CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05699980Updated May 1, 2023

Prevalence and Comorbidities of Dermatoporosis: a French Prospective Observational Study in General Medicine Consultation

An observational study in Dermatoporosis, sponsored by University of Lorraine. Completed at 15 sites in France. Open to participants aged 60 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-05-01.

Sponsored by University of Lorraine · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
370
Ages
60 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The term dermatoporosis (DP) was proposed by JH. Saurat in 2004 and detailed in 2007 to describe a chronic cutaneous insufficiency and fragility syndrome.

The concept of DP, the positive diagnosis and the complications are well identified in the literature. However, while the consequences of skin aging are a growing concern, knowledge of DP is stagnant.

DP is clinically defined by the combination of three clinical signs: skin atrophy, white pseudo-scars, and senile purpura. It mainly sits on photo-exposed regions: posterior face of the forearms and back of the hands in 92 to 100% of cases; but also the pre-tibial, pre-sternal, and cephalic regions.

DP appears at around 60 years old and can worsen with advancing age. Complications of varying severity can occur during its development: skin tears, delayed healing, infection, hematomas including dissecting hematomas that are sometimes life-threatening.

DP is classified into four stages defined in 2004 and revised in 2012. The autonomy of the DP entity or its integration as a marker in multi-organ failure has not yet been determined. It is a condition on the borders of several specialties requiring good coordination between them (dermatologists, general practitioners, geriatricians, nurses, etc.)

The few published epidemiological studies report a prevalence ranging from 4% to 37.5% in patients aged 50 years and over. These epidemiological data are very heterogeneous (age of recruitment, patients hospitalized or seen on an outpatient basis in consultations of different specialties, sample of the population, etc.).

Among these studies, three clinical studies, two on a French hospital cohort, the other on outpatients in Dermatology in Finland, estimated the prevalence of DP between 27 and 32% in adults aged 60 years and older. In all three studies, DP was associated with advanced age, with a risk of DP up to double in patients aged 85 and older compared to younger patients. In two of these studies, a link was suggested with the status of chronic renal failure, either independently for one, or concomitant with taking anticoagulants and corticosteroids for the other. For Kluger et al., DP was also associated with the independent use of very strong local or systemic corticosteroids. For Chanca et al., an independent link between DP and tobacco consumption, taking anticoagulant treatment, and chronic recreational sun exposure has been observed.

Read the detailed description

No clinical study has evaluated the prevalence of DP and the comorbidities often cited in adults aged 60 and over in general practice consultations.

The primary objective of this study is to assess the prevalence in a population aged 60 and over followed in a general practice in the North East of France (Lorraine). In addition, as it has been shown an association between DP and comorbidities or drug intake, the secondary objective is to investigate the possible existence of such associations.

Study design:

An observational, descriptive, transversal, multicenter study was conducted in the North East of France (Lorraine) between May and October 2022. We included by half-day, consecutively, all patients aged 60 and over presenting to a general medical consultation with 20 volunteer practitioners from the 4 Lorraine departments. Each practitioner was trained in the diagnosis of DP through a 27-minutes E-learning video and phone contacts.

Clinical and biological variables:

For each patient, the general practitioner performed his usual clinical examination, with a dermatological examination of the upper limbs. He completed an anonymous online questionnaire with data collected from the interrogation, medical files, and clinical examination.

The following data were reported: demographic data, active or former smoking, diabetes, dermatological history (atopic dermatitis, bullous dermatosis, psoriasis), chronic renal failure (MDRD \< 60ml /min/m2), past sun exposure, Fitzpatrick phototype, treatments (anticoagulant, antiplatelet, systemic, local, inhaled corticosteroid therapy (cumulative duration >= 1 month)).

Finally, the signs of DP and the stage were filled in. For this study, we used the clinical staging of DP as proposed by Kaya and Saurat in 2012.

When signs of DP were present, photos of the dorsal aspect of the forearms and back of the hands (usual practice) were reviewed by the investigator and a dermatologist to confirm the diagnosis. The questionnaires were analyzed by the principal investigator.

As Chanca et al., we divided past sun exposure into three types: recreational, occupational, and childhood exposure. To assess chronic recreational sun exposure, patients were asked about past outdoor activities, such as walking or cycling at least 2 times/week. Occupational sun exposure was defined based on whether patients had an indoor or outdoor occupation. Childhood sun exposure was defined by a history of childhood sunburn.

Fitzpatrick phototype distinguishes six skin types based on tone, from very light skin that never tans (phototype 1), to dark skin, which never gets sunburn (phototype 6). According to this classification, we divided the patients into two categories: light skin (phototypes 1 to 3) and dark skin (phototypes 4 to 6).

02

Conditions studied

  • Dermatoporosis

Keywords

  • skin ageing
  • sun exposure
  • skin tears
  • purpura
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Lorraine is the lead sponsor of 12 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
60 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

All patients aged 60 or over presenting to their general practitioner.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient presenting to his general practitioner
  • Patient aged 60 or over

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal of participation
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
370 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patient aged 60 or over presenting to their general practitioner

    Patient aged 60 or over presenting to his general practitioner (among the 20 general practitioners recruited in Lorraine (eastern France))

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Presence or absence of dermatoporosis on the forearms or back of the hands

    Presence or absence of dermatoporosis on the forearms or back of the hands in patients aged 60 or over in general practice

    Time frame: At admission, Day 1

Secondary outcomes

  1. Measurement of phototype

    Measurement of phototype as a risk factor for dermatoporosis

    Time frame: At admission, Day 1

  2. Childhood sun exposure

    Childhood sun exposure as a risk factor for dermatoporosis

    Time frame: At admission, Day 1

  3. Lifetime sun exposure Measurement of phototype

    Lifetime sun exposure as a risk factor for dermatoporosis

    Time frame: At admission, Day 1

  4. Tobacco consumption

    Tobacco consumption as a risk factor for dermatoporosis

    Time frame: At admission, Day 1

  5. Presence or absence of diabetes

    Diabetes as a risk factor for dermatoporosis

    Time frame: At admission, Day 1

  6. Presence or absence of chronic renal failure

    chronic renal failure as a risk factor for dermatoporosis

    Time frame: At admission, Day 1

  7. Presence or absence of antiplatelet consumption

    antiplatelet consumption as a risk factor for dermatoporosis

    Time frame: At admission, Day 1

  8. Presence or absence of anticoagulant consumption

    anticoagulant consumption as a risk factor for dermatoporosis

    Time frame: At admission, Day 1

  9. Presence or absence of systemic corticosteroid therapy

    systemic corticosteroid therapy as a risk factor for dermatoporosis

    Time frame: At admission, Day 1

  10. Presence or absence of topical corticosteroid

    topical corticosteroid on the forearms or back of the hands as a risk factor for dermatoporosis

    Time frame: At admission, Day 1

  11. Presence or absence of inhaled corticosteroid

    inhaled corticosteroid as a risk factor for dermatoporosis

    Time frame: At admission, Day 1

07

Study locations

15 sites
  • Stéphanie Chevalier
    Ancerville, 55170, France
  • Wissam Al Shouaib
    Basse-Ham, 57970, France
  • Sophie Delaporte
    Bulgnéville, 88140, France
  • Sophie LARUELLE
    Bénaménil, 54450, France
  • Cédric Berbé
    Cattenom, 57570, France
  • Sandra Pacini
    Hayange, 57700, France
  • Anais Leclerc
    Hettange-Grande, 57330, France
  • Benoit Nicolas
    Hettange-Grande, 57330, France
  • Mathieu Zimmermann
    Le Val-d'Ajol, 88340, France
  • Mélanie Damervalle
    Longuyon, 54260, France
  • Patrick Vauthier
    Longwy, 54400, France
  • Aurelie François
    Raon-l'Étape, 88110, France
  • Jean-Louis Autissier
    Thaon les vosges, 88150, France
  • Cabinet Tronville en Barrois
    Tronville-en-Barrois, 55310, France
  • Cabinet Varangéville
    Varangéville, 54110, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kaya G, Saurat JH. Dermatoporosis: a chronic cutaneous insufficiency/fragility syndrome. Clinicopathological features, mechanisms, prevention and potential treatments. Dermatology. 2007;215(4):284-94. doi: 10.1159/000107621. PubMed 17911985 ↗
  • Mengeaud V, Dautezac-Vieu C, Josse G, Vellas B, Schmitt AM. Prevalence of dermatoporosis in elderly French hospital in-patients: a cross-sectional study. Br J Dermatol. 2012 Feb;166(2):442-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10534.x. Epub 2011 Dec 5. No abstract available. PubMed 21787367 ↗
  • Chanca L, Fontaine J, Kerever S, Feneche Y, Forasassi C, Meaume S, Colboc H. Prevalence and risk factors of dermatoporosis in older adults in a rehabilitation hospital. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Apr;70(4):1252-1256. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17618. Epub 2021 Dec 17. PubMed 34918778 ↗
  • Kluger N, Impivaara S. Prevalence of and risk factors for dermatoporosis: a prospective observational study of dermatology outpatients in a Finnish tertiary care hospital. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019 Feb;33(2):447-450. doi: 10.1111/jdv.15240. Epub 2018 Oct 1. PubMed 30198583 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 1, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05699980
Lead sponsor
University of Lorraine
Collaborators
Study Director: Anne Claire Bursztejn, PHD-MD, CHU Nancy - University of Lorraine, Study Chair: Christophe Goetz, MD, CHR Metz-Thionville - University of Lorraine
Responsible party
Antoine Truchetet (Principal investigator, MD, University of Lorraine) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 26, 2023
Start date
May 23, 2022
Primary completion
May 23, 2022
Completion
Oct 3, 2022
Last update
May 1, 2023

Study contacts

Antoine Truchetet, MD
principal investigator · University of Lorraine
Anne Claire Bursztejn, PHD-MD
study director · CHU Nancy - University of Lorraine
Cédric Berbé, MD
study director · University of Lorraine
Christophe Goetz, MD
study chair · CHR Metz-Thionville - University of Lorraine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion