CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05621720Updated Oct 17, 2024

Adopting a Health-social Partnership Program to Promote Health and Self-care Management Among Older Adults in the Community

An interventional study of Case management and Social control call and usual are in Healthy Aging, sponsored by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University. Recruiting at 1 site in Hong Kong. Open to participants aged 60 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-17.

Sponsored by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jan 2025, 1 year 8 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jun 2022; still recruiting 4 years 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
788
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
60 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Hong Kong has notably the longest life expectancy in the world. Ever-increasing demand and challenges are posing to the healthcare, social welfare, and elderly care service system. As a global public health strategy to address the increasing burdens, there is a strong urge for an effective approach to enhance the health and self-care ability among the older adults dwelling in the community. Literature suggested that the effectiveness of community-based self-care management programs is inconclusive. In addition, though the concept of the health-social partnership has been widely promoted to improve primary care, literature addressed that the multiple barriers existed throughout the collaboration. More evidence should be sought in the local context to evaluate the effectiveness of self-care complex interventions program among older adults.

Read the detailed description

This randomized type 2 effectiveness-implementation hybrid trial study aims to examine the effectiveness of a community-based health-social partnership program in promoting health and self-care management among older adults dwelling in the community and to explore the reach, adoption, implementation, maintenance aspects of the implementation process of the program in a real-life setting.

This study has two parts. The first part involves a cluster randomized controlled trial with a two-arm, matched-pairs, equivalent allocation ratio, and parallel design to examine the effectiveness of this study. Based on socio-economic status, community centers will be matched into three comparable pair sets, and further randomized into three intervention and control groups. A total of 788 subjects (394 in each arm) aged 60 or above, dwelling in the community, and cognitively competent will be recruited. Three-time interval outcome measures will be collected. The second part of this study is an implementation research design concerning the implementation process of the program in a real-life setting. Focus group interviews with different stakeholders will be conducted and meeting minutes, and archives of documents will be studied. Summative data will be analyzed in the RE-AIM framework.

The findings of this study are anticipated to shed some light on the effectiveness and implementation of integrated health-social service in Hong Kong context. It will make important contributions, not only to the individuals, but also to the policymakers and service providers advocating the concept of ageing in place and health-social partnership approach care. The informed the health-social partnership collaboration practice in real-world setting can facilitate the translation of research evidence into practice to tackle the health burdens and challenges.

02

Conditions studied

  • Healthy Aging

Keywords

  • Community-dwelling older adults
  • Self-care
  • Health and social partnership
03

In context

Lead sponsor

The Hong Kong Polytechnic University is the lead sponsor of 659 studies on the registry; 250 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
60 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • (i) People aged 60 or above
  • (ii) Living within the service areas of respective community centers
  • (iii) Cognitively competent with Hong Kong version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (HK-MoCA) with score ≥22

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • (i) Not communicable
  • (ii) Not reachable by phone
  • (iii) Not living at home
  • (iv) Bed bound
  • (v) With serious mental illness requiring hospitalization in recent 6 months
  • (vi) Already engaged in similar structured health or social programs
  • (vii) Will not stay in Hong Kong for the current three months
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
788 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention group

    Subjects in the intervention group will receive a 3-moth community-based health-social partnership program (C-HSPP) led by a nurse case manager, and supported by social workers and community workers.

    Other: Case management

  • Other
    Control group

    Subjects in the control group will receive usual community services and a monthly social control call from trained community workers.

    Other: Social control call and usual are

Interventions

  • OtherCase management

    On enrolment, the nurse case manager will perform the initial comprehensive assessment based on the Omaha domains of environment, psychosocial, physiological and health-related behavior. The nurse case manager will execute the intervention scheme of teaching, guidance \& counseling, treatments \& procedure, case management, and/or surveillance, with the mutual goal set with clients to promote health and self-efficacy. Home visits and telephone calls will be employed. The referral network to health and social service will be activated as appropriate.

  • OtherSocial control call and usual are

    Subjects in the control group will receive usual community service. in addition, a monthly social control call from trained community workers will be given to rule out the possible social effects of the intervention. These social calls will not be related the participants' health condition nor delivery of any health information.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Self-efficacy

    The General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE), developed based on social cognitive theory, initially consisted of 20 items and was later refined to a 10-item version that has been translated into Chinese. The scale items are rated on a 4-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (not at all true) to 4 (exactly true). The total score ranges from 10 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy, meaning a stronger belief in one's ability to handle various situations effectively.

    Time frame: Baseline pre-intervention (T1), at three-month when the interventions are completed (T2), and three-month post-intervention (T3)

  2. Change in Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL)

    The instrumental activities of daily living is measured by Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) Scale-Chinese version, a four-point scale with 9-items of activities which include use of telephone, transportation, shopping, meal preparation, housework, handyman work, laundry, medication management, and money management. Each item rate trichotomously (1 = unable, 2 = needs assistance, 3 = independent) and sum the night responses. Higher score means a worse IADL.

    Time frame: Baseline pre-intervention (T1), at three-month when the interventions are completed (T2), and three-month post-intervention (T3)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in quality of life

    Quality of Life will be assessed using the 12-item Short Form Health Survey, version 2, Chinese (HK) version (SF-12v2). This survey includes subscales for physical functioning, role limitations due to physical and emotional problems, mental health, bodily pain, general health, vitality, and social functioning. Scores are weighted according to standard scoring algorithms and benchmarked against general population norms, yielding two summary scores: the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS), each on a scale from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better quality of life, with higher PCS and MCS scores reflecting better physical and mental health, respectively.

    Time frame: Baseline pre-intervention (T1), at three-month when the interventions are completed (T2), and three-month post-intervention (T3)

  2. Change in self-report of pain

    Using numeric (0-10) pain rating scale to assess the pain level. 0-10 where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable.

    Time frame: Baseline pre-intervention (T1), at three-month when the interventions are completed (T2), and three-month post-intervention (T3)

  3. Change in depression

    Using the 15-item Chinese version of the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) to assess depression level. The maximum score is 15 (higher score, more severe) with a cut-off point of 8 with high sensitivity and specificity for detection of depression

    Time frame: Baseline pre-intervention (T1), at three-month when the interventions are completed (T2), and three-month post-intervention (T3)

  4. Change in activity of daily living

    Use of Modified Barthel Index-Chinese version to measure 10 basic activities of daily living function (feeding, dressing, grooming, bathing, toileting, bed-chair transfer, bladder and bowel control, ambulation and stair climbing).It is measured using a 5-point Likert scale from 1= totally dependent to 5= fully independent. Higher score means better in performing activity of daily living.

    Time frame: Baseline pre-intervention (T1), at three-month when the interventions are completed (T2), and three-month post-intervention (T3)

  5. Change in health service utilization

    Measuring the number of attendance to government out-patient clinics (GOPC), and number of unscheduled visits to the emergency department and hospital admission.

    Time frame: Baseline pre-intervention (T1), at three-month when the interventions are completed (T2), and three-month post-intervention (T3)

  6. Change in blood pressure

    Blood pressure measurement will be performed after 10 minutes of sitting rest. A standard electronic sphygmomanometer will be used to measure supine blood pressure on the right arm of each candidate (unless contraindicated). Both systolic and diastolic blood pressure will be measured. Individuals with an average BP 135/85mmHg based on readings in the morning and evening based on 6 consecutive days are considered to be hypertensive based on the Hong Kong Reference Framework for Hypertension Care for Adults in Primary Care Settings.

    Time frame: Baseline pre-intervention (T1), at three-month when the interventions are completed (T2), and three-month post-intervention (T3)

  7. Change in body mass index

    BMI will be measured by the calculation of weight/(height\*height) based on a regularly calibrated weight scale and stadiometer when the subjects wear light clothing without shoes. Normal readings are within 18.5-23.

    Time frame: Baseline pre-intervention (T1), at three-month when the interventions are completed (T2), and three-month post-intervention (T3)

  8. Change in fall incidence

    Asking the fall incidence in the past three months. A fall diary is suggested to completed.

    Time frame: Baseline pre-intervention (T1), at three-month when the interventions are completed (T2), and three-month post-intervention (T3)

  9. Change in medication adherence

    Using 12-item Adherence to Refills and Medications Scale to the respondent's ability to take and refill all prescribed medications under different circumstances.The options vary from "none of the time" to "all of the time", with total scores ranging from 12-48 . Higher score means worse in adherence to refills and medication.

    Time frame: Baseline pre-intervention (T1), at three-month when the interventions are completed (T2), and three-month post-intervention (T3)

  10. Change in capillary blood glucose

    Capillary blood glucose level will be measured by a standard capillary glucose meter.

    Time frame: Baseline pre-intervention (T1), at three-month when the interventions are completed (T2), and three-month post-intervention (T3)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
    Kowloon, Hong Kong
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 17, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05621720
Lead sponsor
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Responsible party
Frances Kam Yuet WONG (Professor, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 18, 2022
Start date
Jun 6, 2022
Primary completion
Jan 31, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 30, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 17, 2024

Study contacts

Wilson Yeung-Yuk Kwok
Contact
wilson-yy.kwok@polyu.edu.hk
+852 2766 4112
Frances Kam-Yuet Wong
principal investigator · The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion