ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05569733Updated Jan 27, 2023

Simultaneous Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and Magnetic Resonance (MR) in Visual Snow Syndrome

An observational study in Visual Snow Syndrome, sponsored by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-01-27.

Sponsored by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
22
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Visual snow syndrome (VSS) is a neurologic condition where patients experience tiny flickering dots in their entire visual field. It has been reported that the brain consumes more glucose in the lingual gyrus (a subdivision of the occipital cortex) and that this also shows increased volume of grey matter (neurons and supporting cells). In this study, the investigators apply fluor-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with magnetic resonance imaging (18F-FDG PET/MR) in patients with VSS and compare this to healthy controls. Aside from an analysis in each brain volume element (voxel), the accuracy of classifying groups based on a volume-of-interest (VOI) analysis of both PET and MR is studied, Lastly, this is also compared to a visual assessment of the PET and MR images.

Read the detailed description

Aim : Prospective measurement of brain glucose metabolism and structural integrity in the brain of subjects with visual snow syndrome (VSS). Voxel-based and volume-of interest comparison to age matched healthy controls retrospectively obtained on the same simultaneous PET/MR imaging system.

Hypothesis : 1/ VSS patients show overactivation of parts of the visual system, in particular the lingual gyrus, which is likely related to larger volume of the gyrus on structural imaging. 2/ Discrimination of VSS patients versus controls can be done by visual read of FDG PET and/or volume-of-interest based discriminant analysis.

Methods : Recruitment through neurology practice specialised in VSS, detailed history taking and assessment of in/exclusion criteria, scanning with simultaneous18F-FDG PET/MR Signa GE Healthcare.

Analysis : visual assessment, group-based voxel and volume-of-interest based analysis (FDG PET, volumetry T1 MRI) with appropriate statistics and corrections for multiple regional comparisons. Discriminant analysis on VOI based data. Dual observer scoring of visual data and assessment of accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of visual image analysis compared to clinical final diagnosis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Visual Snow Syndrome

Keywords

  • FDG PET
  • PET/MR
  • volumetry
  • visual analysis
  • discriminant analysis
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven is the lead sponsor of 959 studies on the registry; 263 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Group 1 : Visual Snow Syndrome patients Group 2 : Healthy Controls

Eligibility criteria

GROUP 1: VSS Patients

Inclusion Criteria:

  • M/F, age 18-85,
  • diagnosis of VSS by an experienced neurologist : dynamic, continuous, black and white tiny dots in the entire visual field lasting longer than 3 months, with at least two additional visual symptoms

Exclusion Criteria:

- other underlying neurological conditions inclusive ophthalmological examinations

GROUP 2 : Controls

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age 18-85 years, M/F, in general healthy condition
  • normal neurological examination, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) ≥ 28, Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI) score ≤ 9, and a normal structural volumetric MRI.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • history of major internal pathology, neurological and/or psychiatric disorders (including psychosis, depression, and anxiety),
  • history of frequent migraine attacks, substance abuse or current use of any central acting medication
  • first-degree relatives with dementia.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
22 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • VSS

    Patients with visual snow syndrome

    Diagnostic Test: simultaneous fluor-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography with magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI)

  • controls

    healthy, screened age-matched controls

    Diagnostic Test: simultaneous fluor-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography with magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI)

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testsimultaneous fluor-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography with magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI)

    All subjects fast at least for 4 hours prior to 18F-FDG injection. 18F-FDG is injected intravenously (150 megabecquerel (MBq)) in standard ambient conditions, supine in a dark, noise free room with eyes and ears open. 18F-FDG PET images are acquired for 20 min on a simultaneous GE Signa 3 Tesla (3T) PET/MR scanner with integrated Time-of-Flight (TOF) (GE Healthcare, Chicago, USA). Simultaneous with the 18F-FDG PET/MR acquisition, zero-echo-time (ZTE) MR data are acquired for attenuation correction and a 3D volumetric T1-weighted BRAVO MR sequence using a vendor supplied high-resolution 8-channel phased array head coil (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, USA).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Group difference in regional brain metabolism as assessed with 18F-FDG positron emission tomography

    Visual, voxel- and volume-of-interest based assessment of of FDG PET

    Time frame: analysis done immediately after imaging

  2. Group difference in regional brain volume assessed with volumetric magnetic resonance imaging.

    Visual, voxel- and volume-of-interest based assessment of MRI images

    Time frame: at baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Discriminant analysis of PET metabolic differences

    Statistical discriminant analysis of FDG between VSS patients and controls

    Time frame: at baseline

  2. Visual scoring of PET metabolic differences

    Visual scoring of FDG between VSS patients and controls

    Time frame: at baseline

  3. Discriminant analysis of MR volumetric differences

    Statistical discriminant analysis of regional MR volumetry between VSS patients and controls

    Time frame: at baseline

  4. Visual scoring of MR volumetric differences

    Visual scoring of regional MR volumetry between VSS patients and controls

    Time frame: at baseline

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Van Laere K, Ceccarini J, Gebruers J, Goffin K, Boon E. Simultaneous 18F-FDG PET/MR metabolic and structural changes in visual snow syndrome and diagnostic use. EJNMMI Res. 2022 Dec 30;12(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s13550-022-00949-0. PubMed 36583806 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Data can be shared on a reasonable request, including full FDG PET and MRI data as well as supporting information.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Informed consent form

Access criteria: Contact PI by email.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jan 2017 to primary completion in Sep 2017, 8 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 27, 2022
First posted
Oct 6, 2022
StartActual
Jan 2, 2017
Primary completionActual
Sep 2, 2017
CompletionActual
Feb 1, 2022
Last update
Jan 27, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 27, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05569733
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 6, 2022
Start date
Jan 2, 2017
Primary completion
Sep 2, 2017
Completion
Feb 1, 2022
Last update
Jan 27, 2023

Study contacts

Koen Van Laere, MD PhD
principal investigator · Head Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion