ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05649345Updated May 14, 2024

TR64 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors

A Phase 1 interventional study of TR64 in Advanced Solid Tumor, sponsored by Tarapeutics Science Inc.. Recruiting at 2 sites in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-14.

Sponsored by Tarapeutics Science Inc. · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2023; still recruiting 3 years 10 months later.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
19
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a open-label, dose escalation, accelerated titration combined 3+3 design, phase I study, to evaluate the safety and tolerability, and to determine the RP2D of TR64 when administered qd in patients with advanced solid tumors. Up to 6 cohorts of 1-6 or 3-6 patients each will be treated in the study.

Read the detailed description

Patients will receive study treatment until criteria for study termination are met. A Safety Follow-up Visit will be conducted 28 days (±7 days) after the last dose of study treatment. Patients who discontinue study treatment for reasons other disease progression will have post-treatment follow-up for disease assessment until start of new anticancer treatment, patient withdraws consent, is lost to follow-up, death, or until the Sponsor stops the study, whichever comes first.

Adverse events will be assessed using the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Version 5.0.

Tumor response will be assessed by computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan using RECIST 1.1 criteria, assessed by the investigator.

02

Conditions studied

  • Advanced Solid Tumor
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Tarapeutics Science Inc. is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Fully understand the procedures of the clinical study and participate voluntarily with signed and dated written form, comply with the requirements of the study protocol.
  • Males and/or females at least 18 years old when signing the informed consent form.
  • or cytologically confirmed patients with advanced malignant solid tumors, eligible patients must have failed standard treatment, no standard treatment, or not suitable for standard treatment at this stage as determined by the investigator.
  • with at least one lesion amenable to response assessment per 1.1.
  • performance status (ECOG) ≤2 at screening.
  • of at least 3 months.
  • Acceptable organ function: (ANC)≥1.5×109/L; count(PLT)≥90×109/L; (Hb)≥90 g/L; Total (TBIL)≤1.5× value(ULN); (ALT)≤2.5×ULN; Aspartate aminotransferase(AST)≤2.5×ULN; ≥50ml/min.
  • Fertile male and female must agree to use medically approved during the study and within 90 days after the last dose of the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known or suspected allergies to any of the drug composition.
  • Medical history and surgical history excluded according to the protocol.
  • Any previous medical treatment history exclude from the protocol.
  • Abnormal laboratory results exclude from the protocol.
  • pregnant and lactating women (currently breast-feeding or less than six months after delivery although not breast-feeding).
  • Subjects may not be able to complete the study duo to poor compliance or other reasons, or unsuitable for the study by the investigator's judgment.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(15)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Measurable disease

The amount of disease can be tracked with a defined measurement, so the study can see whether it shrinks or grows. It might be a tumour measured on a scan or, in some blood cancers such as myeloma, a marker measured in blood or urine.

The criteria or the study team say which measurement counts — having no tumour visible on a scan does not by itself rule you out.

RECIST

The standard rules for measuring tumours on CT or MRI scans, to tell whether a cancer is shrinking, stable or growing during treatment.

“Measurable disease per RECIST 1.1” usually means at least one tumour 10 mm or more at its longest on a CT scan, or a lymph node 15 mm or more across its short axis.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
19 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    TR64

    Daily doses by oral administration on each day of each 28 day cycle. Starting dose is 25mg, with escalation to 400mg, and subsequent dose escalation using a modified Fibonacci algorithm.

    Drug: TR64

Interventions

  • DrugTR64

    TR64 tablets will be given daily for 28 days in 28-day cycles until there appears evidence of progressive disease, intolerable toxicity, or the subject discontinues from the study treatment for other reasons.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events

    Frequency, duration and severity of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events evaluated by NCI CTCAE v5.0

    Time frame: From the first dose to within 28 days after the last dose

  2. Dose limited toxicities

    Incidence of dose limited toxicities

    Time frame: within 28 days after the first dose

  3. Maximum tolerated dose

    Evaluated by safety review committee

    Time frame: Throughout the study for approximately 2 years

  4. Recommended phaseII dose

    Evaluated by safety review committee

    Time frame: Throughout the study for approximately 2 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. AUClast

    Characterize the pharmacokinetic profile of TR64

    Time frame: within 35 days after the first dose

  2. AUCinf

    Characterize the pharmacokinetic profile of TR64

    Time frame: within 35 days after the first dose

  3. Cmax

    Characterize the pharmacokinetic profile of TR64

    Time frame: within 35 days after the first dose

  4. Tmax

    Characterize the pharmacokinetic profile of TR64

    Time frame: within 35 days after the first dose

  5. CL/F

    Characterize the pharmacokinetic profile of TR64

    Time frame: within 35 days after the first dose

  6. Vz/F

    Characterize the pharmacokinetic profile of TR64

    Time frame: within 35 days after the first dose

  7. Terminal half-life (T1/2)

    Characterize the pharmacokinetic profile of TR64

    Time frame: within 35 days after the first dose

Other outcomes

  1. ORR

    Efficacy-Overall Response Rate

    Time frame: Throughout the study for approximately 2 years

  2. PFS

    Efficacy-Progression Free Survival

    Time frame: Throughout the study for approximately 2 years

  3. DOR

    Efficacy-Duration of Response

    Time frame: Throughout the study for approximately 2 years

  4. CBR

    Efficacy-Clinical Benefit Rate

    Time frame: Throughout the study for approximately 2 years

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Jan 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Aug 2026, 43 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 22, 2022
First posted
Dec 14, 2022
StartActual
Jan 12, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Aug 30, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 30, 2026
Last update
May 14, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 14, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05649345
Lead sponsor
Tarapeutics Science Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 14, 2022
Start date
Jan 12, 2023
Primary completion
Aug 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
May 14, 2024

Study contacts

Yang Shu, MD. BS.
Contact
shuyang@tarapeutics.com
86-13918983465
Huan Zhou, PhD
principal investigator · The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University
Funan Liu, MD, PhD
principal investigator · First Hospital of China Medical University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion