CClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT05637073IMTEROUpdated Jul 8, 2026

Effect of Management of the Endometrioma on Ovarian Reserve

An observational study in Endometrioma, sponsored by University of Valencia. Withdrawn at 2 sites in 2 countries. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 39 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-08.

Sponsored by University of Valencia · Observational

Why this study was withdrawn
After months of attempts, an insurmountable difficulty has arisen in recruiting patients at the main center, in addition to the retirement of the principal investigator.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
0
Ages
18 Years to 39 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Investigators aimed at comparing the impact on ovarian reserve of three usual-care management options of endometrioma, laparoscopic cystectomy (LC), hormonal treatment with daily dienogest (HT), or mere ultrasound control (UC).

Ovarian reserve will be measured by the effect on the circulating levels of anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH). Secondary objectives will be effect on pelvic pain, other symptoms, sexual function, quality of life, progression in size of the endometrioma, impact on work productivity and activity impairment, and satisfaction with treatment.

Participants will be followed by up to one year.

Read the detailed description

Investigators aimed at comparing the impact on ovarian reserve of three usual-care management options of endometrioma, laparoscopic cystectomy (LC), hormonal treatment with daily dienogest (HT), or mere ultrasound control (UC).

Secondary objectives were the comparison of the effect on i) pelvic pain, including dysmenorrhea, non-menstrual pelvic pain, deep dyspareunia, or dyschezia, ii) other symptoms including menorrhagia, gastrointestinal symptoms different to dyschezia, or urinary symptoms; iii) quality of life as assessed by the EHP-30 questionnaire; iv) sexual functions, as assessed the female sexual function index (FSFI); v) progression in the size of the tumor in the case of the two non-surgical approaches; vi) impact on work productivity and activity impairment; vii) satisfaction in the patient.

A prospective assessment will be performed on a cohort of women with endometrioma diagnosed by ultrasound from diagnosis for up to one year. The assignment to each management option will be performed under usual care conditions so that the selected option will result from the shared clinical decision of the clinician with the patient.

The target population will be composed of Caucasian premenopausal women between 18-39 years with the diagnosis of endometrioma, one or more, with a diameter of up to 7 cm by endovaginal ultrasound. Body mass index comprised between 17-30 Kg/m2.

Participants will be controlled at 3 months, 6 months and one year.

02

Conditions studied

  • Endometrioma

Browse trials for

03

In context

Endometriosis

901 studies on the registry are indexed under Endometriosis; 259 are open to participants now.

Browse Endometriosis studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Valencia is the lead sponsor of 349 studies on the registry; 73 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 39 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Caucasian premenopausal women between 18-39 years with the diagnosis of endometrioma, one or more, with a diameter of up to 7 cm by endovaginal ultrasound. Body mass index comprised between 17-30 Kg/m2.

Inclusion criteria

  • Caucasian premenopausal women between 18-39 years with the diagnosis of endometrioma, one or more, with a diameter of up to 7 cm by endovaginal ultrasound. Body mass index comprised between 17-30 Kg/m2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous ovarian surgery;
  • Previous pathologies involving the ovary, including other ovarian tumors, polycystic ovaries, or pelvic inflammatory disease;
  • Previous diagnosis of cancer treated with chemotherapy or local radiotherapy;
  • Diseases affecting the endocrine system, diabetes, thyroid, hyperprolactinemia, or the immune system (lupus, Crohn,…);
  • Genesic wish;
  • Endometrioma >7 cm;
  • Unhealthy habits, including smoking, alcohol consumption above social level, or illicit drugs;
  • Insufficient level of autonomy for unrestrictedly signing informed consent;
  • Current or previous use of hormonal contraceptives, Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) analogues, any drug with a known effect on endometriosis, or any drug under investigation, for what a washing up period of 6 months will be required in all cases.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)
Target follow-up
1 Year
Patient registry
Yes
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Interventions

  • DrugDienogest

    Some women in the cohort will be treated with dienogest for one year after consensus with the physician

  • ProcedureLaparoscopic cystectomy

    Some women in the cohort will be treated with laparoscopic cystectomy after consensus with the physician

  • OtherControl with ultrasound without other type of intervention

    Some women in the cohort will be followed with ultrasound control, without other intervention, after consensus with the physician

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in the levels of anti-Mullerian hormone

    Ovarian reserve as measured by the levels of AMH

    Time frame: Change from baseline AMH levels at 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change of Pelvic pain

    Dysmenorrhea, non-menstrual pelvic pain, deep dyspareunia, or dyschezia measured by a visual analogue scale from 0 to 5 and in which higher score means worse outcome.

    Time frame: Change from baseline pelvic pain at 1 year.

  2. Change in quality of life

    Assessed by the Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) questionnaire, in which the minimum score is 0 and the highest 150. Higher score means a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Change from baseline EHP-30 score at 1 year.

  3. Change in sexual function

    Assessed the female sexual function index (FSFI) questionnaire in which there are 6 questions from 0 to 5. The highest score is 30 and the lowest 0. Lower score means worse outcome.

    Time frame: Change from baseline FSFI score at 1 year.

  4. Change in volume of the tumor

    Measured by ultrasound, in the case of the two non-surgical approaches

    Time frame: Change from baseline endometrioma volume at 1 year.

  5. Satisfaction of the patient

    Satisfaction as assessed by a Likert scale in which the score is from 0 to 5 in which higher score means better outcome.

    Time frame: Satisfaction level measured by Likert scale at 1 year.

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • University Hospital Poznan
    Poznan, Poznan 60-355, Poland
  • Hosp Clinico Universitario-INCLIVA
    Valencia, Valencia 46010, Spain
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 8, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05637073
Lead sponsor
University of Valencia
Collaborators
Hospital Comarcal Francesc de Borja Gandía, Valencia, Spain, Hospital Universitario San Juan de Alicante, Poznan University of Medical Sciences
Responsible party
Antonio Cano Sanchez (Professor Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Valencia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 5, 2022
Start date
Mar 14, 2023
Primary completion
Jun 2, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 2, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 8, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion