ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05659485FAMEUpdated Feb 13, 2025

Measuring Family Engagement in Care (The FAME Study)

An observational study in Family Engagement, Patient-centered Care and Critical Care, sponsored by Lady Davis Institute. Recruiting at 6 sites in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-13.

Sponsored by Lady Davis Institute · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 11 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jan 2023; still recruiting 3 years 9 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
198
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

There are currently no validated tools to specifically measure family engagement in the intensive care unit (ICU). To address this gap, an interdisciplinary team developed a novel instrument to measure family engagement in the ICU. This will be a prospective observational cohort with an embedded qualitative study to validate the FAMily Engagement (FAME) instrument in the ICU setting. This study will also evaluate the association between family activation, engagement, and family-centred outcomes, and exploring factors (age, relationship, sex, gender, race/ethnicity) that may influence family engagement in the ICU.

Read the detailed description

This will be a prospective observational cohort study of 198 family members in the ICUs of 4 Canadian hospitals in 3 provinces (Alberta, Ontario, and Quebec) over a 12-week period. These sites were chosen due to their urban setting and distant geographic range to capture differing practice patterns, a higher percentage of racialized patients, and language and cultural differences. The target recruitment is 50 family members from each participating site. A "family member" will be considered anyone with a biological, legal, or emotional relationship with the patient and whom the patient would want involved in their care.

02

Conditions studied

  • Family Engagement
  • Patient-centered Care
  • Critical Care

Keywords

  • Family
  • Engagement
  • Family engagement
  • Family-centered care
  • Measures
  • Instruments
  • Intensive care unit
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Lady Davis Institute is the lead sponsor of 46 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Family members, aged 18 years old or older, of patients admitted to intensive care units. The term "Family member" includes anyone that has a biological, legal, or emotional relationship with the patient and the patient would like to be involved in their care.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Family member of patient admitted to the intensive care units
  • Able to participate in English or French
  • Age 18 years old or older

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ICU stays less than 24 hours
  • Another family member has already participated in the study
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
198 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
2 Weeks
Patient registry
Yes
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Family engagement in care (as measured by FAME)

    The FAMily Engagement (FAME) questionnaire is an instrument developed to assess current family engagement practice. Items address key principles of family-centered care, such as dignity and respect, information sharing, participation, and collaboration. They also address family engagement domains, including family presence, family needs, communication and education, decision making, and direct care. A five-point Likert scale (1=strongly agree, 2=agree, 3=neutral, 4=disagree, 5=strongly disagree) is used for responses, which are then transformed to a 0-100 scoring system, with higher scores indicating greater engagement in care and lower scores indicating lesser engagement in care. The overall engagement score is calculated by dividing the sum of the scores by the number of questions answered, with the result ranging from 0-100.

    Time frame: Within 24 hours of enrolment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Family activation (as measured by FAM-Activate)

    FAM-Activate is a 4-question measure that assesses the family member's knowledge, skills, and confidence concerning care participation.

    Time frame: Within 24 hours of enrolment

  2. Family mental health (as measured by HADS)

    The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) survey is a validated self-reported instrument to measure anxiety and depression in medical patients. The survey consists of 14 questions (7 depression-related and 7 anxiety-related) which are scored on a 4-point Likert scale (0-3). The sum of the sub-scores on each of the two subscales (anxiety and depression) represents the total score. A lower total score indicates a milder condition whereas a higher total score indicates a higher level of distress.

    Time frame: Within 2 weeks of hospital discharge.

  3. Family care satisfaction (as measured by FS-ICU 24)

    The Family Satisfaction in the ICU survey (FS-ICU 24) is a validated 24-item self-report instrument that assesses family satisfaction and experience with care in the ICU.

    Time frame: Within 2 weeks of hospital discharge.

07

Study locations

3 of 6 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Barello S, Castiglioni C, Bonanomi A, Graffigna G. The Caregiving Health Engagement Scale (CHE-s): development and initial validation of a new questionnaire for measuring family caregiver engagement in healthcare. BMC Public Health. 2019 Nov 27;19(1):1562. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7743-8. PubMed 31771546 ↗
  • Brown SM, Rozenblum R, Aboumatar H, Fagan MB, Milic M, Lee BS, Turner K, Frosch DL. Defining patient and family engagement in the intensive care unit. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Feb 1;191(3):358-60. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201410-1936LE. No abstract available. PubMed 25635496 ↗
  • Anderson WG, Arnold RM, Angus DC, Bryce CL. Posttraumatic stress and complicated grief in family members of patients in the intensive care unit. J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Nov;23(11):1871-6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0770-2. Epub 2008 Sep 9. PubMed 18780129 ↗
  • Devlin JW, Skrobik Y, Gelinas C, Needham DM, Slooter AJC, Pandharipande PP, Watson PL, Weinhouse GL, Nunnally ME, Rochwerg B, Balas MC, van den Boogaard M, Bosma KJ, Brummel NE, Chanques G, Denehy L, Drouot X, Fraser GL, Harris JE, Joffe AM, Kho ME, Kress JP, Lanphere JA, McKinley S, Neufeld KJ, Pisani MA, Payen JF, Pun BT, Puntillo KA, Riker RR, Robinson BRH, Shehabi Y, Szumita PM, Winkelman C, Centofanti JE, Price C, Nikayin S, Misak CJ, Flood PD, Kiedrowski K, Alhazzani W. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility, and Sleep Disruption in Adult Patients in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2018 Sep;46(9):e825-e873. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003299. PubMed 30113379 ↗
  • Goldfarb M, Bibas L, Burns K. Patient and Family Engagement in Care in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit. Can J Cardiol. 2020 Jul;36(7):1032-1040. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2020.03.037. Epub 2020 Mar 31. PubMed 32533931 ↗
  • Goldfarb MJ, Bechtel C, Capers Q 4th, de Velasco A, Dodson JA, Jackson JL, Kitko L, Pina IL, Rayner-Hartley E, Wenger NK, Gulati M; American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Lifelong Congenital Heart Disease and Heart Health in the Young; Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention; Council on Hypertension; Council on the Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease; and Council on Lifestyle and Cardiometabolic Health. Engaging Families in Adult Cardiovascular Care: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 May 17;11(10):e025859. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.025859. Epub 2022 Apr 21. PubMed 35446109 ↗
  • Goldfarb MJ, Bibas L, Bartlett V, Jones H, Khan N. Outcomes of Patient- and Family-Centered Care Interventions in the ICU: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Crit Care Med. 2017 Oct;45(10):1751-1761. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002624. PubMed 28749855 ↗
  • Goldfarb M, Debigare S, Foster N, Soboleva N, Desrochers F, Craigie L, Burns KEA. Development of a Family Engagement Measure for the Intensive Care Unit. CJC Open. 2022 Aug 5;4(11):1006-1011. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2022.07.015. eCollection 2022 Nov. PubMed 36444373 ↗
  • Duong J, Kifell J, Gelinas C, Udupa S, Beydoun SA, Stephenson A, Goldfarb M. Validation of the French-Canadian Version of FAME, a Family Engagement Measurement Tool for the Intensive Care Unit. Can J Nurs Res. 2026 Mar;58(1):78-85. doi: 10.1177/08445621251385620. Epub 2025 Oct 15. PubMed 41091932 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Jan 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2025, 35 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 5, 2022
First posted
Dec 21, 2022
StartActual
Jan 31, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2025
CompletionEst.
Dec 30, 2025
Last update
Feb 13, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 13, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05659485
Lead sponsor
Lady Davis Institute
Collaborators
Jewish General Hospital, Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
Responsible party
Michael Goldfarb (Attending Staff, Division of Cardiology, Lady Davis Institute) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 21, 2022
Start date
Jan 31, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 13, 2025

Study contacts

Jillian Kifell, MSc
Contact
jillian.kifell.ccomtl@ssss.gouv.qc.ca
5143408222 ext. 25806
Michael J Goldfarb, MD MSc
principal investigator · Lady Davis Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion