CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05563025vsUpdated Dec 19, 2022

Comparison of Time and Cost Efficiency in Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery Under Regional Anesthesia vs General Anesthesia

An observational study in Anesthesia, sponsored by Samsun University. Status unknown at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-12-19.

Sponsored by Samsun University · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Dec 2022), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
80
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Arthroscopic Shoulder surgery can be done not only under general anesthesia but also regional technics. In this study we aimed to compare the cost and time effectiveness of regional anesthesia and general anesthesia.

Read the detailed description

In our routine practice, ultrasound guided brachial plexus blocks or general anesthesia can be used during shoulder surgery. This retrospective study is designed to investigate the data of the patients who underwent arthroscopic shoulder between 01.09.2021-01.09.2022 at Samsun University Education and Research Hospital. As well as patients' demographic data, presence of additional diseases, operation indications, duration of surgery, intraoperative medical agents that are used, duration of hospital stay will be collected from patients files.Fees for materials used for general anesthesia and regional anesthesia will be determined. A fixed cost will be determined for the use of the operating room, including the salaries of the healthcare workers. After final calculation of both of the group costs statistical analysis will be made.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anesthesia

Keywords

  • Cost
  • Regional Anesthesia
  • Shoulder
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Samsun University is the lead sponsor of 81 studies on the registry; 21 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

All patients between age 18 and 80 of ASA status 1,2,3 who underwent Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery under General or Regional Anesthesia between 01.09.2021 and 01.09.2022.

Inclusion criteria

  • American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) 1-2-3
  • Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Emergency surgery
  • ASA -4
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • General

    Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery under General Anesthesia

  • Regional

    Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery under Regional Anesthesia

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cost of Regional Anesthesia and General Anesthesia

    Calculation of peroperative costs of patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery under general or regional anesthesia. excluding surgical materials

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time

    Measuring the operation room usage under general or regional anesthesia

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Samsun University
    Samsun, Turkey
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Tapar H, Suren M, Kaya Z, Arıcı S, Karaman S, Kahveci M. Üst Ekstremite Periferik Blok Anestezisi Ve Komplikasyonları. Journal of Contemporary Medicine 2012;2(3):195-200.
  • Hewson DW, Oldman M, Bedforth NM. Regional anaesthesia for shoulder surgery. BJA Educ. 2019 Apr;19(4):98-104. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2018.12.004. Epub 2019 Feb 6. No abstract available. PubMed 33456877 ↗
  • Komann M, Avian A, Dreiling J, Gerbershagen H, Volk T, Weinmann C, Meissner W. Association of Perioperative Regional Analgesia with Postoperative Patient-Reported Pain Outcomes and Opioid Requirements: Comparing 22 Different Surgical Groups in 23,911 Patients from the QUIPS Registry. J Clin Med. 2021 May 19;10(10):2194. doi: 10.3390/jcm10102194. PubMed 34069496 ↗
  • Gonano C, Kettner SC, Ernstbrunner M, Schebesta K, Chiari A, Marhofer P. Comparison of economical aspects of interscalene brachial plexus blockade and general anaesthesia for arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Sep;103(3):428-33. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep173. Epub 2009 Jul 8. PubMed 19586958 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 19, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05563025
Lead sponsor
Samsun University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 3, 2022
Start date
Dec 16, 2022
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 1, 2023 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 19, 2022

Study contacts

Murat Ünal
Contact
murat.unal@yahoo.com
+90 362 311 1500 ext. 1128
Serkan Tulgar
study chair · Samsun University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Dec 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion