ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05561907EAT-GOUpdated Jun 15, 2026

Enteral Anastomosis for the Treatment of Gastric Outlet Obstruction: A Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Endoscopic Versus Surgical Gastrojejunostomy

An interventional study of Surgical gastrojejunostomy (SGJ) and Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy (EGJ) in Gastric Outlet Obstruction, sponsored by Northwell Health. Recruiting at 4 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-15.

Sponsored by Northwell Health · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Oct 2022; still recruiting 4 years later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
32
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) occurs commonly in malignancies involving the periampullary region (cancers originating in the head of the pancreas, duodenum, bile duct, or ampulla) or the distal stomach. GOO not only causes debilitating symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, inability to tolerate oral intake, and prevents adequate nutritional intake. Therefore, providing therapy for GOO is imperative to improve the quality of life, and nutritional status of these patients, as well as allow them to continue receiving their cancer treatment

Read the detailed description

After potential subjects are screened from the physicians' schedules, they will be assessed for further inclusion criteria. They will be presented with the informed consent form for their review. Once they have been given the opportunity to review and ask questions, they will sign the consent form and from this point will be considered enrolled into the study.

After signing the informed consent, subjects will be randomized to one of the two cohorts in a 1:1 manner.

On the day of their assigned procedures, subjects will be asked several quality of life questionnaires to obtain a baseline status.

Data will be collected during and immediately following the procedure to assess for any possible adverse events.

Follow-up data will be completed at the following timepoints: 1-day, 2-day, 3-day, 4-day, and 7-day, 30-day, 3-month, 6-month, and 1-year post-procedure.

QOL Scoring Systems GOOSS- Gastric Outlet Obstruction Symptom Score

  • 1 Inadequate or no oral intake
  • 2 Liquids/thickened liquids
  • 3 Semisolids/ low residue
  • 4 unmodified

GFS- Gut Function Score from Lowe et al 2002

  • 0 Profuse vomiting
  • 1 Nausea and occasional vomiting
  • 2 Nausea only
  • 3 Normal gut function

Pre-Procedure Variables to Record Demographic

  • Gender
  • Weight
  • BMI
  • Cancer Type

Clinical Parameters

  • GOOSS
  • Gut Function Score
  • Karnofsky Performance Scale

Procedural Parameters

  • EUS-GJ: presence of ascites, able to pass scope beyond obstruction, use of wire to stabilize position, Length of procedure, intraprocedural AEs, Stent size used, successful completion of procedure
  • Laparoscopic GJ: presence of ascites, length of procedure, intraprocedural AEs, conversion to open GJ, successful completion of procedure

Post-procedure Hospitalization Daily Function

  • GOOSS
  • Gut Function Score
  • Time to initiation of oral intake liquids
  • Time to initiation of oral intake solids
  • Time to discharge
  • Post procedural AEs

    30 Day Outcomes

  • GOOSS
  • Gut Function Score
  • Karnofsky Performance Scale
  • Weight/BMI
  • Able to tolerate TB approved chemotherapeutic regimen
02

Conditions studied

  • Gastric Outlet Obstruction

Keywords

  • Gastric outlet obstruction
  • GOO
  • Periampullary malignancy
  • Periampullary cancer
  • Surgical gastrojejunostomy
  • Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy
  • Gastrojejunostomy
  • Enteral anastamosis
03

In context

Gastric Outlet Obstruction

38 studies on the registry are indexed under Gastric Outlet Obstruction; 14 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 32 is below the median of 69 across 28 interventional studies indexed under Gastric Outlet Obstruction.

Browse Gastric Outlet Obstruction studies →

Lead sponsor

Northwell Health is the lead sponsor of 475 studies on the registry; 107 are open to participants now.

Of its 45 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 23 (51%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Periampullary (pancreas, bile duct, ampulla, duodenum) extending to the distal duodenum (D3) or distal (antrum) gastric cancer
  2. Symptoms of gastric outlet obstruction (at least 2 of 4 required):

    1. post prandial vomiting,
    2. abdominal pain,
    3. inability to tolerate PO,
    4. imaging consistent with GOO
  3. Gastric Outlet Obstruction Scoring System (GOOSS) Score of 0 (no oral intake) or 1 (liquids only)
  4. Age >18 years old
  5. greater than 2 months or failed duodenal stenting
  6. Surgical Candidate/Tolerate General Anesthesia
  7. Unresectable or disease

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Age\< 18 years old
  2. Pregnancy
  3. Intestinal obstruction distal to the Ligament of Treitz
  4. Evidence of other luminal strictures of the GI tract
  5. Previous gastric or periampullary surgery
  6. Inability to complete quality of life surveys (QOLS)
  7. Presence of abdominal ascites
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
32 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Surgical gastrojejunostomy (SGJ)

    An anastomosis will be created between the stomach and the proximal loop of the jejunum during a laparoscopic surgical procedure.

    Procedure: Surgical gastrojejunostomy (SGJ)

  • Experimental
    Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy (EGJ)

    A stent is placed between the stomach and adjacent small intestine under endoscopic ultrasound guidance during an upper endoscopic procedure.

    Procedure: Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy (EGJ)

Interventions

  • ProcedureSurgical gastrojejunostomy (SGJ)

    Laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy

  • ProcedureEndoscopic gastrojejunostomy (EGJ)

    Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided gastrojejunostomy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to initiation of solid oral intake without symptoms of GOO

    Days to initiation of solid oral intake will be measured from randomization to first day of intake of soft solid foods, as indicated by a GOOSS score of 2

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Safety of procedure

    All adverse events (AEs) occurring after treatment will be graded according to ASGE lexicon. A subject will be considered to have had an adverse event if they had one or more adverse events, and they will be considered to have had a serious adverse event (SAE) if they had one or more serious adverse events

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Technical success of procedure

    Technical success is defined as adequate deployment and positioning of the stent(s) for EGJ or technical possibility to create an anastomosis for SGJ.

    Time frame: 1 year

  3. Clinical success of procedure

    Clinical success is defined as improvement to a GOOSS score of 2 or 3 (oral intake of soft solid foods or resumption of full diet) without additional intervention.

    Time frame: 1 year

  4. Time to discharge

    Length of stay will be measured from randomization to discharge alive. All patients will be followed until discharge. Patients who die in hospital will be considered censored and time from randomization to death will be used.

    Time frame: 1 year

  5. Change in BMI

    BMI will be measured immediately prior to the procedure, and at one month and three months after the procedure.

    Time frame: 3 months

  6. Change in albumin levels

    Albumin levels will be measured immediately prior to the procedure, and at one month and three months after the procedure.

    Time frame: 3 months

  7. Change in Gastric Outlet Obstruction Symptom Score (GOOSS)

    The Gastric Outlet Obstruction Symptom Score (GOOSS) scale is as follows, whereas a score of 1 is the worst and a score of 4 is the best: 1. Inadequate or no oral intake 2. Liquids/thickened liquids 3. Semisolids/ low residue 4. Unmodified GOOSS will be recorded at each of the following timepoints: * immediately prior to the procedure * immediately post-procedure * 1-day post-procedure * 2-days post-procedure * 3-days post-procedure * 4-days post-procedure * 7-days post-procedure, * 30-days post-procedure * 3-months post-procedure * 6-months post-procedure * 1-year post-procedure

    Time frame: 1 year

  8. Change in Gut Function Score (GFS)

    Gut Function Score (GFS) scale is as follows, whereas a score of 1 is the worst and a score of 3 is the best: 0\. Profuse vomiting 1. Nausea and occasional vomiting 2. Nausea only 3. Normal gut function GFS will be recorded at each of the following timepoints: * Immediately prior to the procedure * Immediately post-procedure * 1-day post-procedure * 2-days post-procedure * 3-days post-procedure * 4-days post-procedure * 7-days post-procedure, * 30-days post-procedure * 3-months post-procedure * 6-months post-procedure * 1-year post-procedure

    Time frame: 1 year

  9. Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS)

    Karnofsky Performance Scale is measured on a scale of 0 to 100 as follows, with a score of 0 being the worst and a score of 100 being the best: 100 - Normal; no complaints; no evidence of disease. 90 - Able to carry on normal activity; minor signs or symptoms of disease. 80 - Normal activity with effort; some signs or symptoms of disease. 70 - Cares for self; unable to carry on normal activity or to do active work. 60 - Requires occasional assistance, but is able to care for most of their personal needs. 50 - Requires considerable assistance and frequent medical care. 40 - Disabled; requires special care and assistance. 30 - Severely disabled; hospital admission is indicated although death not imminent. 20 - Very sick; hospital admission necessary; active supportive treatment necessary. 10 - Moribund; fatal processes progressing rapidly. 0 - Dead KPS will be recorded pre-procedure and at 30-days post-procedure.

    Time frame: 30 Days

  10. Chemotherapeutic regimen tolerance

    Ability to tolerate TB approved chemotherapeutic regimen

    Time frame: 30 Days

07

Study locations

1 of 4 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lorusso D, Giliberti A, Bianco M, Lantone G, Leandro G. Stomach-partitioning gastrojejunostomy is better than conventional gastrojejunostomy in palliative care of gastric outlet obstruction for gastric or pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2019 Apr;10(2):283-291. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2018.10.10. PubMed 31032096 ↗
  • Troncone E, Fugazza A, Cappello A, Del Vecchio Blanco G, Monteleone G, Repici A, Teoh AYB, Anderloni A. Malignant gastric outlet obstruction: Which is the best therapeutic option? World J Gastroenterol. 2020 Apr 28;26(16):1847-1860. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i16.1847. PubMed 32390697 ↗
  • Maetani I, Inoue H, Sato M, Ohashi S, Igarashi Y, Sakai Y. Peroral insertion techniques of self-expanding metal stents for malignant gastric outlet and duodenal stenoses. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996 Oct;44(4):468-71. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(96)70102-5. PubMed 8905371 ↗
  • Tonozuka R, Tsuchiya T, Mukai S, Nagakawa Y, Itoi T. Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Guided Gastroenterostomy Techniques for Treatment of Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction. Clin Endosc. 2020 Sep;53(5):510-518. doi: 10.5946/ce.2020.151. Epub 2020 Sep 23. PubMed 32962331 ↗
  • Khashab M, Alawad AS, Shin EJ, Kim K, Bourdel N, Singh VK, Lennon AM, Hutfless S, Sharaiha RZ, Amateau S, Okolo PI, Makary MA, Wolfgang C, Canto MI, Kalloo AN. Enteral stenting versus gastrojejunostomy for palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Surg Endosc. 2013 Jun;27(6):2068-75. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2712-7. Epub 2013 Jan 9. PubMed 23299137 ↗
  • Jeurnink SM, Steyerberg EW, van Hooft JE, van Eijck CH, Schwartz MP, Vleggaar FP, Kuipers EJ, Siersema PD; Dutch SUSTENT Study Group. Surgical gastrojejunostomy or endoscopic stent placement for the palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (SUSTENT study): a multicenter randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Mar;71(3):490-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.09.042. Epub 2009 Dec 8. PubMed 20003966 ↗
  • Jeurnink SM, Steyerberg EW, Hof Gv, van Eijck CH, Kuipers EJ, Siersema PD. Gastrojejunostomy versus stent placement in patients with malignant gastric outlet obstruction: a comparison in 95 patients. J Surg Oncol. 2007 Oct 1;96(5):389-96. doi: 10.1002/jso.20828. PubMed 17474082 ↗
  • Itoi T, Itokawa F, Uraoka T, Gotoda T, Horii J, Goto O, Moriyasu F, Moon JH, Kitagawa Y, Yahagi N. Novel EUS-guided gastrojejunostomy technique using a new double-balloon enteric tube and lumen-apposing metal stent (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Dec;78(6):934-939. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.09.025. PubMed 24237949 ↗
  • Khashab MA, Kumbhari V, Grimm IS, Ngamruengphong S, Aguila G, El Zein M, Kalloo AN, Baron TH. EUS-guided gastroenterostomy: the first U.S. clinical experience (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Nov;82(5):932-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.06.017. Epub 2015 Jul 26. PubMed 26215646 ↗
  • Khashab MA, Tieu AH, Azola A, Ngamruengphong S, El Zein MH, Kumbhari V. EUS-guided gastrojejunostomy for management of complete gastric outlet obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Oct;82(4):745. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.05.017. Epub 2015 Jun 16. No abstract available. PubMed 26092615 ↗
  • Carbajo AY, Kahaleh M, Tyberg A. Clinical Review of EUS-guided Gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE). J Clin Gastroenterol. 2020 Jan;54(1):1-7. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001262. PubMed 31567785 ↗
  • Barthet M, Binmoeller KF, Vanbiervliet G, Gonzalez JM, Baron TH, Berdah S. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery gastroenterostomy with a biflanged lumen-apposing stent: first clinical experience (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Jan;81(1):215-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.09.039. PubMed 25527056 ↗
  • Ge PS, Young JY, Dong W, Thompson CC. EUS-guided gastroenterostomy versus enteral stent placement for palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Surg Endosc. 2019 Oct;33(10):3404-3411. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-06636-3. Epub 2019 Feb 6. PubMed 30725254 ↗
  • Kerdsirichairat T, Irani S, Yang J, Brewer Gutierrez OI, Moran R, Sanaei O, Dbouk M, Kumbhari V, Singh VK, Kalloo AN, Khashab MA. Durability and long-term outcomes of direct EUS-guided gastroenterostomy using lumen-apposing metal stents for gastric outlet obstruction. Endosc Int Open. 2019 Feb;7(2):E144-E150. doi: 10.1055/a-0799-9939. Epub 2019 Jan 30. PubMed 30705945 ↗
  • James TW, Greenberg S, Grimm IS, Baron TH. EUS-guided gastroenteric anastomosis as a bridge to definitive treatment in benign gastric outlet obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Mar;91(3):537-542. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.11.017. Epub 2019 Nov 20. PubMed 31759034 ↗
  • Wannhoff A, Ruh N, Meier B, Riecken B, Caca K. Endoscopic gastrointestinal anastomoses with lumen-apposing metal stents: predictors of technical success. Surg Endosc. 2021 May;35(5):1997-2004. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07594-5. Epub 2020 May 1. PubMed 32358692 ↗
  • Itoi T, Ishii K, Ikeuchi N, Sofuni A, Gotoda T, Moriyasu F, Dhir V, Teoh AY, Binmoeller KF. Prospective evaluation of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided double-balloon-occluded gastrojejunostomy bypass (EPASS) for malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Gut. 2016 Feb;65(2):193-5. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310348. Epub 2015 Aug 17. No abstract available. PubMed 26282674 ↗
  • Tyberg A, Perez-Miranda M, Sanchez-Ocana R, Penas I, de la Serna C, Shah J, Binmoeller K, Gaidhane M, Grimm I, Baron T, Kahaleh M. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastrojejunostomy with a lumen-apposing metal stent: a multicenter, international experience. Endosc Int Open. 2016 Mar;4(3):E276-81. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-101789. PubMed 27004243 ↗
  • Khashab MA, Bukhari M, Baron TH, Nieto J, El Zein M, Chen YI, Chavez YH, Ngamruengphong S, Alawad AS, Kumbhari V, Itoi T. International multicenter comparative trial of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gastroenterostomy versus surgical gastrojejunostomy for the treatment of malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Endosc Int Open. 2017 Apr;5(4):E275-E281. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-101695. PubMed 28382326 ↗
  • Perez-Miranda M, Tyberg A, Poletto D, Toscano E, Gaidhane M, Desai AP, Kumta NA, Fayad L, Nieto J, Barthet M, Shah R, Brauer BC, Sharaiha RZ, Kahaleh M. EUS-guided Gastrojejunostomy Versus Laparoscopic Gastrojejunostomy: An International Collaborative Study. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2017 Nov/Dec;51(10):896-899. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000887. PubMed 28697151 ↗
  • Brewer Gutierrez OI, Nieto J, Irani S, James T, Pieratti Bueno R, Chen YI, Bukhari M, Sanaei O, Kumbhari V, Singh VK, Ngamruengphong S, Baron TH, Khashab MA. Double endoscopic bypass for gastric outlet obstruction and biliary obstruction. Endosc Int Open. 2017 Sep;5(9):E893-E899. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-115386. Epub 2017 Sep 13. PubMed 28924596 ↗
  • Chen YI, Itoi T, Baron TH, Nieto J, Haito-Chavez Y, Grimm IS, Ismail A, Ngamruengphong S, Bukhari M, Hajiyeva G, Alawad AS, Kumbhari V, Khashab MA. EUS-guided gastroenterostomy is comparable to enteral stenting with fewer re-interventions in malignant gastric outlet obstruction. Surg Endosc. 2017 Jul;31(7):2946-2952. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5311-1. Epub 2016 Nov 10. PubMed 27834024 ↗
  • Chen YI, James TW, Agarwal A, Baron TH, Itoi T, Kunda R, Nieto J, Bukhari M, Gutierrez OB, Sanaei O, Moran R, Fayad L, Khashab MA. EUS-guided gastroenterostomy in management of benign gastric outlet obstruction. Endosc Int Open. 2018 Mar;6(3):E363-E368. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-123468. Epub 2018 Mar 7. PubMed 29527559 ↗
  • Chen YI, Kunda R, Storm AC, Aridi HD, Thompson CC, Nieto J, James T, Irani S, Bukhari M, Gutierrez OB, Agarwal A, Fayad L, Moran R, Alammar N, Sanaei O, Canto MI, Singh VK, Baron TH, Khashab MA. EUS-guided gastroenterostomy: a multicenter study comparing the direct and balloon-assisted techniques. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 May;87(5):1215-1221. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.07.030. Epub 2017 Jul 24. PubMed 28750837 ↗
  • Antonelli G, Kovacevic B, Karstensen JG, Kalaitzakis E, Vanella G, Hassan C, Vilmann P. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastro-enteric anastomosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Liver Dis. 2020 Nov;52(11):1294-1301. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2020.04.021. Epub 2020 Jun 3. PubMed 32505567 ↗
  • Fan W, Tan S, Wang J, Wang C, Xu H, Zhang L, Liu L, Fan Z, Tang X. Clinical outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy for gastric outlet obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2022 Feb;31(2):159-167. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2020.1792500. Epub 2020 Jul 16. PubMed 32672479 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 15, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05561907
Lead sponsor
Northwell Health
Responsible party
Petros Benias (Director of Endoscopic Surgery, Northwell Health) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 30, 2022
Start date
Oct 28, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 15, 2026

Study contacts

Sumbul Yousafi
Contact
syousafi1@northwell.edu
(718) 470-7983
Nichol Martinez, MD
principal investigator · Northwell Health

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion