CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05611164Updated Nov 14, 2022

Evaluation of SiD's System for Improving Assisted Reproduction Treatments

An interventional study of Software assisted selection of individual spermatozoa for intracytoplasmic sperm injection in Infertility, sponsored by IVF 2.0 Limited. Completed at 2 sites in Mexico. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 40 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-11-14.

Sponsored by IVF 2.0 Limited · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2022, registered Nov 2022).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 40 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

According to the WHO, infertility affects 15% of reproductive age couples worldwide. Among the assisted reproductive technologies available for patients with infertility, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has become one of the most widely employed and is now thought to be the most common method for oocyte insemination outside of the human body.

ICSI entails the selection of an individual sperm cell and its injection directly into an oocyte. Usually, an embryologist performs the selection of the individual sperm cell to inject by subjectively observing the morphology and progression of the candidate spermatozoon. Subjectivity and time constrains, however, suggest the best possible candidate might not always be selected. Further optimization of ICSI technology remains a significant goal, yet the majority of approaches proposed in the literature have returned mixed results. The deployment of an artificial intelligence (AI) software capable of detecting and non-invasively predicting the value of individual spermatozoa in real time could significantly improve ICSI.

SiD (IVF 2.0 Ltd, London, UK) is a software designed to identify, evaluate, and assist in the spermatozoon selection process ahead of ICSI. SID uses a mathematical model to evaluate individual spermatozoa in real-time according to their motility patterns (for instance velocity, linearity, straightness) and their morphology. The software has been developed by making use of retrospective data analysis, but its prospective evaluation is still pending.

With the above in mind, this study intends to address the following question: can the use of a software assistant for the selection of individual sperm cells for injection (SiD), improve ICSI outcomes (oocyte fertilization, embryo development and quality, embryo ploidy, pregnancy, and live birth)? Patients with a clinical indication for undergoing ICSI will be prospectively enrolled into the study. Following ovarian stimulation, the oocytes retrieved from each patient will be randomly split into two groups and inseminated by ICSI using sperm selected either subjectively by an embryologist (control group) or by the software assistant SiD (experimental group). Embryos will be allowed to develop for up to six days and until blastocyst formation assessments are completed. Embryos might be subjected to cytogenetic screening or used for embryo transfer according to patient needs. The recorded outcomes will be anonymized prior to statistical analysis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Infertility

Browse trials for

03

In context

Infertility

2,506 studies on the registry are indexed under Infertility; 407 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is below the median of 120 across 1,698 interventional studies indexed under Infertility.

Browse Infertility studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with IVF 2.0 Limited as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Participant's age between 18 and 40 years of age.
  • Informed consent signed by the patient before treatment.
  • IVF treatments with medical or embryology indication to perform ICSI.
  • Cycles with at least 2 oocytes in Metaphase II.
  • Fresh ejaculated motile sperm.
  • Fresh oocytes.
  • Selection of sperm using a 7% or 10% PVP solution.
  • Presence of motile sperm at the time of sperm selection for ICSI.
  • Videos recorded with a total magnification of 200x.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients diagnosed with recurrent pregnancy loss.
  • Spermatozoa extracted by testicular biopsy.
  • Frozen/thawed spermatozoa.
  • Frozen/thawed oocytes in any case.
  • That the recommendations for use of SiD have not been fully followed.
  • Poor quality of saved ICSI video.
  • Inability to reliably trace sperm-oocyte-embryo throughout the process.
  • Oocytes that are not in Metaphase II.
  • Patients with immotile sperm
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Sperm selected by embryologist without software assistance

    For each patient, oocytes collected following one ovarian stimulation cycle are randomly distributed in two groups ("no intervention" and "experimental" arms), in a sibling oocyte study design. In the "no intervention" arm, the individual spermatozoa for injection are selected subjectively by the embryologist.

  • Experimental
    Sperm selected with AI assistant SiD

    For each patient, oocytes collected following one ovarian stimulation cycle are randomly distributed in two groups ("no intervention" and "experimental" arms), in a sibling oocyte study design. In the "experimental" arm, the spermatozoa selection for injection is performed based on the recommendation of the AI assistant SiD.

    Device: Software assisted selection of individual spermatozoa for intracytoplasmic sperm injection

Interventions

  • DeviceSoftware assisted selection of individual spermatozoa for intracytoplasmic sperm injection

    Half of the oocytes will be injected with a sperm selected with SiD's assistance

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Fertilization rate

    Rate of oocytes that present two pronuclei or cell division

    Time frame: 16-18 hours after ICSI

  2. Blastocyst formation rate

    Rate of oocytes that have a defined trophectoderm and inner cell mass

    Time frame: around 120 hours after ICSI

  3. Usable blastocyst formation rate

    Rate of oocytes that have a blastocyst that is transferable accoring to its quality

    Time frame: around 120 hours after ICSI

Secondary outcomes

  1. Ploidy status

    euploid rate (when available)

    Time frame: trophectoderm biopsy is performed around 120 hours after ICSI

  2. Biochemical pregnancy

    human beta chorionic gonadotropin

    Time frame: 2 weeks after blastocyst transference

  3. Clinical pregnancy

    Presence of heartbeat

    Time frame: 6 weeks after blastocyst transference

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • New Hope Fertility Center
    Guadalajara, Jalisco 44630, Mexico
  • New Hope Fertility Center
    Mexico City, 11000, Mexico
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 14, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05611164
Lead sponsor
IVF 2.0 Limited
Collaborators
New Hope Fertility Center Mexico
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 9, 2022
Start date
Apr 1, 2022
Primary completion
Sep 5, 2022
Completion
Oct 31, 2022
Last update
Nov 14, 2022

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion