CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05689125Updated Jun 13, 2023

Bougies as Aid for Endotracheal Intubation Via Video Laryngoscopy During Continuous Chest Compressions

An interventional study of Railroaded bougie and Preloaded bougie in Endotracheal Intubation, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Simulation, sponsored by Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Completed at 1 site in China. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-06-13.

Sponsored by Peking Union Medical College Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
65
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trials is to analyze the effects of using bougies as adjuncts on the performance of endotracheal intubation via video laryngoscopy during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in anesthesia residents. The main question it aims to answer is whether bougie use has a significant effect on first-attempt failure of endotracheal intubation via video laryngoscopy during continuous chest compressions. Participants will perform endotracheal intubation via video laryngoscopy by four methods in a randomized order in a simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation scenario on a manikin. The four methods are endotracheal intubations assisted by a railroaded bougie, assisted by a preloaded bougie, assisted by a stylet, and with no assistance. Researchers will compare the first-attempt failure rate of the four methods to see if a railroaded bougie method has a significant different first-attempt failure from that of the other three methods.

02

Conditions studied

  • Endotracheal Intubation
  • Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
  • Simulation
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Peking Union Medical College Hospital is the lead sponsor of 1,115 studies on the registry; 463 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Residents who are enrolled in the three-year standardized residency training program in the Department of Anesthesiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital in February, 2023.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Residents who refuse to participate and residents who fail the pre-test.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
65 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Railroaded bougie

    An endotracheal tube is loaded onto a bougie posterior to the placement of the bougie into the trachea.

    Device: Railroaded bougie

  • Other
    Preloaded bougie

    An endotracheal tube is loaded onto a bougie prior to initiating laryngoscopy.

    Device: Preloaded bougie

  • Active comparator
    Stylet

    A stylet is placed within an endotracheal tube prior to initiating laryngoscopy.

    Device: Stylet

  • No intervention
    Naked endotracheal tube

    Residents expose the glottis by a video laryngoscope and perform the endotracheal intubation without assistance of stylet or bougie.

Interventions

  • DeviceRailroaded bougie

    Residents expose the glottis by a video laryngoscope and place the tip of bougie through the vocal cords. Then, an assistant loads an endotracheal tube on the free end of the bougie. Residents advance the endotracheal tube over the bougie and withdraw the bougie.

  • DevicePreloaded bougie

    Residents expose the glottis by a video laryngoscope and perform the endotracheal intubation using a bougie with a preloaded endotracheal tube while an assistant secures the free end of the bougie. Residents withdraw the bougie when the endotracheal tube reaches an appropriate depth.

  • DeviceStylet

    Residents expose the glottis by a video laryngoscope and perform the endotracheal intubation with the assistance of a stylet. An assistant withdraws the stylet when the tip of the endotracheal tube passes through the vocal cords. Then residents place the endotracheal tube to an appropriate depth.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Failure on the first attempt

    An attempt is terminated and defined as a failure when a resident tries for one minute but is still unable to start ventilation, or when a resident feels unable to succeed and decides to give up, or when a resident withdraws a laryngoscope blade, a bougie, or a tube out of the month after the initial insertion. This outcome will be measured based on videos of endotracheal intubation procedures recorded by a camera placed on the right side of the manikin.

    Time frame: At the completion of the intubation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Failure on two attempts

    If the first attempt of a method fails, the resident will be given a second opportunity of the same method. This outcome will be measured based on videos of endotracheal intubation procedures recorded by a camera placed on the right side of the manikin.

    Time frame: At the completion of the intubation

  2. Duration of the first attempt

    The time elapsed between the insertion of a laryngoscope blade into the month and either the start of ventilation in a successful attempt or the termination of a failed attempt. This outcome will be measured based on videos of endotracheal intubation procedures recorded by a camera placed on the right side of the manikin.

    Time frame: At the completion of the intubation

  3. Overall intubation duration

    Duration of the first attempt if it succeeds or the sum of the duration of both attempts if the first attempt fails. This outcome will be measured based on videos of endotracheal intubation procedures recorded by a camera placed on the right side of the manikin.

    Time frame: At the completion of the intubation

  4. Self-reported intubation difficulty

    0-10 ranking scale with 0 representing "the easiest" and 10 "the most difficult" rated by the residents.

    Time frame: At the completion of the intubation

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Peking Union Medical College Hospital
    Beijing, Beijing 100730, China
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — The study plan can be obtained from the principal investigator on request.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 13, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05689125
Lead sponsor
Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Responsible party
Huang YuGuang (MD, Peking Union Medical College Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 18, 2023
Start date
Feb 9, 2023
Primary completion
Feb 20, 2023
Completion
Feb 20, 2023
Last update
Jun 13, 2023

Study contacts

Xu Li, MD
study chair · Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Yuguang Huang, MD
principal investigator · Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion