CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05657795Updated Mar 10, 2025

Optimising Neonatal Ventilation with Closed-loop Oxygen Control

An interventional study of Closed-loop automated oxygen control (Oxygenie, SLE6000) in Infant, Newborn, Diseases and Mechanical Ventilation Complication, sponsored by King's College Hospital NHS Trust. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-10.

Sponsored by King's College Hospital NHS Trust · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Ventilated newborns frequently need supplemental oxygen but its use must be monitored carefully as both giving too much or too little oxygen can have harmful effects. Giving too little oxygen results to low oxygen levels (hypoxia) and increases the risk of complications and mortality. Excessive oxygen delivery (hyperoxia) increases the risk of diseases involving several organs such as the retinas and the lungs. Although infants born very preterm require support with their breathing more often, more mature neonates may also need to be ventilated at birth and to receive supplemental oxygen. Therefore, they may suffer from problems related to hypoxia and hyperoxia.

For the above reasons, oxygen levels are continuously monitored and the amount of oxygen provided is manually adjusted by the nurses and doctors.

Closed-loop automated oxygen control systems (CLAC) are a more recent approach that involves the use of a computer software added to the ventilator. This software allows for automatic adjustment of the amount of oxygen provided to the baby in order to maintain oxygen levels within a desired target range depending on the baby's age and clinical condition. Previous studies in preterm and very small infants showed that automated oxygen control systems provided the right amount of oxygen for most of the time and prevented hypoxia and hyperoxia with fewer manual adjustments required by clinical staff. Preliminary results from a study that included infants born at 34 weeks gestation and beyond showed that CLAC systems allowed to reduce the amount of supplementary oxygen more rapidly. With this study we aim to compare the time spent in hyperoxia and the overall duration of oxygen treatment between infants whose oxygen is adjusted either manually or automatically while they remain ventilated. This will help us understand if CLAC systems help reduce the complications related to oxygen treatment.

Read the detailed description

This will be a randomised controlled trial. The investigators aim to recruit a minimum of forty ventilated infants born at or above 34 weeks of gestation. Participants will be randomised to either closed-loop automated oxygen control or manually controlled oxygen from recruitment to successful extubation.

Informed written consent will be requested from the parents or legal guardians of the infants and the attending neonatal consultant will be requested to assent to the study.

Eligible infants whose parents consent to the study will be enrolled within 24 hours of initiation of mechanical ventilation.

Randomisation will be performed using an online randomisation generator. Patients will be ventilated using SLE6000 ventilators. Ventilator settings will be manually adjusted by the clinical team as per unit's protocol. The intervention group, in addition to standard care will also be connected to the Oxygenie closed-loop oxygen saturation monitoring software (SLE). This software uses oxygen saturations from the SpO2 probe attached to the neonate, fed into an algorithm, to automatically adjust the percentage of inspired oxygen to maintain oxygen saturations within the target range. Manual adjustments to the inspired oxygen concentration will be allowed at any point during the study if deemed appropriate by the clinical team.

Patient will be studied from enrolment till successful extubation. If an infant fails extubation and required reintubation within 48 hours, he will be studied in his initial study arm. Therefore, for the infants randomised at the intervention group CLAC will resume.

02

Conditions studied

  • Infant, Newborn, Diseases
  • Mechanical Ventilation Complication
03

In context

Infant, Newborn, Diseases

134 studies on the registry are indexed under Infant, Newborn, Diseases; 30 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 72 across 81 interventional studies indexed under Infant, Newborn, Diseases.

Browse Infant, Newborn, Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

King's College Hospital NHS Trust is the lead sponsor of 164 studies on the registry; 54 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Infants born at or above 34 weeks completed gestation requiring mechanical ventilation and admitted to King's NICU within 24 hours of initiation of mechanical ventilation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Preterm infants less than 34 weeks gestation
  • Infants with cyanotic congenital heart disease
  • Infants on high frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Manual oxygen control

    Standard ventilation with inspired oxygen concentration adjusted manually as per unit's protocol.

  • Other
    Closed-loop automated oxygen control (Oxygenie, SLE 6000)

    Ventilation with Oxygenie software (closed-loop automated oxygen control system), adjusted by clinical staff as necessary

    Device: Closed-loop automated oxygen control (Oxygenie, SLE6000)

Interventions

  • DeviceClosed-loop automated oxygen control (Oxygenie, SLE6000)

    The OxyGenie closed-loop oxygen saturation monitoring software (SLE) uses oxygen saturations from the SpO2 probe attached to the neonate, fed into an algorithm, to automatically adjust the percentage of inspired oxygen to maintain oxygen saturations within the target range. Manual adjustments including the percentage of FiO2 will be allowed at any point during the study if deemed appropriate by the clinical team.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The duration of oxygen treatment

    The duration of oxygen treatment will be measured in median (interquartile range) number of days of oxygen treatment for participants in each group.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  2. The percentage of time spent in hyperoxia

    Target oxygen saturation range for our study population is 92-96%. Hyperoxia is defined as the time spent with oxygen saturation levels exceeding 96%. The time spent in hyperoxia will be calculated as a percentage of the total time of monitoring.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. The percentage of time spent receiving an inspired oxygen concentration (FiO2) above 30%

    The time spent with an FiO2\>30% will be calculated as a percentage of the total time of monitoring.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • King's College Hospital
    London, SE5 9RS, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ramadan G, Paul N, Morton M, Peacock JL, Greenough A. Outcome of ventilated infants born at term without major congenital abnormalities. Eur J Pediatr. 2012 Feb;171(2):331-6. doi: 10.1007/s00431-011-1549-8. Epub 2011 Aug 11. PubMed 21833494 ↗
  • Williams LZJ, McNamara D, Alsweiler JM. Intermittent Hypoxemia in Infants Born Late Preterm: A Prospective Cohort Observational Study. J Pediatr. 2019 Jan;204:89-95.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.08.048. Epub 2018 Oct 1. PubMed 30287066 ↗
  • Lakshminrusimha S, Konduri GG, Steinhorn RH. Considerations in the management of hypoxemic respiratory failure and persistent pulmonary hypertension in term and late preterm neonates. J Perinatol. 2016 Jun;36 Suppl 2:S12-9. doi: 10.1038/jp.2016.44. PubMed 27225960 ↗
  • Salverda HH, Cramer SJE, Witlox RSGM, Dargaville PA, Te Pas AB. Automated oxygen control in preterm infants, how does it work and what to expect: a narrative review. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2021 Mar;106(2):215-221. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-318918. Epub 2020 Jul 30. PubMed 32732378 ↗
  • Sturrock S, Ambulkar H, Williams EE, Sweeney S, Bednarczuk NF, Dassios T, Greenough A. A randomised crossover trial of closed loop automated oxygen control in preterm, ventilated infants. Acta Paediatr. 2021 Mar;110(3):833-837. doi: 10.1111/apa.15585. Epub 2020 Oct 6. PubMed 32969040 ↗
  • Abdo M, Hanbal A, Asla MM, Ishqair A, Alfar M, Elnaiem W, Ragab KM, Nourelden AZ, Zaazouee MS. Automated versus manual oxygen control in preterm infants receiving respiratory support: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Dec;35(25):6069-6076. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1904875. Epub 2021 Apr 8. PubMed 33832390 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 10, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05657795
Lead sponsor
King's College Hospital NHS Trust
Collaborators
King's College London
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 20, 2022
Start date
Dec 7, 2022
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2024
Completion
Jun 30, 2024
Last update
Mar 10, 2025

Study contacts

Theodore Dassios, PhD
principal investigator · King's College Hospital/ King's College London

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion