A Phase 2 interventional study of Trastuzumab deruxtecan and Standard-of-Care in HER2-positive Early Breast Cancer, sponsored by West German Study Group. Recruiting at 44 sites in Germany. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-09.
Sponsored by West German Study Group · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment
ADAPT-HER2-IV will address question of optimal neoadjuvant therapy in patients with less advanced -HER2+ EBC.
ADAPT-HER2-IV is planned as a superiority trial to demonstrate higher pCR rates in both clinically relevant subgroups of low-intermediate risk HER2+ EBC. Moreover, it aims to demonstrate excellent survival in patients treated by T-DXd (with the use of standard chemotherapy at investigator´s decision restricted only to patients with substantial residual tumour burden after T-DXd-treatment).
As the ADAPT-trials have clearly shown, pCR after 12 weeks of therapy, independent of the specific de-escalated neoadjuvant regimen and independent of further use of systemic chemotherapy, is an independent predictor of excellent prognosis4,19, also in patients treated by an antibody-drug conjugate alone (T-DM1), or in those receiving pertuzumab+trastuzumab+/-weekly paclitaxel.
In contrast to the adjuvant setting, none of the neoadjuvant trials so far has focused on HER2+ patients with a low-intermediate risk profile (e.g., node-negative patients with cT1-2 tumours). The ADAPT-HER2-IV trial aims to close this evidence gap.
Since there is some uncertainty about the optimal treatment duration in intermediate- to high-risk HER2+ EBC (e.g., tumour size >3 cm), we recommend using a longer 18-week taxane-based treatment (+/- carboplatin, at investigator´s decision) due to a large body of evidence for taxane + carboplatin combinations in patients in locally advanced stages.
Antibody-drug conjugates appear to be ideal candidate drugs for a "de-escalated" treatment due to their favourable safety (reduced alopecia, polyneuropathy rates, etc.) and a high efficacy profile (e.g., comparable pCR rates after 18 weeks of T-DM1 and taxane+pertuzumab+trastuzumab in the PREDIX HER2 trial20). Similarly to the classical chemotherapy landscape, optimal duration of antibody-drug conjugate-based neoadjuvant therapy remains unclear. pCR rates of around 40% to 60% were observed after 12 and 18 weeks of T-DM1 treatment (+/-pertuzumab) in the ADAPT TP, KRISTINE and PREDIX HER2 trials in HR+/HER2+ disease21,22. Moreover, long-term survival seem to be comparable between T-DM1+pertuzumab and older chemotherapy-containing regimens (docetaxel+carboplatin+trastuzumab+pertuzumab) despite of higher local progression rates and lower pCR in one study22.
Trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-DXd) has shown promising activity in a small cohort of metastatic patients, including both HER2+ and HER2-low BC, pre-treated with several lines of therapy. Doi et al. reported overall response rates (ORR) of 58% and a disease control rate of 100% with overall survival at 12 months at in HER2+ disease pre-treated by T-DM1+/-pertuzumab in a late line setting23. T-DXd-therapy was associated with a manageable safety profile. Recently, clearly higher efficacy of T-DXd vs. T-DM1 was shown in second line metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in the DESTINY-03 trial24. Median progression free survival was not reached in T-DM1-arm vs. 6.8 months in the T-DXd-arm. This effect was independent of hormone receptor status, prior pertuzumab treatment, visceral metastases, number of prior therapy lines and presence of brain metastases. ORR was doubled (34.2 vs. 79.7%), favouring the T-DXd arm.
4,278 studies on the registry are indexed under Recurrence; 990 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 702 is above the median of 50 across 3,373 interventional studies indexed under Recurrence.
Browse Recurrence studies →West German Study Group is the lead sponsor of 15 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Patients eligible for inclusion in this study must meet all the following criteria:
1. Female patients with invasive, untreated HER2+ breast cancer (as assessed by local pathology) maximum 6 weeks before registration (standard-of-care diagnostic biopsy according to current AGO guidelines) 2. Age ≥18 years 3a. Cohort 1: low- to intermediate-risk for recurrence as per investigator´s decision (recommendation: cT1c - cT2 (1 - ≤3cm) AND cN0; cT1a/b, cN0 excluded), OR 3b. Cohort 2: intermediate- to high-risk for recurrence as per investigator´s decision (recommendation: cT2 (>3 - ≤5cm), cN0) 3c. Cohort 3: intermediate- to high-risk for recurrence as per investigator´s decision, (recommendation: clinical stage II (cT2, cN0); cT1c, cN0 only if neoadjuvant treatment intended) 4. Written informed consent 5. LVEF ≥ 50% within 28 days before randomisation 6. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0-1 7. Adequate bone marrow and organ function within 14 days before randomisation as defined by the following laboratory values:
and/or whose FSH- and oestradiol-blood values are within the postmenopausal range per local laboratory normal range.
10. Female subjects must not donate, or retrieve for their own use, ova from the time of randomisation and throughout the study treatment period, and for at least 7 months after the final study drug administration.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients eligible for inclusion in this study must not meet any of the following criteria:
Primary malignancies within 5 years, with the exception of
Lung criteria:
Receipt of live, attenuated vaccine (mRNA and replication deficient adenoviral vaccines are not considered attenuated live vaccines) within 30 days prior to the first dose of trastuzumab deruxtecan or carboplatin.
Note: Patients, if enrolled, should not receive live vaccine during the study and up to 30 days after the last dose of IMP.
12 weeks T-DXd i.v. in neoadjuvant treatment; pCR dependent T-DXd for 1 year in total in postneoadjuvant treatment
Drug: Trastuzumab deruxtecan
18 weeks T-DXd i.v. in neoadjuvant treatment; pCR dependent T-DXd for 1 year in total in postneoadjuvant treatment
Drug: Trastuzumab deruxtecan
Standard-of-Care-Treatment: 12 weeks PAC+T+P (standard-of-care) in neoadjuvant treatment; pCR dependent SOC chemotherapy +T+/-P or SOC T+/-P for 1 year in total in postneoadjuvant treatment
Drug: Standard-of-Care
Standard-of-Care-Treatment: 18 weeks PAC/DOC+Carbo+T+P (standard-of-care) in neoadjuvant treatment; pCR dependent SOC chemotherapy +T+/-P or SOC T+/-P for 1 year in total in postneoadjuvant treatment
Drug: Standard-of-Care
12 weeks T-DXd i.v. follwed by 6 weeks SoC chemotherapy in neoadjuvant treatment; pCR dependent postneoadjuvant treatment: * non-pCR: 14 cycles of T-DXd is strongly recommended or SoC treatment, i.e., chemotherapy and anti-HER2-treatment, including T-DM1 at investigator´s decision * pCR: SoC treatment, e.g., T +/- P or T-DM1 (at investigator´s decision)
Drug: Trastuzumab deruxtecan · Drug: Standard-of-Care
12 weeks T-DXd i.v. follwed by 12 weeks SoC chemotherapy in neoadjuvant treatment; pCR dependent postneoadjuvant treatment: * non-pCR: 14 cycles of T-DXd is strongly recommended or SoC treatment, i.e., chemotherapy and anti-HER2-treatment, including T-DM1 at investigator´s decision * pCR: SoC treatment, e.g., T +/- P or T-DM1 (at investigator´s decision) Therapy for patients with non-pCR who received neoadjuvant T-DXd (12 weeks) + 12 weeks (4 cycles) of SoC chemotherapy will exceed total therapy over one year. Here, approximately 66 weeks are considered as maximum therapy (individual variations may apply)
Drug: Trastuzumab deruxtecan · Drug: Standard-of-Care
Standard-of-Care-Treatment: 18 weeks PAC/DOC+Carbo+T+P (standard-of-care) in neoadjuvant treatment; pCR dependent SOC chemotherapy +T+/-P or SOC T+/-P for 1 year in total in postneoadjuvant treatment * non-pCR (in particular ypT \>1b (5 mm) or ypN+: 14 cycles with T-DXd recommended * pCR: SoC treatment, e.g., T +/- P or T-DM1 (at investigator´s decision) Therapy for patients with non-pCR who received neoadjuvant SoC chemotherapy will exceed total therapy over one year. Here, approximately 60 weeks are considered as maximum therapy (individual variations may apply).
Drug: Standard-of-Care
T-DXd i.v.
Also known as: ENHERTU
Chemotherapy+T+P
Also known as: Chemotherapy+T+P
Adverse drug reactions with CTCAE-grade 3 or higher, compared between patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant monotherapy for 18 weeks (part 1, cohort 2) and patients treated with SoC for 18 weeks (part 1 and 2, cohorts 2 and 3 pooled)
compared between patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant monotherapy for 18 weeks (part 1, cohort 2) and patients treated with SoC for 18 weeks (part 1 and 2, cohorts 2 and 3 pooled)
Time frame: after 18 weeks of neoadjuvant treatment
distant disease-free survival (dDFS, according to STEEP 2.0 criteria): T-DXd
dDFS in patients with T-DXd neoadjuvant monotherapy (pooled experimental treatment arms of part 1, pooled cohorts 1 and 2)
Time frame: after 3 years
distant disease-free survival (dDFS, according to STEEP 2.0 criteria): CTx
in patients with T-DXd neoadjuvant therapy followed by CHT (pooled experimental treatment arms of part 2, cohort 3)
Time frame: after 3 years
pCR rate after neoadjuvant treatment
defined as ypT0is/ypN0, compared between patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant monotherapy (pooled experimental treatment arms of part 1, pooled cohorts 1 and 2) compared to patients of corresponding standard-of-care treatments (DOC/PAC+T+P or DOC/PAC+Carbo+T+P) (pooled standard-of-care treatment arms of part 1, pooled cohorts 1 and 2)
Time frame: after 18 weeks of neoadjuvant treatment
distant disease-free survival (dDFS, according to STEEP 2.0 criteria): 18 weeks
compared between patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant monotherapy for 18 weeks (part 1, cohort 2) and patients treated with SoC for 18 weeks (part 1 and 2, cohorts 2 and 3 pooled)
Time frame: after 3 years
distant disease-free survival (dDFS, according to STEEP 2.0 criteria): 12 weeks
compared between patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant monotherapy for 12 weeks (part 1, cohort 1) and patients treated with SoC for 12 weeks (part 1, cohort 1) 2 and 3 pooled)
Time frame: after 3 years
distant disease-free survival (dDFS, according to STEEP 2.0 criteria): 12 plus 6 weeks
compared between patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant therapy for 12 weeks followed by 6 weeks CHT (part 2, cohort 3) and patients treated with SoC for 18 weeks (part 1 and 2, cohorts 2 and 3 pooled)
Time frame: after 3 years
distant disease-free survival (dDFS, according to STEEP 2.0 criteria): 12 plus 12 weeks
compared between patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant therapy for 12 weeks followed by 12 weeks CHT (part 2, cohort 3) and patients treated with SoC for 18 weeks (part 1 and 2, cohorts 2 and 3 pooled)
Time frame: after 3 years
distant disease-free survival (dDFS, according to STEEP 2.0 criteria)
in patients with pCR after neoadjuvant treatment without further chemotherapy: It should be tested whether 3-year dDFS of each arm exceeds 92% (literature data)
Time frame: after 3 years
pCR rate: 18 weeks
defined as ypTis/ypN0 in patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant monotherapy for 18 weeks (part 1, cohort 2) and patients treated with SoC for 18 weeks (part 1 and 2, cohorts 2 and 3 pooled)
Time frame: after 18 weeks treatment
pCR rate: 12 weeks
defined as ypTis/ypN0 in patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant monotherapy for 12 weeks (part 1, cohort 1) and patients treated with SoC for 12 weeks (part 1, cohort 1)
Time frame: after 12 weeks treatment
pCR rate: 12 plus 12 weeks
defined as ypTis/ypN0 in patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant therapy for 12 weeks followed by 12 weeks CHT (part 2, cohort 3) and patients treated with SoC for 18 weeks (part 1 and 2, cohorts 2 and 3 pooled)
Time frame: after 24 weeks treatment
Clinical response after 6 weeks
defined as either cCR, cPR, cSD, after 6 weeks of neoadjuvant treatment compared between T-DXd treated patients and SoC treated patients
Time frame: after 6 weeks treatment
Clinical response after 12 weeks
defined as either cCR, cPR, cSD, after 12 weeks of neoadjuvant treatment compared between T-DXd treated patients and SoC treated patients
Time frame: after 12 weeks treatment
Clinical response after 24 weeks
defined as either cCR, cPR, cSD, after 24 weeks of neoadjuvant treatment compared between T-DXd treated patients and SoC treated patients
Time frame: after 24 weeks treatment
iDFS
survival endpoint STEEP 2.0
Time frame: at end of study
OS
survival endpoint STEEP 2.0
Time frame: at end of study
LRFS
survival endpoint STEEP 2.0
Time frame: at end of study
BCFS
survival endpoint STEEP 2.0
Time frame: at end of study
DRFI
survival endpoint STEEP 2.0
Time frame: at end of study
QOL
health-related quality of life
Time frame: after 1 year
adverse drug reaction with CTCAE-grade 3 or higher: 12 weeks mono
Number of ADR with CTCAE-grade 3 or higher in patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant monotherapy for 12 weeks (part 1, cohort 1) and patients treated with SoC for 12 weeks (part 1, cohort 1)
Time frame: after 12 weeks treatment
adverse drug reaction with CTCAE-grade 3 or higher: 18 weeks combined
Number of ADR with CTCAE-grade 3 or higher in patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant therapy for 12 weeks followed by 6 weeks CHT (part 2, cohort 3) and patients treated with SoC for 18 weeks (part 1 and 2, cohorts 2 and 3 pooled)
Time frame: after 18 weeks treatment
adverse drug reaction with CTCAE-grade 3 or higher: 24 weeks combined
Number of ADR with CTCAE-grade 3 or higher in patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant therapy for 12 weeks followed by 12 weeks CHT (part 2, cohort 3) and patients treated with SoC for 18 weeks (part 1 and 2, cohorts 2 and 3 pooled)
Time frame: after 24 weeks treatment
Proportion of patients with any TEAE: 18 weeks mono
compared between patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant monotherapy for 18 weeks (part 1, cohort 2) and patients treated with SoC for 18 weeks (part 1 and 2, cohorts 2 and 3 pooled)
Time frame: after 18 weeks treatment
Proportion of patients with any TEAE: 12 weeks mono
compared between patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant monotherapy for 12 weeks (part 1, cohort 1 ) and patients treated with SoC for 12 weeks (part 1, cohort 1)
Time frame: after 12 weeks treatment
Proportion of patients with any TEAE: 18 weeks combined
compared between patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant therapy for 12 weeks followed by 6 weeks CHT (part 2, cohort 3) and patients treated with SoC for 18 weeks (part 1 and 2, cohorts 2 and 3 pooled)
Time frame: after 18 weeks treatment
Proportion of patients with any TEAE: 24 weeks combined
compared between patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant therapy for 12 weeks followed by 12 weeks CHT (part 2, cohort 3) and patients treated with SoC for 18 weeks (part 1 and 2, cohorts 2 and 3 pooled)
Time frame: after 24 weeks treatment
Frequency of TEAE: 12 weeks
in all T-DXd based neoadjuvant treatment regimens as well as in SoC for 12 weeks (part 1, cohort 1)
Time frame: after 12 weeks treatment
Frequency of TEAE : 18 weeks
in all T-DXd based neoadjuvant treatment regimens as well as in SoC for 18 weeks (part 1 and 2, cohorts 2 and 3 pooled)
Time frame: after 18 weeks treatment
Proportion of patients with adverse event of special interest (AESI): 18 weeks mono
AESI) (interstitial lung disease, QT time prolongation, LVEF decrease, infusion related reactions) compared between patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant monotherapy for 18 weeks (part 1, cohort 2) and patients treated with SoC for 18 weeks (part 1 and 2, cohorts 2 and 3 pooled)
Time frame: after 18 weeks treatment
Proportion of patients with adverse event of special interest (AESI): 12 weeks mono
AESI) (interstitial lung disease, QT time prolongation, LVEF decrease, infusion related reactions) compared between patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant monotherapy for 12 weeks (part 1, cohort 1 ) and patients treated with SoC for 12 weeks (part 1, cohort1 )
Time frame: after 12 weeks treatment
Proportion of patients with adverse event of special interest (AESI): 18 weeks combined
AESI) (interstitial lung disease, QT time prolongation, LVEF decrease, infusion related reactions) compared between patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant therapy for 12 weeks followed by 6 weeks CHT (part 2, cohort 3) and patients treated with SoC for 18 weeks (part 1 and 2, cohorts 2 and 3 pooled)
Time frame: after 18 weeks treatment
Proportion of patients with adverse event of special interest (AESI): 24 weeks combined
AESI) (interstitial lung disease, QT time prolongation, LVEF decrease, infusion related reactions) compared between patients treated with T-DXd neoadjuvant therapy for 12 weeks followed by 12 weeks CHT (part 2, cohort 3) and patients treated with SoC for 18 weeks (part 1 and 2, cohorts 2 and 3 pooled)
Time frame: after 24 weeks treatment
Frequency of AESI in T-DXd
in all four T-DXd based neoadjuvant treatment regimens
Time frame: after 12 weeks treatment
Frequency of AESI in SoC: 12 weeks
in SoC for 12 weeks (part 1, cohort 1)
Time frame: after 12 weeks treatment
Frequency of AESI in SoC: 18 weeks
in SoC for 18 weeks (part 1 and 2, cohorts 2 and 3 pooled)
Time frame: after 18 weeks treatment
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
West German Study Group