7 (best imaginable), higher scores indicate better usability

Time frame:
Post-intervention assessment, approximately 4 weeks after program completion and approximately 16 weeks after enrollment
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
"Adjective Rating Scale" (Measure of Usability)
score on a scaleTailored ProgramFeedback Program
"Adjective Rating Scale" (Measure of Usability)5.92 ± 1.085.75 ± 0.97
SecondaryNumber of Participants Rating Behavioral Treatment Acceptability as 4 or Greater

Rating of behavioral treatment acceptability - "I would recommend this program to other adolescents and young adults"; Possible range = 1 (strongly disagree) - 5 (strongly agree), better scores represent better acceptability; Dichotomous variable created representing whether participants scored this item as 1-3 (not acceptable) or 4-5 (acceptable)

Time frame:
Post-intervention assessment, approximately 4 weeks after program completion and approximately 16 weeks after enrollment
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Rating Behavioral Treatment Acceptability as 4 or Greater
ParticipantsTailored ProgramFeedback Program
Number of Participants Rating Behavioral Treatment Acceptability as 4 or Greater118
SecondaryMedical Adherence Measure

1-item self-report of missed doses

Time frame:
Post-intervention assessment, approximately 4 weeks after program completion and approximately 16 weeks after enrollment
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of doses taken
Medical Adherence Measure
percentage of doses takenTailored ProgramFeedback Program
Medical Adherence Measure97.62 ± 5.5690.28 ± 15.71
SecondaryElectronically Monitored Medication Adherence

Each participant will be given an electronic monitoring device to store their medication. The electronic monitoring device records each time the device is opened.

Time frame:
Starting 4 weeks prior to treatment initiation (approximately weeks 1-4) and continuing until 4 weeks after program completion (approximately weeks 12-16)
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of doses taken
Electronically Monitored Medication Adherence
percentage of doses takenTailored ProgramFeedback Program
Electronically Monitored Medication Adherence85.44 ± 14.3863.25 ± 30.84

Adverse events

Collected over 4 month study period. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Tailored Program0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)
Feedback Program0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Tailored ProgramFeedback ProgramTotal
Mean19.25 ± 2.4718.73 ± 2.5018.99 ± 2.44
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Tailored ProgramFeedback ProgramTotal
Female347
Male9817
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Tailored ProgramFeedback ProgramTotal
Hispanic or Latino224
Not Hispanic or Latino91019
Unknown or Not Reported101
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Tailored ProgramFeedback ProgramTotal
Black or African American101
More the one race011
Other race101
White91019
I don't know112
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Tailored ProgramFeedback ProgramTotal
United States121224
08

Study locations

3 sites
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45229, United States
  • St Jude Children's Research Hospital
    Memphis, Tennessee 38105, United States
  • Seattle Children's Hospital
    Seattle, Washington 98105, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • McGrady ME, Ketterl TG, Webster RT, Burns MMK, Bills SE, Burke M, Szulczewski L, Brock MY, Schwartz LE, Herriott JK, Hommel KA, Pai ALH, Mara CA, Norris RE. Feasibility Trial of a Tailored Adherence-Promotion Intervention for Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2026 Jan;73(1):e32127. doi: 10.1002/pbc.32127. Epub 2025 Oct 27. PubMed 41146444 ↗
  • McGrady ME, Ketterl TG, Webster RT, Schwartz LE, Brock MY, Szulczewski L, Burke M, Hommel KA, Pai ALH, Mara CA, Steele AC, Regan GG, Norris RE. Feasibility pilot trial of a tailored medication adherence-promotion intervention for adolescents and young adults with cancer: Study design and protocol. Contemp Clin Trials. 2024 Apr;139:107483. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107483. Epub 2024 Feb 29. PubMed 38431133 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jan 18, 2023
  • Informed consent form · Jan 24, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 2, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05706610
Lead sponsor
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
Collaborators
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Cincinnati
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 31, 2023
Start date
Feb 23, 2023
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2024
Completion
Mar 31, 2025
Results posted
Dec 2, 2025
Last update
Dec 2, 2025

Study contacts

Meghan E McGrady, PhD
principal investigator · Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion