ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT05636501Updated Dec 18, 2025

Treat-to-target Prednisolon Taper in Patients With Polymyalgia Rheumatica

An interventional study of Treat-to-target Prednisolone Taper and Usual care in Polymyalgia Rheumatica, sponsored by Aarhus University Hospital. Active, not recruiting at 6 sites in Denmark. Open to participants aged 50 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-18.

Sponsored by Aarhus University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) has an incidence of approximately 1000/10\^6 for persons more than 50 years. Treatment with prednisolone carries several significant adverse effects, and it is therefore essential to taper prednisolone as fast as possible. Systematic treatment strategies (treat-to-target) is the most important improvement of disease management for other rheumatic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis in the last decades. Thus, the purpose is to investigate benefits and harms associated with a nurce led systematic prednisolone taper strategy at the department of rheumatology compared to individual treatment by discretion of the general practitioner. It is a 1-year open label randomised trial with a 1-year extension in 120 treatment naïve patients with PMR.

02

Conditions studied

  • Polymyalgia Rheumatica

Browse trials for

03

In context

Polymyalgia Rheumatica

68 studies on the registry are indexed under Polymyalgia Rheumatica; 22 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 120 is above the median of 66 across 39 interventional studies indexed under Polymyalgia Rheumatica.

Browse Polymyalgia Rheumatica studies →

Lead sponsor

Aarhus University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 298 studies on the registry; 80 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients newly diagnosed with PMR according to the EULAR criteria for PMR.
  • No sign of GCA on ultrasonography of the temporal and axillary arteries.
  • Age over 50 years.
  • Danish spoken and written language skills sufficient to fill out questionnaires.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Peroral, intraarticular or intramuscular application of within the last month.
  • Previous prednisolone treatment for GCA/PMR.
  • Unable to give consent.
  • Symptoms of GCA (newly onset-headache, tenderness of the temporal artery, jaw claudication, vision disturbances).
  • Active malignant cancers within the last 5 years (except basal cell carcinoma).
  • Other inflammatory rheumatic diseases (eg. rheumatoid arthritis, polymyositis, spondyloarthritis, psoriatic arthritits, gout).
  • Uncontrolled diseases (eg severe active asthma, cardiac disease with class IV)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Treat-to-target Prednisolone Taper

    Patients randomized to the "Treat-to-target" group is prescribed with a systematic prednisolone taper according to a specific scheme. The starting dose can be increased if remission is not reached initially or in case of relapse, folloved by taper according to the specific scheme. A nurse will make a minimum of 5 phone consultations the first year, and hereafter minimum every 3 months.

    Other: Treat-to-target Prednisolone Taper

  • Placebo comparator
    Usual Care

    Patients randomized to "usual care" are dismissed from the hospital after the diagnosis and the prednisolone taper are subsequently performed by discretion of the patient's general practitioner.

    Other: Usual care

Interventions

  • OtherTreat-to-target Prednisolone Taper

    Systematic prednisolone taper

  • OtherUsual care

    Prednisolone taper performed by discretion of the patient's general practitioner.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of patients in prednisolone free remission 52 weeks from baseline

    Proportion of patients in prednisolone free remission 52 weeks from baseline

    Time frame: 52 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in prednisolone dose from baseline to week 52

    Change in prednisolone dose from baseline to week 52. Key secondary.

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  2. Proportion of GCA patients diagnosed during the first 52 weeks

    Proportion of GCA patients diagnosed during the first 52 weeks. Key secondary

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  3. Self-reported number of relapses during the first 52 weeks

    Self-reported number of relapses during the first 52 weeks (assessed by increase in symptoms and an increase in prednisolone dosage). Key secondary

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  4. Change in patient-reported global visual analogue scale (VAS) from baseline to week 52

    Change in patient-reported global VAS from baseline to week 52. Scale 0-10, 10 is worse. Key secondary

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  5. Change in polymyalgia rheumatica activity score (PMR-AS) from baseline to week 52

    Change in PMR-AS from baseline to week 52. scale 0-indefinitely. High score is worse. Secondary

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  6. Proportion of patients with an undiagnosed vasculitis assessed by ultrasound at week 52 Proportion of patients with an undiagnosed vasculitis assessed by ultrasound at week 52

    Proportion of patients with an undiagnosed vasculitis assessed by ultrasound at week 52. Secondary

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  7. Changes in short form (SF)-36 mental component summary (MCS) from baseline to week 52

    Changes in SF-36 MCS from baseline to week 52. Secondary

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  8. Changes in short form (SF)-36 physical component summary (PCS) from baseline to week 52

    Changes in SF-36 PCS from baseline to week 52. Secondary

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  9. Changes in health assessment questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI) from baseline to week 52

    Changes in HAQ-DI from baseline to week 52. High score is worse. Secondary

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  10. Changes in patient reported polymyalgia rheumatica visual analog scale (PMR VAS) from baseline to week 52

    Changes in patient reported PMR VAS from baseline to week 52. High score is worse. Secondary

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  11. Changes in patient reported fatigue visal analog scale (VAS) from baseline to week 52

    Changes in patient reported fatigue VAS from baseline to week 52. Higher is worse. Secondary

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  12. Changes in patient reported stiffness visual analog scale (VAS) from baseline to week 52

    Changes in patient reported stiffness VAS from baseline to week 52. Higher is worse. Secondary

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  13. Changes in patient reported duration of morning stiffness from baseline to week 52

    Changes in patient reported duration of morning stiffness from baseline to week 52. Secondary

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  14. Proportion of patients where baseline DXA scan are performed during the first 3 months after baseline visit

    Proportion of patients where baseline DXA scan are performed during the first 3 months after baseline visit. Secondary

    Time frame: 3 months

  15. Proportion of patients where HgbA1C blood samples are taken during the first 52 weeks

    Proportion of patients where HgbA1C blood samples are taken during the first 52 weeks. Secondary

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  16. Frequency of patient reported adverse effects and comorbidities related to prednisolone treatment after 13, 26, 39 and 52 weeks

    Frequency of patient reported adverse effects and comorbidities related to prednisolone treatment after 13, 26, 39 and 52 weeks. Secondary.

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  17. Proportion of patients with patient reported infections during the first 52 weeks

    Proportion of patients with patient reported infections during the first 52 weeks. Secondary.

    Time frame: 52 weeks

07

Study locations

6 sites
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — All IPD that underlie results in the publications

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

Time frame: Starting 6 months after publication, and 2 years.

Access criteria: By resonably request.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jan 2023 to primary completion in Oct 2025, 32 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 10, 2022
First posted
Dec 5, 2022
StartActual
Jan 12, 2023
Primary completionActual
Oct 9, 2025
CompletionEst.
Nov 2026
Last update
Dec 18, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 18, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05636501
Collaborators
Horsens Hospital, Regionshospitalet Silkeborg, Gødstrup Hospital, Regionshospital Nordjylland, Aalborg University Hospital, Frederiksberg University Hospital
Responsible party
Kresten Krarup Keller (MD associate professor, Aarhus University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 5, 2022
Start date
Jan 12, 2023
Primary completion
Oct 9, 2025
Completion
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 18, 2025

Study contacts

Kresten Keller
principal investigator · Aarhus University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Oct 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion