CClinicalTrials.gg
Sign In
CompletedNCT05680428Updated Jan 18, 2023

Early Feeding Versus Conventional Feeding

An interventional study of early feeding and conventional feeding in Ileostomy - Stoma, sponsored by DHQ mardan. Completed at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-01-18.

Sponsored by DHQ mardan · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 11 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2020, registered Dec 2022).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
34
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare early feeding vs conventional feeding after stoma reversal. The main question it aims to answer are:

  • whether it is beneficial to start oral feeding within 12hrs after stoma reversal

Participants will be randomly assigned two groups either early feeding or conventional group

02

Conditions studied

  • Ileostomy - Stoma
03

In context

Lead sponsor

DHQ mardan is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • having ileostomy
  • no peritonitis
  • intestinal obstruction

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • uncontrolled diabetes
  • uncontrolled hypertension
  • sepsis
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
34 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    early feeding group

    after stoma reversal in patients in this group oral feeding was started with in 12 hrs after surgery

    Other: early feeding

  • Active comparator
    conventional feeding group

    after stoma reversal in patients in this group oral feeding was started 48hrs after surgery

    Procedure: conventional feeding

Interventions

  • Otherearly feeding

    oral feeding within 12hours after stoma reversal

  • Procedureconventional feeding

    oral feeding after 48hours of NBM after stoma reversal

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To evaluate the outcome of early versus conventional oral feeding in stoma reversal in terms of postoperative ileus

    comparison of post-op anastomotic leakage hospital stay wound infection

    Time frame: 5days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • DHQ
    Mardan, Kpk 25300, Pakistan
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 18, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05680428
Lead sponsor
DHQ mardan
Collaborators
DHQ HOSPITAL MARDAN
Responsible party
Sajid Ali,FCPS (consultant General Surgeon, DHQ mardan) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 11, 2023
Start date
Jan 10, 2020
Primary completion
Jun 10, 2022
Completion
Jul 10, 2022
Last update
Jan 18, 2023

Study contacts

sajid khan, fcps
principal investigator · DHQ mardan

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Other studies from this sponsor

DHQ mardan

Start the discussion