CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05578924Gyn-MGUpdated Oct 18, 2022

Factors Associated With Gynecological Consultation by General Practitioner

An observational study in Adult Daughters, sponsored by Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne. Status unknown at 1 site in France. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-10-18.

Sponsored by Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Oct 2022), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
2,000
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Because of the shortage of doctors in France, notably gynaecologist, general practitioners are definitely an essential partner women's health. However, few of them regularly practice gynecological acts.

A lot of studies have studied why general doctors not practice gynecological acts but it would necessary to include the women's perspective.

Read the detailed description

The aim of the study will be identify women's factors associated with gynaecological consultation by the general practitioner.

02

Conditions studied

  • Adult Daughters

Keywords

  • Adult women
  • gynecological acts
  • general practitioners
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne is the lead sponsor of 62 studies on the registry; 21 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

women aged more than 18 years old, who consent to participle to the study

Inclusion criteria

  • women aged more than 18 years old
  • woman agreeing to participate to the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • women aged less than 18 years old
  • woman not agreeing to participate to the study
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
2,000 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • Other" women group "

    women aged more than 18 years old

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Acceptance of gynecological consultation with a general practitioner

    would the woman agree to consult a general practitioner for a gynecological reason ? (Yes or No)

    Time frame: Day 0

Secondary outcomes

  1. Women's knowledge of general practitioner gynecology competences

    Does woman know that a general practitioner is able to perform gynecological acts? (Yes or No)

    Time frame: Day 0

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Ufr Medecine Urca
    Reims, 51100, France
    • Coralie Barbe · Contact · 326913665
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 18, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05578924
Lead sponsor
Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 13, 2022
Start date
Sep 9, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 1, 2023 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 18, 2022

Study contacts

coralie barbe
Contact
cbarbe1@univ-reims.fr
326913665 ext. +33
co bar
Contact
curss@univ-reims.fr
326918822 ext. +33
barbe coralie
principal investigator · pratictioner

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Oct 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion