CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05704725Updated Feb 14, 2025Results posted

A Study to Evaluate ABP 938 and Aflibercept (Eylea®) in Participants With Chorioretinal Vascular Disease (CVD)

A Phase 3 interventional study of ABP 938 and Aflibercept in Chorioretinal Vascular Disease, sponsored by Amgen. Completed at 4 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-14.

Sponsored by Amgen · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
49
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objective of this study is to is to assess the ability of retina specialists to successfully administer, via an intravitreal (IVT) injection, a 2 mg dose of ABP 938, using the ABP 938 aflibercept prefilled syringe (PFS), compared to a 2 mg dose of aflibercept using the aflibercept PFS.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chorioretinal Vascular Disease

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Chorioretinal vascular disease
  • CVD
  • ABP 938
  • EYLEA®
  • aflibercept
03

In context

Vascular Diseases

1,027 studies on the registry are indexed under Vascular Diseases; 167 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 49 is below the median of 78 across 639 interventional studies indexed under Vascular Diseases.

Browse Vascular Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Amgen is the lead sponsor of 1,015 studies on the registry; 49 are open to participants now.

Of its 245 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 159 (65%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Must sign an IRB approved informed consent form before any study-specific procedures are initiated.
  • Men or women ≥18 years old.
  • Treatment-naïve or previously treated neovascular age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular edema, macular edema following retinal vein occlusion, or diabetic retinopathy in the study eye.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

  • Active intraocular or periocular infection or active intraocular inflammation in either eye.
  • Uncontrolled intraocular pressure greater than (>) 25 mmHg in the study eye.
  • Deemed legally blind in one or both eyes.
  • History of or any current indication of excessive bleeding or recurrent hemorrhages, including any prior excessive intraocular bleeding or hemorrhages after IVT injection or intraocular procedures in either eye.
  • Current systemic infectious disease or on a therapy for active infectious disease.
  • History of any medical, ocular or non-ocular conditions that, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere with the injection procedure or pose a safety concern.
  • History of stroke or transient ischemic attacks or myocardial infarction within the last 6 months.
  • Treatment with anti-VEGF IVT injection in the study eye within 28 days.
  • Any use of intraocular corticosteroids in the study eye within 3 months.
  • Receipt of any systemic anti-VEGF within the last 6 months.
  • Any invasive intraocular surgery, prior long-acting therapeutic agent, or ocular drug release device implantation in the study eye within the past 3 months.
  • For women: pregnant or breast feeding, or planning to become pregnant while enrolled in the study and for 3 months after IP administration.
  • Sexually active participants and their partners who are of childbearing potential who refuse to use adequate contraception while on-study and for 3 months after IP administration. Male participants must agree not to donate sperm during study and for 3 months following dose of IP.
  • Allergy or hypersensitivity to the IP, to any of the excipients of ABP 938 or aflibercept, or to other study-related procedures/medications.
  • Previously enrolled in this study.
  • Participation in any interventional clinical study within 3 months prior to screening.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
49 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ABP 938

    Participants will be randomized in a ratio of 2:1 to receive either a single IVT injection of ABP 938 in a PFS or a single injection of aflibercept in a PFS.

    Drug: ABP 938

  • Experimental
    Aflibercept

    Participants will be randomized in a ratio of 2:1 to receive either a single IVT injection of ABP 938 in a PFS or a single injection of aflibercept in a PFS.

    Drug: Aflibercept

Interventions

  • DrugABP 938

    IVT injection

    Also known as: PAVBLU™

  • DrugAflibercept

    IVT injection

    Also known as: Eylea®

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of IVT Injections Successfully Administered

    A successful injection was defined by whether the retinal specialist administering the IVT injection answered 'yes' to the following question: Did the PFS allow for the safe and effective administration of the prescribed dose? Percentage of successful injections and Clopper-Pearson 95% Confidence Interval is reported.

    Time frame: Day of IVT injection (study day 1)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) in Study Eye

    An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant. Events that met the AE definition are as follows: * Any abnormal or worsening ocular safety result that is considered clinically significant in the medical and scientific judgment of the investigator. * Exacerbation of a chronic or intermittent pre-existing condition including either an increase in frequency and/or intensity of the condition. * New conditions detected or diagnosed after study treatment administration even though it may have been present before the start of the study. * Signs, symptoms, or the clinical sequelae of a suspected overdose of either study treatment or a concomitant medication. AEs were classified by system organ class (SOC) according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (medDRA) and graded by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 5.0

    Time frame: Up to 28 days

  2. Number of Participants With Serious Ocular TEAEs in Study Eye

    A serious AE is any event that met at least 1 of the following serious criteria: * Fatal. * Life-threatening (places the participant at immediate risk of death). * Requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization. * Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity. * Congenital anomaly/birth defect. * Other medically important serious event. AEs were classified by SOC according to medDRA and graded by CTCAE, version 5.0

    Time frame: Up to 28 days

  3. Number of Participants With Non-ocular Serious TEAEs

    A serious AE is any event that met at least 1 of the following serious criteria: * Fatal. * Life-threatening (places the participant at immediate risk of death). * Requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization. * Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity. * Congenital anomaly/birth defect. * Other medically important serious event. AEs were classified by SOC according to medDRA and graded by CTCAE, version 5.0

    Time frame: Up to 28 days

07

Results

Posted Feb 14, 2025

Participant flow

This study was conducted at 4 centers in the United States between 23 January 2023 and 24 March 2023.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneABP 938Aflibercept
Started3316
Completed3215
Not completed11
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up01
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject10

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of IVT Injections Successfully Administered

A successful injection was defined by whether the retinal specialist administering the IVT injection answered 'yes' to the following question: Did the PFS allow for the safe and effective administration of the prescribed dose? Percentage of successful injections and Clopper-Pearson 95% Confidence Interval is reported.

Time frame:
Day of IVT injection (study day 1)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Successful Injections
Percentage of IVT Injections Successfully Administered
Percentage of Successful InjectionsABP 938Aflibercept
Percentage of IVT Injections Successfully Administered100 (89.1 to 100.0)100 (79.4 to 100.0)
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) in Study Eye

An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant. Events that met the AE definition are as follows: * Any abnormal or worsening ocular safety result that is considered clinically significant in the medical and scientific judgment of the investigator. * Exacerbation of a chronic or intermittent pre-existing condition including either an increase in frequency and/or intensity of the condition. * New conditions detected or diagnosed after study treatment administration even though it may have been present before the start of the study. * Signs, symptoms, or the clinical sequelae of a suspected overdose of either study treatment or a concomitant medication. AEs were classified by system organ class (SOC) according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (medDRA) and graded by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 5.0

Time frame:
Up to 28 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) in Study Eye
ParticipantsABP 938Aflibercept
Number of Participants With Ocular Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) in Study Eye30
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Serious Ocular TEAEs in Study Eye

A serious AE is any event that met at least 1 of the following serious criteria: * Fatal. * Life-threatening (places the participant at immediate risk of death). * Requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization. * Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity. * Congenital anomaly/birth defect. * Other medically important serious event. AEs were classified by SOC according to medDRA and graded by CTCAE, version 5.0

Time frame:
Up to 28 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Serious Ocular TEAEs in Study Eye
ParticipantsABP 938Aflibercept
Number of Participants With Serious Ocular TEAEs in Study Eye00
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Non-ocular Serious TEAEs

A serious AE is any event that met at least 1 of the following serious criteria: * Fatal. * Life-threatening (places the participant at immediate risk of death). * Requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization. * Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity. * Congenital anomaly/birth defect. * Other medically important serious event. AEs were classified by SOC according to medDRA and graded by CTCAE, version 5.0

Time frame:
Up to 28 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Non-ocular Serious TEAEs
ParticipantsABP 938Aflibercept
Number of Participants With Non-ocular Serious TEAEs00

Adverse events

Collected over 28 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
ABP 9380/32 (0%)0/32 (0%)2/32 (6.3%)
Aflibercept0/16 (0%)0/16 (0%)2/16 (12.5%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventABP 938Aflibercept
Vitreous detachmentEye disorders2/320/16
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders0/321/16
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/321/16

Baseline characteristics

Full Analysis Set (FAS): All randomized participants.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)ABP 938AfliberceptTotal
Mean71.0 ± 11.4066.3 ± 15.6469.5 ± 12.97
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)ABP 938AfliberceptTotal
Female14216
Male191433
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)ABP 938AfliberceptTotal
Hispanic or Latino9413
Not Hispanic or Latino231235
Unknown or Not Reported101
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)ABP 938AfliberceptTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native112
Asian101
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American303
White281442
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported011
08

Study locations

4 sites
  • Retina Consultants of Texas - Austin Retina
    Austin, Texas 78705, United States
  • Retina Consultants of Texas - Bellaire Retina Center
    Bellaire, Texas 77401, United States
  • Retinal Consultants of Texas - San Antonio Retina Center
    San Antonio, Texas 78240-1657, United States
  • Retina Consultants of Texas - The Woodlands Retina Center
    The Woodlands, Texas 77384, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Oct 19, 2022
  • Statistical analysis plan · Oct 19, 2022

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual patient data for variables necessary to address the specific research question in an approved data sharing request.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 14, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05704725
Lead sponsor
Amgen
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 30, 2023
Start date
Jan 23, 2023
Primary completion
Feb 17, 2023
Completion
Mar 24, 2023
Results posted
Feb 14, 2025
Last update
Feb 14, 2025

Study contacts

MD
study director · Amgen

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion