CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05639335Updated Jan 17, 2023

Effects of Characters on Parents' Perceptions of Breakfast Cereals

An interventional study of No Character Control and Experimental Characters in Obesity, sponsored by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-01-17.

Sponsored by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,017
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Purpose: To test how the presence of characters on breakfast cereals affects parents' perceptions and purchase intentions for their children.

Participants: \~1,000 parents of children ages 2-12 Procedures: After completing a screener and reviewing a consent form, participants will complete two unrelated experimental studies. Participants will then move on to this study, where they will be randomized into conditions and view three breakfast cereal box images, with or without characters. They will then be asked a series of questions about their children and their perceptions about the breakfast cereals

Read the detailed description

The use of characters, such as cartoons, is a prolific form of child-oriented marketing and may have particularly persuasive power in children. Parents and caregivers - who make most food purchases for children - are also persuaded by child-oriented marketing practices. The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of characters on parents' perceptions and purchase intentions of a breakfast cereal product.

Setting: This is an online study using Qualtrics. Recruitment: Participants will be recruited by Qualtrics panel company, a survey research firm through which participants are recruited voluntarily.

Informed Consent: Participants will read a written consent document that includes information about the study's purpose, expectations, and possible risks and benefits. Participants will acknowledge that they have read and agreed to the terms by clicking forward.

Randomization: Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: 1.) control (breakfast cereal boxes with no characters) or 2.) characters (breakfast cereal boxes with a brand and at least one licensed character). Participants will view three brands (Frosted Flakes, Apple Jacks, Froot Loops).

Assessment: Using an online platform (Qualtrics), participants will complete an eligibility screener prior to the first experiment. They will then complete two unrelated experimental studies before beginning the current study. Participants will then be randomized into a condition and shown an image of the three cereal brands in random order. After each brand exposure, participants will be asked to respond to a series of questions measuring the following constructs: purchase intentions, perceived healthfulness, and perceived child appeal. After viewing all three brands and answering the aforementioned questions, participants will be queried on their perceptions of their child's perceived food-fussiness. Demographic information, such as age, gender, race/ethnicity, education, and income will be gathered at the end of the study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Obesity
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill is the lead sponsor of 1,340 studies on the registry; 133 are open to participants now.

Of its 155 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 136 (88%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 or older
  • Parent or guardian of at least one child between the ages of 2-12

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • \<18 years old
  • is not the parent or guardian of a child between the ages of 2-12
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
1,017 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    No Character Control

    Participants will view images of three breakfast cereals (Frosted Flakes, Apple Jacks, Froot Loops) containing no characters.

    Other: No Character Control

  • Experimental
    Character

    Participants will view images of three breakfast cereals (Frosted Flakes, Apple Jacks, Froot Loops) containing their respective brand characters (e.g., Tony the Tiger) and a licensed character recently featured on these cereal brands (e.g., Buzz Lightyear).

    Other: Experimental Characters

Interventions

  • OtherNo Character Control

    Participants will view images of three breakfast cereals (Frosted Flakes, Apple Jacks, Froot Loops) containing no characters.

  • OtherExperimental Characters

    Participants will view images of three breakfast cereals (Frosted Flakes, Apple Jacks, Froot Loops) containing their respective brand characters (e.g., Tony the Tiger) and a licensed character recently featured on these cereal brands (e.g., Buzz Lightyear).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Purchase intentions

    The primary outcome will be purchase intentions, measured using the following item: "How likely would you be to buy this cereal to your \[age\]-year-old child in the next month?" using a 5-point likert-style response scale ranging from "not at all likely" (1) to "extremely likely" (5).

    Time frame: During ~15 minute online survey

Secondary outcomes

  1. Perceived healthfulness

    Perceived healthfulness will be measured using the following item: "How healthy or unhealthy would it be for your \[age\] year old child to eat this cereal every day?" with a 5-point likert-style response scale ranging from "very unhealthy"(1) to "very healthy."(5)

    Time frame: During ~15 minute online survey

  2. Perceived child appeal

    Perceived child appeal will be measured using three items adapted from previous research. Item 1: "How much do you think your child would enjoy eating this cereal?" (5-point likert scale, ranging from "not at all" (1) to "a great deal" (5)) Item 2: "How much do you think your \[age\]-year-old child would like the taste of this cereal?" (5-point likert scale, ranging from "not at all" (1) to "a great deal" (5)) Item 3: "How much do you think your \[age\]-year-old child would want to eat this cereal?" (5-point likert scale, ranging from "not at all" (1) to "a great deal" (5))

    Time frame: During ~15 minute online survey

Other outcomes

  1. Past week cereal consumption

    Participants will be asked to report their child's past-week breakfast cereal consumption with the following question: "In the past week, how many days did your \[age\]-year-old child eat cereal?" (Measured using drop down menu, ranging from 0-7 days).

    Time frame: During ~15 minute online survey

  2. Perceived child food fussiness

    Perceived child food fussiness will be assessed with a subset of the Food Fussiness Subscale. The following items will be queried: Item 1: My \[piped age\]-year-old child is interested in tasting food they haven't tasted before. (5-point likert scale, ranging from never (1) to always (5)) Item 2: My child \[piped age\]-year-old child decides that they don't like a food, even without tasting it. (5-point likert scale, ranging from never (1) to always (5)) Item 3: My \[piped age\]-year-old child enjoys tasting new foods.(5-point likert scale, ranging from never (1) to always (5)) Item 4: My \[piped age\]-year-old child refuses to eat new foods at first.(5-point likert scale, ranging from never (1) to always (5)).

    Time frame: During ~15 minute online survey

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27516, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Hall MG, Lazard AJ, Grummon AH, Mendel JR, Taillie LS. The impact of front-of-package claims, fruit images, and health warnings on consumers' perceptions of sugar-sweetened fruit drinks: Three randomized experiments. Prev Med. 2020 Mar;132:105998. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.105998. Epub 2020 Jan 23. PubMed 31982477 ↗
  • Liem DG, Zandstra LH. Children's liking and wanting of snack products: Influence of shape and flavour. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009 Jul 2;6:38. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-6-38. PubMed 19573228 ↗
  • Dial LA, Musher-Eizenman DR. Power of packaging: Evaluations of packaged fruits and vegetables by school-age children in the U.S. Appetite. 2020 May 1;148:104591. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.104591. Epub 2020 Jan 9. PubMed 31927069 ↗
  • Wardle J, Guthrie CA, Sanderson S, Rapoport L. Development of the Children's Eating Behaviour Questionnaire. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2001 Oct;42(7):963-70. doi: 10.1111/1469-7610.00792. PubMed 11693591 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — A deidentified dataset and analysis syntax that underlie the publication of the main study findings will be uploaded to a public website upon publication of the paper.

Supporting information: Sap, Analytic code

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 17, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05639335
Lead sponsor
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 6, 2022
Start date
Dec 13, 2022
Primary completion
Jan 3, 2023
Completion
Jan 3, 2023
Last update
Jan 17, 2023

Study contacts

Marissa G Hall, PhD
principal investigator · UNC-Chapel Hill

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion