CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05689242Updated Jan 19, 2023

Intravenous Nalbuphine Versus Intravenous Dexmedetomidine for Conscious Sedation in Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy

A Phase 4 interventional study of Dexmedetomidine Injection [Precedex] in Colonoscopy, sponsored by Assiut University. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-01-19.

Sponsored by Assiut University · Phase 4, Interventional, and Other

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jan 2023), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
66
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to compare the sedative, analgesic effect and hemodynamic changes due to dexmedetomidine and nalbuphine during elective colonoscopy.

Read the detailed description

Colonoscopy can be performed for the screening of cancer, adenomas, and polyps, for the assessment of known or possible bleeding, and for the evaluation of possible causes of abdominal pain, gastrointestinal symptoms, and/or changes in bowel habits. colonoscopy is associated with discomfort and sometimes pain. At present, the commonly used methods are the intravenous injection of propofol, etomidate, ketamine, and other drugs to make the patient's unconscious. The disadvantage is that the patient cannot cooperate during the examination (e.g., for changing position), and medical staff is needed to assist in turning over the patient, if necessary. This may compress the patient's stomach and abdomen, which may cause gastric reflux and aspiration, which may cause pneumonia, with morbidity and even mortality. Nalbuphine hydrochloride is a mixed agonist-antagonist opioid with a duration of action of approximately 3-6 hours. It is chemically related to both the agonist analgesic oxymorphone and the antagonist naloxone, and acts as an antagonist at the μ receptor and as an agonist at the κ receptor, resulting in analgesia and sedation with minimal effects in the cardiovascular system. Any slight RD that occurs would be restricted by a ceiling effect. Dexmedetomidine, a new drug, is highly selective α2-adrenergic receptor agonist. It possesses hypnotic, sedative, anxiolytic, sympatholytic, and analgesic properties without producing significant respiratory depression. It also reduces both anesthetic and opioid analgesic requirements during the perioperative period. It has an impressive safety margin,and it may be suitable for conscious sedation during painful procedures.

02

Conditions studied

  • Colonoscopy

Keywords

  • Dexmedetomidine
  • nalbuphine
  • colonoscopy
  • Conscious Sedation
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Assiut University is the lead sponsor of 4,901 studies on the registry; 2,098 are open to participants now.

Of its 13 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. The subject is scheduled for elective colonoscopy.
  2. The subject is ≥ 18 years and ≤ 80 years.
  3. Both sexes.
  4. No obvious abnormalities in preoperative ECG, blood routine ,electrolytes, and other tests .
  5. ASA class 1-3.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject is known or believed to be pregnant or lactating women.
  2. Patients allergic to α2-adrenergic agonist or sulfa drugs
  3. Chronic Opioid Use (daily or almost daily use of opioids for > 3 months).
  4. Patients that are immunologically compromised, or receiving chronic steroids (>30 days), excluding inhalers.
  5. Sleep apnea syndrome or difficult airway.
  6. Patient known to be asthmatic or recent chest infection.
  7. Patients that are prisoners.
  8. Patient refusal.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
66 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group I

    Receive initial loading dose of (Dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg I.V) diluted up to 10 ml with normal saline infused over 10 min, followed by a continuous infusion of 0.2-0.8 μg/kg/h through a 50 ml syringe and an electronic infusion pump

    Drug: Dexmedetomidine Injection [Precedex]

  • Experimental
    Group II

    Receive (Nalbuphine 0.1 to 0.2 mg/kg I.V) diluted up to 10 ml with normal saline infused slowly over 10 min.

    Drug: Dexmedetomidine Injection [Precedex]

Interventions

  • DrugDexmedetomidine Injection [Precedex]

    intravenous dexmedetomidine for group I and nalubphine for group II in colposcopy

    Also known as: nalbuphine

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. variable is to compare the sedation effect between Nalbuphine and Dexmedetomidine.

    3- Sedation score: sedation will be monitored immediately after examination, at PACU admission, and 30 min after procedure by Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS; 1974) The RSS scores sedation at six different levels, according to how rousable the patient is. 1. Patient is anxious and agitated or restless, or both. 2. Patient is cooperative, oriented and tranquil. 3. Patient responds to commands only. 4. Patient exhibits brisk response to light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus. 5. Patient exhibits a sluggish response to light glabellar tap or loud auditory stimulus. 6. Patient exhibits no response

    Time frame: before the study drug administration (baseline), after the study drug administration ,Then every 5min till the examination ends,at PACU admission, and 30 min after procedure.

Secondary outcomes

  1. variables are the hemodynamic comparison, pain score assessment and adverse event among two groups.

    4- Pain score: Intensity of pain will be monitored immediately after examination, at PACU admission, and 30 min after procedure by visual analogue score (VAS),The (VAS) consist of 10cm line, with to end points representing 0 (no pain) and 10 (pain as bad as it possibly be), ask the patient to rete their current level of pain by placing a mark on the line, by using a ruler to measure the distance from 0 (no pain point) to the current pain mark

    Time frame: before the study drug administration (baseline), after the study drug administration ,Then every 5min till the examination ends,at PACU admission, and 30 min after procedure.

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ulmer BJ, Hansen JJ, Overley CA, Symms MR, Chadalawada V, Liangpunsakul S, Strahl E, Mendel AM, Rex DK. Propofol versus midazolam/fentanyl for outpatient colonoscopy: administration by nurses supervised by endoscopists. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003 Nov;1(6):425-32. doi: 10.1016/s1542-3565(03)00226-x. PubMed 15017641 ↗
  • Muller S, Borowics SM, Fortis EA, Stefani LC, Soares G, Maguilnik I, Breyer HP, Hidalgo MP, Caumo W. Clinical efficacy of dexmedetomidine alone is less than propofol for conscious sedation during ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Apr;67(4):651-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.09.041. Epub 2008 Mar 4. PubMed 18291396 ↗
  • Kaygusuz K, Gokce G, Gursoy S, Ayan S, Mimaroglu C, Gultekin Y. A comparison of sedation with dexmedetomidine or propofol during shockwave lithotripsy: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2008 Jan;106(1):114-9, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000296453.75494.64. PubMed 18165564 ↗
  • Karanth H, Murali S, Koteshwar R, Shetty V, Adappa K. Comparative Study between Propofol and Dexmedetomidine for Conscious Sedation in Patients Undergoing Outpatient Colonoscopy. Anesth Essays Res. 2018 Jan-Mar;12(1):98-102. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_206_17. PubMed 29628562 ↗
  • Candiotti KA, Bergese SD, Bokesch PM, Feldman MA, Wisemandle W, Bekker AY; MAC Study Group. Monitored anesthesia care with dexmedetomidine: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial. Anesth Analg. 2010 Jan 1;110(1):47-56. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181ae0856. Epub 2009 Aug 27. PubMed 19713256 ↗
  • Scott J, Huskisson EC. Graphic representation of pain. Pain. 1976 Jun;2(2):175-84. No abstract available. PubMed 1026900 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 19, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05689242
Lead sponsor
Assiut University
Responsible party
OMAR ABDELAZIZ ABOELFADL (omar abdelaziz abulfadl abdelaziz, Assiut University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 19, 2023
Start date
Mar 2023 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 19, 2023

Study contacts

omar AB abulfadl, bachelor's
Contact
omarabulfadl1@gmail.com
0021069909234
hamdy youssef, prof
Contact
hamdyayoussef@yahoo.com
0021090008490

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jan 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion