An interventional study of Neurowave and Sedline indices in view in RASS-score, Deep Sedation and Post-cardiac Surgery, sponsored by Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel. Completed at 1 site in Belgium. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-02-09.
Sponsored by Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care
In the intensive care unit of the Free University hospital of Brussels, sedated patients are standardly monitored with the Masimo SEDline device to see how deeply a patient is asleep. During this study we want to attach 1 extra device to 30 sedated patients, lying in the intensive care unit. This device, called the NeuroSENSE brain monitor from Neurowave systems, uses a different scale to indicate the ideal depth of sedation. In total, both devices will be hung on a patient for 2 times 35 minutes. At minute 33, a RASS score will be determined in each patient. This score will be determined by talking to the patient or administering a pain stimulus. Based on the reaction of the patient an estimation can be made how deeply a patient is sleeping. Our goal is to find out which device correlates best with the effective clinical state of the patient.
Adequate sedation level is important for patient comfort and safety. As under- and oversedation are common several devices are used that measure the Depth of Anesthesia (DoA). Each device uses its proprietary algorithm to calculate a depth of anesthesia index and each index has its own optimal range. The optimal range for the NeuroSense monitor (NeuroWave Systems inc., Cleveland, OH, USA) is between 40 and 60, while the optimal range for the SEDline monitor (Masimo Corporation; Irvine, CA, USA) is between 25 and 50. When the device indicates a value within these limits, the patient is optimally anesthetized for a surgical procedure. In this study, 30 patients will be monitored simultaneously by both the Neurowave and SedLine devices. The study will determine which device is the most accurate and therefore the most ideal for use in the ICU.
Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel is the lead sponsor of 362 studies on the registry; 103 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
This arm consists of all the patients that fulfill the inclusion and exclusion-criteria and are therefore suitable for the study. The Neurowave brain monitor is attached on the patients forehead and the study starts. At that moment the included patients are monitored by the Masimo/Sedline en the Neurosense/Neurowave monitor.
Device: Neurowave and Sedline indices in view
3 additional electrodes are attached on the patients forehead. After electrode placement, the indices of both the SEDLINE device and the NEUROWAVE device are noted every 5 seconds for 1 minute
Comparison of the depth of sedation indices per assigned RASS score using the prediction probability
The main objective of the study is to compare the DoA indices of the NeuroSense/NeuroWave monitor and the SEDline/Masimo monitor in sedated patients in ICU. Both values are then correlated with the patient's clinical sedation level by assigning a RASS score to the patient each time. The RASS score stands for Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale and ranges from -5 to +4. A score of -5 stands for a patient who is unresponsive to any stimuli whereas a score of +4 means a highly combative patient. To determine which device correlates best with the clinic, predictive probability will be used. The prediction probability is a value between 0 and 1. A score of 1 corresponds to a correct classification of the DoA in each case. A value of 0 corresponds to a discordance between the clinic and the index value. The device whose predictive probability is closest to 1 correlates best with the clinic and will likely be the best device to use.
Time frame: 33 minutes
This study is completed, as verified in May 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel